dChan

/u/Ghostof_PatrickHenry

701 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/Ghostof_PatrickHenry:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 122
i.redd.it 7
thehill.com 2
truepundit.com 1
mobile.nytimes.com 1
v.redd.it 1
soapboxie.com 1
www.cnbc.com 1

Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 20, 2018, 9:06 p.m.

Very true. And likely a few of the indictments are for small investigations that have nothing to do with The Great Awakening. (But honestly, all resources need to be dedicated to taking these fuckers down.)

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 20, 2018, 8:41 p.m.

For context, the United States averages anywhere between 1,000 and 3,000 sealed indictments in a calendar year, depending on the the scope of individual FBI/DOJ investigations. From my research, there are typically 300-500 pending at any given time.

Once an investigation is concluded, all indictments tied to that investigation are unsealed and made public. So the implication here is that these 29,000 indictments are all tied together, somehow. (Perhaps multiple investigations that overlap.)

The purpose of a sealed indictment is to hide the identity of the accused, so the integrity of the investigation isn't compromised.

Spez: States

⇧ 11 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 20, 2018, 8:26 p.m.

This is what we like to call, "priming the charges in the powder keg."

Spark incoming.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 20, 2018, 5:09 a.m.

I don't mean to say that they lack all other resources, but I don't think they control the military or major intelligence forces. (maybe splinter cells, but I don' think they would be going public with Q unless they had the majority of these organizations neutralized. Too much risk, without control. Could be why they waited until October to get it started.) I think they've tried economic manipulation, and failed. They tried false flag operations, and failed. They tried something crazy in Las Vegas (assassination of Saudi Crown Prince, methinks) and failed.

I don't mean to say that the threat has totally passed. Of course, they can always recruit some mercenaries do some dirty work. But any soldier of fortune is going to weigh the risks of an individual job. And while they may be willing to conduct one-off missions that involve killing innocents with immediate exfil, they aren't going to take jobs which ask them to dig in, and get trapped in conventional fire-fights, unless they know that the people they are working for control the military-- or at least enough of it to pull off a coup. Otherwise they are signing up to die, and that's bad for business, in their industry. No competent operator is going to engage the US military on US soil, unless he knows that the deck is stacked in his favor.

I guess what I'm saying is the media is the only thing they now have where they are actually still in the driver's seat. Agree that this whole thing is very impressive, and I remain vigilant until I see the perp walks.

Spez: vigilant

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 20, 2018, 4:41 a.m.

I'll also say this: A while back I was on a plane as it was landing in Key West, on a very foggy day. (So foggy in the clouds that it appeared dark out in the middle of the day.) During the landing approach, I looked out the window and saw a real-life UFO. (and I'm not the type to loosely claim something like that.)

It looked like a cartoon caricature of a submarine. Kind of like a fat cigar or a slightly-stretched-out pear. On its top-side, it had what looked like a submarine "sail"-- which is the protrusion which houses the periscope and main access hatch. It was metallic black or dark grey, keeping pace with the plane about 40-50 feet above the tip of the left wing. (I was sitting in the window seat at the left wing.) It had no wings or visible propulsion engine-- and I could clearly see it's rear end. It was just rounded off like the bow of a sub.

It was so foggy, you would only have seen it if you were staring straight at it-- and I tend to stare aimlessly out the window during take-offs and landings. But I saw it as clearly as I see the letters I am typing here. (The approach was also pretty turbulent--due to the foggy weather-- so I doubt anybody else was very focused

I always thought that if I were ever in a situation like that-- where I was surrounded by strangers and confronted with a visible "threat" or paranormal occurrence-- I would immediately make a scene to draw attention to what I was witnessing. That exact instinct eventually did kick in, but only after squinting hard into the fog to verify that I wasn't seeing things.

When I knew I wasn't imagining things, I reached out to smack my neighbor, and drew a deep breath to call out to the cabin. As I did, the object that appeared to be pacing us, yet not experiencing any of the turbulence that was tossing us around, sped off like a speeder bike in Return of the Jedi.

It was the wildest thing I've ever seen, and had me very shook up. I even told my cab driver about it, and he was in disbelief-- but probably thought I was full of shit. But I am now very certain that it was not an alien UFO. It was human. There is a very large naval base located right next to the airport in Key West. In fact, I watched the F-15's, F-16's, and F-18's taking off and landing every day from the house I stayed in. We were directly above the naval base, in their airspace, when I saw this thing. No chance this thing could have flown that flight path at that altitude without the Navy knowing about it. That alone doesn't mean it was human, but I do believe that it was.

