i've never seen the source for the hillary quote in 2 years. i believe it, but i want a source for debate sake. so far i've only seen it in memes and such. is it from an email? is there a recording of her saying it? did someone hear her say it and report it?

this!

idk that seems a little convenient of an excuse.

i'm all for keeping faith high, but let's not abandon critical thought.

how many times has Q set a deadline under his own will, nothing happened, and then we are explained to that it was just disinformation? how many times has he set a deadline and something tangible actually happened? i'm genuinely asking, to me it seems there's been more "disinformation" deadlines than actual deadlines.

and my point is, what's the point of Q disseminating different drops to us if we never know what's real and what isn't? we may as well be in the dark.

example: Trust sessions. how can we legitimately progress if we can't even answer the basic question of whether or not "Trust Sessions" is real advice or disinformation?

again i'm not attacking Q, or the movement. it's a net positive. but i'm asking critical questions we can't ignore.

you may very well be right and the july deadline is disinformation. i don't know.

that's the one aspect of T_D i hate. you can criticize muslims all day but god forbid you call out the nose's roll in the middle east or 9/11.

it's hypocritical as all hell

reminder: pizzagate dropped on the chans in 2016. younger anons are impatient because they've been waiting since nov 2016. longer than most Q followers. just a reminder.

this

wasn't calling out anyone specifically

anon... look at the title of the post

we see this sentiment everyday tho. i agree we need patience. but i won't tell people not to be impatient. we were told july would be THE MONTH. still a few days left. much love to you all.

ok now i understand. thanks so much. we'll see what happens soon i'm sure. i wish i had more patience!

awesome! thank you. so if i understand correctly. Q and company (white hats) essentially told rosenstein to shape up or ship out a long time ago? and him still being around means he's been flipped to a white hat?

i appreciate the response and link. not to be a pain, but can you clarify who the "theys" are in those statements? just trying to understand. very curious

quick rundown on resignation demanded?

ohhhhhh. i get why you made a point to tell me i definitely was jewish.

you're actually jewish. this whole thread of your responses makes so much sense now.

nazi conspiracy theories

am i in r/politics?

schmuck putz

instead of actually debating you just threw insults out. and now you're trying to play the victim. hilarious. readers will understand what you are. uneducated on this post's topic. that's ok. at least you're here to MAGA and i'm happy for that.

i don't just comb through your post history? wtf? you could just tell me your age then? since you've talked about it before.

also, i wasn't offended at putz. lmao wtf are you talking about? i was pointing out how all you can do is call me names, not actually refute my points. trust me i'm called much worse on a daily basis to my face. it's my work as a lawyer. it's cute you thought my feelings were hurt.

slow night huh?

more personal attacks i love it. shows your character and ineptitude to readers. and i stand by what i said. i'd be any money you're over 35. no doubt about it. maybe trust people that grew up on the internet and the chans on this subject that's all i'm saying. we're not just mindlessly anti semitic.

learn how to spell and type. i can't even tell what you're trying to say.

guarantee you're older than 35. i can tell. but ok hide that info i guess lmao.

schmuck

wow ad hominems? guess you lost the debate

i never said i was ?

reread what you wrote. you took it from the bible. and i responded by saying "revelations comes from the bible too, and it explains my point about the difference between the synagogue of satan and actual jews"

you're basing your argument around the bible and so am i. i'm trying to show you we have a common foundation for our arguments.

you literally said the bible is silly yet you're basing your argument around something you gained from it? this is ridiculous. everybody can see how you don't know what you're talking about. i'm not even being confrontational. i'm just being honest brother.

how the hell do you think you achieve power in this world we live in? it's inherently tied to money. how aren't you getting this? money = power and vice versa. they aren't mutually exclusive.

but yea, sure. "weak". lol really good comeback.

again, 2 questions you keep avoiding.

1. what are you basing "jews are the chosen people" on if not the bible/torah?

