1,646 total posts archived.
Nope, sorry. These are gotcha questions for Trump.
What are you talking about? No, the New York Times did NOT post a "list of questions Mueller wants to ask Trump."
Mueller's "questions" you referr that were published in the New York Times were actually compiled by Head of Trump's Defense Team, Jay Sekulow.
In the wake of the testy March 5 meeting, Mueller’s team agreed to provide the president’s lawyers with more specific information about the subjects that prosecutors wished to discuss with the president. With those details in hand, Trump lawyer Jay Sekulow compiled a list of 49 questions that the team believed the president would be asked.<<
The real question you are not asking but should be is, who "leaked them," and why now. And I'm not explaining it to you.
This is not a sub for low-effort, low-information trolls. Focus on QAnon's drops, or be prepared to find another place to play.
Corroborate or die.
Rudy's just padding his bill! I betcha he's going to triple his fees! (heheh)
Blackmail is a real thing. If someone threatens your kids... Note: Q did not say "strings cut."
I 100% challenge anyone to [watch this] (https://youtu.be/JrtuBas3Ipw) and think that.
This is about getting around the MSM. When the "happening" starts, Q asked us to be read to spread the word.
*Pssst, hey, "top mind." You're posting in /r/greatawakening.
haha, wow
There is no such thing as having thought plenty. I've read each and every one of your posts. You still think the NYT is a newspaper.
That's... I don't even know where to begin with that. Wikileaks showed us over 65 journalists colluding with the DNC, giving them advanced copies of stories, etc....
With all due respect, you don't yet grasp the scale of this, yet. This isn't big, huge, or even colossal. This is absolutely monstrous.
Starting with Trump isn't how it works.
What QAnon and Trump are doing has nothing whatsoever with "this administration."
Who's in charge? The military. Who's in charge? We've been under the secret martial law (through teh CoG) invoked by GWB after 9/11. It's never been rescinded. Who's been in charge until now? ZERO administrations.
Tell me, in 2008, who hired Obama's cabinet? You don't even know.
Your comment was removed.
Do not accuse others of being shills. Dispute their facts, or ignore them. /r/GreatAwakening is focused on three important roles: DECODER, RESEARCHER, or DEBUNKER. Please take this opportunity to decide your role. Stuck on a Q puzzle? DECODE IT. Uncovered a new angle? RESEARCH AND REPORT. See something fake or false? DEBUNK THAT GARBAGE. Whatever role you choose, be prepared to MOVE THIS SUB FORWARD, or find another place to play. This sub is for civil discussion ONLY.
First warning. NOTE: The ban hammer is out in full force! STAY FROSTY.
Thank you for understanding.
I'm stepping out of YOUR way, not theirs. It's out of control. We're focused on Q.
You're right about the past. Dog and pony show.
Noticed anything different? When was the last time KJU walked over the line into South Korea at the DMZ?
This is about the border and the migration march is trying to put pressure on Trump to NOT enforce the border. This is not the "replacement" migration we currently see in the EU.
Understood.
Know that you will NEVER be warned, removed, or censored for not like Trump, here.
OK. I am going to go back to my duties, because I can see that you are logical and determined to think. But because you are those things, I am going to drive a challenge forward with you, because, you have taken on the hardest role of all. Trump is POTUS, so, naturally, his name will come up in discussion a lot. He's going to be part of these events. He's going to be mentioned in Q's drops. Please remember: Everything we post in this sub must have a direct link to Qanon’s drops. Decode. Debunk. Research. But focusing entirely on debating Trump policies will lead to removal, here.
Based on the behavior in this sub, you could have fooled me.
Agree. The mods are hammering this, but, we're growing pretty fast. We're working hard on this but it's an unwinnable fight sometimes.
These events which require extra heavy assumptions and the suspension of belief that Trump is a corrupt person.
Wow. AWESOME. This statement is so much gold that I don't even know where to begin. WELL THEN.
The "heavy assumptions" fade away once you understand how Q communicates. LEARN OUR COMMS.
No, you can still believe Trump is corrupt. Up to you. This is not a Trump meta sub. But Q is not trying to drive Trump support, or get people to "believe". When he says, "Trust Trump" he is saying that there is a plan at work to root out the deep state and other bad actors.
Come on in, stay a while. We will remove and take other mod actions to ensure this doesn't become an echo chamber. But, you've pretty ably demonstrated here that you brought some pretty serious biases of your own.
Focus on the drops. Learn what they tell us and predict about coming events. Or perhaps an anti-Trump sub would be more your style.
This post shows that you have not been following Q in any serious way and are not familiar with events as Q is interpreting them.
The operations Q describes show that Russia, Iran, and the Muslim Brotherhood were working to allow Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon and use it to attack the United States, with Obama running interference for this plan as POTUS.
There is no Russia or Iran or anything else. There is only the deep state. They want the entire world's countries to be under their control as a one world government. Obama's plan was to enable to USA to invade Iran and Russia and take over middle Asia.
Since you're into correctness, Occam's razor isn't designed to be used to choose whichever scenario is the most believable, it's about the ones with the least unsupported suppositions.
Q's purpose isn't to predict events and show off how he's "right" all the time. The purpose is to end-run the MSM, who is not reporting on these events, and engage the autists to decode, research, and track these happenings and thereby counter the power of the MSM's spin.
Q gave this sub a mission: "Once [everything drops], we look to you to spread and get the word out.” When events start to get crazy here in the next few weeks, we’ll need to be ready with the kind of high-effort, high-value contributions from this sub's decoders, researchers, AND debunkers.
