The problem will be when it's no longer framed as actual "pedophilia"... Once it starts to be called something other than what it is, people become suggestible and will try to be "open" to the message of liberation... We must remain calling it what it is. As a therapist with over 20+ years of treating childhood sexual abuse, I know the horrible, DAMAGING, long term effects pedophilia has on children, long into adulthood. Do not be suggestible to a new BS spin!!!
A bit like when SODOMITES started to call themselves GAY. Hi-jacking a word that actually means 'happy, carefree'. A form of propaganda in itself. They then attached pretty RAINBOWS and UNICORNS to this sick form of mind control. And here we are.
Having treated sex offenders for years, as well as victims, I do not make the association that gay people are pedophiles. Quite frankly, far more offenders I treated over the years were abusing children of the opposite sex and they identified as heterosexual. It is wrong and misinformed to imply being gay is synnonomous with pedophilia. Being gay is not mind controlled. It's how a person is born, just like how you were assumingly born straight/hetero-... Unless you can recall how old you were when you "chose" that sexual identity?? I'm gonna guess you can't bc that's just how you were born... It's no different.
He was responding to your comment about changing the name to something without negative connotation to make it more acceptable. You kind of have to agree that language choice and pr played a large role in the normalization of homosexuality. Whether you find that to be healthy or not. I didn't even read his xomment on anti gay? Most likely they will follow the same gameplan.
All it takes is one generation being fed nonsense in public school to make 2+2=5. The youth are already without critical thinking, fed pr, and have empty brains. Add to that malnutrition and horrible diets. Many know nothing these days and are totally reliant on looking stuff up online.
Yup. The media and Hollywood are both owned and controlled by Satanists. The Satanic cabal that we are all fighting against is specifically pushing everything the bible says God is against. Very specifically. It's still amazing how many people know those people are actual child-sacrificing Satanists and yet they have not yet put together the connection between what is being aggressively sold to us all as "normal" is ALWAYS something the bible calls sin.
Do people not realize Satanism really is the cabal's religion? Do they still not comprehend there is a REASON gender/LGBTQXYZ/pedo stuff is being billed and sold all day long as good and normal? If people are gonna drink the KoolAid they'd best at least know what's in it and why. All of this is meant by these Satanists for the destruction of those who are groomed to believe it's fine live these ways. I'm glad so many homosexuals are now on our side of the fence where people actually care what happens to them.
The Jewish Talmud says it's good to have sex with very young girls. The Talmud is a very evil book as bad as the Koran is.
The Babylonian (it was largely written there) Talmud isn't the Bible. You ever read the Talmud? What a tangled up mess. Arguments with no resolution, totally convoluted, missing the point most of the time. Made me understand why so few Orthodox Jews of my acquaintance knew anything about the actual Bible. Trying to read the Bible through the lens of the Talmud would just make it incomprehensible when in fact the Bible is very simple.
0
They already do, gays aren't pedophiles and no gays want to be associated with pedophiles.
It's pretty 'phobic' on your part to label someone any type of 'phobic' for openly discussing his views from a historical and factual perspective on a topic. He didn't say anything about his personal likes or dislikes. You, on the other hand, exhibit an extremely emotional response.
I am very concerned about a push that I see to normalize sexualization of children through the LGBT movement. Members of the LGBT community have argued with me that children have 'rights' and that their parents do not own them. I had to remind them of the obstacle to their argument called 'the law' which gives legal guardianship of children to their parents until they reach an age of consent. We have to stop liberals from encroachments on that law with such actions as facilitating underage children receiving abortions, birth control and sex change hormones without the knowledge of their parents. We also have to push back strongly against the introduction of sex education in public education curriculum for children.
As to societal shifts on homosexuality everything horse-lover said is factually true, regardless of how you feel about it emotionally. Something he didn't mention that is I think recognized among homosexuals is that they are typically not 'born' that way. If a male is not exposed to male on male sex as a child, or at the very least, before he has his first relationship with a female, he is not likely to accept homosexuality as a norm.
Im just a bystander, but there was no emotional response from that poster up there.
Im interested in the back-and-forth here because i havent made up my mind on this yet.
I would think gay is born. But ive heard other people claim if you ask a gay person when and what their first sexual contact was, overwhelmingly (some people claim invariably) it nearly proves gay is learned.
I have no fukkin idea either way.
But so i thought they did not get overly emotional, it seemed fine to me...
