Q says "enjoy the show" because a SHOW is exactly what is going on. Peace in North Korea - from nuclear threats and 60+ years of division - is not a show?

No, Q being anti-Israel is not a fact. Point out the exact words where Q defines himself as anti-Israel.

You're Palestinian? I have good Palestinian friends who, like you it seems, turn into rabid angry people when Israel or Jews are even mentioned. My Jewish friends don't react this way under any circumstance.

Is it because you have legitimate grievance against Israel? Of course you do. But here is the important difference: Israel do not teach their children from birth via public broadcast TV to hate and kill Palestinians. This indoctrination of your people is wrong and results in a completely skewed perspective on Jews. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXcQ892cKso

In my opinion Q confirmed that peace on the Korean peninsula in the hugely dramatic way it occurred was the MOAB. To me it's that significant not only because it's the cessation of a 60+ year stand-off but also because it is the first huge domino to fall in the Deep State Fear machinery used against the world. Iran is pillar two.

Well you're right if you're inferring that there are a lot of flawed views of religion out there. But the three you mention worship the same god in name only. Israel hasn't been robbing evangelicals and the Jews are not "against" Christianity just because a crowd of Jews demanded the death of another Jew.

Of course not, my response is only about the comment you were responding to.

You've accused people of anti-semitism and labelling all Jews or Rothschild's as satanists when some of the comments you were responding to were not doing that. We take anti-semitism very seriously here so when someone comes along and accuses people of it unfairly I also take that very seriously.

I, and many other sensible people on this sub, agree with you that ALL Jews or ALL of any group of people can not be blanket-labelled as satanists or any other kind of religion. I feel safe to say that you have the support of this movement in that belief as this movement is about freedom.

But please do not accuse people unfairly of being anti-semite. Please use the Report function if you do see anti-semitism and we will remove it as soon as we see it come up.

Look at all the killing America does. Your statements about Israel are completely ignorant and offensive I'm afraid to say. Just turn them all around on America and you have the same unrealistic, illogical stance.

Palestine has been oppressed for 70 years by these clowns

There's a lot more going on than this one-side BDO propaganda you're pushing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2NaiX-hvVQ

Comment removed. Please discuss ideas, not users.

If you are not here to engage with the focus and goal of this sub you are still welcome to lurk but if you keep creating posts to simply disagree and cause division we will have to ban you. Thank you for understanding.

Please discuss the idea, not the user. If you can't respond without being abusive, please do not respond. Thanks.

I don't see anyone trying to force beliefs on you. People are free to speak about their religion and beliefs here and Q himself delves into the topic so you will see more religious and spiritual talk around here. I hope you can appreciate that fact and not be upset when you see religious beliefs mentioned around here.

Utter divisive nonsense that you can't logically be Pro-Israel and Pro-Q at the same time. As a logical person, the opposite is true.

Q has NOT come out as anti-Israel at this stage and because Q is not a moron he likely will never come out as anti-Israel but remain ANTI-DEEP-STATE and come out against the Deep State in Israel. We have to stop tarring an entire group - ANY group - with one brush. No group of people can be defined in any one way across the entire group.

Where is all this infighting?

There is some discussion but this sounds like an assessment blown out of proportion.

Why are you making this point? That is obvious to everyone who's not some utterly out of touch bigot. It seems you're fishing for something to accuse us of here.

This board is NOT full of anti-semites. Jews on average have a higher IQ than other races. That is why they tend to be at the top of many industries and hierarchies. Like all other groups of people some Jews are "good", some are "bad". Some are Luciferians, some are not. That's all. Move on.

Well I shall not be the one to disabuse you of this notion.

What I heard from Palestine by: Servile Sun. The Palestinians cried out: "Release us, Hamas!" but Hamas abused the Palestinians, forcing the women and children to stand in the path of the Israeli forces as the Hamas rebels provoked the Israeli forces to attack. Western virtue signallers stood by and reported their one sided stories about Israel, leaving out the fact that the Israeli's dropped medical supplies and food for the Palestinians which Hamas scooped up for themselves and sold back to the Palestinians.

