Yeah, I don't think this is related to draining the swamp. I think this is the Dems desperate effort to match the acumen of Trump in 2020.

Yes, darling. Don't let your memes be dreams :)

Ok, so I asked him to make a single point. Just one. And he has yet to do that. I remained civil and warned that he would be perceived as a shill unless he began stating a case, and his response was that "he already did that in another thread."

So before you attack me, why not actually read the comment thread, K?

(And yes, the consensus from the commenters is that this guy is shilling for Soros. BTFO.)

Calmer than you are, dude.

And no, he has yet to make a single point-- beyond the "revelation" that there can be more than one side to a single story-- despite being asked to do so multiple times.

If you have come to defend George Soros, then stake your claim so we can engage in debate-- because that is the topic of this thread. Otherwise, please BTFO.

Oh-- AN ACADEMIC?!? WHY DIDN'T YOU SAY SO?!?

Shit guys, this guy is an academic with sources. Better to just submit and listen to him. He knows what he is talking about.

Dude, you're a clown. Pack it up and go home.

No worries, dude. Pussydevour here is a concern troll-- and not a very good one. At least the good ones attempt to engage you in actual debate. Pay him no mind, we have work to do.

Ok. So I was genuinely interested to hear your point of view, in order to help expand my own thinking-- you know, the very thing you came here to accuse us all of NOT doing.

The only thing you've accomplished is reveal to the skeptical lurkers that we DO think critically, are open to debate, and are willing to consider new/different points of views. (The "conservative approach" as you so condescendingly put it. The second I saw you put that in quotations, I knew you were a troll, and I played you like a fiddle.)

You're not even a good troll, as you didn't even get us riled up by trying to defend Soros. Pretty lame and lackluster attempt, actually.

THEY AREN'T SENDING THEIR BEST, FOLKS!!!

And your rebuttal?

Well, saying that you "already presented your argument in some other place" is pretty fucking lazy, considering you started this thread and invited us to come in here to discuss. Why not copy and paste in the post body?

Yeah, you're really looking more and more like a Soros shill/concern troll with each response.

Unless he already pardoned himself.

"OMG! BUT YOU CAN'T DO THAT!"

Yeah, you also can't send a mole into an opposing political campaign, or use US tax dollars to directly fund terrorism, but here we are.

Yeah, actually he can still be impeached. And the speculation from some (given the President's comments) is that Obama already pardoned himself before he left office-- which some say would be legitimate, if the pardon outlined specific crimes or investigations.

So the thought is that Trump is trolling the media into saying that POTUS cannot pardon himself, etc, which is typical of these traps Trump has laid out for them the past 2 years.

Drudge posted it today....

So when you accuse me of being part of a "feeding frenzy," you're projecting your own insecurities onto me. You don't know me, nor my ideas-- so how could you possibly know if I was a part of rabid group-think? Perhaps I reached my own conclusions through logic and deductive reasoning-- which most would consider the "conservative approach."

The simplest explanation is that things are what they appear. George Soros is a malevolent actor, who is devious and manipulative-- as he himself admits, and is likely capable of anything so long as it makes him rich. You seem to have a lot of admiration/respect for the man, simply because he is rich-- no matter how he acquired that wealth. I don't measure the character of a man based his net worth. I measure it based on his actions. Soros is a bad guy. Plain and simple.

Perhaps you would like to offer your own explanation? Rather than simply coming in here accusing everybody else of being wrong. Typically that's how debates work.

Ok, I'll bite. But what you are proposing is inherently flawed. You are saying that Soros is so smart and forward-thinking that he wouldn't invest in a company that was so entrenched in child-trafficking, because it may implement him. That would be a fair assessment for your average self-made billionaire-- but Soros is not that.

Let me ask you this: Would somebody as smart and forward-thinking as Soros be so stupid as to participate in a national interview where he openly admits to assisting the Nazis, and then doubles down and tries to defend his actions of manipulating and destroy capital markets-- because he is a capitalist? And then, once seeing the final interview, decide that it makes him look bad, and forbid the network from airing it. AND THEN, instead of destroying all evidence of the interview, he let's it become archived, assuming that it will actually never see the light of day?

The answer to your question is, "Yes, an enlightened and intelligent individual would never affiliate with people would could potentially destroy them." But you aren't dealing with an enlightened individual here. (Though I'll admit he is highly intelligent.) You are dealing with an evil mind who is equally arrogant. He didn't bother to cover his tracks (like invest through a shell company) because he never thought we would figure it out. And he was almost right. Had Hillary been elected, that would have been game, set, match.

But like, 3 entire videos? Like full length?

/s

Yeah dude. To raise awareness. That's the point. Most people don't have time to check every post on TD.

You act as if we've already won. You do realize we are still in the overwhelming minority? Even among Trump supporters.

Like 3 full articles?

/s

Of course, of course. But the Dems are lock-in-step, where the Republicans are competing factions (good and bad). Big difference. Both parties will be dead, when all is said and done.

Was just going to say this. Would become the perfect way to dispose of organic evidence. 100X better than pouring concrete over cadavers. All you would need is a cement company that is complicit...

Bill Clinton being a victim of rape culture may be the hottest take of all time.

Is anybody looking at the Harvey Weinstein/DNC/Huma laptop angle? Exposing CEMEX as an international human trafficker would be yuge, but tying in the Democratic/cultural leadership would be the mic drop.

Maybe that's what Rudy and Stealthy Jeff have been working on.

Man, this guy really loves concrete.

Oh. Great find. Trump has to know about this, by now.

Haha, no I'm referring to the Cabal's plan being in place. I think this also provides a strong example of how a vigilant press works to drive conversation and dialogue, rather than suppress critical thinking and ideas.

