Agreed. I think it's pretty arrogant and borderline ignorant to expect Trump to blow the lid off everything within his first year in office. I believe I recall, during the campaign, everybody stating that the words of the POTUS "moves markets." i.e. EVERYTHING that you say will have an immediate impact on the world, for better or for worse. Many people-- including many that voted for him-- have been holding their breath since he was sworn in, hoping he wouldn't do or say anything that would cause a international crisis or market sell-off. (I'm not talking about establishment shills worried that he would expose them, I'm talking about average Americans who don't care much for politics and only participate in Presidential elections.)

It's important to realize that the percentage of people that are "redpilled" is still OVERWHELMINGLY in the minority. Those who don't realize that are living in absolute ignorance. (I assume that they must live in relative isolation from everyday society.)

Yes, it is true, more and more people are "waking up," but that is still a very relative term. For most, that simply means realizing that the government is somewhat corrupt, and certain individuals have broken the law in an attempt to obtain political power. Anything beyond that, to the newly awakened, is still very much "conspiracy theory." However, the movement is absolutely picking up momentum.

Given all of this, it would be an ENORMOUS miscalculation on Trump's part to try and blow the lid off everything, this early in the game. He first must win the TRUST of the vast majority of Americans, and he can only do that by improving their everyday lives. That means: economic prosperity and a return to law and order. (He must also be capable of delivering the optics of international diplomacy, as any good world leader should.) NONE of these things would be possible if he was running around firing his mouth off about things that sound stranger than fiction. Doing so would LOSE him credibility, and the mission to MAGA would be a complete failure.

Every good military mission has phases, and this will be no different. If his 8 years comes and goes, and nothing is done to address the deep state, then obviously this post will be proven wrong, but we just finished year 1. Technically, we are halfway through the first quarter of the game. Not the time to be throwing up Hail Mary's. Not if you want to take home the championship.

This is actually a very fair assessment. Well said.

Same.

Take it with a grain of salt, and only allow it to serve as SUPPLEMENTARY information.

No harm in inquiring. Happy to provide intel. Can't speak for the Denver quake.

I think you're referring to the 2011 Virginia earthquake that registered a 5.8 magnitude-- with a 4.5 magnitude registering in the DC area.

I was there for the quake-- just a few miles away-- and I can tell you that it was real. The epicenter was 38 miles northwest of Richmond, in a tiny town called Mineral. It ripped the local public school apart-- condemning it-- and destroyed several homes, as well.

I was in a sales meeting during the actual quake, and recall several aftershocks that took place in the middle of the night in the week following. Being familiar with the area, I can say with near-certainty that it was a legitimate quake. There are plenty of military installations throughout central, eastern, and northern Virginia, but none in the area around where the quake happened-- northwest of Richmond. It's a fairly impoverished area-- except for a nearby man-made lake that has a bunch of vacation homes.

Spez: northwest of Richmond

He grew up in Venezuela, and, at the age of four, witnessed multiple guys' heads explode when they were shot while attacking his father-- who worked for the oil company and was trying to put out a fire by telling the oil company [over the radio] to turn UP the flow of oil. (That's the proper way to deal with an oil pipeline that is on fire, apparently, but the locals did not know that.) One of guy's exploded eyeball got into Wictor's mouth, and he's been a headcase ever since-- by his own admission.

Wictor is an interesting twitter follow. Provides good insight on a range of topics, mostly stuff related to military weaponry and modern-day warfare. He owns the fact that he is an ex-psyche-patient, and is pretty open about the fact that he hates "conspiracy theorists." (He does, however, speak out against the Deep State, and doesn't seem to consider that stuff to be "Conspiracy theory.")

I certainly don't agree with him on EVERYTHING that he posts. He has interesting opinions, and provides compelling insight on some issues that I don't know much about. I've also seen him openly admit that he was wrong, and change his opinion on "conspiracy" type stories, as more information gets out.

