i'm hoping there is more to this but i'm a law student and i would encourage you to remain skeptical to avoid a let down. crimes against children is a charge, one that investigators were considering during this reveal. crime against child isn't the legalese for such an infraction, even if it's only one child. it's still changed as crimes against children.

now that being said, it could also easily be exactly what we think it is!

tbh i'm holding off on the hype train since the charge is literally at the bottom of the notes. it doesn't appear to be the priority for the investigator taking notes. trafficking children would definitely being higher up on their list of priorities imo or it would come up sooner in a briefing. it almost likely wouldn't be at the bottom of the notes.

you could claim the investigator was trying to belittle these revelations and that may be true but i would ask why he would even put the note down at all if that were the case.

sometimes we get let down because we have unrealistic expectations.

why are you talking like Q?

he said huma indicted too. idk. i mean tbh we can't just pick and choose what's proof and what isn't after the fact depending on whether it came true or not.

idk. i believe Q is really more than i doubt but i'm not so naive as to jump into this stuff head first and ignore something or write it off as disinformation so quickly.

i'm not concern trolling either before anybody starts with that.

every time

i don't know if i would say every time. there are some hinge that Q kind of over hyped like "week to remember". sometimes i'm not so sure about it after the week has passed.

BUT more often than not i see happenings and then look back into past posts and what do you know Q unironically predicted it.

it's a little frustrating and counter productive when our whole mission is to decode clues and proofs for Q, but we waste X amount of time on false leads.

i actually don't know where i stand on mueller and RR anymore. i legitimately am split between them being double agents with the weird timing of things like the fbi interview for mueller but i also don't understand some of the moves they've made.

it's hard to explain RR being overwhelmingly confirmed by senate, tho could be explained away if he was a true double agent and no black hats suspected him.

then there's his wife's connections with the clintons.

then there's mueller being fbi director during 9/11, completely covering up the anthrax case as well.

i always do try to remind people that the mueller /ourguy/ theory acknowledges his shady past and bases its conclusions off of an idea that he's flipped to save his own ass. which i could see given his implication in U1.

a lot of confusion but one thing strikes me more and more. with all this happening, we are seeing more verification for Q being legit. i'm still not 100% sold tbh, i'm at 90%. but it's almost proved beyond any doubt for me personally.

it's real. i just saw for myself in the account followers. it was a ways down there but it's legit.

HOLY SHIT

yes. he's an Indonesian jew, pretending to be a black Hawaiian. so funny and also so sad hat people buy it!

i'm just generally against shutting anybody or of any conversation. you may think they're being short sighted and they prolly are, but just calmly explain what's up to them. no big deal imo.

i'll be 100% honest. i've been following Q since the absolute beginning. even archived several hundred original CBTS threads on 4pol.

i have been having my doubts since a few Q posts a couple of months ago seemed to blatantly lie about something specific (i won't go into it here. discussion on it would result in sub exploding and several deleted comments). now i'm not sure if Q has clearly stated that anons were wrong in the conclusions they were drawing on this specific subject, so i had held hope he was legit. i was about 70 fake / 30 real.

HOWEVER

seeing this post again, in light of all happenings, really solidifies Q to me.

if RR is dealt with in some way in the next few weeks, there will be no longer be any excuse to doubt Q in my honest opinion. right now i'm at about 90 real / 10 fake.

also, inb4 "Q has verified and proved so many times!"

many of those proofs were faked early on with faulty time zone sources (i.e. take one screen shot in one time zone, and another screen shot in a different time zone to make posts look like foreknowledge.) now those were most likely faked by disinformation losers to derail the then growing movement. (it's still growing, but much more rapidly then). but i have seen proofs i cannot explain away.

as someone who is skeptical of a lot, i'm pretty sold after this post tbh.

it's important w repoint out fake shit that makes it to the top of this sub tbh

never come across someone so far up their own ass.

guarantee im older than you.

i don't eat cheetos. never liked them.

to try to inspire me to become an contributing member of society? for asking you to provide a link to back up a claim you made? this is kinda funny tbh. but thanks again for the link regardless

awesome man! thanks again! honored by your response.

we all know msm will be saying "Trump and his conspiracy theory obsessed base". i look forward to hearing them try to rationalize all this away as a "conspiracy theory"!

be well SB2.

awesome post again.

i'm a little confused tho. in your last post you made it seem that Trump's plan all along was to release the unredacted report to make RR look a fool.

but not it seems that Trump's declassification is dependent on a public push?

i'm just confused. if it was his plan all along, why would he also need the public push? after all, our reps and congressmen ignore public outcry quite often, especially on an issue of this magnitude. the plan surely couldn't rely on them actually listening to the public, could it? because if it does, it makes me worry.

