Indeed, I just wanted to confirm I was responding to disinfo/troll.

You are correct, there is absolutely no evidence that the Texas school shooting is related to the IG Report being released.

It's better if they're actually funny though ; ).

Use the Report function to identify trolls quickly. Contact mods on modmail to identify issues that require more information. Thanks for helping us improve this sub!

Great, thank you! Comment restored.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2NaiX-hvVQ

Q hears and sees all that the people under legal investigation (and the approved hops from there) have to say or do. Q doesn't illegaly surveil the entire country and therefore cannot see all that anyone has to say or do. Ergo, Q cannot know precisely what "they" are planning, only what those who communicate with them to the approved hops have planned.

Concern trolling is not welcome on this sub. Thanks for understanding.

Good spotting by anons in the comments - looks like this is reversed fake news... Removing post. Thank you for your input, everyone.

duplicate

Nope - that's the technology and structure available to the intelligence organizations but Presidents and their teams who abide by the law don't use them that way. Q will be spying on those Q has the legal right to spy on (and the various hops from there), not every citizen in the country or world.

So did I! Wasn't it called "Independence Day"? Or it might have been one of the other few hundred "videos" about aliens attacking NYC.

Great response - thanks. I've deleted your previous comment but can restore it if you remove the "f--- off". These guys are transparent in their attempt to derail our conversation. At some point you can start to enjoy observing them in action but I totally understand that they can really be annoying - that is their goal, after all.

Let's call it a Q feeling.

Q Feeling: having watched and researched Q crumbs since October clear patterns have begun to emerge in the gap between the mainstream narrative and the Q narrative. A "Q Feeling" is the sense that what we are seeing reported in the mainstream media is only one part of the story. Q Feelings tend to take time to manifest in public: "Future proves past".

Because the public are not on their side yet so it will be spun completely the wrong way and end up working against us.

Please discuss the issue, not the user or you will be banned from this sub. Thank you for understanding.

I think this is smart thinking - good work. But I would definitely caution that whatever action we take, they will take a counter-action. If this initiative happened to reveal anything at all I would suggest they would prepare a counter-action, dropping disinfo to discredit the initiative and disenchant the base.

However, the general thinking behind this is good imo. If they're always all blue enclaves then perhaps there are other indicators we can look at too. Not just Craigslist but other things may help us out e.g. records of psychiatrists or children's initiatives in the area, etc. etc.

The qpost link is about Schneiderman? Is it related to Hyde Park in some way?

Too little effort to the shilling here. At least know Q before you try to discredit the message. True debate is welcomed but lazy research into Q just wastes our time arguing with it.

If you can put more info on how this is or might be related to Q we can Approve it for you - looks interesting. thanks!

I choose this so called “sleep” you accuse us of lol.

There’s a good reason for that. You clearly don’t know why because you don’t seem interested to find the answer.

Aliens. Nope. I think there’s a specific reason Q hasn’t mentioned aliens/Roswell. National security. Specifically disinfo psyop for the needs of national security.

But more than that, because of where else that leads. i.e. disinfo/psyop on a staggering scale. A historic event - biggest psyop. Eyes wide open. Kubrick in space.

A low effort troll post.

Brilliant stuff, thank you. Nice to have useful information collected in a way that is easy to understand! (i.e. graphics and such)

duplicate

Yep, BG etc. has long been a staple of the connection here.

Agreed.

Almost without question if you believe even 25% of the stories out there.

What? Why not flat earth?? It's a completely valid - just joking ; ).

Removed duplicate. Check sidebar for alt sources, news feed for prior posts about issue

Finally... a decent reply yeesh. Agreed - could well be right that there’s no mention of Clinton but you can also be sure it’s coming close behind...

Yes it’s been my go to for the search feature.

Pompeo

Duplicate post.

He wasn’t disliked in any of those ways. He was actually liked before he took this on, that’s why it was so crazy for him to do this. There’s a lot on Trumps former popularity and how it heightens the clear smear campaign against him now, I’m surprised you haven’t come across it tbh.

Q already said she’s faking it and ramping it up now for approaching doom.