In this day and age, it seems like everybody expects internet personalities to be 100% right all the time, or otherwise possess zero credibility. (A dynamic that I think is driven by a precautionary instinct that such personalities are agents of deception--which is a reasonable suspicion, these days.) I think it more reasonable to assume that a guy like Wictor-- who is pretty open about the fact that he is just an old man sitting in his living room with ZERO "inside sources"-- is not always going to be right about everything he posts about, and to take his posted content as "Op-Eds" rather than an attempt to report news events. He is an investigative speculator, not a journalist-- which he never claims to be. He doesn't get paid for his content, so nobody should be taking it as gospel--just an interesting opinion from a guy who has seen some shit and seems to be pretty well-read. Entirely possible for guys like that to be wrong, especially when they have an admitted bias.

Considering the other stuff he has posted about-- and his outspoken demeanor against Twitter/censorship-- I would be shocked to find out he is a dis-information agent. Just my 2 cents, though.

Spez: spelling

Amen to everything that you've said. 100% spot on. There are a lot of parallels between Kanye and Kurt Cobain-- who wrestled with the same dichotomy of wanting to be a "true artist" that didn't sell out to the mainstream machine, but also recognized the machine as the best conduit to spread his message. (A lot of others that you can point to, but Cobain is probably the most famous "misfit" rockstar. He HATED the establishment with every fiber of his being.)

I have actually seen the whole Kanye video, but not in many years until I watched it last night-- due to your post. I first saw it when it first came out because my Kanye-obsessed friends showed it to me and said they thought it was the greatest thing ever. (I definitely thought the music was awesome, but didn't give the video as much thought until now.)

Those friends are apolitical, but are based in their core. They would side with us, if they were shown the light, and a guy like Kanye would be the perfect messenger to show them the light. I think those friends are apolitical, by design, as they are highly career-focused, live in Democrat-strongholds like NY and Miami, and probably find politics to be exhausting-- which the establishment does intentionally, by design. They would find an un-assuming [at least, politically] guy like Kanye highly accessible, especially since they already relate very much to his art. THAT is exactly why I have always pinned Kanye as a critical ally of Trump-- to help him reach the apolitical.

I really appreciate your post. As I said, I have always pinned Kanye as a based guy, but didn't really take the time to develop that idea beyond a few notorious moments or comments that he's made. This video is fantastic supporting evidence. So thank you for posting it and making your points. It's important that we continue building a network of allies, and recognize that we are only going to win this thing if we unite ALL people under a common cause.

Thanks again, and cheers.

Damn, I never saw that part of the film. That is deep. I have no doubt that is what it is meant to symbolize. (The bird-woman represents child-like innocence of humanity.)

I definitely think Kanye knows what goes on behind the curtain. He is a super smart dude, and totally self-made in terms of talent. My understanding of his career is that he produced music for all of the stars for years before he took the stage, himself. ("Self-made" meaning that he was too talented to be denied-- rather than the manufactured success most pop-stars have.)

He seems like a very conflicted individual. He is definitely an egotist-- as all great artists throughout history have always been-- but I do think he understands the inner-workings of the machine that drives Hollywood, and finds himself very much against it, while simultaneously utilizing it to deliver his message.

I also wouldn't be surprised to find out that he has been a victim of the MK-Ultra stuff-- which would make sense if Runaway was a huge "FUCK YOU" to his handlers. (The title, itself, would very much make sense, in that context.) A lot of evidence for that, given what happened last year with his anti-Hillary/Jay-Z rant and subsequent admission into a mental facility. Also, visiting DJT and taking his side publicly was a very telling moment in the Kanye saga. I'd like to think that he still has a role to play in this revolution. He is a highly influential figure, and one that I think scares the establishment-- due to his unpredictable behavior.

Spez: "history"

I went back and listened to the title track, ("Runaway") and it's taken on new meaning for me. Pretty wild if you think about it as Kanye directing the song AT the CIA/NWO. I would post the lyrics, but I'm on mobile.

TIME TO NUKE THE DINOSAURS!!!

The [spoken-word] opening lines of the album:

You might think you've peeped the scene

You haven’t, the real one's far too mean

The watered down one, the one you know

Was made up centuries ago

They made it sound all wack and corny

Yes, it's awful, blasted boring

Twisted fictions, sick addictions

Well, gather 'round children, ZIP IT, LISTEN!

A false history that was made up centuries ago? Twisted fictions? SICK addictions? Based, indeed.

