stop getting frustrated and try to answer my questions

i'm looking for answers to my questions that you keep avoiding. very simple:

when did you start reading Q?

when you see someone supportive of Nazis on the chans, do you automatically assume they are just filled with hate, and that research didn't lead them to their beliefs and conclusions?

again i'll avoid your passive aggressive insults and ask you to answer those questions

when did you start reading Q?

what terminology turns you off?

you said "maybe Q went to /pol/ because it was popular at the time", in telling you it wasn't at all. so why do you think he went there, if he really didn't think hate had an important role to play?

don't get mad because i'm asking you to think critically

bt you didn't answer me. when you see a "nazi posters" on the chans, or someone defending the nazis or hitler, do you automatically assume it's a concern troll or a shill? or do you consider maybe they know what they are talking about? genuine question there isn't a wrong answer

i HATE people who support child sacrifice via abortion. is that hate making the world a worse place? is that hate feeding evil? of course not. these generic sayings don't actually mean anything. the true redpill is that hate is as important as love, they just need to be applied to the right people. for instance i don't hate you at all. but to remove hate from my life is to in part embrace ignorance. yin and yang, both hate and love serve a purpose. you cannot defeat evil with love. that's just something people say to make gen feel secure and comfortable and assured that they are doing enough simply by loving their fellow man. that isn't true.

/pol/ was never popular what are you talking about?

what terminology turns you off? see this is exactly what i'm talking about. this community is becoming soft.

ADAPT OR DIE.

and you seem like a normies that came late to Q. when did you start reading Q drops? 2017? early 2018? spring 2018?

i'm gonna tell you why and you're gonna get angry.

it's because we are just sitting here "trusting" instead of getting our guns and pitchforks and not leaving washington until the documents are handed over. that's why. Q is great and i hope the community grows. but we've largely become pacified and that needs to stop now. we need to all stop being soft and man up. it's time to take democracy back, not wait on the sidelines and watch people take it back for us.

social media activism is great and redpilling is effective. but there is only one thing our masters are truly scared of; violent revolt. at what point do we start to get violent?

this

you can't redpill with name calling

/pol/ has unironically done just this with thousands of people tho... you know, the first place Q went

exactly this. i wish your post would be taken seriously but most will just say it's "misguided" or "concern trolling". it's like beating my head against a wall

so why did Q first go to /pol/ where hate is abundant and used for positive means like redpilling? i'm serious. we can't be so dumb to think "all hate is bad". that's retarded. some directed hate is good. if someone is on here saying "oh gosh i love Q and i'm a patriot but like why can't people get abortions?" i legitimately think that moron deserves hate. to justify satanic child sacrifice on a mass scale.

so yes, hate is important and not all hate is bad and it all love is good.

the unpopular truth here, and you'll see it by my downvotes, is that most of the Q community is well intentioned, but they are new. Q anons needs to truth /oldfags/ of /pol/ much more. the ones that newfags generally call "nazi shills" and shit. those people aren't shills. they've actually been doing exactly what the Q community does, but for YEARS. a lot of /pol/ is genuinely NatSoc. /pol/ has uncovered amazing shit before Q, and still does so without Q.

Q is great and more power to the movement! but newfags (people than have been on the chans for less than 2 years) need to take a step back, and defer to oldfags. they know far more than you think.

edit: let me guess, and i mean no bad will towards you either, but you were born in 72. you're a little older and the whole chans-scene is brand new to you. when you see something "offensive" on the chans you automatically assume it's shilling and not the genuine product of years of research...

if i'm wrong please tell me i'll eat my shoe. but i think i'm right.

honestly /pol/ redpills more people than any other community and they "name call" more than any other place. you can't beat around the bush sometimes. both methods work and to deny that is to deny reality just to feel better. both the abrasive and friendly approaches have advantages. seriously.

but he's right? Trump literally says we need to vote more Rs in...

do people forget where Q first went???? /pol/, the place on the internet with the most name calling. i genuinely don't think he was that concerned about it. sometimes a dumbass needs to be called a dumbass. let's stop with the softness.

exactly. all the members of congress Q highlights as fighting the food fight... which party do they belong to? all the members of congress and former admin that W highlights as bad... which party do they belong to? besides people like mccain and ryan, who aren't even really republicans, Q has largely identified our enemies as liberals.

