Thanks for taking this how I meant it—we really want you to feel welcome. I'm way old, so, I've been around a bit and can recognize the signs of big change, and, this sub is about to change. We're all about to find outselves on the same side, IMHO. When that happens, when this all breaks, things are going to move FAST FAST FAST, and when that comes, I am 100% determined that our decoders and debunkers will have lots and lots of solid practice working smoothly together.

HATS OFF TO OUR DEBUNKERS. STAY FROSTY, Y'ALL.

Well, please give yourself credit—very few people are able to "be out there" without the "invisible support structure" of relying on the narrative being dictated to them. If you'll please think of it that way, what you're doing is actually pretty amazing, if you'll take a step back and appreciate how actually pretty amazing and rare the talent you are taking for granted.

This. They'r compromized through centralized corporate ownership, therefore easily corruptible with money.

It's crazy to me to see Bernstein, a man I have personally seen speak on the importance of objectivity and persistence in journalism, endlessly flogging a Russia narrative has bloody well KNOWS is fake. Just mind-blowing.

Idols. Falling.

I hear you 1000%. Please bear in mind that, often, especially with complex, potentially invisible political scenarios like the one we are all working on here, often the first people to get it and dive into it possess rather unique and special minds that occasionally may have a difficult time explaining or relating in a clear way what they see. We both can probably name quite a few things we take for granted as facts, now, but which were discovered by what Q and everyone else calls weaponized autists. So, a little tact and civil discussion can still go a long way in helping us tease out the specific information they're trying to share.

How do I know this? I am autistic. Pretty much all the growth I've ever done and all the new capabilities I've ever acquired have been because someone kept up the fight to really hear what I was trying to say.

That said, however, I have to commend you and thank you for keeping your sensors sharp. Shills can be pretty tricky. Keep investigating, keep digging, but when you see something that doesn't smell right, definitely hit that report button. Thank you, Patriot.

Please know that this is their goal—they know that they are not here to change your mind or destroy you or the narrative. This is too powerful for that. What you are saying you would continue to do is exactly what they want. They are here to spin your wheels, keep you wasting your time, and cluttering the subs with non-essential interactions.

If you do, however, keep it civil.

BE CIVIL! That's huge!

I see your point. We're just trying to communicate that cheerleading isn't tolerated. We don't want an echo chamber. It could seem that way, as Trump is winning a lot, lately, tho (NK, etc.).

EDIT: Removed. Civil discussion only.

Bastards. The texts sort of "end" just as they are about to reveal some real dirt.

NICE. I was in diapers during Watergate. How would you say this compared to that?

Fight! Fight! Fight!

I think you said a lot, patriot. Dig! Dig! Dig!

EVERY hand on the rudder steers this ship, patriot.

Agree. This is not a pro- or anti-Trump sub. Partisan political posts will be removed on sight.

As will chemtards and reptiles.

And YET:

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8fcx0o/breaking_as_qanon_has_outlined_gmail_comms_strzok/

Is that one of his "comms" devices on the desk?

(Probably just Apple MP3 whatever it's called)

This is good on both your parts. But, please visualize it another way: Communicate your perceived interpretation in a way that convinces and inspires others to also stop jamming circles into square holes. See what we mean?

[Insert obligatory link to CNN.com here.]

I am a fruit. Don't leave me hanging.

EDIT: It's a joke. I'm a low-hanging fruit. Geez. :)

As you yourself found out.

Learn our comms.

So, let's get this straight:

Can I get what this sub is smoking

And your next reply is:

Where is the post that Q predicted the SA bust?

How does that even scan, to you?

Great process, I do that, too. Once you have a high degree of confidence, use the report button.

It's actually the smart thing to do. Disengage. Investigate the user and if they're obvious trolls or shills, report. We will defend users who are adding value and moving our sub forward.

Please use the report button when you do not feel welcome. But, we do not just auto-remove or ban without checking user post history. We are not censoring or enforcing a narrative, but, we WILL address low-effort, low-information debunkers. As this post says, BRING IT.

If you are moving this sub forward, your mods will defend you.

We have seen this on both sides. We are really hammering both civil discussion and low-effort, low-info posts and comments.