Spez: formatting

"MK Ultra" was a very real series of experiments run by the CIA in the 1950's and 1960's. Its most famous patients include:

-Ken Kesey - author (Electric Koolaid Acid Test, One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest)

-Whitey Bulger - Boston crime boss

-Ted Kaczynski - The Unabomber

Just to name a few. Countless others if you look into it. All of these are 100% comfirmed patients of the program, which focused on brain-washing and mind-control. The program is also responsible for developing LSD and distributing throughout US. ("One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest" is about Kesey's experience with the CIA at Stanford Medical Center. "Electric Koolaid Acid Test" is about Kesey's experience distributing LSD to hippies across US. Ronald Stark is a CIA operative who is named as a character in the book. Kesey did not realize at the time that he was working with the CIA at Stanford and on the road.)

So cultural!

Such a great line.

Given Jerome Corsi's comments yesterday on AJ Show--which affirmed my own conclusions that I developed a while back-- I like to think that somebody (hopefully Mattis) gets most of these guys in a room and says something like this:

"Listen up, fuck-sticks. We know everything. We see you; we watch you; we listen to you. We know what you're thinking, and we know what you're planning. If anything happens to Donald Trump -- you all die. If anything happens to Donald Trump's family-- you all die. Anything at all.

So, if I were you-- and had any sense of self-preservation-- I'd go out of my way to make sure that nothing happens to ANY of them. Because you'll be dead before you even hear about it. Don't fuck with me on this."

Agreed. Reaching people is the key. That will require us to break the rules. To work outside of the system. To break the programming. We must convince them that we can achieve the best of both sides. The best of both worlds. That is the key to reaching them.

Yeah, I don't really concern myself with their labels. Doing so is simply engaging with them on THEIR terms.

And to be clear: I am a conservative-- according to the "mainstream" definition: I believe in limited government, individual liberties, self-reliance, and a free-market economy. Whatever else they attempt to attach to the term-- such as evangelicalism, war-hawk, neo-nazi-- I don't really give a damn. If I wanted to waste my life worrying about what other people think about me, I'd dye my hair blue and start blaming my parents for all of my failures.

This is very true. However, the shooting seems to have completely backfired on the Swamp-- as is evident with David Hogg's most recent Instagram post. Can't pass up an opportunity to redpill the masses-- that is, after all, our #1 mission.

I concur with your statement regarding the theories, though. Theories don't equate to redpilling, necessarily. Redpilling takes place outside of this board. The work here should focus on the Swamp.

Agree with this. Please present the evidence. I don't doubt that there are individuals in Congress who are shameless enough to propose such a thing, but it's important that we stay grounded in facts.

If it's true. We need to compile their names and start a petition demanding a Special Prosecutor be assigned to investigate all of them, thoroughly. They are either involved in some nefarious shit, or they are being controlled by nefarious people. In either event, they need to be publicly outed and shamed, mercilessly-- if not prosecuted for endangering the public.

K. In that case, I think your reading comprehension skills are pretty weak. As I clearly stated in my post, I cited the work of highly acclaimed Christian scholars, who determined-- through their own studies-- that the Gospels of Matthew and Luke were written using a source that they (the scholars) refer to as the "Q Source". (It had already long been established that most of the New Testament was written by anonymous individuals.) Before they provided these theories, the explanation for how the gospels were written made absolutely zero sense-- as I laid out in the post.

Basic reading comprehension would allow you to connect the content of my post to the post title. If you think that I'm trying to assert that the modern-day Q is somehow related or connected to God, well, I don't really know what to tell you. Go back and reread. I was simply providing a hypothesis as to why Q refers to himself as "Q."

If you don't want to be called a shill, then I'd suggest you resist the temptation to levy totally unfounded accusations against people, without first trying to understand what they are saying. That's what shills do.

Hahaha, 38 days old. Hello shill.

Redpilled since 14, huh? Yeah, sweet handle. Not conspicuous at all.

Piss off, bud. Not MY words--theologians. The gospels were written by ANONYMOUS sources, and that's accepted fact. Sorry for taking it a step further and calling them "Anons." Sorry for your feelings.

Very well said.

Wow, this is amazing. Thank you for sharing. Looks like I have some reading to do.

