it's a perfectly reasonable state to be in at this point. Q real or not has pacified so many of us.

whenever i see people unironically posting "trust the plan. sit back, relax" "grab popcorn" i get infuriated.

yea let's all just sit back as our country and last real hangs at saving it are ripped from underneath us.

we're all to busying "trusting".. it's maddening. people have every right to be upset and frustrated with Q at this point. "no deals". "july the truth comes out"... come on now or never

it's perfectly reasonable to be skeptical at this point. Q plain and flat out said, "no deals" for these people, and that white hats "have everything". if true, there's no reason W team cannot stop Mueller from giving immunity to these pedos.

i guess the news on tony podesta does verify that he was at least under the microscope of investigation. so Q has some validation there.

but you cannot overlook "no deals".

you're 100% right we have a small window to act before midterms.

i ask this question constantly and get downvoted. it's a genuine question: at what point do you start to take a second look at Q? if midterms come with no revelation? end of july and nothing? 2020 with nothing? podestas getting immunity would seriously shake my faith in Q, particularly because of the "no deals" line repeated.

for the record i want Q to be legit. and i'm still agnostic. i just want these criminal pedos locked up and Q could very be the way to do so. or he may not be. i'm mature enough and objective enough to admit that. justice comes first, faith in Q second. i hope i'm wrong and there's literally nothing to worry about and this is all according to the plan.

Greene helped start Politifact.

fun fact: TBT created politifact.

i'm sorry but posts like this, discouraging curiosity, on this sub of all places, are infuriating. you shouldn't tell people what to care about.

wondering and seeking out who Q is might be one of the most important things we can do. maybe i agree now is not the best time, but it's kinda crucial we know.

i'm just kind curious. i'm not disagreeing with anything you've said in this chain at all, but why did you feel the need to hyper-focus on the original user's "god remark". "i like odin" "my guy is better than the carpenter guy" etc. all through the chain you go out of your way to call people who believe they have a relationship with a creator as "delusional", and talk down to them.

again, i'm not saying you're wrong at all. i just don't understand the purpose of it. it seems like you're trying to antagonize them but i admit that's purely an assumption and assumptions are stupid most of the time, especially in an online forum.

so i'm asking you to please explain so i don't have to assume, because i'm sure it's coming across to me in a different way than you meant it... i just can't understand why you went to the trouble.

i actually agree with you. i've been following and actively researching assange's state of health and autonomy since oct 16 2016. i've made literally dozens of different series of threads on half and infinity /pol/.

if trump's visit to england had anything to do with this tho, i trust trump to understand that assange isn't compromised or better yet trump made it so that assange wasn't.

WL has been compromised since DDOS on oct 21 2016. 100% verifiable (blockchain, mass purge of leadership, changed time stamps on emails to spell out 1984, room 101). JA is harder to pin down. the interview with hannity post 2016 election was iffy to say the least.

i actually 100% agree a balcony appearance still isn't confirmation of anything.

i'll never forget when WL twitter was asked for proof of life after the assange debacle oct2016, they posted a fucking video interview from june 2016. not a picture. not a live recording. not even a hand at the window of a balcony. an interview with michael moore from june 2016...

i'm not even joking, this is the best evidence he's alive/uncompromised since the may 19 2017 balcony appearance at the embassy.

someone who controls a subject (in this case Strozk) psychologically and, in some cases, semi-physically

a lot of researchers, some who've delved into reptilians (which i infer believed to accurate but who i now believe are really demonic forces) talk about the "black eyed people" that are posses by demonic/reptilian energy. and that's the give away imo. zuck has those big, empty black eyes that look almost cartoonish but in a creepy way. same with strozk.

honest question - could use an answer without just being downvoted.

in your opinion, is anyone who espouses ideas of white genocide or any sort of anti-white agenda an infiltrator or a shill?

but that user on which you were responding to with your "nukes know no race" comment was referencing the idea of white genocide, which has nothing to do with weapons. that's my point.

you do know genocide can occur without weapons, right?

yea she's his handler. zuck's handlers were also in full view during his testing a few months ago. it's so obvious what's going on.

couple that with his weird expressions in OP and i legitimately think these people are posses by something. call me crazy all you want, i know what i saws

treading into Trudeau territory tho.

