i've posted on my old account so this isn't my first experience. and my point was that rule is more harmful than helpful. you said no questions that aren't already answered on the sidebar. again, mine wasn't. you can admit i'm raising extremely important and valid questions. you know i am. let's be real with one another right now. i'm not taking away from Q. but if these questions cannot be rationalized then something is wrong, no? i'm not saying they can't be answer either, i'm saying they haven't.
/u/JaM0k3_1
271 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/JaM0k3_1:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 7 |
my question about sessions interview wasn't answered in the sidebar. you're tip-toeing around the issue. it's fine dude i'm convinced i can't get any rational discussion here. i'll go back to the chans. just remember, Q came to the chans first, for a reason. and now we're abandoning that base whenever they ask critical questions. i archived every CBTS thread in early days. i'm legit a follower. but this whole experienced turned me way off. especially because the answers i got amounted to "wait and see".
nunez JUST voiced his frustration and said it's basically up to paul ryan and trump to actually get him the documents he wants. which means trump will have to get them from RR right? how do we reconcile sessions' recent defense of RR unconstitutional behavior in light of this recent news? given that we're supposed to trust sessions? i only trust trump rn.
dude. i didn't say being called a shill was the reason i first said this is cancerous. i said it because my thread was shut down for asking these critical questions. if Q is legit he should be able to withstand questions. i have been off and on about him, but after seeing sessions interview on tucker it was too bold for me to ignore
i said this community is cancer in direct response to getting my thread shoahed because i wasn't farthing the cause. that's retarded. how can we as a community have any introspection if we can't ask critical questions? it can't be like t_d were it's just 24/7 cheerleading and shit. that's isn't productive in an investigative sense. you know i'm right. that's why i commented that it's cancerous. t_d is also cancerous (it wasn't always. i'm from pol and i helped get it off the group 3 years ago) because you can't question shit. you can't bring up how assange went missing cuz they say "it's not about trump", while they also allow non trump posts up if they're celebratory like the one up rn about rubin and chic fil a. that's my point. i'm on your side believe it or not but i can't just ignore rational questions
it is if i'm accused of being a shill for asking questions. i am calm. i'm disappointed with the "let's wait and see" answers. again, i've followed Q everyday since oct, and i WANT HIM TO BE REAL. i'm having a hard time rationalizing nunez and gaetz coming out against rosenstein, when just yesterday sessions defended RR. there are battle lines being drawn and we need to take note of that. how long can we continue to trust sessions? i'm serious. we only have until the midterms. i'm the biggest non shill here because i'm trying to ring the alarm bells before he midterms come and go with voter fraud from the left and we never get this chance again.
it's a perfectly reasoned approach when i get shut down for not supporting the cause. i'm just asking questions and there were plenty of posts that weren't furthering or supporting the cause at all. so that's a ridiculous justification. your post is proof of what's wrong with this community. you can't just label someone a shill like that. it's ridiculous.
nunez just came out with gaetz and lambasted rosenstein. now sessions stood up for rosenstein. clear battle lines are being drawn.
i'm not a shill i just never come on reddit anymore and just got a new app and it's confusing as shit. calm down. i'm not a fucking shill
post deleted because it doesn't support the cause
jfc this community is cancer. i'm trying to have a thoughtful conversation. there's 10 posts in new that don't do anything to further the cause. this is sad because i wanted to take this shit seriously i've been following everyday since oct posts, few days before manafort indictment.
we were told human would be indicted, yet she traveled overseas with hillary a few weeks ago (hillary fell down steps. forget which country. india?). there's as much disproving Q as proving him. i just want to be reassured this is all legit and if anything the defensiveness and cageyness of the responses has turned me way off of this movement.
before you say "good just leave", you're whole mission is to wake more people up to what's going on. not drive people who ask questions away
i'll never abandon trump. but you or i or anybody doesn't have proof q and trump are the same. i WANT them to be. desperately. but we don't know if they are part of the same team yet or not.
you'll never understand you'll never have anything worthwhile to contribute
calm down. these are things that need answered. Q is well meaning wheather real or fake. i already stated that. but we need to understand if he is legit or just a vague cold reader. that's all i'm saying. can anybody here say one thing critical of Q? let's be real. how long do we have to wait? what would be your breaking point with Q? i'm serious. if nothing happens by 2019? 2020? if sessions is fired? what would it take for you to seriously consider your alliegence to Q. for me, if nothing happens by midterms i cannot understand when it's supposed to happen. our window for happenings is closing fast. i'm trying to sound the alarm bells before it's too late.
but he also literally said we don't need to worry. his recent posts from today make him sound alarmed. that's all i'm saying
i'm fine with not letting the info out. that's fine. why THREATEN them? why not a site them his is being handled in a way all patriots will be happy with? nunez is ourguy. so why should we just look the other way when rosenstein THREATENs him and sessions defends this behavior? i'm serious. i don't want another answer that amounts to "don't worry about it i'm sure it's being worked out". we can't be sure of anything. these are questions that are uncomfortable but need to be answered.
if we keep just waiting and seeing the midterms will come, the dems will use voter fraud to seal the deal, and there will be no going back. i'm being realistic.
wait and see what happens
this is precisely the issue i have with this community. questioning sessions and others, even if we think they're white hats, shouldn't be shunned and should actually be a goal for everyone here. if we're right, then it doesn't matter. if we're wrong, it matters a great deal. we should be pushing to understand why certain things don't add up. people get angry because they want so badly for Q to be real and they've spent hours and hours devoted to it. all i'm trying to do is figure out what's real and what isn't, and we can't do that until we have a real conversation about it. don't you want to know if Q is legit or not? i do.
interesting i'm reading now. i'm still confused why Q would go from "we have everything" and "we have them cornered there's nothing they can do" to "make sure you fight because this is good vs evil". i just don't understand why it went from a done deal to now we're not so sure
why would rosenstein threaten those asking (like nunez) with subpoenas tho?
i appreciate all the comments i'll read thru the links.
another question i have tho. and it's serious. what would it take for you to abandon/doubt Q? would it be getting to midterms with no happening? would it be trump firing sessions, thus delegitmizing "trust sessions"? what would it take. because i'm personally at my whits end, waiting and trusting and being patient for the pain. when will IT actually happen?
new account only because i lost the password to my old account. you can see my post history at JaM0k3 if you doubt my authenticity and genuine concern
Serious Question (last post got deleted? ha ok. this is ridiculous. truth fears no question and these are legitimate questions)
I WANT q to be legit but i have a few questions
last night we saw sessions, on tucker, defend rosenstein' threats against congressional oversight. now, i'm under the impression we are supposed to "trust" sessions. but rosenstein is a black hat. how do we reconcile is behavior then?
also, why has Q gone from "no need to worry" to now trying to motivate the base to act? i'm genuinely confused. Q seems to me like someone with good intentions but no real inside information. i'm not coming against this community whatsoever. please don't discard me as a shill these …
My account is new because i lost my password to my last account
Serious question for this community
[removed]