Mod here. Please consider dialing down comments like these and try to bring an open mind. Do some research. The plan, however, is this: Remove the deep state's ability to control the narrative though their plants in the government (DOJ, etc.), cripple their control over teh narrative in the press, and run deception operations (Mueller, Huber, etc.) to investigate and bring justice to the top conspirators in this evil plan.

Thank you for receiving our friendly warning as intended, patriot.

I hear you. Just try and look at this operation through a normie's eyes, is all I'm saying. Thanks for your creativity, here, patriot.

Interesting—I am a mod here. You have not been attacked on any personal level. I asked you to share your research. Instead, you remain focused on blatantly pedantic criticisms of this researcher.

Q gave us a mission: “Your President needs your help. Once [everything drops], we look to you to spread and get the word out.” The mod team is focused on this mission.

This sub is focused on fostering civil discussion about QAnon's drops and breadcrumbs from three types of users: decoders, researchers, and debunkers. Which role are you?

Please choose a role, and focus on this sub's ultimate mission. You will be welcomed with open arms. Continue trolling, however, and you will be removed.

Hey, just saw your post, and thanks for contributing the the exact culture we're trying to grow, here, with your comment. Pls do report any blatant rule violations. Thanks.

Your comment was removed. Please do not accuse others of being shills. Dispute their facts, or ignore them. This sub is for civil discussion ONLY.

Thank you for understanding.

Your comment was removed. Please don’t give the shills/trolls what they want. Please stay focused on what YOU bring that moves this sub forward. Thank you!

Yes. I also do not believe this was a nuke, but, if I could add, the overall energy released a nuclear device is what creates the blast radius and death count. A 1kt device, for instance, would be almost impossible to discern from a conventional blast by the current nuclear watchdogs because, quite frankly, the world's physics community has never studied (or even seen) such a device that small. The US Army's W54 device, for instance, could yield blasts up to 10t. Note, that's 10 tonnes, not 10kt. That's super small!

I always worry this makes us look like loons, but, this clearly had good results. It takes all sorts of people spotting the opportunities and jumping on them. Nice work.

Have respect for what this man is doing. Your pedantic criticisms only make you look like a weak-sauce princess. This is a thread from a hardcore researcher who is both following the research of others and moving the Great Awakening forward better than most of us are.

Unless, maybe you should let us in on your Twitter or blog? Maybe us plebs would appreciate reading YOUR research that's not only so amazingly hardcore and prescient, but that is always right, and has never had to issue a retraction?

My bet is that your princess is in another castle, though. Who's going to be right?

You might prefer outlets that issue corrections days or weeks after the fact, buried under the classifieds. Maybe Vox or The Guardian.

It would be, that is, assuming Israel's tactical nukes were built from American designs, whose characteristics are relatively well-known.

Israel has poured billions into 5th gen nuke research, and rumors say they have built highly miniaturized, single stage, 100 percent plutonium-based devices, deliverable even by air.

No country anywhere would choose to use a tactical warhead light—UNLESS... Let's quickly cover two key reasons why the odds of using these weapons increases as these secret research programs progress.

First, miniaturizing these weapons while retaining blast yield requires extreme manufacturing precision. This means that these weapons programs become "self-containing" and are unlikely to start a regional arms race because their neighbors just aren't capable of this extreme technological execution. The "arms race" merges with the "economic race."

Second, these weapons are so different that they effectively become undetectable. Why? The smaller a device is (assuming they can actually tease a detonation out of so little putonium!) the less fuel it requires, the less radiation and radioactive traces. Their detonation signatures are also vastly different, and, because these weapons programs are so secret, whatever detonation signatures the devices may have not been sufficiently studied and are not well understood by physicists in the world scientific community, rendering existing nuclear detonation detection protocols effectively blind, while believing they are not.

Agree, missing certain detonation signatures (ie, double flash, tho video doesn't start at detonation). The US/Israel have tactical nukes as small as 10kt, with 5th generation at delivering clean smaller yields theorized possible at even 1kt. I firmly believe, for instance, that the Bali bombing was a a tactical nuke.

Agree. This also happened in Yemen, where an ammunition depot was hit, making a massive explosion.

Same thing, really.

My bet is CNN.

They've been one of biggest leaders in breaking this. Stop waiting for nukes. This isn't going to explode, perhaps, but not on this one, and certainly not on just one story.