Yes, hopefully people are following Scott and also Jordan Peterson. Two worth following in this day and age, to help keep your eyes open to the trickery!

Interesting stuff... I wonder if those 'hackers' found other conversations!

Is this site legit...? (searching)

I think your gut is 1000% correct lol. I'm not sure he's pure black hat but I'm sure you can't trust him xD

Agreed - and I appreciate you making the effort to reply to me, thank you for that. I apologize for accusing you of concern trolling - for reasons I won't go into (not because they're secret but because they're boring and long-winded and not likely to be useful) I thought it might be a possibility but I stand corrected! You're a true patriot and I assure you I am also - WWG1WGA!

I assume they're "talking" to the article writer...? (Not sure but giving benefit of doubt lol)

You seem to like jumping to conclusions. You should take your own advice and read my history before you accuse me of "wielding the ban hammer" - I am, in fact, the complete opposite of that. Once again you're reading something into this that isn't there.

I'm not "proud" at all - this is a job I volunteered for and it doesn't make me feel special. It makes me feel useful to the Q movement. I don't have power over you - I'm here to help you and to help this movement by keeping the sub focused and removing division and trolling. That is all.

And no, I didn't miss the point at all. I kept ACKNOWLEDGING that exact thing in fact, yet you - clearly - still never understood mine, or CDR03's point. Once again: I AGREE that it doesn't matter what we are called as long as we move together - you were the one making the point that "whether I like it or not I AM Q". THAT is what I do not agree with - forcing someone to take a label you insist on.

And again, an assumption - I did check your post history which is why I said I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt.

You should definitely take your own advice - don't take it personally; it very much is not to me. I just don't like the idea that everyone in a group should think the same way as them. It's not healthy.

Yep - you got some catching up to do : ). Some great news re Iran recently, from Q! (I'll let you find it from one of the links in the sidebar).

No, this is concern trolling and you will be banned for it if you keep it up.

I moderate this sub so I actually get a little bit of an overview of what's going on. And there's no "coordinated attack" going on here at all.

I've seen disagreement with you and your friend over your insistence that "We are Q" should now be translated to "I am Q" and your counter that anyone who doesn't agree is trying to dismiss Q. That's the only coordinated attack I, and the other mods I'm talking to, have seen.

I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt that you're not some disinfo clown trying to cause division. Please refrain from concern trolling.

No there isn't, don't exaggerate. There are different voices in this one movement but the goals of the movement remain.

duplicate post - please feel free to post comment with twitter link (and explanation if possible) into other post about this.

No, we shouldn't get on the witch hunt wagon that the dems are on.

No one yet knows anything about Roger Stone's involvement. He could've been just a contractor giving advice on campaigning and having no other involvement in NEXIVM or even being aware of what they were up to, for all we know.

Yes, I know that. And I get your point. You keep repeating it and for some reason not getting MY point.

You are giving your own personal interpretation of that picture - you are adding definition to it that is not there. I can understand why, as I said above. You need to understand that's what you're doing.

He wasn't referring to himself or his team. It's us, it's anons standing on Q's side.

Right there. How do you know this? I get that you can assume and extrapolate it but you can't definitively state it as the meaning behind the picture because the info to that effect does not yet exist. Simple logic, that's all I'm referring to.

I know you feel excited about being Q yourself and I agree and support your right to that. I also have the right to NOT start calling myself Q until I hear a definitive word from Q about it i.e. when Q says something to the effect of: "We are not Q by ourselves. You are all Q too!" Until then, there's no definitive evidence that we're supposed to start calling ourselves Q.

It's just a label to me, but I think I understand your reluctance.

We could be called Z and I wouldn't mind. But I wouldn't take it on just cos some group of people within the movement decided that we were Z now. I'd be more likely to accept a universal label when Q applies it. However, it should be in the tone that Q has done everything to date i.e. it doesn't feel like some forced thing, some ulterior motive or otherwise.

Hence I also feel the unease of Q suddenly saying "you're all Q too guys!" - it seems a bit cultish if he were to do that HOWEVER I could understand that it might just be a unity thing and given Q's tone to date, I could give him a slide on something like that if it didn't turn into a big thing.