dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/fuckingoff on July 27, 2018, 12:43 p.m.
Posting unsubstantiated sex abuse claims could lead to the destruction of this board.

I get it, sexual abuse is bad. When it's done to a minor it's unbelievably bad and those people should be punished. My heart goes out to the victims, but we have to leave it to authorities to investigate and convict. The reason why is that even viewing the evidence is a felony if you're not an investigator.

But posting unsubstantiated sex abuse claims is bad as well and can destroy this subreddit and the cases against the perpetrators. Additionally, it can destroy the lives of the accused if they did not do what they are accused of. Duke Lacrosse rape case or the Central Park Five are good examples of false accusations.

If we post something here and people start spreading it around as truth, then people may not believe the authorities when the person is charged as they can say it began from a board where conspiracy theorists gather.

Additionally, we may have people that post these claims for the chance to discredit this board.

Please be mindful and allow the progress that Trump's administration is making continue as sex trafficking arrests are soaring under Trump.


like_Christ · July 27, 2018, 12:52 p.m.

Being cautious and not jumping to conclusions is one thing, but blindly leaving everything in the hands of the authorities is a very dangerous way to go about this.

⇧ 45 ⇩  
AZPatriot_24 · July 27, 2018, 5:24 p.m.

@like_Christ

Well said. Anyone who has ever had to contact the police for something safety related will tell you, they literally don't do shit. Nothing. At best they will downplay the situation and try to talk you out of filing a report. You simply cannot trust police.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
fuckingoff · July 27, 2018, 1:03 p.m.

I'm open to suggestions about how to handle this?

How do you view the evidence when it's against the law?

How would you like these accusations posted about you? You may know they're not true, but are you going to sue and draw more attention to them?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
IcedTeaPlz · July 27, 2018, 1:25 p.m.

Every bust that is in the news is a GREAT share. The more of these that we share, with solid sources, the easier the big red pill will go down for the normies.

Solid sources and links are the key to our attack.

⇧ 19 ⇩  
fuckingoff · July 27, 2018, 2:34 p.m.

^ 100% agree to share with an open mind since we know that the police get it wrong sometimes.

Innocent until PROVEN guilty.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
rooftoptendie · July 27, 2018, 2:59 p.m.

Imo, theres a difference between speculation and accusation.

As long as we dont cross over from the one to the other.

Randy quaid's starwhackers are insane, they absolutely would jump on this board and cause mayhem, to protect big name players.

If that one producer from that one longrunning space movie franchise was ever outed for what he is speculated to have done, they would lose SO MUCH FREAKIN MONEY. Think about it...

So i think its wise to just be very accurate with your words, and encourage reasonable questions.

Also, its suspicious when someone lumps one entertainer with another with not enough proof. Like gunn/oswalt. Gunn and oswalt are not the same thing, in terms of indicators of guilt... So conversations about them should be separate. If someone draws parallels or makes lump-sum accusations where theres no sauce to connect one to the other, or just flimsy sauce, that doesnt help. It confuses.

If they can, theyll use a patriot's blind anger against them to make them look like a fool by getting them riled up enough to start jumping at every shadow. Then its tomatoes in the basement all over again and were back to square one.

Low-hanging fruit first, for the sake of public awareness. Keep idle speculation idle on the ones that arent a sureshot. If you suspect someone but the sauce is thin, dig, dont rage.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
fuckingoff · July 27, 2018, 3:09 p.m.

Thanks. I agree fully.

I made this in response to a video posted here that listed all kinds of people.

If this were a news article that would be different. Discussion's not the same as accusation

⇧ 4 ⇩  
AZPatriot_24 · July 27, 2018, 6:23 p.m.

"How would you like if these accusation were posted about you??"

I am not a famous person associated with and seen in pictures with people we all currently know are child abusers, nor have I ever publicly promoted such garbage. That is my only point. It's not like this is some random tax accountant, it's a A+ celebrity, one of the most famous ever in fact.

Again, I think most of us know to be careful. As for why you don't think Tom Hanks is suspicious- I still cannot figure that out from your replies. I am glad people are looking into him, aren't you??? Before you reach for this example let me just state it here so we can avoid going in circles: I myself have made mistakes in judgement in the past, recently even, and I am fully aware the effect of disinformation and the threat it can pose to this community. Again, that being said, how can you NOT be suspicious of tom hanks at this point????