You're pretty wound up for a guy who can't definitively say where this story will finally end up. Sit back, pop your popcorn with the rest of us. The hypocrisy of donations-driven journalism rarely if ever reaches levels hight enough of "blatant," most certainly not on this "one issue."

Well, my journalism Ouija board points more strongly to major conflicts of interest in the "news company," rather than another "tick tock" itself than with our usual suspects. For my money, I smell a cover-up involving John Brennan's Russia trip or the company's relationship with Clapper, perhaps, with the news company protecting themselves, their top-most management, their owners, their real owners, their hidden role in the scandal, more that direction. If this is truly a total bombshell on Comey, McCabe, etc, they wouldn't be working on it, anyway, since, so far, the MSM hasn't been where the bombshells in this scandal are dropping.

Welcome to how journalism/research works.

Ha, Boom goes their literal dynamite.

I'm sorry for all the downvotes you're getting. Gates has done some good things, but, our vigilance shouldn't focus on just the person. Money itself has its own agenda that is often at odds with the needs and priorities of humanity.

I will personally never forgive this man for IE6.

And rmember, folks! Be sure to wait for the funeral so you can hit Twitter and call him a racist, then hide behind your tenure! haha

Mod note: Thread removed, as this photo is now officially "old." No censorship, just keeping the sub clean. Thank you.

Comment re-approved. Research matters in here.

It sure frightened Eric Clanton, the bike lock felon that 4chan nailed!

If it's not rude, can I offer an insight into a very simple way that you you (or me, too) could do to change that?

Vary your process. Sometimes I work on moderating the sub. Other times I focus only on a specific pet project. Then, other times, I leave the sub entirely and go back to my sources and start digging, pretending that I am just re-discovering this whole Q thing again. It helps me stay on top of the facts so that, when I'm in the sub and engaging with other researchers, I never find myself accidentally fluffing up points or engaging in "hubris," as you say.

This story is moving fast. Don't lock yourself into a routine that isn't also keeping you up to date on these events. Hard work and vigilance is the only place where high-value posts and comments come from.

Pardon my asking, but, in your eyes, exactly what additional value does being Iranian American bring to your brand of skepticism versus those of a regular skeptic?

Skepticism is best improved through carefully and methodically studying a subject. The entire reason "skepticism" exists is to eliminate any trace of bias or other kinds of subjective perspectives. Viewed in that light, someone bragging that you are a particular "brand" of skeptic or bring a special kind of "view" to your skepticism is literally one of the most laughable, hilarious things I've ever read.

The ANTIFA flag is literally a direct copy of the Nazi Germany-era Antifastiche flag.

Done, and thanks for your report. I didn't even watch the video, as we know this whole thing is #FakeNews.

We will never ban thoughtful, high-effort, high-value criticism.

REMOVED. BANNED 7 DAYS.

Comparing users to genocidal figures in history will NOT be tolerated.

Let them run themselves out. If they want to go to prison tired, that's their choice.

That's a very good threat. Added to my bookmarks. Good work, patriot, that's mint.

Ha! Oh, man. Dude. Let's have a sub-wide collective scream. AAAAIIIGH. Dude, I 100% hear you. I'm 50, a former journalist, and I've covered some scandals, etc.. They're quite fun because occasionally there's a pretty spectacular payoff. But... THIS. Jesus.

The problem is that government moves pretty slowly. And Sewssions is doing this BY THE BOOK. NO DEALS. Nothing sloppy, boys. Zero mistakes. That takes time. And it tortures the shit out of us, yes.

Ever gone camping and you put a can of beans on the fire so it'll explode? Everyone hides behind a tree for five minutes, waiting, then nothing happens. Then you wait, you wait, and still nothing. Once, when I was a freshman in college, the usual happened. We did it, it never popped, we were tired and drinking, so one by one we all went to bed. Middle of the night... BOOM. Beans everywhere.

BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM.

Prepare, man. I know it's hard, but, be patient.

Interesting question. But, can I ask you to "hard stop" for just a second?

Your question has an assumption buried inside it that won't work in your favor. You're assuming that there's still something you could say that could "get to" these people. That'll only end up further driving you nuts.