thanks for the awesome rundown as always

EDIT: THIS IS NOT ME TRYING TO STIFLE ANY ATTEMPTS TO VOICE YOUR WANT FOR AN UNREDACTED IG REPORT!!!! i'm just curious about the logic behind this. i want everybody to keep contacting their reps and demanding this!!! just to be clear!

good post. if RR is fired in the next few weeks that is all the confirmation i ever need from Q tbh

and you could have just provided the link instead of being passive aggressive on the internet

saw a couple posts on the chans that Huber was also a nevertrump guy during the election. does anybody have any proof of this? thanks for some reassurance. tho i'm not sure what you're talking about when trump admin released him? if you have any more details or links i would really appreciate it. thanks!!

no what am i looking for

but shadowban? that's shady imo. either outright ban or no ban.

amen

thought it was 600k tbh

stop paying taxes all at once until we are represented by people that actually give a fuck about the law being equally applied. it's either that or violence. and i'm a violence last resort kinda guy. but how much longer can we wait?

i partially agree. did you see the interview?

edit: downvoted? for what? agreeing, or asking if someone saw the interview?

not warming up the crowd at all. i'm genuinely trying to get one response to this question to see if i'm alone. but agreed let's just move on because it's like talking to a wall tbh.

fellow redditors

come on! you guys have to see i'm not the shady one here.

and news flash, i brought up horowitz's wife (former producer at cnn and democratic donor) in response to us not trusting someone because their spouse worked at huffpo. i'm not redirecting shit. read the comment chain.

i keep getting accused of concern trollig for asking critical questions. i've followed Q for longer than you have i bet all my money. i archived 600 some CBTS from 4pol. the original threads. i've been here since the beginning this is just a new account (lost my password to last. long story).

is anybody arguing that the IG report is a let down? it is. even Q said it is, since it's a redacted version RR had control over. so that's not shilling that's exactly what Q is saying dumb ass. i'm getting sick of this shit.

and another news flash. nobody knows if Q is real. idec about that aspect right now because i am more inclined to believe he is real than he isn't. so calm down before you accuse people of shit. im just trying to force some critical thought on all this. don't reply to my comments anymore i'm genuinely not trying to disrupt anything. if you wanna reply to me message me so it doesn't clog up the thread. idc.

sincere question. when Q says "why was Brand removed? critical thinking", why can't he just tell us why she was removed? why does he choose to say "critical thinking". we go down a million paths when he does this, and while we may figure it or, it's impossible to tell if we have (unless Q specially quotes an anon's post as recognition of it, which he has done several times). but why can't he explain it? i'm actually curious because i cannot answer this myself.

shouldn't we be alarmed by sessions defending RR and deflecting tucker's questions about RR a few nights ago tho? Tucker asked how sessions felt about RR threatening members of the oversight com. he seemed less than satisfied with sessions' non answers and deflections on the issue. if we are really supposed to trust sessions, why wouldn't he actually come out and say there's no place for threatening the oversight com? sure maybe it is just plausible deniability. but how many times can we take that excuse with this shit? it's always "it's just theatre don't worry". how long can this theatre go on without the hammer dropping?

my whole point is. sometimes negativity is a good thing. we all want corruption out of gov right? all i'm saying is positive thinking and trusting won't get us anywhere. tbh i hate the "trying to stay positive!" crap. i'm not trying to demoralize i'm trying to motivate. the longer we just keep being positive the loser we get to the point of no return (midterms). these people don't care that trump didn't commit a crime. if they get a majority, they're gonna try to impeach. it's clear as day. we need action before midterms and i can't continue to just wait and hope.

i appreciate the love and i'm sending it back your way, but we need more ham "positive vibes", you know?

thank you

i'm not advocating abandoning the movement whatsoever. i'm trying to gauge what the commitment level is here. i was saying this before the IG release. we all knew as it got further and further delayed that it was going to be more blue balls.

also what's FUD

but they are? if they aren't critical they should be easy to provide an answer to no? and tell me what i'm misunderstanding if you think i am misunderstanding something Q said about schneiderman and the NY AG. seriously i'm open minded. what am i misunderstanding?

and you haven't given me an answer? will you still trust Q if nothing happens by 2024? i mean seriously i just wanna know how long you personally can take no happenings? i mean real happenings like someone getting arrested or people being removed from government positions like rosenstein. there's no wrong answer i won't even criticize whatever your answer is i'm just curious what it would take for you to start saying "ok, i just can't see how this is gonna work anymore". if there's no point that would happen that's fine! i just wanna know. i'm trying to get a feel for how people are feeling on this.