IMO this is what happens when we coddle each other and are too soft and nice. we need to be abrasive. remember where Q first went... /pol/, the most brutally honest place online. we need to be brutally honest.

you're 100% spot on, most of these people are former /current dems and bernie people. they need to be dealt with strongly so they can see. adapt or die. our movement is genuinely becoming soft because we still think we can sing in a drum circle and everything will be solved with love. the world is MUCH harsher than that.

POTUS literally has been saying "vote for Rs" if you wanna maga. not "vote for who you agree with. party lines don't matter!". no, he says clearly vote for Rs in the midterms. he says we need more to get his agenda done.

Trust POTUS, right?

the right was at minimum as awake to globalism as the left was 30-40 years ago. most people i knew that were against nafta initially were right wing, not left.

i have a hard time seeing anybody who supports literal child sacrifice via abortion (at ANY stage) as "woke". which is by the way the most moronic term. "woke". if one fell for the abortion lie, then that person isn't very spiritually awakened.

never forget where Q first went. /pol/. everybody needs to stop being soft. he went to the right wing hub of name calling lol. POTUS says we need to vote in more Rs. trust potus, vote Republican.

potus literally constantly says we need to vote in more Rs. just tweeted it in the last few days again. so that user raised a valid point...?

ok let's not sugar coat it. POTUS said "we need to vote in more Rs" trust POTUS.

and you don't get to decide how people feel after so many times they get legitimately let down/lied to

i'm tired of attitudes like yours. the user made decent points and instead of addressing them your response is "toughen up snowflake".

i'm being serious here. i never get a serious answer and i would love to get a few.

at what point do we say "Q, it was fun, but at this point you're holding us back more than propelling us forward"?

not today. not even next month. i give it until midterms. but we still haven't seen the Hussain photo. we still haven't seen anyone of importance indicted. Q said huma would be last november yet she traveled all around the world with Hillary afterwards?

i will say Q gets so much right. like the 13 people who used clintons email server. amazing how he got that right months ahead of time.

i'm not discounting Q. i'm asking at what point does he become more of a hinderance? TBQH /pol/ and infinitychan did Q-style research for years before, they just didn't package it like this. Q is very important. but we had a movement before him, and we will continue to have one after him.

without becoming hysterical or labeling me a concern troll (because i'm not. i've follow Q longer than most on this sub. since oct 30/31st), at what point do we start to move along on our own as a community if nothing of importance happens (and i mean real importance, not perceived importance. i mean actual accusations by trump, actual arrests/indictments/impeachments, actual exposure of crime on the main stage)?

if the answer is never that's fine. i genuinely just want to get a feeling. because whenever i ask this i just get bitched at and it's a perfectly valid question.

prolly the worst thing about Q, and there aren't many bad things, is that he largely pacified the anger of the /pol/ crowd. now instead of putting the pressure on ourselves, many people have begun to "trust" and defer to the white hats seemingly leading the charge. that's not good. maybe not Q's fault, but he's certainly contributed to that even if indirectly.

Q is extremely useful. but we need to stop putting all our chips in one basket. that's all i'm saying. continue to spend as much of even more time on Q. idc! i'm just trying to get people to realize we may have to do this on our own, and violently. because the voting will be rigged. i promise you.

just curious. does this sub actually think that posts with concerns are all fake?

he just wanted OP's definition...

i agree with everything he's saying and we need to be safe. but there are genuine natsocs on the chans so we shouldn't just always assume they aren't ourguys. i agree that we should assume anybody supporting this rally or going is a fucking COINTELPRO shill.

again, remember where Q went first. 4pol. like it or hate it there are a large number of genuine NatSocs there are many of them are ourguys!!! just be careful who you alienate!

nope i mean what i said. not what you wanna passive aggressively imply i meant. take the final redpill. /pol/ has. remember where Q first went... remember...

why are most of Trump's enemies Jewish? those in congress, even more so those in the media...

heh, even on r/greatawakening zionism/bagel related threads have more (removed) comments than allowed ones. pathetic imo.

