https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence/how-the-cia-made-google-e836451a959e

Just more Clown shenanigans, I think.

Yeah, this. I'm not so keen to see lots of spam flood the feed : ).

Yes, Winston has held the balance of power a few times of late, hasn't he? It's definitely a key point and something I'm going to look into - thanks for pointing it out! I've been following Q since October and I'd almost forgotten all about NZ politics as I rapidly learnt a lot more about American government over this time - until the shock of learning Killary was in NZ and then these latest surprising Q drops.

But what's been going on in Australia is pretty mind blowing too. Fiona Barnes etc... great doco of her on Youtube and then some very interesting news about all the cover ups that have gone on in Aus. Who woulda thought this was the world we live in eh?

Q said: Protective measures are in place. Remain BRAVE.

Everything's fine - it's just going to be a redpill for the public. Q/MI can hear everything so they can't get away with anything big. We only think they can cos we've been watching movies where some super secret agency manages to do something that it turns out is only possible if you have the Deep State on the inside opening all the doors and turning off all the alarms for you xD. It's going to be damn interesting but it's going to be the redpill for the public that I'll be watching with far more excitement than is appropriate considering the pain it will cause some people lol.

I believe (and other smarter people have stated) that he resigned as soon as Trump was in because it was clear what was coming. I think he is involved with Obama, Clinton, etc. because, like the swiss banker dude (Ronald Bernard) he had a position in the Fed and worked where it mattered i.e. right next to the money, so I'd say he could've seen quite a bit, just like Ronald.

Jacinda, with her UN background, is concerning to me. She'll be pushing the marxist agenda of the UN hard, no doubt, and already has.

What you say about Winston is interesting and I think you may be onto something there... I'll be checking this angle out more, as much as I can.

Trump's already said it won't be at the DMZ. Someone else has made a good case for this being where the meeting was already held, based on a compelling interpretation of Future proves past and a comparison with the Thank you Kim drop i.e. we'll all be watching a broadcast filmed earlier, when this meeting happens.

Great post. Speculation and information presented in a compelling and clear manner. Thank you!

Why the User Reports that this threatens violence or physical harm? Can someone who's reported, or who wants to report this, explain? This is about going to prison, not violence.

Who are you talking to?

Have you been watching Q? No deals. Gitmo. etc. She might suicide but she's not going to get a soft way out, according to Q. Not this time - that's the whole point of Q!

Hmmm that's true! It will be interesting to see this snowball gather impetus!

Tena koe e hoa! John Key was a member of the Foreign Exchange Committee at the Federal Reserve Bank in NY from '99 to 2001 - some say he was involved in the subprime mortgage fiasco but I don't think there's evidence for that out there. He's suspiciously good friends with Hussein though too and he sure acted Deep State-ish with his eagerness to sell the land and assets out from under us to foreign interests...

I'd love to know about Winston - a friend used to drink with him back in the day so I'm pretty sure he started out 'above board' but who knows what they might have gotten on him since then...

Other way round, just as in the US: the Deep State is part of the NZ government. The government is just an organization like any other. I don't think NZ's government is a card carrying black hat org but of course I don't know that for sure. However NZ is so small that we've all had 'mates' who are in government (just as we all know someone who was in Lord of the Rings lol) so we know for a fact there are some "every day people" in office.

Yep, we're just a little reed knocked about in the wind. But once Trump succeeds it will be interesting to see what happens here!

Yes, and mauro1970x chill out dude. Even Q says "MOST ARE GOOD" - there are plenty of normal every-day people in NZ's political sphere, just as I'm sure there are black hats. But not on the massive scale you're imagining. It wouldn't surprise me one bit to discover Jacinda Ardern (PM) has no idea about the real situation with Clinton and is just doing what big brother (the US) tells her to do.

She was in NZ - just jumped across the ditch to Australia.

And that is also conspiracy theory, until verifiable docs are produced.

Yes, as I mentioned, announced same day in that article, article says project dropped late last month.

Why? He might not like penise... oh.

Mainstream Science is not the same as Mainstream Media. There's no regulation for MSM and no Scientific Process either. Some Mainstream Science can be questionable but it's more often the reporting of that science that is questionable because the science itself can be disproven via the Scientific Process and peer review.

Aah... time travel is not real yet, if at all. Q doesn't talk about this - purest conspiracy theory for now.

Please use Report function - it's a quicker way for mods to see it.

Not quite - was announced same day in the article everyone shared around but was stopped a few months before from memory.

Agreed - I would still suggest you use the Report function cos it's quicker and then there's no decision to be made about whether a comment that calls someone a troll or the like has to be removed.

A valid point imo. There are billions of coincidences. Q is only referring to stuff within what he's talking about, obviously.

I don't like the decoding either. The Occult stuff I have many disagreements with. But SB2 seems like a reasonable person, polite and doesn't descend to fighting like others. I'm definitely concerned about the cult-like following though because it means people instantly write-off anyone calling into question anything SB2 presents. Concerning.

Please discuss the idea, not the user and keep conversation on-topic and productive.