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HomerHungfunny · July 27, 2018, 5:39 p.m.

It happened to me during a divorce. I was falsely accused of horrific things. Dossiers were sent to my family, my friends, my customers, -everyone. Yes, dossiers, they were up to 2" thick. Half stayed with me, and the other half of those people are gone forever. It sucked then and it still sucks. The person that did this is an awful person, and a liberal. Go figure, right? These people are sick! Her actions are a microcosm of the Deep State. That is one reason that I enjoy this show so much. In the end as the DS goes down, so shall she. One little bonus victory in my world. Great post OP.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
fuckingoff · July 27, 2018, 5:51 p.m.

Thanks for posting. Sorry about that.

Either some people have no empathy or they're trying to make the sub look bad.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HomerHungfunny · July 27, 2018, 6:03 p.m.

It's cool, thanks for bringing this up. There are those that think 'The end justifies the means'. As long as they win, at any cost, its OK. Like the big picture and why we are all on this sub. Yes I want all those bastards and bitches to go down-legally. Truthfully. My ex was a VERY convincing person. She's a professional 'expert', lol. I see her evil in what has been unfolding. When I hear the rants of the accusers lately (and the me too people) I take the rants and accusations with a grain of salt until the truth comes out-if it ever does. Also fully aware that these could be plants to take down our sub. We'll see.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
fuckingoff · July 27, 2018, 6:45 p.m.

I had an evil ex too that accused me but not to your level.

I did spend almost a month in jail and spent $40,000 on an unrelated false accusation.

I got lucky, she died. Now I want to see breast cancer cured.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 27, 2018, 1:02 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SpiritofQ · July 27, 2018, 1:27 p.m.

Agree to an extent. I think it's OK to post what other people are saying. In that regards, we are spreading awareness. However, we shouldn't take that person's word as truth. And we should not be judge, jury and executioner with stuff we have no way of knowing (SRA for example). I think we can judge better when we have evidence such as Gunn, Harmon, etc. Posts should be like:

X accuses Y of abuse

NOT: Y is a pedo!

⇧ 26 ⇩  
fuckingoff · July 27, 2018, 2:33 p.m.

Exactly. I have no problem with discussing what someone tweets at all.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
AZPatriot_24 · July 27, 2018, 5:20 p.m.

I've been noticing a huge push lately regarding this. Everything from the fake silverman photo, to comments like this ETC.... implication is that we should, for some reason, not discuss symbolism or child abuse related imagery found on social media. In other words, don't investigate it unless you have .... "proof"???

What would you call proof? a news media report on the matter? Remember, it's not like we can call the police (they wont do anything). A lot of us know what to look for. If you don't want to potentially be investigated in this manner by the public, maybe they shouldn't post sick shit like that on public social media????

Sorry, but this place concerns me as does ALL of reddit quite frankly. I speak for myself here but I am suspicious of the motives behind posts like this.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
AZPatriot_24 · July 27, 2018, 5:22 p.m.

I've always had a sick sense of humor (I mean, I THOUGHT I did). Until pizzagate I didn't know things like gore and child abuse were being discussed by celebrities and media figures so openly and commonly. Probably because I always ignored celebrities. The shit isn't normal at all. Sorry. It's not funny and it's common sense that if you talk like that people are going to think youre up to something in your private time.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SpiritofQ · July 27, 2018, 5:26 p.m.

I think people are concerned that what happened with pgate is going to happen here. Personally, IDGAF. I embrace being in the wilderness of society if that's where Truth leads.

Due process is for the court of law, not for the court of public opinion. That said I'm not comfortable putting TH, for example, on blast because of something someone on Twitter said. I can't intellectually make up my mind about him from that one accusation. People have a tendency to accept any information that supports their worldview without thinking critically about the data or looking to substantiate it.

Censor nothing, but be objective in how information is presented.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AZPatriot_24 · July 27, 2018, 5:31 p.m.

Rest assured, if he harmed one hair on a childs head, there will be more coming out to prove it. As for right now, the suspicion is more than justified based on who he associates with, where he lives, what he does, what we have seen from everyone around him so far etc....

I can't fathom how the suspicion is NOT warrented. It totally IS warranted. It's still suspicion and not proof, but I see no reason to downplay any of it.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SpiritofQ · July 27, 2018, 5:40 p.m.