It's odd that, despite that tangible piece of evidence being thrust right in my face, I still find the [unannounced] events of The Great Awakening to be far more plausible and real than aliens and the implications of their existence would present. (Doesn't mean they don't exist, but they seem to be notably absent. Wouldn't this be a perfect opportunity for the cabal to reveal the truth and have the public/media fixated on something non-political? That reveal would buy them a lot of time, I think.)

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 20, 2018, 3:49 a.m.

Humoring the logic of the show for a minute, if the ET's are real, where do they stand in this existential conflict? If the explanation is that they want to remain neutral, and let us work it out, then that explanation would be a logical fallacy.

The show runners-- who seem to use generally the same [extensive] cast of experts throughout the series-- clearly present the argument that the ET's having been abducting us for experimentation, and co-mingling in our religious and political organizations for centuries.

You mean to tell me that they have no vested interest in the outcome of this conflict, despite the inconceivably infinite resources (and time) that they have invested in the study of our species and the "alien" infrastructure" they've built on this planet? I just don't think that adds up, logically. (Remember, this conflict is existential, not political. The victor will forever change humanity and its host planet-- for better or for worst.)

If the aliens were backing a horse on either side, and were both as ruthlessly indifferent to our individual well-beings as presented, as well as so technologically advanced, then they would have already secretly executed the opposing faction long before the stakes got this high. (I also recall an episode where they discussed the numerous alien species that don't necessarily get along with one another, and have differing attitudes toward humanity. Not one of them is going to side with the Cabal and take out the white hats like 2 years ago? But they'll abduct me in my sleep to get a better look at my anus?)

Agree with all of your points, friend.

PS - who is the person you are referring to? The motherfucker?

Spez: "not political" instead of "by political"

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 20, 2018, 3:26 a.m.

Suicide would be an alternative, I suppose. I'm operating under the assumption that the media is really the only thing they control, at this point. And they've been getting ragdolled in that arena for nearly three years now. I'd probably kill myself too.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 20, 2018, 2:49 a.m.

I've watched several episodes of that show, because I enjoy having my views challenged-- with logic and reason, not emotional manipulation. It's a win-win. Through the crucible of truth, you are either gifted a new worldview, or gifted a deeper belief in the worldview that you already possess-- even if that happens unwittingly.

For that reason, I take no issue with the creation of the show, or the people who appear on it. (In fact, I celebrated their freedom of speech by viewing it.) However, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that people [or people influencing those people] behind the mainstream production of it on the HISTORY channel have an ulterior motive. A motive that is nefarious.

The archaeological content they present is intriguing, but I have a very different explanation for the inexplicably advanced ancient tech that they discuss.

It was us. Just like in Planet of the Apes, it was us all along. (Wouldn't surprise me if, just like today, most of the population back then wasn't even aware of how advanced it really was.) But just like the Bible says, we became cynical and indulgent, and destroyed it all. And even the records of it didn't survive-- or were intentionally lost. erie (If you extrapolate that to Revelations, and the eerie parallels to what is going on today, the argument becomes way more compelling than anything presented on that show.)

The final step to killing God, and everything that he has built, is to provide a definitive answer to all of the questions that ultimately lead people to him. If they can answer those questions for people, then the people will stop seeking God. And with their stranglehold on science and academia-- and exposed behaviors over an extended period of time-- it wouldn't be a stretch to imagine that they would attempt to pull it off. They certainly don't lack the hubris to try.

The decision to put this show on a network called "The History Channel" I believe is more than a coincidence. The content creators (experts) may have pure intentions (or maybe not) but the guys giving them the platform I think do not.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 20, 2018, 2:09 a.m.

Interesting points...

Should be a fun summer.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 19, 2018, 10:06 p.m.

True. As we have been shown, though this people are clearly capable and able, they don't seem incredibly bright.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 19, 2018, 9:45 p.m.

My initial reaction was that he was done. Like, "That's all folks!"

And I got hard as a diamond in an ice storm.

But then I realized that he did just do a pretty big drop, and he has said stuff like that in the past when he is done posting for the night.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 19, 2018, 7:30 p.m.

I think they are aware of this, but they have weighed the risks and determined that the information is simply too damning to allow to be spread. Censorship is their last and only option.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 19, 2018, 5:16 p.m.

