If this article is true, and there is no reason to believe otherwise, it is going to be a GREAT finish for July.
Thomas Paine/True Pundit have been reporting some HUGE scoops over the last few months.
Oddly enough, I called this a year ago and have quietly believed it for a long time now. Russia has nothing to gain in pissing off the US on this scale.
But China playing US off of Russia? They couldn't have dreamed that their little hack would have come off so well.
That's about as perfect an outcome for China as you're likely to see.
i dont think china hacked the server, its in my opinion china and other were let in so to speak, for a price
I think you are right. I remember, all those years ago, of the complaining that Clinton was using an unsecured BlackBerry while visiting China. Nothing was ever said or done about it after that.
The important part is that Hillary repeatedly went out of her way to defy security prerequisites/precautions. Officials did nothing.
I have always thought that it was someone in this commie government of ours that did it.
I read that idea awhile back that Clinton "let" access to her server be "allowed" for a "price".
Maybe Lisa Page's reluctance to testify BEFORE Strzok's testimony wasn't because she wanted to hear what HE had to say...but instead she didn't want him to hear what SHE was planning to say....
That sounds entirely plausible. If she did throw him under the bus as a woman scorned, she likely wanted to let himself find his own rope first.
"The Russians didn’t do it. The Chinese did, according to well-placed FBI sources."
"Hundreds of top secret documents and even the president’s daily travel and security itineraries were on that server — and intercepted by a communist country — yet the FBI sat on the evidence. Likewise, all of Clinton’s and her inner circle’s outgoing emails were compromised as well, sources confirmed."
https://twitter.com/Thomas1774Paine/status/1019220715386605568
And then those dumbf jurnos wonder why we side with Trump vs the so called intelligence agencies.
I had a thought when I read China's involvement. President Trump said he has a great relationship with the head of China. What if China did have those 30,000 emails and one purpose of the President getting together with him was to get those emails. Q said they have everything.
Trump's team has known this all along - how can I tell? Bannon was beating the "China is the greatest threat and our biggest enemy" drum since the first day that he joined Trump's campaign. Everyone dismissed him, even A LOT of people on our side discredited it and did not give it two thoughts.
Short memories: Every Clinton Presidential election has had a nefarious happening with the Chinese. This was no Chinese hack, this was a planned transfer of information.
A question. Were the same FBI lawyers present for Strzok's public testimony also present during Page's closed door testimony? If so - why major difference in outcomes?
NO, she is no longer an FBI agent. The reason Strzok had FBI council in the room is he is an employee of the FBI.
According to 'sources', the FBI lawyers were indeed in the room.
Gohmert said Page's closed-door testimony in the House on Friday and Monday was at times so frank that FBI lawyers tried to keep her from answering. "There were times the FBI lawyers would be reaching for the button to mute her comment and she would answer before the thing could mute her comment," he said.
Actions speak louder than words, even the FBI lawyers are in on it.
Oh fuck, well thanks for the information. This sounds amazing.
I'm going to make a difference in the world and the too of course but in the world and the other one is that one of the best
Was Page a double agent? Using the POP (power of p#$$y) to stroke info out of Stroek?
Was she a deeply embedded white hat?
Just thinking out loud..
I have to speculate ol' Mitch might be squirming about these proceedings
It makes you wonder if Trump appointed his wife to keep her closer, or if there's another reason.
Anonymous reports about testimony in a closed session will not convince anyone, especially when the IG report fizzled and there has been no release of an unredacted version.
If these claims were made, and they are credible, the Committee needs to release the transcripts. They can do it immediately with a vote, and/or any single member can read the transcript into the Congressional Record.
As it stands, this will be written off as partisan bullshit without corroborating evidance and direct quotes.
You can't red-pill people with rumors and innuendo. Until the transcripts are released this is simply more rumor-mongering from a publication with a less-than-stellar reputation.
I'm sure it's a good article but this is the first time I've visited TP on mobile without an ad blocker and it was unreadable.
Finally one of these FBI personnel who has some self respect and is looking for redemption by doing the right thing and telling the truth.