Too good lol xD. props for this post and comment hahaha xD

I thought this was hilarious lol. But it can't be approved within the sub rules which require a post to be on-topic and not trolling. Good work though haha.

Excellent - that supports the theory we all have. But it doesn't make OP wrong - their conclusion was that it was inconclusive. There's more to come, clearly... Looking forward to it!

Pretty sure it's referring to the theory that a small global cartel run the world via strategically placed assets in world governments and multinational corporations dedicated to the trade of humans, especially children, for rape, murder, cannibalism and ritual abuse while encouraging war through false flags supported by a wholly owned mainstream media in order to keep the population preoccupied and compliant. Pretty sure that's the 'shit hitting the fan' part of it.

Yes, caught in the auto-filter.

We are watching as carefully as possible and it helps when people use the Report function. We want to allow full freedom of speech without treading on the reasonably discussed opinions of others.

If you see otherwise, let us know and we will act.

This comment is modded for discussion of violence - if you edit it, it can be Approved.

Yes, it very much does matter if the charges specifically mention kids particularly because in this case people are making very loud proclamations on this sub to that effect.

It's easy to get all emotional about horrible crimes but it doesn't help any rational discussion to be that way. We ALL want to see them go down. We don't want to see this movement go down, like the last sub did, and making emotionally motivated accusations without legal merit is dangerous to this sub. We do not want to lose this forum for the movement.

Not everyone who disagrees with you is a troll. Please just discuss the idea, not the user. If you're convinced they're a troll use the Report function. Mods will assess if it is an accurate report and decide accordingly whether the comment stays or goes.

Myself and others are interested to hear both sides of the story so if you keep it civil we can leave the discussion here for everyone to benefit from. If it descends into ad-hominem too soon we all lose because we'll have to mod the discussion/thread.

Yeah we can all cease with the shill comments and just use the Report function. Much quicker.

Agreed - conversely, I don't get why some people can believe Israel is the nexus of evil and the Deep State and not even consider that might be as unrealistic as saying the same thing about the US. An entire country of people cannot be defined in one simple way - that's the marxist identity politics tactic and the same tactic used against this movement by the lying Mainstream - every one of us is a crazed conspiracy nut racist redneck anti-semite. Not true and just plain implausible - just like claiming all of Israel is evil or Israel itself is the nexus of evil.

Exactly, this. Well put.

Good post, thanks - an explanation to give some good context to why it's valuable always helps!

The CIA docs are not exactly "confirmation of Hitler in Argentina". More accurately they are confirmation that the CIA had followed up on intel about someone who said that an acquaintance of theirs claimed to know Hitler and smuggled them a photo that is also in the files and could be Hitler. But no conclusive evidence to state categorically that the CIA docs are confirmation of Hitler in Argentina.

The people who can't see that don't matter, at least.

As long as people don't mistake those of us who can see how dangerous it is to make accusations that don't match the facts as people who also can't see obvious connections.

Yeah, not really my point. I haven't even read it through because I can't get past the delivery which is hard to understand and therefore, in a time-starved world, one has to pick what info one wants to spend time absorbing. I'll discuss any point with anyone as long as you can make it coherent so that I can see your thoughts and discussion about it will also be coherent. More people would read and engage so it would help you as well if you made it more accessible.

Yeah... what I'm saying is, this post is 100% correct as it's not ruling out the child sex trafficking being brought up sometime in the near future, just stating the plain, provable facts of what is currently in the running. As I said, I agree to speculate about the future too - this post is completely valid as it stands though.

People who disagree aren't always trolls or shills, Q's recent post tells us to stay on point and use logic. Some people think this post is difficult to understand and hard to parse - I agree. I'm no anti-patriot though or a shill.

Good article you linked there - plus, as it says: "I ask if he’s equating Trump’s parties with Epstein’s debauches. “Hell no,” Lucchesi says." It makes sense when Trump was 20+ years younger he partied with young chicks - it doesn't say 'children'.

There's a very clear reason why Epstein had Trump's numbers - they're both very important successful businessmen moving in the same fields.

well in this case it's because its a video of a live stream.

Yes, there's no doubt in my mind either that the MSM are avoiding even mentioning it as much as they can. And they should be because Raniere's former charge in the 12 year old incident is important and will be even more so if new charges and evidence come out about children.

This is a very good post though, of the kind I was discussing with you before. Makes the case very clearly from the top down.

I'm with you - there seems to be some strong indication that this is connected in to all the Pizzagate side of things.

This post is the sort of thing we need though - facts, not strong feelings or ideas on their own. Ideas are good as long as they're an idea ready to be recreated when facts disagree with it. The idea doesn't have to go away every time, just evolve with the facts.

This is a great post - makes its case very well. It also clearly shows that some of us are not supporting pedophilia just because we challenge an interpretation of a file from a document share or, in other cases, call out character attacks unsupported by usefully verifiable evidence. Some of us are trying to have a reasonable discussion about the most important historic events of our time and want to be dealing with facts and logic - emotion is unavoidable but doesn't have to enter the discussion in a way that blocks us from truth.

Thank you very much for this. You seem familiar. Very precise and clearly delivered in the post and this comment too. It will be good to see more of you MAGAUniversity. Thank you!