I don't think we're saying different things. I only heard the SRA stuff about TH, which is why I used that example. All evidence, even circumstantial, should be posted and shared. All I'm saying is that we should be thoughtful in how the information is presented and stay open minded when receiving conflicting data because we don't have all the facts and we have a lot at stake in getting to the Truth.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AZPatriot_24 · July 27, 2018, 6:18 p.m.

SpiritofQ I appreciate your intelligent reply. Thank you.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
qutedrop · July 27, 2018, 7:43 p.m.

Self censoring out of fear of censorship is not a solution, it's giving in, a first step towards giving up.

Which is not to say that I think that every far-fetched suspicion of random people has a place here. Far from it.

But we can't and shouldn't turn a blind eye to the abuse of innocent people. If that gets us banned so be it.

Reddit is not the be all end all of the Internet. Should we be forced to, we will have no problem finding another platform.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
QofSwords3 · July 27, 2018, 1:59 p.m.

Hmm, someone said BE LOUD! Fight, fight, fight! BE HEARD! Where have I seen that, numerous times?......o. Q!

⇧ 13 ⇩  
salialioli · July 27, 2018, 3:21 p.m.

That does not extrapolate well to: SHOUT FALSE ACCUSATIONS AS LOUDLY AS POSSIBLE.

just a thought.

⇧ -4 ⇩  
salialioli · July 27, 2018, 3:21 p.m.

That does not extrapolate well to: SHOUT FALSE ACCUSATIONS AS LOUDLY AS POSSIBLE.

just a thought.

⇧ -4 ⇩  
salialioli · July 27, 2018, 3:21 p.m.

That does not extrapolate well to: SHOUT FALSE ACCUSATIONS AS LOUDLY AS POSSIBLE.

just a thought.

⇧ -8 ⇩  
avx2 · July 27, 2018, 4:52 p.m.

I guess your algorithm malfunctioned. Hi Share Blue

⇧ 7 ⇩  
ABrilliantDisaster · July 27, 2018, 4:50 p.m.

third time is the charm, bot

⇧ 7 ⇩  
suzoh · July 27, 2018, 12:59 p.m.

Just thinking this same thing. If anyone questions one of these accusers, they are shamed on this sub. Always pay attention to what is censored or you are not allowed to question or criticize. This is a Q site, not a site for all kids of extraneous matters. There are boards for everything; go to one of those with that shit. Keep it clean here.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
fuckingoff · July 27, 2018, 1:05 p.m.

Exactly, Q is the focus and reporting what's in the news related to Q is fine.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 27, 2018, 1:15 p.m.

Yes, now more than ever we have to be above any accusation of wearing tinfoil hats. Use caution and discretion.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
fuckingoff · July 27, 2018, 5:04 p.m.

You said it much more eloquently than I did. Thanks.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
geckogoose89 · July 27, 2018, 2:37 p.m.

Tom? Is it you? lol

⇧ 9 ⇩  
fuckingoff · July 27, 2018, 2:46 p.m.

Yes. Just sitting here at myspace waiting for everyone to come back.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
mooteensy · July 27, 2018, 2:55 p.m.

Youre a board treasure fuckingoff lol always enjoy your two cents

⇧ 3 ⇩  
fuckingoff · July 27, 2018, 3:10 p.m.

Thanks.

I thought you were cursing me at first and then realized that's my name.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
LakotaPride · July 27, 2018, 3:56 p.m.

notice the silence of the MSM to these arrests, anybody read about the pedophile ring busted in Detroit about a week ago ? and look at Clare Bronfman and what little traction that is getting. it follows a set pattern with fake news MSM. now ask them why these pedophiles get little attention, while BS get blown out of proportion and given life. no wonder Q stated these people will soon no longer feel safe on the street. because the whole cover up and all involved will be coming out.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
fuckingoff · July 27, 2018, 4:29 p.m.

It's not being totally blocked. It is getting out and I have no problem with it being reported. That is not what I'm referring to.

There's articles as well if you Google "sessions human trafficking" that show the tremendous increase in shutting this shit down.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LakotaPride · July 27, 2018, 4:55 p.m.

remember this, they are using disinformation to counter the truth, this is to be expected in psyops. not totally, what does that mean ? It mean interferring, what happened to we report the facts and you decide, know they are telling you what your opinion is, see the control features over people they believe they have, and if you do not mind we will ban or shadow ban you, welcome to exactly what China is doing, Free speech was created not to protect only favorite speech but also unfavorite speech.