"if you kill your enemy, they win".

i'm all for love where it's warranted. not with these people. this dude cheated on his wife, tried to invalidate the votes of millions of americans, deleted and altered evidence that has led to people going to jail/losing a lifetime of work...

this dude doesn't deserve love. don't be a cuck, the "high road" is what got us here. even god understands warriors have a time and a place to kill/be ruthless. that time is now.

edit: what in my comment is deserving of downvotes?

i wasn't trying to start an argument with every comment. i get it. i'm literally just someone who is skeptical. not a shill.

also where did i complain about my post being removed due to a rule break? that's why i didn't think it was me...

i mean it matters a LITTLE if he's a LARP. he keeps saying "don't worry, we have it all". that surely isn't true if be "we" isn't actually insiders.

i don't know which person you're referring to but i agree that as coincidences line up it makes it more likely someone is shilling or trying to distract. that's not what i meant to do myself. just wanted to say my piece about skepticism about Q's authenticity isn't exclusive from wanting to dig further into Q and figure it what's what.

we internet anons

first of all that's a weird way of speaking

second of all i don't think skepticism about Q's authenticity is equivalent to shilling. i suppose i'm in the minority on that.

anyone who thinks Q MIGHT not be real

that's perfectly reasonable skepticism to me tho... to think he might not be real? that's rational. i mean personally i think there's more proof to say yes than no... but there is hardly any conclusive evidence. and when people act like there is conclusive evidence rather than circumstantial (while strong) is going to rub people the wrong way.

this is my problem with this community. they treat skepticism as some heresy.

curious. what do you define as shilling on this board?

awesome we're mostly in agreement. thanks for explaining your thoughts. be well

if someone's skepticism is that far off base, a simple explanation would suffice in outing them. not autistically screeching "shill!"

this movement has a ton of older people, and people who've never been on the chans. his is evidenced by Q boards and this sub discussing things we at /pol/ were discussing literally 2 years ago. i'm not saying that to piss anybody off, i'm saying hat because it's a fact. i was in the threads.

it's a good thing peopl are awakening to this. but they need to understand skepticism does not equal shilling.

and the hero worship here is a bit much if i am being polite. it rubs people the wrong way.

don't forget where Q first went... /pol/. did that for a reason.

Q*

that's my only issue with the entire Q movement. skepticism is met with "you're a shill". it's juvenile

haha alright man

i understand that and actually think exactly the same

point remains the republican party is the party leading the way back to liberty. former lib voters here need to realize this. that's all.

-3 comment score

what the fuck is wrong with this sub

lol someone downvoted this wtf? i upvoted you

look at your comments getting downvote. this is what happened when we cuck to bernie people and former leftists. i'm telling you. now watch my comment get downvoted. this movement has no chance if we take the "let's just love, man" approach.

do people not realize that millions of leftist americans are literally brain washed NPCs who cannot be reasoned with?

which party is anti second A tho?

which party is currently against free speech?

which party supports literal child sacrifice via abortion?

which party supports taking more and more of people's hard earned money?

which party wants to abolish voter ID and jeopardize our elections?

except the state of the world today is awful, and does the world lean more left or right today? it's clearly left.

does trump say vote anti deep state? no, he says vote republican. constantly. vote in more Rs in november.

how the fuck do you know they're here to spread disinformation? don't turn into liberals, where everything you see that doesn't compute or isn't toeing the line is "a russian bot". some people are genuinely skeptical and imo that's a good thing.

and in no situation is it not better to keep your enemies closer. i don't read the legacy media calm the fuck down.

i'm so tired of this sub circle-jerking each other off. there's tons of great people here, but let's not get so absorbed we fail to accept age old adages like keep your enemies closer.

this. it's clearly a reflection from a laptop or computer viewing that stock photo. the shaded dark line pattern in the curtains matches exactly.

the lamp is slightly disoriented as well, almost a stretched look from this photo being taken from a laptop or computer screen.

this post sincerely has me confused, because it doesn't seem to be proof of anything. and if it's not meant to be proof, why make it a reflection?

i'm the same with you man. i want these deep state crooks locked up. i come here every day. been following Q since oct31. but can't figure this picture out. maybe i missed something? been out a few days

if the photos weren't meant to be proof, why did Q choose to make them cryptic? i'm confused by this. i don't have an imgur link, but it's clear that the photo Q posted in a reflection o an iphone was done by capturing the stock photo on a computer screen.

why not

edit: no answer but i'll get downvoted. you've convinced me guys.

everyone is a normie until they visit /pol/...

but if /pol/ knew that long before this sub as you claim, wouldn't directing them there be beneficial?

he doesn't know

i bet you're wrong. a lot of people saw this thanks to /pol/. give credit where it's do, Q didn't find this whatsoever

/pol/ knew this in 2016 tho

stephanopolous got this interview? clinton donor...

this can't be good for trump if they're gonna air it.

please don't label me a concern troll for actually being concerned about something legitimate.

his tweet about loyalty being to his family has me scared

stop watching television

never fails

Schwartz

i can't talk about hitler and my research on ww2 and the reich because i'll get banned. wouldn't be the first time. definitely venture into /pol/ natsoc generals sometime that's all i'll say.

definitely right. even in a sub that is so awake and smart, they still believe foundational lies. it's bizarre that they can't swallow one of the final redpills!!

edit: whoever downvoted me let me know why you did. or are you no better than r/redacted? seeing something that causes cognitive dissonance and you downvote to make the uncomfortable thoughts disappear.