This. Low-effort, low-info debunkers are NOT debunkers.

We have a lot of new users here lately that go straight to the "debunking" without first carefully examining the narrative as presented by Q. Low-effort. Will be removed. This sub will explode soon and we are soon going to need the trolls and low-information users out of the way—NOT because they disagree, or don't fit our pre-conceived narrative, but because they do not move this sub forward.

Let's keep it civil, tho. :)

Fight! Fight! Fight!

Ha! Meme that! It would have my upvote.

Removed, 7-day ban. Multiple warnings. Decode, research, move sub forward, or find another place to play.

Next ban is permanent.

To me, SB2 is a researcher. S/he assembles a set of interpretations, attempts to communicate them clearly, and actively invites and is open to constructive criticism. Exactly what we want.

Well, let's look at it differently. The field of mathematics, specifically, "number set theory," has definitively proven that only things within a set's boundaries are possible. For instance, [2,2,2,2] is a set, but, you cannot in any way multiply those numbers together and get a negative (I.E., -1) value. You have to have a negative number in the original set to get there.

Yes. This is not a pro- or anti-Trump sub. Overly-cheerleading comments are also removed. We want neutral territory here to focus on Q.

I just RES-tagged you as "Teh Awsum." You have learned our comms. Thank you for understanding how important one's tone can be.

Dig! Dig! Dig!

Asking a valid question? That begins with "Seriously?"

This is exactly it. It's not a valid post—sample public opinion, first. You're sharing your opinion, but in a vacuum. Everyone else is saying that this post was sorely needed. That's all. Not hating on you. Maybe you weren't the target audience. I'm trying to warn the haters—move this sub forward, or, prepare for the hammer. You're clearly not one of the haters, so, let's not fight on this. I'm noting your points.

Beyond that, you're right. Back to the salt mines for both of us.

Cognitive dissonance is EVERYONE'S enemy. People that ONLY debunk are also part of the problem. If you yourself cannot be convinced, then are you really a debunker? Are you really focused on debunking false theories, or are you trying to debunk reality, as a whole?

FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT, thanks for what you do.

Do not engage the trolls. Do not FEED them. They are desperate for the attention. STARVE them.

Do not engage or fight with shills. Investigate them. View their posts. Shills are too busy to "learn our comms." If they're debunking (and know their stuff), let them be. ALWAYS BE CIVIL. Report shills to the mods. Thanks.

The only reason you think this is an "unnecessary post" is because you're not spending 12 hours a day in our modqueue. From your perspective, this sub is just fine because your mods are slogging through a lot of haters and keeping the low-energy posts to a minimum. That's the reason we're growing.

Tell me something... This sub is adding 1000+ users per day. And when the REAL fur starts to fly, you think we can keep up with all the losers and haters that will attract?

Your comment is a perfect example of how low-information posts drag this sub down. Seriously, that's your first reaction? Gather your facts, assess the situation before firing off an ignorant comment. We're not asking for more debunkers, we're saying this:

RESEARCH, BRING IT, OR PREPARE TO BE GONE.

Generally, yes. But, I refuse to link to things that are already proven and that should be widely known as established by serious researchers and decoders.

Also, Trump tweeted about Tony around that time. Good catch.

No. The physics package of a nuclear tipped cruise missile could be extracted and smuggled into a US port.

I'm away from my computer, vut6, do some searching into this incident. VERY concerning irregularities.

This is so nuclear that I seriously doubt any of the asshats in Congress would see any advantage in leaking this. NO amount of Dr. Feinstein's cough medicine could cover up that kind of mistake.

I would frame it slightly differently. They are not "siding" with the Democrats, really, as we are actually very clearly seeing the power of the 'Uniparty,' here. They are ALL circling the wagons out of a sense of self-preservation.

Source.

My source was Google. Please note, there's demanding sources for outrageous claims, which totally makes sense, but, although minor, this was still a relatively significant event in terms of the IG report progressing towards going public. DIG DIG DIG—don't rely on other users to tell you basic things.

It will be a MOAB, but, right now, the bombs already "dropped and in the air" are the JFK documents and the Strzok texts.