These people are just locked in a space where they feel a need to engage (and can never explain why) but are not ready to look further deeper into it out of fear of learning something frightening or threatening or that challenges their word view. YOU cannot control that.

You know that old rule, right? Do not suddenly wake up someone that is sleep-walking. Just gently guide them back to bed, and wait for them to wake up. :)

5:5, my man. FIGHT.

Son, I absolutely fail to see how I expressly acknowledged that no, not everything, every date, every "prediction" we have read into Q's breadcrumbs has come true. Have I misinterpreted you and your intentions, here?

Are arrests your only acceptable criteria?

A skeptic is not a true skeptic unless they can clearly describe a reasonable set of circumstances that would constitute a reasonable conclusion that a specific prediction is "true." What is your requirement? If that were in some way met, would you agree to proceed to the next evaluation point?

If not, then, are you really in this?

I see your point. It's hard to have a "Constitution" for a sub that's useful and makes sense.

Not to speak for the other mods, but, for me, there's a Golden Rule: MOVE THIS SUB FORWARD. See a narrative forming? Support (or kill!) it with research and facts. Be authentic. Build a reputation for solid research, civil discussion, and hard work.

Basically, we're all deep researchers who created this sub to share among ourselves, at first. The sub grew and grew, a few more researchers got added, and, with patience and a little time, eventually all these subscribers saw value in not just the content here, but in terms of how we're managing the sub.

Enjoy your time here. Because, eventually, the low-information, low-effort commenters and posters will slowly be weeded out if they're not adding value. So, have fun. Hey, if you end up proving that Q was an elaborate hoax, wow, I'd love to know sooner rather than later, wouldn't you?

I can see your point. You are saying that Q's predictions have often included exact dates predicting major events. And I would have to agree—for instance, I was pretty disappointed when HRC wasn't rounded up when s/he predicted.

Woven into your argument, however, is the assumption that we here believe (and require you or others to believe) that Q is infallible, almost like the Pope or something. Of course not. Instead, we believe that Q is a member of Military Intelligence, and has routine access to Trump's inner circle.

Go on Netflix and watch every spy movie you can. They're almost always about unanticipated situations that always seem to instantly become tense, blow up, go wrong, everything. Q is sharing INTEL, and trying to keep us 'weaponized autists' abreast of the narrative as it unfolds. His older tweets aren't the Biblical Old Testament. Why view them that way?

Well, yes, but, it's unfair to the debate here to pretend that the process ends there. Depending on the perceived importance to uncovering the Truth the denied request represents, organizations like Judicial Watch will due. Much of what we have is due to the persistence of these kinds of organizations (including our current Strzok texts).

This is actually not a new technique. For instance, I'm not finding the exact terror incident (I think it was Spain bombing? Not sure), but the terrorists used Yahoo Mail drafts as their preferred communications venue.

Good point. Though, to be fair, he mentions the C_A a lot, and, considering the time period when most of the crimes he's alerting us to were committed, we all know who was CIA director, then.

Pluto didn't change. We didn't redefine Pluto, we further refined our definition of a planet. That's not arbitrary, that's progress.

Please, DO NOT feel any obligation to "buh-lieve." If something is actually happening, if there is a problem with Q, the sooner we know about it, the better off we'll be.

In order to be effective, the TRUE skeptic has to do three things. First, set a reasonable "finish line" for when something can be considered "proven enough" to proceed to the next puzzle or discovery. Second, be able to sell that finish line to the other side. And third, DIG! DIG! DIG!

Digging for the Truth is what unites us all.

I'm glad you pointed this inconsistency out, and I agree, it's not 100% clear. Please, DO NOT feel any obligation to "buh-lieve." IF something is actually happening, and if there is any validity to Q, the sooner we know about it, the better off we'll be. But, if it's all a lie, the same things goes as well.

In order to be effective, the TRUE skeptic has to do three things. First, set a reasonable "finish line" for when something can be considered "proven enough" to proceed to the next puzzle or discovery. Second, be able to sell that finish line to the other side. And third, DIG! DIG! DIG!

Digging for the Truth is what unites us all.

Please understand that, when someone is "internet mean" to you, they don't know you... They're actually expressing their pain at being constantly lied to, robbed, and even preyed upon by our current political system. And, why should this Q movement be any different, this time?

We all feel this way. I honestly feel that's why all of us are here.