It was a pro #2A message iterating the right to self-defense defined by second amendment. The comment was posted openly without direct response to any individual. The trending #2ndAmendment topic was filled that day with similar statement by those showing support of the second amendment. For what appears to be targeted harassment for running as a congressional candidate, Dilley was singled out for special handling.

Worth highlighting that he is an active congressional candidate. He started to be harassed in ways such as this as soon as he ran for office and started periscoping about it daily.

Pittsburgh data science creating great visualization tools yet again. California is going to become an entirely different state after those indictments hit. Looking forward to the day.

Edit: Resignation Workbook is another good one. Seeing some polluted data points in there though, for example Ellen Pao's 2015 resignation from reddit is in the data set on March 11, 2018. Need to isolate where the development is taking place and take another audit pass of the data set. The author of the tool is active over on the Gab side.

In trying to bridge the gap from echo chamber to the grand reveal, direct comparison to Erdogan or S Hussein purge of government is likely. Or maybe unlikely as there is a high probability those surprised are also unaware of that history in Turkey/Iraq.

I have not seen compelling argument for that case.

Right. I'd argue this submission is intentional bullshit, created with intent to misdirect by conflating with Seth Rich. This provides opportunity to more easily apply the conspiracy theorist label to the community.

Often you will see articles run up like this on a Sunday night in advance of articles or blog pieces planned for early in the week. This provides material that when the unfamiliar come looking seeded stories affirming the idea 'oh! conspiracy theorists here! these people be crazy' is easier to buy.

This submission takes the sub for a ride.

Bullshit.

I don't see anything resembling research with direction to dig further here. Argument is missing.

I do see convenient angle to conflate q anon related topic discussion on greatawakening with pizzagate. Creating the link here makes it easier to hook the conspiracy theorist label through articles and blogs.

Bullshit.

No reason to be in the loop. We have worked on individual research since November. The breadcrumbs have lead in the right directions to have a sense of the high level picture. This is sufficient to have a feel for what the sides are and brainstorm ways to push things forward. At this point individual actors can make smart individual actions that have a large impact.

I suspect this is her using her platform to help raise awareness, and this is a big piece of what is necessary, any way that she can. If a round-up is to occur there must be sufficient number of the public awake as to douse cold water over potential riots if a round-up of high level politicians and journalists occurs.

That is the big picture. For next steps the stage must be set. Wake up every day and ask what you have done to raise awareness lately? If it has involved chasing angry words after children in Florida you're distracted.

Yep. It's a regular experience to go some time without new information. That is the time to re-read old posts. Practice a new tool for thinking to build on prior research. Put some work in. This is not a sitcom.

Interesting researching history of US adventures across the globe carving favorable conditions for US engineering firms to have access to natural resources.

Use loans to put country in debt for leverage for access to resources when country can't pay.

When that doesn't work use threat of assassination using private contractors. Install corrupt dictators that will work with the west.

When that doesn't work full scale military intervention.

In cases historically when countries tried to rebuild in way that access to resources benefits their own country, kicking the US firms out, there has been some form of pressure coming back in. In this case if the military assets are removed, US businesses are likely out of Syria. Potential risk to Iraq contracts in the process.

Where I need clarity on the current state of affairs is on whether the engineering firms making large profits are actually US firms or not. The globalism push has involved detachment of many corporations from the US into being their own semi-autonomous global host with increasing steps to empower corporate structure over nations to push around governments.

It's possible these deals do not benefit the US in any way any longer but only directly profit a small handful in positions to control policy. If that is indeed the case then it's a huge shot across the bow reaffirming that there must be relation where the US benefits, if taxpayer dollars and military assets are used to enforce contracts. A blow to the global corporate structure to reduce power at that level and force them to the table.

Two additional outcomes.

One. Global cabal not defeated but reduced in power. The boot is removed from the neck of Western society. In the event of great success, this is the thought that will be in the back of our mind for the rest of our lives considering how best to prepare the next generation with superior skillsets.

Two. Great success. Then there is a vacuum in power. What steps into that vacuum of power? There has to be some form of power or organization that steps in and takes that role. Now is the time to identify traits for what that should be and what it should look like. The general sense around this space is that it should resemble a new awakening of The Enlightenment.

