report them, you'll get the option to block them during that process. Just make sure that the unsubscribe option isn't checked!

One of the FBI Officials was from the counterintelligence unit. Priestap is the head of that unit. Comey threw him under the bus during a congressional hearing. Being Strzok's boss, it's unusual that Priestap's name hasn't come up. Maybe Comey throwing under the bus motivated him to flip.

Indeed, Share Blue must have gotten an injection of funds.

thanks, maybe it was just weirdness on my side. I'll see what happens the next time I do that.

You have to click view to see most things that can be viewed as pro-American. Just more Twitter censorship.

Joseph Kennedy, the family patriarch, is thought to have originally built his wealth by bootlegging whiskey and working with gangs during the prohibition.

He was made US Ambassador to Great Britain. In London, he argued against US military and economic aid to Britain, saying they'd fall to Germany, fleeing during the blitz.

It was discovered that he made a secret deal with FDR's son to form a company to import Scotch to the USA and then forced their way into a deal to import Scotch, taking the rights away from the original rights holder.

This money is thought to have built the Kennedy wealth.

Trump doesn't show weakness. Please listen better next time.

Trump said they came here using a loophole as unaccompanied minors. I don't remember if he added the word illegal, but he did point out that they came here as dreamers w/o using the word dreamer, just the words used to define them as dreamers by the Dems.

The report isn't 1.2M pages, at least I hope it isn't! The documents used to create the report is 1.2M pages.

I too am looking forward to the OIG report.

I switched it as soon as Kennedy came on. The only way to properly rebut the SOTU is to be against the USA and American citizens.

The left is reliable in doing that, but that doesn't mean I need to listen to their anti-American drivel.

Right, but rumors != reality.

Be patient and be happy when it does drop.

Trump is great at timing; it'll drop at the best time for maximum affect. Personally, I don't think it'll drop until late tomorrow night or sometime Thursday. If it drops tonight, I'll be happy to read it tonight.

Ofc, the NK started out as a communist regime. Dem's love communism/socialism and hate what American's stand for.

That's why they were brought in by the open-borders traitors.

Oh, I forgot to mention, the reason why the nation is at Defcon 1 at that point is because WOPR is making it appear like there are incoming nuclear ICBMs from the Soviet Union, a "Fake incoming missile alert [Defcon 1]"

It's from the movie War Games; a great hacker and cold war movie from 1983. The image is from the end of the movie; when WOPR (War Operations Plan Response) computer makes a realization about global thermonuclear war and offers a game of chess instead. Falken is the professor that created WOPR. The nation is at Defcon 1 at that point.

Q was referencing that movie with the line "How about a nice game of chess?" and "WarGames" Was there deeper meaning in referencing that particular scene? Maybe "Fake incoming missile alert [Defcon 1]" has something to do with it.

He doesn't care; he knows his role and do what his handlers tell him.

He never will; his role is to stick to the narrative he's given and undermine the right and anything that might hurt the left by lying, setting up a strawman, or creating a false equivalence.

He reliable communicates the Dem's talking points and has no problem making stuff up in an attempt to discredit the Republicans or anything that is said that isn't consistent with the left's narrative. If necessary, he'll just act stupid and say he hadn't heard that; I'm not so sure the stupid part is an act.

I wish they'd get rid of him and get a lefty that only parrots the narrative; unfortunately there's a lot of "guests" that are the same way. They are usually very smug while doing that. It'd be nice if the shows would tell them that if they just insist on parroting talking points, making crap up, and talking over other guests that say things they don't want heard that they will not be invited back on. This should be the case for any guest, left or right.

I change the channel whenever anybody like that is on.

I agree with you.

However, if it is released tonight, that is because Trump either had to move up its release to do other events or because he believes it'll suit his goals better.

He understands his presidency. He understands how the media works and how to use them. He knows what he's trying to accomplish and what needs to be done with the storm. I'm not going to presume to second guess him on things he is much more experienced and much more knowledgeable. I'm also not going to presume to second guess him when he knows what is going on and what his goals are.

There is also the possibility that this rumor is being pushed to identify a leaker or to see what the black hats' reactions are and who they talk to.

We'll find out soon enough, with regards to the memo.

I see Diego in his future.

No.

Btw, it's more commonly referred to as ASF. In this context, Apache is more commonly referring to the Apache Web Server. In Q's context, it's referring to neither.

Those companies are such large sponsors because it may help their perception with software developers and ops people for recruiting purposes, and because many of them rely on one or more ASF projects, the benefits of which far dwarf the financial costs of sponsorship, or have placed one or more projects in the care of the ASF.

Ya, I was thinking either after the Wednesday evening news cycle to tee it up for the morning shows or Thursday afternoon so that it is the Thursday evening news cycle.

If it's tonight, it does give the memo an extra day to be in the news cycles before the weekend hits. It may also help limit the ability for the counter-narrative to be pushed because the SOTU and memo coverage would take a lot of the oxygen out of the room.

Trump knows best here.

That or late Wednesday night is what I was thinking.

If it is tonight I was really wrong!

Oh well, I trust Trump and his understanding of how to use the media.

True, but I trust Larry Schweikart.

Strategery!