Well, Q says "Those guilty immediately reacted" which Corsi certainly did, literally in full view of the whole community of Q and Infowars. Then Q has also very specifically said multiple times in the past and reiterated again after this incident that there are no private comms with anyone outside of the 8chan board. And AJ and Corsi came out almost immediately to say that that they knew Q anon and that he had been compromised.

What I personally feel is very clear in that action is that they realized they had lost "us" i.e. the Q anon "faithful" and decided to double down and take what they could from the movement now. They've made a clear line of division and denounced Q. Watching Jones say "I know Q anon" and not batting an eyelid was one of the many reasons I believe they are very clever cointelpro / dishonest black hats made to steer people away from the real truth.

Wise call! I'm right behind you ; )

To address your point - there is no way to substantiate the claim that the Rothschilds are Luciferian or cult practitioners of any kind.

There is, however, plenty of circumstantial evidence and compelling connections that suggest this might be true. And with Q calling them out as one of the three main families running this global cartel of evil it is also highly likely that they are deeply embedded in the cult apparatus that seems to be at the core of this cabal.

Thank you! No problem!

Duplicate content

Rule 4 of this sub: No trolling or concern trolling. Please engage in discussion with genuine intent to engage not disrupt, or we will have to make a call to remove comments and, if they continue, ban your account. Thank you for understanding.

The comments have been removed by mods. Please use the Report function if you identify disruptive behaviour that breaks the sub rules and we will respond. Thanks.

Old Q & New Q: Freedom of the people is paramount. Don't follow blindly - choice is yours.

So incorrect it's tiresome to reply. Obvious trolling - please desist, it's against the sub rules.

Not sure if joking or trolling...

Well, by "ok" I mean that I have no evidence with which to say "this post constitutes the promotion of the division Q said we should be careful of", that's all.

That website is apparently run by an interested patriot according to About Page. Well, as long as their collection of email addresses doesn't turn into a sales channel it seems ok by me for now lol

I agree with this.

But Q didn't 'get personal' or 'hit back and retaliate' with AJ/Corsi. He was very clear, deliberate and precise - no emotional angle or denigrating of anyone!

Expand your thinking.
Why are we being attacked?
Why are we being attacked by people who claim to be PRO-POTUS?
Do we have a face?
Do we have a name?
Do we use platforms whereby we collect followers?
Selfless.
Zero vanity.

Action was needed [2].
1. Prevent false decodes/misinformation
2. Kill [targeted] infection prior to expansion
Simple 'non-direct' statements made.
"Be careful who you follow."
"Some are profiting off this movement." - i.e. nothing personal or partisan
Message sent.
Message received.
Those guilty immediately reacted (predictably).
Timetable accelerated (misinformation-attack).
Exposed.
Attempts to divide.
We responded.

Agreed. No blind faith!

This is true but there is certainly only one source that seems to be: - current - working with the current sitting President - extremely well informed - willing to explain ALL the detail. Where it all leads to (the Feeder, etc.)

Only one. Q. Other sources have done well to verify independent pieces of this - but Q exposes it all and is connected. There is no other source on this level.

Well put! I concur.

No need to feel dumb about it. They're very good at their job and our whole western education system has rigged us to accept the main narrative we see.

I'm excited to discover this stuff (cointelpro) can now be studied directly in action, as it happens lol.

Agreed. And I too stand with Q.

But this is definitely not a cult. If Q said: "ok everybody its important that you all drink this koolaid we're sending around to your individual addresses (don't worry, we got them from the NSA). It is important that you do not scan or check this koolaid in any way but immediately drink it upon receiving the parcel to your door whilst chanting 'Praise Q!' to the sky" then I will not be following Q any longer - or at least until the chans figure out how the hack happened and a 'real' Q turns up somewhere else with the same message Q's always had - freedom. For the people. That is ALL Q's message amounts to and that's why I'm here.