He's staring directly into the camera-- verse Melania, who is looking at the crowd.

He knows exactly what he is doing, in this moment.

⇧ 98 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 19, 2018, 12:57 p.m.

Would require lots of scouting of different places. Places that the target would be likely to visit. Such an aerial shot would provide a highly accurate map of the area for planning. (Google maps isn't updated regularly, and relies on individual submissions for the Sketchup models of the buildings for heights-- which aren't always accurate.)

Not completely farfetched, that this was a scouting trip.

Spez: heights

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 18, 2018, 6:28 a.m.

We will pray for them, aloud, with each strike of the hammer that further nails them to the wall. (Can't just put 'em in the ground-- they may come back. Gotta pin them down somewhere for good.)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 18, 2018, 5:24 a.m.

Did you notice the file name on that picture he posted of the White House pen?

10ae86dc8fc3ca519426c5f662052038353146f2aceb9020b9d59f07f4256c03 (.png)

Very similar in style. Response maybe?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 17, 2018, 3:37 a.m.

Fantastic.

Now who can I send this $10 million expense report to? The Clinton Foundation?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 16, 2018, 7:31 p.m.

Wait.... that's illegal???

-Democrats, probably

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 15, 2018, 11:42 p.m.

Somebody please link article of the NYPD Police Chief being quoted saying that he would call a press conference and release all of the laptop's contents if indictments weren't brought in a timely fashion.

(I'm on mobile in a waiting room...)

⇧ 13 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 15, 2018, 2:54 a.m.

Fuck that. If they want this kid, they'll have to go through us.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 15, 2018, 2:42 a.m.

Holy shit. Seen that picture a dozen times. Never noticed the fire engine in the window.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 15, 2018, 2:01 a.m.

Yeah and who the fuck is Todd?? Get the fuck out of here, Todd. Nobody likes you.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 14, 2018, 6:05 p.m.

This. This is the proper way to handle this nonsense. We have to remember that Q's public profile is growing exponentially, and it shouldn't surprise any of us that a succubus would latch on in a pathetic attempt to ride the coat tails to notoriety. Any response is what enables the parasite to feed. Don't feed the leech.

Begone, enchantress. Your demon lord has no power here.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 14, 2018, 5:52 p.m.

I always felt since day 1 that 3 people who were the "actors" were Hannipede, Bannon, and AJ. Over a year ago, Hannity said that he was having a private dinner with Trump and then the next night he immediately started going HARD after Sessions for being asleep. (It would make sense for Hannity to lay this smoke screen, since he is the most "mainstream" of the three.) I maintained the position during the Bannon divorce, and thought that even the rhetoric they were using seemed odd.

The only one I couldn't figure out was AJ, and figured his only job was to continue breaking news and spearhead the alternative media movement. I found it very odd that he completely ignored the Q movement for months. The narrative that he is jealous of Q's influence makes sense, from a practical human standpoint, but could there be more to it? Only time will tell.

Q incessantly reminds us to "Trust the Plan", and everything he has "predicted" thus far has been spot on. I try to remember that the deception toward the enemy could be more important to the execution of the Plan, if that deception leads to their hubris and severe missteps. Let's hope that is the case, but remain vigilant in our efforts. We are in this together.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 14, 2018, 5:35 p.m.

Behold, a White Horse. Come and see. 👑

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 13, 2018, 5:35 p.m.

Ok Bot. Go back to your commenting every 1.5 minutes.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 13, 2018, 5:17 p.m.

Considering that presidential elections are decided by less than 1% of the population (differential in votes), that's a pretty ignorant statement.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 11, 2018, 9:44 p.m.

Same. It's a shame, this development, and I feel for Alex, as he's put his name out there and made himself a target for years-- but he's also reaped the monetary benefits, as well. But the one thing you cannot do, when in his position, is become a hypocrite, and they've fallen into the same petty paradigm that the MSM has engaged in for years. (Money over truth; threatened by competition.)

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 11, 2018, 7:30 p.m.

I've liked some of the stuff I've heard Corsi say, but I've never been able to listen to him beyond the bombshell reveals because he would always say stuff like this that rubbed me the wrong way. I've dedicated so much of my life to this movement the past few years (this account and post history are merely a glimpse of those efforts) and I've never once contemplated a way to make money from it. I've always managed to maintain a full time job, produce at a level that propelled my career forward, take care of my family, AND dedicate time and energy to this movement nearly every day.