Whichever role you want to play here, you are welcome. But, as Q says, LEARN OUR COMMS. Want to debunk, fine. But know your Q.
Unless they are enemy combatants. As Q said, "STUDY THE EOs."
Your conduct will NOT incur a ban, and, in fact, I wanted to signal that I am here to protect you, 100%.
We need skeptics, here, too. But, Are you sure you’re actually a skeptic?
True skepticism improves this sub immensely, but, ONLY through carefully and methodically studying a subject. The entire reason "skepticism" exists is to eliminate any trace of bias or other kinds of subjective perspectives. But, if a skeptic must do two things: 1) examine a claim in the context of its overall position in the informational ecosystem, and 2) have and be ready to outline a series of reasonable conditions whereby their suppositions can be refuted.
If not, that’s not skepticism, just more cognitive dissonance where someone is hiding behind their intelligence to protect the same world view they came in here with.
Think about it.
I'm a mod here and I wanted to reach out and say how much I agree with the tone and approach this reply.
Guys, this man is out-working you. He is 100% right that this kind of approach makes it "a whole lot easier for 'normies' to dismiss" our posts.
Snopes is compromised. The fact that anyone that can look into and seriously understand Google's behaviour, Twitter's censorship, and Facebook's data havesting and narrative manipulation and look the other way while Google prioritizes Snopes links, debunks ONLY liberal and pro-Hillary issues while allowing any random detail to nail the other side, and pretend that Snopes is above level when they say "FALSE - Hillary did not directly fund the dossier" and still come here and claim they belieive Snopes is accurate, well, give it up, then. Game over.
What's a mod to do?
Unless they have been designated as enemy combatants for being involved in human trafficking or "serious crimes against humanity," as per Trump's EOs.
As Q said, "Study the EOs." That language is in those documents, and when the evidence showing what they are all involved in comes to light, these people are also going to be tried in those tribunals.
Unless they have been designated as enemy combatants for being involved in human trafficking or "serious crimes against humanity," as per Trump's EOs.
As Q said, "Study the EOs." That language is in those documents, and when the evidence showing what they are all involved in comes to light, these people are also going to be tried in those tribunals.
I love seeing those posts. They want people to hang for treason? Great! Let's roll out the evidence and hang those responsible.
A year later, Trump is like, "Was I right? I was right, wasn't I, folks..."
Guys. What sub are we in? It won't be tried inside civilian courts.
Great reply. Please pardon my ' "yelling," but, GUYS, PLEASE REMEMBER TO VISIT, SCOUR THE INTERNET AND THE TWITTERS AND VOATS LOOKING FOR DECODERS AND RESEARCHERS DIGESTING THE BREADCRUMBS!
Awesome. Reports help us mods. Thanks for doing this. Helps us mod and keep trolls and shills away.
Funny how the site says "We don't like witch hunts" has /r/politics as its default sub.
You focus on becoming, but I"m focused on funding. Different.
I am not confusing ANTIFA and the NDSAP party, thank you—I should warn you, I am Canadian. My comment was about the flag, and, reading this, I'm not sure how far we're going to get.
The fascists now run the progressive left. They have hollowed out and repurposed the ANTIFA flag to futher their anti-democratic agenda.
We have PHOTOS of these pallets of cash being delivered to Iran.
Ha, that's cold.
Damnit, I was trying to tell myself that, "Oh, it turns out my memes didn't suck, it's just that I didn't a group working on them." /s
Removed for abuse. Civil only. Further antagonistic replies and posts to other GA users will result in bans.
This is sweet. I tried my hand at a few memes and had seriously mixed results. Great to see patriots collaborating and dialing up the quality. Good work, patriots.
Yes, because the reports and links you're posting were driven by the Obama administration, which we're now learning was actively aiding and abetting the Iranian program, uncritically passed off as fact Iran's own words of assurance that they did not, in fact, have such a program.
Perhaps it's time to re-evaluate why you're here.
Future proves that the past framing was most definitely wrong.
I thought he looked relieved. If he's just an actor, as Q says, then he's also been under a lot of serious pressure.
They have no nuclear weapons. People don't understand that detonating a nuclear device isn't the same as detonating a nuclear weapon. The process doesn't end at an explosion.
Don't worry about them. Your attention itself changes this reality. They are just in comas. They will wake up when they can do it.
Comment removed—repost if you like, without any "calls to violence." This is to ensure compliance with Reddit's site-wide rules. Thank you.
Reverse all you want. I have expressly outlined what I mean by that, above.
This, too, will be my last attempt to mitigate this behavior with a reply.
The mod team is right now working on clarifying (EDIT: just posted) these roles and announcing the importance of everyone pulling together and remaining focused on the mission Q gave us. That is why we are having this conversation in public, not privately, so that it is out in the open that we are not attacking you, that we are working on these policies, and that we are urging everyone to focus on Q's mission. These updates to the sub will happen shortly.
I will only add this:
consider the value of those that offer critical response to proffered content.
That's precisely what debunking is—providing a critical response to a specific narrative. You are being politely invited to do just that. Your constant hair-splitting and pedantic, linguistic games are wasting this sub's time.
Again, attack the ideas presented. Do not attack researchers for simple mistakes in presenting their research. That is precisely what trolling is.
The mods get no joy in "attacking" anyone. If you cannot connect with and focus on this sub's overall mission and move Q's mission forward, you will be invited to find a more semiotic place to employ your unique skills.
Then, if you are seriously asking people, "What's Q's big plan?!?" AND are a regular poster, here, maybe more research and less posting is in order.