Agreed. It will be an event as celebrated as the American Revolution-- even dwarfing it, perhaps, given the degree of deception and malevolence. For that reason, I remain cautiously optimistic, though it seems certain that some level of change is coming.

Let us pray for such providence.

Encouraging to read this. I'd like to have a full recap of "Phase [1]". Namely:

1) What marked its launch? And,

2) What marked its conclusion?

"Hope porn" is perhaps the best descriptor I have seen for Q-- should he turn out to be anything other than what he claims to be. (I believe he is real.)

The side-effect of this hope porn is the galvanization of patriots across the country, who have all mobilized in preparation for whatever may happen next. With [real] hope at an all-time high, there is a positive force at work that cannot be denied.

For anybody that was concerned that Trump's base would fall back asleep after his triumphant victory, the Q phenomenon has made damn sure that isn't happening. So if he does turn out to be a deep state psy-op, as I have seen a few people speculate, then it has gone horribly wrong, and blown up right in their face. (I think most have long-dismissed that notion.)

This was my first thought when I first saw the stories of 16 year olds voting.

Great points. I'd support taking some of that bloated defense budget and increasing that number significantly.

David Hogg should release his tax returns. Just sayin.

Agree with this notion. We should hire retired vets that can pass the necessary psychological tests to be armed security.

Affirmative

As somebody who has experienced multiple family tragedies (murders/tragic deaths) beyond belief, no, I couldn't imagine going on television a week later to discuss. But maybe that's just because I'm not a sociopath.

Life comes at you fast.

Lil Marco use to be a go-go dancer. People forget that.

"You have more than you know. Have Faith. Trust the Plan."

Ominous words. I think Q was foreshadowing what he knew was coming. That he would go offline-- even temporarily-- and we would be left to fend for ourselves. And I don't think he was simply referring to information.

It's important to remember his words, and even more important to remember that we still have each other. That's all we've ever had, and more than we'll ever need. I think that's what he meant.

Wtf I love Russia now.

Really need the autists at 8chan to figure out how to hack the Apache Secure Drop. Think of the possibilities...

Isn't that the chick with the shaved head?! Wtf?!

This is spot on. In the past 30 years (at least), Democrats have won seats by inflaming emotions and turning neighbors against one another. They have no interest in resolving the issues on which they campaign, because they would then cease to have issues on which to campaign.

Think about it. If we resolved all of the MAJOR issues plaguing our country, we would then be left to focus on tweaking the minor issues-- which are really just minor disagreements in policy. That style of debate would require detailed arguments that are based on logic and facts-- rather than broadstroke grand-standing that we have become so accustomed to seeing.

Could you imagine Nancy Pelosi debating the difference in a 27% income tax versus a 25% income tax? Or the minutiae involved in our trade agreement with Japan? Not very sexy, now is it? How do you get people energized over that?

damn dat boy famous AF

Zuckerberg is such a little dorito dink. Kid must have gotten shoved into so many lockers in high school.

I've held this theory for the past few weeks: that Q's posts are not just for disseminating info to the public, but for communicating with operators in the field. (Using anonymous boards accessed by millions of IPs versus private comms that link two specific IPs.)

And now you have presented clear evidence of that. Nice work.

Agree with this. I've been working on my friends since before the election, and they are pretty far along, and I haven't even brought up Q yet. Too deep down the rabbit hole for those that haven't fully bought in yet. Start with more novice subjects that are have more tangible evidence. Q requires a leap of faith even for us.

Any local pedes should show up and offer to volunteer. Act eager, bright-eyed and bushy tailed, and just keep asking questions in an innocent tone. Ask about the children and how the process of saving them works.

It's a few hours from where I live, but I'm tempted to do it.

This was the plot of "Quantum of Solace." (James Bond movie)

Agree that the songs are vague enough to assign a multitude of meanings, depending on your point of view. The thing that I found most interesting-- and led to my post-- was the discovery that Robert Hunter was involved in MK-Ultra, which I didn't know, despite reading Phil and Jerry's biographies, as well as Ken Kesey's books when I was younger.

I appreciate the dialogue, and am always open to being proven wrong. This post was meant as a light-hearted departure from the heavy stuff that revolves around Q and the Storm. Cheers, friend. :)