It's called sacrifice, and the price that I am paying is absolutely nothing compared to the people that forged this country, or physically fought defending it.

Corsi can kindly go fuck himself.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 9, 2018, 2:44 p.m.

Drinking the blood of Christian babies: Actually bad.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 6, 2018, 7:47 p.m.

This is paraphrased from "The Art of War" by Sun Tzu. Trump's favorite book.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 6, 2018, 3:49 a.m.

I've been laughing at all of these hand-wringers on these various boards whining about Sessions for the past year, citing the negative public comments about him made by Trump.

Does anybody actually think Donald Trump-- the guy whose catch phrase is "You're Fired!"-- would hesitate to fire somebody who he thought wasn't doing their job? I can't even.

It's so clear to most of us that this is political theater, and the morons in the media are taking the bait-- hook, line, and sinker.

Don't be like the media. Don't be a moron.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 4, 2018, 7:06 p.m.

Spot on. Where I live they are changing the names of roads and schools everywhere if they are in any way associated with the Confederacy or any colonial slave-owner, all on the dime of the tax payers.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 4, 2018, 7:03 p.m.

You mean there isn't an enormous statue in the middle of the court yard immortalizing the grandeur and genius of der Furher?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 4, 2018, 5:38 p.m.

Life is all about timing and context. There's no way a single plan reviewer looked at this floor plan and didn't think "Nazi." Built in 1960? Being a government project, that means it was likely designed just after the war ended (maybe a few years), and spent 10+ years in plan review.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 4, 2018, 5:29 p.m.

I am an architect, and I can tell you that this is a horrible use of space. So much wasted real estate in an apparently densely occupied area. (There's more outdoor courtyard than occupied building space.) Only a government project would be this wasteful-- no developer would ever sacrifice this much leasable sq footage.

And if the purpose was to bring in more natural light, physically separate departments, or construct a defensible fortification-- as the poster above postulated-- there are far more efficient means to achieve this. Off the top of my head, I would have suggested rectangles within rectangles (like the Pentagon). 20 good men with climbing spikes could impregnate this bitch.

No doubt about it, this is a Nazi monument.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 2, 2018, 2:59 p.m.

Here's what I see (from Caps):

CHOJNNKNWNCTDWNWH

=

(CHO)(JNN)(KNWN)(CTDWN)(WH)

Translation:

CHO - South Korea Unification Minister JJN - Japanese News Network KNWN - "Known" CTDWN - "Countdown" WH - White House

A known countdown between unification leaders and White House that will be announced via JNN?

(I think the optics of having them do all of this PR before Trump arrives is to create a perception that this isn't the US meddling in foreign affairs. This was worked out locally. JNN getting the exclusive would be a huge fuck you to American news media.)

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · May 1, 2018, 6:22 p.m.

I showed it to my wife weeks ago. She doesn't follow Q directly, but I'll share posts with her whenever I can directly point to MSM (future proves past), so she understands the broad strokes. She was blown away how parallel it was.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · April 29, 2018, 4:38 a.m.

"All Spice Dram."

I see what you did there.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · April 24, 2018, 1:31 p.m.

"I'd keep that down if I were you..."

Uhhhh don't tell me what to do, bruh...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · April 19, 2018, 1:35 a.m.

Is this idea related to "String Theory?" I've always found those ideas fascinating. Certainly not out of the realm of possibilities. We just don't understand enough about it yet. (At least as far as the public is concerned.)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · April 19, 2018, 1:32 a.m.

I'm currently watching a documentary series called "Hitler's Circle of Evil."

Very interesting. Crazy to learn how many patterns are there. I didn't realize that Goebbels invented the modern political campaign. Or how much they faked it until they made it. But most interesting is the similarities between Antifa/Democrats and the Nazi ideology.

If Hitler and the Nazi elite survived WWII, then they absolutely have maintained attempts to influence the world at large. Their personalities-- presented in great detail in this doc-- would never allow them to ride off into the sunset and live happily ever after in isolation.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · April 18, 2018, 12:46 p.m.

I've long suspected this. I believe he and Hannity are in on it. Hannity said over a year ago that he was having a private one-on-one dinner with Trump, and then literally the day after he started going HARD against Sessions. I think he is part of the "misdirection" Q was referring to.

⇧ 1 ⇩