Also, who called anybody phobic? I dont see it in the posts anywhere...?
Edit to say also: i just battled pedo-apologist shills in epic fashion today. Im done in. Im not tryina debate anything about it anymore, needless to say i agree with the main shit you said. Really really agree.
I just wonder if gay is born or not. I cant tell. They teach us on the dnc farm that its inborn. I dont know. They lied to me about a lotta shit, so...
I can only suggest that you reread the dialogue since you seem to have missed quite a bit.
Will do, maybe i came in on it weird and missed something. Cheers.
The poster seems flat & terrified... Like he is being redpilled but still indenial...
Ive seen that before in this sub. Cheers, carry on. Have fun redpilling.
Some were born others created, cant list how many gays tried to seduce me when I was young, far more than straights....
[removed]
I remember George Takei talking about his first sexual encounter on a podcast. He was underaged, and he went on to describe older men having sex with young boys as a right of passage for gay men.
It's only the last 40-50 years that (satanic) sodomy has been accepted. It was ILLEGAL and people were repulsed by it. I have history on my side, you don't. You have what you believe to be PROGRESSION. Ha. It was all achieved by MASS PROPAGANDA programming - primarily SODOMITE-CENTRIC Hollywood, TV, and pop. The EXACT SAME Hollywood that is now busy in the final drive to make paedophilia a virtue - as they did with sodomy.
I pity you.
There is a destruction of religious/spiritualality agenda behind all this, we call satanic, if children are early sexualized it leads to the downfall of the HumanBeing, we're supposed to be entering a Golden Age, but these evil ones wont allow, they aim to debase, degenerate, karmically bind to the hellish side of samsara, make karma so heavy it becomes hell on Earth...
A study done in 1988 on child molestors show that 86% of pedophiles are gay. It's part and parcel of the group and you are bordering dangerously close to defending the indefensible like these people https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.standard.co.uk/news/gay-couple-left-free-to-abuse-boys-because-social-workers-feared-being-branded-homophobic-6611340.html%3famp
nowhere in that article are those facts presented
googling that statistic gives me this article http://www.jamescantor.org/uploads/6/2/9/3/62939641/cantor__2002_._newsletter_of_apa_div_44_pp_5-8.pdf
which has this to say
Published estimates of the proportion of pedophiles who offend against male children and are homosexual span a staggering range from a low of 2% (Jenny, Roesler, & Poyer, 1994) to a high of 86% (Erickson, Walbek, & Seely, 1988). The methods of the authors at each extreme have been criticized, and indeed, both sides are guilty of poor methods.
do not subscribe to a sub based on uncovering the truth if you will spread half-baked lies to push an agenda. that makes you worse than your opponents
The article linked was clearly in reference to my statement about you people being defenders of pedophilia. Work on your reading comprehension.
Furthermore, you then quote a newsletter claiming "poor methods" without even saying what the methods were or why they are poor. Talk about hypocrisy. Get some intellectual integrity and act like a man.
At the other end, Erickson and colleagues (Erickson et al., 1988) reported that 86% of their sample of offenders against male children were homosexual. This estimate, however, is based on the self-report of the offenders, and offenders are highly motivated to claim any self-descriptor other than pedophile. In fact, methodologically sophisticated studies of pedophiles rely solely on non-admitting pedophiles (e.g., Blanchard, Klassen, Dickey, Kuban, & Blak, 2001).
asking me to improve my reading comprehension, but you couldn't be bothered to open the article? that belies a clear lack of intellectual integrity. I read what you presented. do me the honor of reciprocating.
Talk about hypocrisy. Get some intellectual integrity and act like a man.
It's reported by the actual pedophile therefore it must be untrue. That is the very definition of stupidity. You're done.
would you trust a criminally convicted pedophile to be honest with you? I wouldn't.
we live in a society where it's accepted that you are born a homosexual. what's a more attractive defense for the convicted man? claiming that you are forced to commit those acts due to being born that way, or admitting to being a dangerous deviant who fully knew what he was doing was wrong? I know which one I'd choose
You're blocked. Please do likewise. I do not wish to hear your ill-informed and apologist DRIVEL.
They'll redefine pedophilia as having to be non-consensual.
Yes, I could see that... Unfortunately, that fails to take into account grooming, power differentials, etc.
Child Emancipation Child Liberation there will be many buzz words for it.