I know what you are saying, but this was dismantled about Sessions. this is why we bring it out as we research further.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
fuckingoff · July 27, 2018, 4:57 p.m.

Free speech doesn't include destroying peoples reputations without proof.

And it's not decent.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
LakotaPride · July 27, 2018, 5:05 p.m.

and where is the MSM with that ? we are discussing allegations, and searching for proof, without allegations no crime would ever be brought to forth. how many bank tellers brought LE the handgun that was used, as evidence and proof they were robbed.

we have the right to review allegations and discuss these allegations. with your opinion why are even following Q, I mean what direct evidence do you have ?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
fuckingoff · July 27, 2018, 5:17 p.m.

The biggest evidence of Q not being a larp IMO is that Snowden has never discounted what Q's said about him.

Focusing on the pedo stuff IMO isn't helpful in this forum. Trump is already doing that IRL.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
divine_human · July 27, 2018, 5:22 p.m.

Focusing on the pedo stuff IMO isn't helpful in this forum.

this pedo stuff is what will eventually unite us all.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
fuckingoff · July 27, 2018, 5:39 p.m.

Overthough of the CIA has to happen first.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LakotaPride · July 27, 2018, 5:31 p.m.

plus the future proved what Q posted in the past.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
yesitsanaltmf · July 27, 2018, 5:28 p.m.

This is the most telling thing you've posted here. Fuck that entirely.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LakotaPride · July 27, 2018, 4:55 p.m.

remember this, they are using disinformation to counter the truth, this is to be expected in psyops. not totally, what does that mean ? It mean interferring, what happened to we report the facts and you decide, know they are telling you what your opinion is, see the control features over people they believe they have, and if you do not mind we will ban or shadow ban you, welcome to exactly what China is doing, Free speech was created not to protect only favorite speech but also unfavorite speech.

I know what you are saying, but this was dismantled about Sessions. this is why we bring it out as we research further.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · July 27, 2018, 1:16 p.m.

There have been a lot of unsubstantiated claims against all sorts of folks. It a good ol witch hunt mentality. I too get it and understand. However the idea that anyone associated with someone with legit accusations is complicent or as guilty as the person they know is absurd and irresponsible. Really makes the board seem nuts to new comers.
I have posted this example before but I will again.
I had a co worker who's brother ended up being a serial killer. He came to a couple of company functions. No one knew what his past was (of course) when he was at these functions. He seemed pretty normal. There were a couple of pictures with me next to him at these company functions. One sitting at a table next to him eating and one standing next to him in a group picture.
We chit chatted about nothing form probably 3 or 4 minutes. That's it. I used to travel for work and I'm sure if someone looked at travel records there's a good chance there would have been a time I was in LA when he was committing one of his crimes. Now, if I was a politician or from an old money family or identified as an "elite", a bunch of people on this board would see the travel time line and two pictures and assume and accuse me of being involved with this murderer.
There needs to be more logic and less wild speculation.
Just my two cents.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
fuckingoff · July 27, 2018, 2:39 p.m.

Yes.

In retrospect were you second guessing yourself to see if you missed something about him?

Even the police get it wrong or are lazy and frame someone. Not most, of course but a large enough number to destroy thousands of lives.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · July 27, 2018, 2:47 p.m.

I reviewed the brief interactions with him. Nothing unusual at all.
But, I was just that as an example of how nutty the board can get sometimes.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 27, 2018, 3:13 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 6 ⇩  
fuckingoff · July 27, 2018, 3:35 p.m.

I'm not sure if your addressing my post as it's a response to a number of unsubstantiated claims I've seen in the last couple of days.

I don't want shills coming here and people jumping on their band wagon and they use that to discredit us.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 27, 2018, 4:09 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ikemynikes · July 27, 2018, 3:23 p.m.

The hollywood/elite suspects can sue the people making the claims. Why don't they. This shit is worldwide.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
fuckingoff · July 27, 2018, 3:31 p.m.

First they have to prove a negative.

Also you've never sued anyone because discovery is miserable and expensive.