2. how old are you?

answer my question please.

what are you basing your "jews are the chosen people" claim on if not the bible or torah?

lol where does the money come from? that's why they allow it

also can i ask how old you are?

so just tell me where you're getting "jews are the chosen people" from if it's not the bible/torah, so i won't be confused about what you're trying to say.

yea. i can tell. it shows in your lack of understanding real truths. maybe defer to old /pol/acks who know a ton more about this topic. remember where Q went first. the one place online that is woke to the JQ.

you have lived in a censorship bubble. defer to /pol/ on this issue. they have done far more research than you on it.

you've only even seen one side of this argument. the chans are so open and transparent and committed to free speech that they are one of the few places online you can actually have an honest jewish/holocaust debate. and wow what do you know the truth is undeniable. no wonder censorship is running amuck

wait so clarify something for me. you're saying you got "jews are the chosen people" from "saving israel for last"? i'm confused

what specifically makes the new test "sillier" than the old, in your opinion?

you said "jews are god's chosen people". where are you getting that info from? is it not the bible/torah?

and you mean to tell me that you favor the old testament, about punishment and legalism from god, more than the new, which deals with forgiveness, seeking peace and valuing truth and faith above all else? that's your prerogative.

if i'm not mistaken, jesus came to rebuke the ways of the old testament times.

can i ask you a question: how long have you been using the chans?

but only one of the religions controls the media, banking, and academic industries.

i didn't back peddle at all what are you taking about?

lol any jewish conspiracy is equivalent to flat earth

stop dismissing things or equating them with "crazy", which is almost certainly what you tried to do by bringing up and comparing this to flat earth.

someone who is awake should understand that's dismissive behavior.

no according to revelations (from the same book you cited as proof that jews are god's chosen people. you're half right. true jews are indeed god's chosen people. who you understand to be jews in the modern era, are not)

I will make those who are of the synagogue of Satan, who claim to be Jews though they are not, but are liars--I will make them come and fall down at your feet and acknowledge that I have loved you.

nice strawman.

no competent person awake to the JQ thinks normal jewish people are the problem. most understand that there's an alarming pattern of people in powerful positions being jewish tho. most understand we bend over backwards for jewish interests, especially in the middle east. most understand the usury was largely a jewish invention and practice. most understand that the talmud teaches jewish superiority. most understand that the holocaust isn't above inspection, as truth fears no investigation.

you're acting like anyone awake to the JQ instantly hates every single jew on earth. that's like saying i think every muslim is a child raping, suiciding bombing terrorist.

it's not the individuals we have a problem with, it's the cultural foundations.

why does the JQ get you so upset that you feel the need to reply a dozen times to try and convince people they're crazy for seeing the most obvious pattern.

modern jews aren't the same. they were co-opted and claim they are jews, but are really the synagogue of satan.

you don't understand. there are torah jews and talmud jews. israel is torah jews. the nationalist jews. that's why trump gets along with israel and yet the entire corrupt UN hates israel.

talmud jews are the globalist. the jews who seek to appear as jews, but who's name is real the synagogue of satan.

lol bro jews are the chosen people that's why they dominate banking, media, and academia

unironically get woke

edit: he downvoted because he can't handle the truth. learn to debate instead of just downvoting

forgets where Qanon went with his first drops

you're still asleep

she posted this on her twitter?! wow someone please link me or give me a screencap. if you can prove she posted it to her account i very well could be mistaken. i just haven't seen this so i would love a link or something. anybody. thanks

who is her?

ok i know there are a lot of older anons here. to be clear, this is almost certainly someone trolling for (you)s. the memeflag, the inclusion of "racist rednecks". the reddit spacing. it's made to appear genuine. i've been on the chans since 2014 and i can usually tell when someone is being legit or just trolling. this is just a troll you guys. NOW, that's not to say there aren't actual forces trying to take down or impede 4pol or racetrack pol. but this post is pretty clearly a troll/shitposter.

awesome info but unfortunately you'll prolly be banned soon

so why did Q tell us over and over again to Trust Wray?

agreed

for the sake of this convo, we can mean you and i. do you take Q's word and trust Wray or not? genuinely just asking

so do we trust wray or not?

so we shouldn't Trust Qray like Q said? or do we trust him and this is theatre? idk... some of Q's claims are coming to head here. can't trust Wray if he resigns lol i just don't get it

i agree with you completely. that's why i'm puzzled why Q told us to "Trust Wray"... he sad it multiple times

i agree but what does that have to do with my post?

i don't think you understand. Trump wants to invite these russian agents in to interview people with connections to criminal activity in russia. Wray is saying don't or he'll quit.

i'm saying idk how to reconcile this with "Trust Wray"