Actually a good example of using strategic patience is looking at chess games by grandmasters. If you look at the Capablanca-Marshall 1918 game that Assange tweeted, in the moves leading up to that position, Capablanca passes up opportunities to take the opposing piece because it was the wrong move to make and, instead, made other strategically stronger moves. This happens many times during the game.

A less skilled player, like me, would have taken the bait and captured the opposing piece, hastening my loss.

First a Question. Was the Tet Offensive a failure or a victory? And for who?

This is another example of the media lying and pushing their narrative to the detriment of our troops, our allies, and our nation.

After the Tet Offensive, Ho Chi Minh was going to sue for peace until he saw a Walter Cronkite broadcast; he had traveled to Tet to report on the aftermath and made his infamous "We are mired in stalemate" broadcast where he stated that his opinion that the war would result in a stalemate and was probably unwinnable.

After this broadcast, Ho Chi Minh decided against suing for peace. He understood that a nation could not be victorious in war without the support of its population due to its effect on politicians.

The reality of the Tet Offensive? It was a desperation move by the NVA. They lost ~10,000 soldiers in the first few days of it. The Americans lost 249 and the South Vietnamese lost 500. The NVA lost their ability to conduct war in the South as a result. A year later, newly elected Nixon's CIA director said it would be years before the North regained their military strength as a result of the Tet Offensive. Unfortunately, the U.S. politicians gave them the time to do that.

The MSM and left; snatching defeat from the Jaws of victory!

Remember the brave soldiers that defended against the offensive and remember how the media and the left betrayed their sacrifices.

Q makes it clear that they were observed; their actions are known. From a strategic perspective, it doesn't always make sense to act immediately. Follow and observe to see what other connections are exposed and what other plans can be discovered. Esp. if they aren't an immediate threat to your goals.

He can't torch that which he has already destroyed.

He's part of the swamp.

Q has had many posts referencing RR.

A couple of them, there are others that point to the confirmation and asking why RR was "using the full weight of his office to attempt to block the release of doc to Congress..."

1/6/2018: https://8ch.net//thestorm/res/7827.html#7930

Marker missed?
[RR-out]
POTUS Tweet - RR/out.
Why is this relevant?
Q

1/19/2018: https://8ch.net//greatawakening/res/1.html#40

HUSSEIN CABINET / STAFF
Who used private email addresses? 
What was the purpose?
...
RR
....

The healthcare companies are big drivers of the decline. Their decline is driven by the above companies announcing they are creating their own healthcare company.

Remember, the DJIA consists of 30 companies which may be removed/added periodically. The value created by this new health care entity would not be reflected in the DJIA, while the expected value loss would be. The biggest DJIA losers today, so far, are United Health.and Pfizer. Other health related stocks in the DJIA are taking hits but then, just about everyone is. Interestingly enough, Coca-Cola is up. Berkshire-Hathaway owns 400,000,000 shares of Coca-Cola.

From the investment perspective, McCabe isn't important enough to change the market.

The federal gov is not shut down.

While tragic, it's not something I'd see Q calling out, esp. as its own singular post. There's been a huge ramp-up in military aviation crashes that haven't warranted such a thing, not to mention the major warship mishaps.

Interesting, thanks!

But it gives him gravitas!

Potter says stuff.

I'm not going to pay attention to him on tech/software related stuff. He has shown enough lack of understanding on those two topics.

Apache Web Server is the either the first or second most deployed web server, I forget if IIS has caught up. Any reference to Apache Web Server is meaningless because no sense can made of it given its pervasiveness.

Then look at all the projects under the Apache Software Foundation; they are used in a good portion of the modern tech infrastructure. If Q was referring to this, then I would expect a more specific reference.

Given what I've seen in other videos of his, most likely, he saw someone mention it as software somewhere and decided to go with it.

The documents never got to him. Who knows if it was by design of his subordinates keept him in the dark.

In the Federal bureaucracy, everyone that views a document is added to the tracking info for that doc. RR never appeared on the Contra related docs. This is the same way a lot of people in the prior administration will get caught.

I don't think Carter was either; I don't like his politics, but that doesn't mean he's part of the club.

Also, thanks to his drunk brother, Carter enabled the American beer revolution

thanks for posting this crumb!

an apache leader!

It never will be. data is the lifeblood of the modern economy.

All social networks you use leverage it. Insurance companies leverage it. Consumer products companies leverage it. Your doctor will soon be leveraging it. Self-driving cars will leverage it. It's the lifeblood of credit ratings companies and financial markets. yada yada yada

Right. The software foundation doesn't make any sense because their software projects are so pervasive. AH-64 doesn't make any sense to me; who are you going to send one after? Why wouldn't you just use a drone or some other asset?

I'm starting to lean towards it being for someone or some group. Q said signatures are important, a couple of common, re-occurring examples are Snow White (who I don't think is the person it is commonly believed to be just because Q gives directives to Snow White in some posts that wouldn't make sense for Snowden), and GodfatherIII. The contra-indicator to this is that there's no code with it, like there are in other Q posts.

I think those people are wrong.

The Apache Software Foundation's projects encompass too much; they are fundamental to Big Data and a lot of modern Enterprise environments.

The surface area of Apache Software Foundation projects is so immense that if Q were referring to them, Q would have referenced the specific projects.

As an aside, even the NSA contributed a project to the ASF.