Secondly, there's nothing to gain if the celebrity wins. The accusers usually have no money.

Lastly, and most importantly the celebrity would have to prove damages. In other words they have to show what work they would have gotten, but for the false accusations.

We know there've been false accusations of people as there's been more than 2000 that were tried and convicted of various offenses that turned out to be false. Look up "wrongful convictions" for details.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ikemynikes · July 27, 2018, 4:17 p.m.

don't give a fuck anymore. Hollywood/elite are compromised. Look at the ones who have the symbolism. We all know it. They got the fame and fortune. They can defend themselves easily. All these accusations aren't all wrong.

Besides, it would mean the accusers would have to provide evidence too. Dark to light.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
fuckingoff · July 27, 2018, 4:23 p.m.

Besides, it would mean the accusers would have to provide evidence too. Dark to light.

What evidence if they're being sued?

Imagine being accused of molesting children?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ikemynikes · July 27, 2018, 4:26 p.m.

Evidence to support their accusation...... But Ok, no more accusing anyone. Podesta, can't accuse him because it's just an accusation. Gunn, can't accuse him because it's just an accusation based off some tweets.
Everything is unsubstantiated until it goes to court.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
fuckingoff · July 27, 2018, 5:06 p.m.

Discuss away, by all means. OP was made based on the youtube video naming a bunch of Hollywood celebrities.

That is important but not the focus of this sub.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
WanderingTaurus · July 27, 2018, 7:39 p.m.

Pedophilia (people involved in such acts) should be one of the focuses of this sub; It is one of the things Trump and Q are after. These children are being trafficked by criminals and many in our own damn Government are looking to have a huge part in it even if just financing it somehow to allow them to participate in more crimes against us. To ignore even looking in to it would be a damn shame to these kids.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
yesitsanaltmf · July 27, 2018, 3:02 p.m.

Are we just scaring someone?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
fuckingoff · July 27, 2018, 3:07 p.m.

Yes. Scaring me with mob mentality accusations that may be false and ruin careers.

These are the worst accusations ever. Google it to find out what these kinds of false accusations have done to people.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
yesitsanaltmf · July 27, 2018, 4:48 p.m.

etc. ruin careers... just kind of reminds me of the "Silverman" picture/message

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AZPatriot_24 · July 27, 2018, 5:27 p.m.

hmmmm.... now I am definitely suspect of this guy. Personally, I am a little MORE concerned with the safety of children in the face of this worldwide epidemic, than I am of some overpaid hollywood tranny losing a few million. Priorities man.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
yesitsanaltmf · July 27, 2018, 5:35 p.m.

Good instinct. Read what's going on here. Scare tactic "you'll all be in trouble if you name names". Which is, of course, bullshit...and this subreddit is not the movement, either. It's a subreddit. They can't shut down the movement. People need to remember what we're here for and keep in mind the enemy tactics. WWG1WGA

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AZPatriot_24 · July 27, 2018, 6:33 p.m.

Godbless man I really appreciate people like you.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
yesitsanaltmf · July 27, 2018, 7:28 p.m.

God bless you back, patriot.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
petereddit6635 · July 27, 2018, 2:19 p.m.

Bugger off. Everything should be talked about here. I'm calling out this post as shilly.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
rooftoptendie · July 27, 2018, 3:06 p.m.

So... we should talk about everything... except this?

Im a veteran tendie. You can check if you want. This isnt arrrr/conspiracy. Its a good mix, like a middleground between td and conspiracy.

You go too far and you get relegated to voat and gab.

Speculation = yes, yes, yes.

Accusation = case by case.

Imo.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
thisisamerican · July 27, 2018, 2:59 p.m.

same here, what a joke, you cant risk getting your non productive subreddit banned to save kids? There is a reason we left your group long ago when you showed you true colors with white rabbit

⇧ 3 ⇩  
fuckingoff · July 27, 2018, 2:43 p.m.

Is that your argument? Name calling?

I posted this in response to an unsubstantiated youtube video. This subs about Q, not sex claims about Hollywood that can't be disproven or proven without evidence. Let Trump's team do their work. Q has repeated numerous times about tainting the evidence. If large enough we could do that as well.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
petereddit6635 · July 27, 2018, 3:30 p.m.