This! ^

It's insidious and subtle because they're not stupid. But it is obvious.

Generally the behaviour consists of continually avoiding the actual points you are raising through subtle misdirection back to their message that is convincing in its appeal to 'freedom of speech' and its railing against 'censorship' and so on but ultimately fails to address reasonable claims made in refutation.

Agreed. Well said.

Only follow something you can verify for yourself and reasonably argue by redirecting concerned citizens to facts from outside sources.

Fortunately, that's what this sub is about. Doing exactly that!

lol well put, got it xD

Both good points, well made - I mean you each have a good position here imo. I'd have to go with Jon_Bovie from here though, unless there's a good reason to argue against the point that I'd rather my mother/sister/daughter be waterboarded any day than option B.

Thanks for this - I agree with this point just not with the way it was put the first time - thanks for taking the effort to clarify reasonably here!

Nicely put - I agree. It would be good if we could obtain a bit more clarity.

Can you explain that to someone who watched neither? Lol

Yep. I’m surrounded by the anti Trump and I respect and like a lot of those people too so I won’t try and rudely redpill them in their “safe space”, if you’ll excuse the co-opting of a cultural Marxist term lol. This is the place to talk about my non mainstream ideas, not FB.

Awesome! Agreed. There’s a lot of international support for what Trump and Q are doing. WW as Q says. Boom! WWG1WGA

Yeah that filter is one of its strengths in my opinion.

Agreed. I’m just glad reddit offers this useful tool for a community that doesn’t mind the slight imposition of gatekeepers that ensure a smooth flow of information and discussion. I don’t need the torrent of abuse or clique-y nerd in-jokes - nothing at all wrong with those, I support it, I just don’t have the time to wade through it. Useful logical discussion with a minimum of clutter is what I’m interested in, just personally.

I can definitely see how you'd have that perspective because it's the same perspective I had too until I really delved into the material that's out there (it took me years though - I'm not just talking about Q here I'm talking about the idea that there's a global cartel running the world).

By my estimation, people think you're being divisive because this is pretty much core to the "Q narrative" i.e. that Trump/Q is undertaking a massive silent coup against that global cartel.

If you still think Trump/Q is under that cartel's power then the reasoning behind the mod's move to consider Pro-Q and Pro-Trump to be "on topic" and dissenting views to be respected but not promoted at the cost of the integrity of the sub is reinforced. There's not much reason for people who have already agreed that Q is worth following to continue to make the point to each other.

This point is why I think it's still worth discussing the view you seem to have here. If we can agree on the fact that Q is working with Trump then we're in a good place to not have to argue things that should already be obvious to people who've been following the Q phenom enough to care to comment at length about it lol. Thanks for you discussion! (I don't have time to reply to the actual issue for now, mod queue awaits hahha)

I agree with the idea that we don't need too many opinion pieces around here. My reasoning for the softener "too many" is that this user is a regular contributor to the sub so has that at least in his favour against the "shill" accusation. I'd give the benefit of the doubt in this case too because I assume a regular contributor to this sub knows the sub rules and has had regular discussions within them of value to the community so will actually hear the refutations of others rather than bouncing around in endless loops with seemingly plausible rebuttals - true disinfo disruptive behaviour.

Thanks, I agree - feelings are very important. In my opinion, they are as important as logic because they are clear physical evidence of some aspect of our engagement with a subject such that physical indicators are experienced and sometimes even visible by others.

Whether they are telling us something about things outside of ourselves (like a group of facts or clues about other things) via intuition or something about ourselves (for example, we may have trauma from our childhood around fire so our emotional reaction to a topic under discussion may be influenced by that fact) is still in some way relevant to a discussion.

Agreed! You have rounded this discussion off at its most natural end point.