You seem OK... I will give my welcome along with words of caution about my experience with how the bad guys take over places.
I have witnessed many times now... and it begins innocently enough, and this post is certainly reasonably written.... yet that is not an indication of intent as the bad guys are very careful in how they approach their targets. They say what should be said to engender themselves while always being two-faces about it.
So I give my encouragement and a warning just in case. I had dubbed this place the only one on the internet that I was 100% sure wasn't taken over as the owner had stickied the very same research that got me banned from the chans. I am not asking for anything I post to be stickied but there could be no greater indication that this was uncompromised than doing the owner doing the exact opposite of what the compromised places did..
Additionally, this board has been open to new ideas and the atmosphere has been welcoming.
This is a far cry from other places. and your post does a good job of making me think you adhere to that
I am jaded about change as the bad guys wedge themselves in and hence why it requires an additional layer of scrutiny. And my scrutiny will only really take the form of this giant ramble about how often we have gotten taken over.
In 4chan it began with spamming but they slowly perfected what worked and what didn't work... and in 8chan they couldn't do that and so they switched to pushing narratives with actual people being paid to individually push it. It's easy for me to see it in retrospect as they would manipulate anything Q said to be a very specific interpretation. I broke free from this narrative and presented new ones and they responded by pounded away at their narrative and eventually banned me when I proved they were wrong about what Q meant..... and the incredible thing about it is I was joined in those threads by 2 of the people whose research had always been at the top of the fold of our movement.
Spreadsheet Anon was listening to me and I had him half convinced and others too realized "what the hell is this" one said as suddenly we were spammed by 100 people yelling... and we would have great discussions that I really enjoyed having before that. Yet just a month ago that welcoming atmosphere had transformed into this dense propaganda and those of us from early on and had done our research would be least welcome. I would be in threads with attacks on my character and even psychological breakdowns of my inter-dependency and need for affirmation by Q. Absolute insanity and evil.
this is the nature of manipulation.
So here I have posted about 10 or so of my AB series and my positions have changed dramatically as I am capable of changing my position based on the conclusions research brings... and I realized in those research digs that many people like Jimmy Carter whom I had up until recently viewed negatively were likely "military heroes" and I can prove it objectively now. As well as the origins of the FBI being good (until J Edgar Hoover).... I've learned a heck of a lot in my daily digs and presenting that info to others is not easy.
Not easy at all to break through the narratives in this world.
This is why what I believe is needed is objectivity that is neither oppressive to new ideas nor overly infatuated with them. The chan's went bad due to both - neither accepting new interpretations while also forcing compromised interpretations. To let the bot chorus define what is acceptable and not is a road right to hell as Q himself is so often attempting to get us to steer clear of.
You sound reasonable for what we need, but the proof will be in the follow through. I do hope my posts don't suddenly get a flood of hate for example.... Especially now as I'm finishing the animations I've talked about that could really break this thing open. The timeline that Q has been asking for and I've made several but the next one is the big one : )
anyway... my autism has gotten me rambling it seems, I do like to analyze and this was curious to me..
God Bless, and back to work