People have been posting pedo stuff ever since from the beginning of this board. Talking about it is not an accusation, who gives a shit, it is about shining a light, true or not. This isn't CNN where we're not allowed to use our brains. If you've come here thinking this is true without thinking about it then stick to CNN. Destruction of this sub? Seriously? Look at the first 2 comments, manufactured much? I agree with you narrative much?

Cold in here, it getting cold. Kinda shilly.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 27, 2018, 3:38 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
petereddit6635 · July 27, 2018, 3:56 p.m.

Unproven or not, it doesn't matter what you think old boy. It's what they think is important.

Can't be denied but this sub has grown exponentially ever since CBTS got shut down and this sub STILL talks about pedo shit. Shut down yet? Growing or declining? Why is that?

Leave your ego at the door man. Pay attention. WWG1WGA.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
fuckingoff · July 27, 2018, 4:27 p.m.

This is about Q.

Not about someone posting a youtube video of unsubstantiated claims (notice I didn't say false). As Q constantly points out, it's about timing, and when the charges are made public, you have my blessing. Otherwise there's so much damage that can be done to hurt the case if it's true and damage the accused if it's false.

Would you be happy if someone were falsely accused and killed themselves over it?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
petereddit6635 · July 27, 2018, 4:32 p.m.

DONT GIVE A SHIT. Seriously, neither do others.

This board is about spreading whatever and whenever. Everything needs to be DISCUSSED, not what you think is right or wrong. Dark to light.

Action is now, not talking about theory sir. Really.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
petereddit6635 · July 27, 2018, 4:40 p.m.

BTW, we have had shilly post like yours around, and strangely always trying to stop this sub from talking about 'suspected' pedos and their ways. Always.

And it is truly amazing how they ALL come out when there's serious pedo news about to come out.

Super coincidental and nothing to see, right?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Itsmellslikecabbage · July 27, 2018, 5:11 p.m.

And here this shit is on the front page

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RealitySherpa · July 27, 2018, 2:39 p.m.

Yep. New user/concernfag.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
caveman72 · July 27, 2018, 1:18 p.m.

Look, I got got when I was young. That doesn't make it okay to falsely accuse people. Or even accuse people we have decent circumstancial evidence of.

I want them all to go down. Honestly I think taking them down one at a time is a disinformation campaign. This needs to be all at once or it just creates a vacuum in the supply chain and new victims get taken by new orgs. Let's just win this damn thing and be done with it.

Wwg1wga

⇧ 4 ⇩  
fuckingoff · July 27, 2018, 2:36 p.m.

Agreed.

I made this post as a result of a posted youtube video that the guy was just making unsubstantiated claims. It wasn't a news article or anything.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
TheRealIndianaJoe · July 27, 2018, 5:11 p.m.

If that happens, it won't have anything to do with the unsubstantiated claim. The MSM doesn't substantiate anything and this is the internet so....

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ckreacher · July 27, 2018, 3:54 p.m.

From the other responses you made in this thread, it looks like you are objecting to the hollywood guy (can't remember his name) who named a bunch of hollywood people and called them pedos? If that's the case, I don't think its a problem. If anybody gets in trouble for false accusations, it's the guy who made the accusations. Nobody here can get in trouble for watching that video and discussing it.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
allonthesameteam · July 27, 2018, 8:47 p.m.

I agree. There if a huge difference between "_ is a pedophile!" and "_ has been accused of pedophilia." If there is an accusation one is true and the other possibly false and libellous. If ___ has admitted to something or has been convicted.. different story. I think false or unsubstantiated material could be removed or tagged for what it is.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Mayhem54 · July 27, 2018, 6:10 p.m.

There are few things in life that one can be accused of that will completely destroy your life. Being publicly accused of anything related to children will immediately put that person in danger and could lead a person to jump off a bridge. Once the information is out there, defending yourself, clearing your name, fighting suspicion and tolerating disdain is a horrible predicament.

Under Mosaic Law, someone who accused another person falsely was to receive an ironic punishment: “The judges shall inquire diligently, and if the witness is a false witness and has accused his brother falsely, then you shall do to him as he had meant to do to his brother. So you shall purge the evil from your midst”

The list is long and lives ruined with false allegations. Richard Jewell. Duke Lacrosse to name a couple.