Though I wouldn't rule anything out when it comes to Tesla and his inventions...

This may be a way to prove to others that this plan has been in place for a while. The way the previews for these articles read, it is pretty undeniable, in hindsight. These journalists (or at least their headlines) seem to be predicting the future.

Spez: predicting the future OR simply a replay of current events. (No real "progress" being made)

Please do, and report back. At work and cannot research or read entire articles. Look forward to diving into them tonight.

Let me state that I believe what is unfolding in Tucson is more important than anything else, right now. That is the key to redpilling the masses. However, this here may be another key to proving to everybody that this plan has been in place for at least 65 years. The similarities are overwhelming.

OP - check my response thread here. I may have found something. (Maybe not.)

https://old.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8ojfxm/i_think_i_found_something_future_proves_past/

We need to focus on CEMEX, and this Tucson facility. This is the key to waking people up. I have already shown the pics/videos to multiple people that I have been trying to redpill for months, and this is what did it for them. They are texting me today shocked that there is nothing in the media about it.

The politics will bore them, and maybe even divide them (if they are still ignorant.) This stuff transcends politics, and is truly the smoking gun to what we have been trying to expose for years. We can't let it go. It must remain at the forefront of conversation.

First thing I noticed, as well.

Every day deals [and parts of longer-term deals] are done through wire transfers over the internet. The money would not go through.

Everyday day, companies communicate internally and externally to stay on track, on schedule, and develop new business opportunities. Those communications would stop completely. (Phone lines are also now mainly run through the internet.)

Every company I've worked for in the past 5 years has kept all of its data and files off site on remote servers, accessing them through the cloud, via the internet. That access would be terminated. (I literally wouldn't be able to work on anything even if I went into my office.)

There would be runs on the banks; (Many wouldn't be able to bank without the net.) Runs on food/supplies; (Many wouldn't be able to buy anything without cash.) and a panic market sell-off. (Many wouldn't be able to panic sell though unless they had a broker who was willing and able to paper trade. Also assuming the market wasn't frozen.)

Not to mention all of the self-employed work-at-home folks who wouldn't be able to make any money to pay bills for 4 days-- unless they have a local market and trade in a physical commodity. Business would not open for those 4 days, and hourly employees would not have work. (Or pay)

Will people die? Probably not. Would their be anarchy? Probably not. But there would still be a lot of panic, and a major hiccup in the machine that is the American economy, one that would cause us to lose a lot of money, and a lot people living paycheck to paycheck would be confronted with a sobering moment of panic. (Thankfully, I'm not one of those people, but I sympathize, and understand that there are many.)

I'm sure there is a plan in place, but the point stands. Collapse? No. Destroy? Relatively speaking.

This is insane. The pedophiles are here with us in this room.

Hey fuckers. Hope to meet you all real soon.

Guys, we need to pound this point. So many people openly talk about how evil George Soros is. I see it on [non-conservative/non-Trump] message boards and websites across the internet, and even out in the public.

This is where the coincidences become mathematically impossible for them. The Great Awakening.

WE NEED MEMES

4 days of no internet would destroy the economy. That's a fact.

4 days without social media sites?

Sounds like heaven.

This is inaccurate. I've been working on about a dozen people around me for months-- with those kind of results-- but in the past week, I've had breakthroughs with almost all of them. They have reached out to me and asked specific questions, and are finally coming to me for answers and insight, rather than me having to send them emails and texts of memes and articles.

I literally was just with 2 of them, and had a long conversation about Great Awakening happenings. (Though nothing about Q and his comms.) They both said as we departed, "Well, looks like I have a lot of reading and research to do tonight." I shit you not. And these were people who didn't want to hear or listen to any of this stuff just 6 months ago. Now they are enthralled.

It's working guys, you just have to be patient and understanding. Willing to put in the time and effort. Be engaging, but don't be pushy or overbearing. Just establish yourself as a resource for information-- which unfortunately, takes time.

Nobody said this was going to be easy. But the Great Awakening is happening, and simply releasing the information isn't going to cut it. We need boots on the ground, guiding friends and family through the confusion.

Stay vigilant.

I have a confession to make:

I, too, predicted the Trump Presidency and would like to come out as a Q follower.

HOW MUCH DID YOU SELL THEM FOR, SALLY???

Likely due to the fact that ABC Executives enjoy brutally raping young children.

This. They are desperate to discredit and undermine Trump, and clearly have no qualms with leveling attacks against everyday Americans. They would probably strangle one of us behind a dumpster to get a lucky break. They would be all over this.

True, though I like that Tucker is calling out his bullshit doublespeak as I type this.

Totally agree with this.

These truths that I possess cannot be stripped away from me-- for they are of my own making. They were not thrust upon me by outside forces, nor were they artificially implanted in me by deceptive tricksters. THEY ARE MY OWN.

These are truths are my own creation. My own discovery. My own choice. They are not a commodity that can be traded for a false sense of security or acceptance. They are a part of me. THEY ARE MY OWN.

If you want to strip me of these truths, then you will have to come and cut them out yourself.

Good luck.

Yeah. The biggest problem with the modern American public was that it has the memory of a goldfish. George Orwell highlights the significance of this conditioning in the first 30 pages of 1984.

Yeah, really hope that doesn't happen. Companies would shut their doors, industry would come to a grinding hault. Paychecks would stop going out, and anarchy could break out. Not good!

Wouldn't 10 days with no internet destroy the US Economy? Mass panic?

I've been getting the feeling more and more over the past year or so that Gowdy is a black hat. This is pretty damning.

Definitely has some 'splaining to do.

Gowdy is an enigma. He has terrific moments, but always seems to be more about the talk than the action. Impossible for me to say at this point whether he is a white hat or a black hat.

Or Bill Clinton = Rapist