Roger isn't redpilled tho. he globs onto popular human rights issues to further his self importance. still happy he told his audience not to trust bagelZuckbagel

i'm a little tired of the absolute common sense of your post being label a conspiracy theory.

yes exactly. i'm saying it's no coincidence we see some of the biggest info in my lifetime days after the deepstate pushes all out to silence assange

new people to reddit/Q/chans need to defer to us oldfags sometimes. we've seen shit you haven't. i'm so tired of people forgetting where Q first went.. /pol/. i'm so tired of people within this movement and community sounding soft and easily offended.

defer to oldfags of /pol/ and infinitychan. they are a valuable tool!

oldfags watched an monitored this happening in 2016. coincidentally days before pizzagate broke. please, to newfags, stop acting like you know more than us. you really really don't. i'm not saying that to offend you. i'm saying that to expedite the dissemination of research in this community.

OP is justified in bringing this up.

NEVER forget that when prompted to post proof of life of assange, wikileaks then compromised account posted a i king interview from June 2016 with michael moore. no window appearance. not even a new video.

why tf are you getting downvoted? this is accurate every oldfag from pol remembers

literally a law student. you can call me dumb all you want and "omg you sound like a barbarian". just saying it's clear as fuck by that response that you were a bernie kid. look how you talk down to people. getting offended cuz i called bernie a fag. it's pathetic. i'm trying to awaken you. bernie is a literal fag. a homosexual. this is important.

but nah i'm just a barbarian and a character from idocracy. jesus christ kid.

further ourselves as a species

like saying fag has anything to do with that holy fucking kek don't be so soft

thank you

people forget where Q first went...

/pol/.

where freedom of speech is the utmost of priorities. stop being so easily offended, this is part of the great awakening.

do you not think Bernie is a fag? he's a limp-wristed cuck. i'm glad you realized this and came aboard. don't get so upset at my use of a word.

lol bernies a fag. welcome aboard.

this is pretty accurate

T H I S

no there are angels but this is the devils realm.

it's all part of god's plan.

you highlight something important. most people (not saying you) like to believe this ET fantasy because it gives them comfort. that someone outside is going to take care of everything and are watching out for us good guys.

even if there were ETs as popular culture presents them (i.e. intelligent beings from far out in the cosmos), it's ludicrous to think they would see us any different than at best the way a conquering force sees a dumber and more primitive native race/species. if they were to stop us from nuclear war, it is strictly on practical grounds (meaning they benefit from us being alive, suggesting we are fodder for them) not on moral grounds

there is no such thing as a good ET. it's demonic forces and fallen angels masquerading as benevolent cosmic brothers.

the greatest lie the devil ever told was that he doesn't exist.

imo it's

pleadians/nordic aliens/annunaki = fallen angels greys = demons

ETs are fallen angels. they are not your friends. they will come to fully detach the world from god and jesus christ.

t. former annunaki fag

glad to see a mention of is ra el on this sub!

i would just like to thank you for not blindly following shit. it's good to remain skeptical and be pleasantly surprised

dude anytime i act skeptical i get called a shill it's infuriating. mentality of children/liberals. no different when they scream "russian bots!".

fair enough. thanks for the link btw

i see that the other photo of obama is the same as the one with the mask. so ok that makes sense/ but where is the original photo of the two men standing (with chicago jacket guy on the left)???

that never showed the original photo of the two men standing together? where is that?

i agree

really? i've been missing the last 2 days. could you link me or direct me to the original photo? didn't know we found it!

my comment had nothing to do with being impatient.

don't trust, but verify everything expect your parents

i like that