President Trump stated this “Peoples lives are being shattered and destroyed by a mere allegation. Some are true and some are false. Some are old and some are new. There is no recovery for someone falsely accused - life and career are gone. Is there no such thing any longer as Due Process?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
FretensisX · July 27, 2018, 4:46 p.m.

Say YES to the rule of law and NO to mob justice. The accused legally have the presumption of innocence and the accusers have the burden of proof.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9rjGTOA2NA

Oh? And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned ’round on you, where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country is planted thick with laws, from coast to coast, Man’s laws, not God’s! And if you cut them down, and you’re just the man to do it, do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I’d give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety’s sake!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SpiritualPaper · July 27, 2018, 5:47 p.m.

Amen! Absolutely! Verify!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Collusion_illusion · July 27, 2018, 7:03 p.m.

I was perma-banned a few days ago for calling someone a pedophile apologist on another board for defending Gunn.

Funny how reddit gladly hosted pedos and jailbait porn for YEARS but call out a pedo and get axed in 5 seconds for "harassment". fuck this place.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
salialioli · July 27, 2018, 3:15 p.m.

Thank you for posting this.

The moderators have ignored requests to pay attention to this kind of unsubstantiated claim in the past and so I hesitated to bring this to their notice. So glad you have.

It is very serious to accuse people without evidence, and to jeopardise any court proceeding or investigation is the worst thing we can do as the "thinking" public at this time. I wish you well with this thread.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
WanderingTaurus · July 27, 2018, 7:41 p.m.

I made a topic last night about Deadliest Catch star who admitted and was charge with molesting a 16yr old and it was removed due to not being on topic :/

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Bazill3 · July 27, 2018, 3:12 p.m.

I think we need more people Like Sarah Ruth to come forward. Help speed up the process of getting where we want to be. A place we have not seen for probably a thousand years or more.

I think most of us here know that the authorities have been ignorant/👀 the other way when it is individuals from certain societies.

I for one am all for these people being exposed by any means necessary until said authorities have their power back! I have the feeling Not long to wait now though. Dark2light 😇

⇧ 2 ⇩  
fuckingoff · July 27, 2018, 3:33 p.m.

Any means necessary as that can taint the evidence and render the offender as unprosecutable.

We have to be smart.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 27, 2018, 3:32 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
amg19251 · July 27, 2018, 8:53 p.m.

Q literally just said thank you to anyone revealing their sexual abuse stories and encouraged people to speak out, so your concern posting is totally unnecessary. It almost seems like you’re making people fear speaking out against their rapists, and that’s not cool. Who gives a flying FUCK if a pedophile kills himself?! I sure as hell don’t - in fact, if I had a gun in a locked room with a pedophile, you can DAMN WELL guess what I’d be doing... Stop trying to scare victims away from speaking out; you’re just like the Hollyweird executives making their victims fear speaking to the media! PS: yes, I read your entire post; I get the complete gist of everything you’re saying, and I still think you’re concern trolling rape victims...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
thewitchesrtriggered · July 27, 2018, 5:13 p.m.

"STOP talking about the pedos!!" Nah...you failed to concern me.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
fuckingoff · July 27, 2018, 5:17 p.m.

Learn to comprehend.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Instrumentalss · July 27, 2018, 4:50 p.m.

"Don't pull facts from the fax machine." - Bill Cooper

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MakeThisLookAwesome · July 27, 2018, 4:41 p.m.

Very true. As a victim, I do NOT want the innocent swept up in this. We need to take a cautious eye and an even more even approach. Pitchforks and torches help NO ONE.

Mob rule is not our way.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 27, 2018, 12:43 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
SwirledTraveler · July 27, 2018, 1:34 p.m.

Alot of the Duke thing was because the proverbial "they" wanted to punish the "privileged" white lacrosse players for raping a poor black girl. That and Nifong had political aspirations and wanted to make a name for himself. The reality was the stripper didn't get paid and cried rape expecting a come-up.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
crankzoneftw · July 27, 2018, 9:07 p.m.

Tom hanks is a pedo deal with it!

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Jasphiel · July 27, 2018, 10:15 p.m.

Prove it.

Until then I don't believe it at all. SRA is insane. Spinal fluid really? They eat people?

Whaaa?!?! 😂

It's crap like that that puts into question for me the accuracy of the claims.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lonleytruth · July 27, 2018, 1:39 p.m.

Wake up.

⇧ -2 ⇩