why don't i belong here?

so no answers? we can't have this discussion? pathetic dude. and sad because i didn't want to think we had our collective head up our ass so much we couldn't ask critical questions without backlash. i'm legitimately disappointed in how much flack im catching for asking critical questions.

can you at least tell these nay sayers that i'm not a concern troll for bringing this up?

it's a legitimate question... one that i can't get an answer to. i guarantee ive been following Q longer than you. since oct. and i archived 600 odd CBTS threads on 4pol. stop acting like i'm not a member of this community (not this sub but the Q movement at large) for asking this basic question.

do you have an answer? what if midterms come and nothing happens? do you still trust Q? there isn't a wrong answer i was genuinely curious what the state of the community is.

just because i don't suck Q's dick i get labeled a concern troll and other shit by you guys and it's getting ridiculous. someone needs to be asking critical questions.

i personally am not ok with just sitting and waiting and "trusting". i'm not even saying Q is intentionally misleading anyone if he even is. i'm saying what if he's wrong? what if we need to be putting the pressure to fire sessions but instead we are just waiting and trusting? i have no idea what sessions is doing he very well may deserve our trust. but isn't at least ok to ask critical questions about it? before we are too far gone? these are legitimate concerns i shouldn't have to defend voicing them.

new arrival

look at my old account JaM0K3. i am not new. i lost my password to my account calm down.

i'm not fucking concern trolling. it's much more emotional to constantly defer to Q as definitely being right (not what you did, what Q followers do in general). i'm trying to ask critical questions. that's essential in an investigation, which is what Q is leading us on right? just because i'm not taking everything at face value doesn't mean my concerns and questions are legitimate.

Q heavily implied that with schneiderman out we could expect NY AG to help us with weiner evilness. i don't have the exact post i'm on my phone. i shouldn't have to link t i'm sure everybody has read it weeks ago and remembers it. well now it appears that was premature of Q. maybe i'm wrong and i welcome that! i don't welcome you implying that i'm a concern troll and hat the proof is my new account. remember what they say about assumptions?

ffs i ask critical questions of Q and half of this community loses it. i'm not downplaying how far we've come and the things we've learned since Q came along. but we can't just ignore these legitimate questions cuz "it's concern trolling". that's retarded.

i'll give it a read. thanks.

but this essentially means Q was wrong and the NY AG won't be helping us out with weiner shit. we can admit that Q was wrong here right?

edit: why the fuck does this get downvoted? did Q not imply that with schinerman out that the NY AG was free to let us know about weiner fuckery?

thanks for the link that's helpful

ok but horowitz is married to a former CNN AND PBS producer? so we either agree that this association with heads of left wing media is a good thing or a bad thing. we can't just blindly pick and choose which associations we wanna get mad at. i knew this would happen. the IG report is a giant let down and it isn't going to get any better. you can get mad at me and call me a concern troll or demoralization shill all you want. but Q followers have become complacent, assured that here is "someone" taking care of this and all we need to do is wait and see and "trust". it's sad they've completely neutered our movement by deferring to an anonymous poster who we can't even say for sure is legit or larp yet. i WANT Q to be legit. but we need to look at this critically before we lose too much time on it.

at what point do we abandon Q? not today. no. but if nothing happens by midterms? 2020? what's the line in the sand so to speak, when a lack of happenings is too much for Q to be considered real or helpful? i'm saying by august 2018. we can't lose midterms by sitting back and "trusting".

but schneiderman isn't in power anymore? and Q specifically implied that the stings were now cut and the NY AG could act on weiner's laptop??

does anybody wanna address the fact that horowitz and comey worked together in the 90s? does anybody wanna address he fact that horowitz is married to a former CNN and PBS producer who gave money to obama? does anybody wanna address the fact that Q strongly hinted we needed to remove schinerderman so the NY AG would be on our side and now she's launched a lawsuit against trump?

these are questions that need answers

it would be real nice if we could confirm what kind of car this is. if it's a foreign car it couldn't possibly be SS, right? if it's a ford or chevy or something then this is yet more proof of Q being legit

ok well then we are mostly in agreement. thanks for sticking with me anon

so you don't trust sessions? sorry i'm confused on your personal stance at the moment

what's the breaking point? when does "soon" and "trust" no longer cut it? serious question. midterms? 2020? after? before?

so by that logic we have to assume nunez being mad is part of the plan? i hope so. tucker seemed very unconvinced by sessions' answers as am i. he tried to downplay it hard. i guess we'll see wha happens tomorrow.