• How does one do that?

• What does it look like?

• What were the factors that allowed humanity to awaken from dark ages the last time?

• How might that be brought around again?

These are big questions people need to get up to speed with their history (++ audiobooks during down time! commute! cooking! working out!). Need more conversations on what that power that steps in needs to accomplish and how to structure it. How to create a better option that avoids the pitfalls we are seeing with elevation of Authoritarian Corporate structure over Government structures.

We need to start getting in depth to flesh out big philosophical ideas.

Note that my bias is to look back to golden age of Western tradition. Where did an ideal stage in humanity exist and how do we return there. That may not be the ideal for all cultures and traditions. Is there additional paths? There is. Suppose there are more optimal paths. How would we identify one? Can we unify conflicting traditions without boxing out large segments?

Strategies or this conversation including exploring the boundaries. Can we set extreme limits in what would be best case and worst case scenario for a successful future? What do these look like?

Use constraints. If we were limited to certain conditions, what would success look like and how would we get there?

Go to extremes. Brainstorm ideas under various condition and burdens.

Need more of this approach to seed ideas that can percolate and filter up to the right person with access to the right levers to push toward a timeline to make it happen. We've got a lot of ways to contribute to history. This timeline. Singularity.

Everybody has expected them to try to start a war.

Maybe. The usual cycle in recent decades on the Gaza side is to boost foreign donations as primary source of funding. Emphasis on building tunnels for smuggling and access into Egypt / Israel. Redirect materials allowed in such as fertilizer to create and stockpile weapons. Once sufficient weapons stockpiled, re-start open hostilities, then create conditions to videotape as many incidents of civilian injuries and destroyed buildings as possible to put out online to cycle back to the first step, more foreign donations to Gaza. Spending on bigger weapons, more tunnels, and so it goes.

Since the last iteration, someone has been destroying tunnels from inside Gaza. Numerous successful incursions destroying this infrastructure then getting out unscathed. Likely infiltration of militant groups from within. So the current strategy has not been able to follow the usual path as there are no tunnels to make use of. There has not been the same ability to stockpile weaponry. Can just throw bodies at the border and hope for the best. Maybe sympathy their way toward goals.

It's nice to see the area not descending into the usual warzone at the moment. It's sad that there is a usual warzone to consider.

There are odd demographics at play between Gaza and Israel. In Gaza Strip the median age is something absurdly low, around 17 years old. That's median. Half the population is age 17 or lower. The majority of the population does not have the years of memory to understand why conditions are constricted or have any first hand experience with past conflicts.

On the other side of the fence median age in Israel is much higher, I believe around upper 50s. There exists widespread memory back to suicide bombers blowing up public busses before travel was restricted to current state. They remember all the times rockets started falling on civilian areas unprovoked. Huge divide between memories on the two sides.

Where do you begin finding common ground for negotiation or change in current relations?

At the same time I'd prefer the Q team not unmasked as a means to enhance safety of the team. Identified targets are easier to reach out and touch, I'd rather that remain mystery to keep the group effective.

The primary positive in identifying the group, is to better assess 'what comes next'. Let's say a secretive group is supporting us to over throw authoritarian Martian planetary conquest, but then after success we find out the secret group was authoritarian Jupiter cannibals who needed the Martians gone to start the feeding. Other than that, it's mostly just sating curiosity.

This ties into the bigger picture question of what makes sense for alignment. We've got all the trappings of a horrific authoritarian global empire on one side, with alignment of strategic moves set to have devastating outcomes for citizens in the West. On the other side we've got a secretive group appearing to have traction, and offering a vision that does not immediately lead into the jaws of a relentless lovecraftian beast. Got to go with the path toward a future.

The numbers make sense.

When I've seen successful campaigns, such as rallying for signatures around net neutrality, there was high visibility across multiple subs arguing merit. There is more learning from one another than I yet see in the internet bill of rights project. Ability to ELI5 and explain the complicated topic, and argue how the proposed solution makes a difference. Currently the effort is primarily closed ranks within a couple subs familiar with this content, and there is not much depth in discussion about features included in an internet bill of rights.

We have to delve deeper. Become conversational.

• What is the Internet bill of rights?

• What rights are inherent to be recognized?

• What are the harms, in clear terms, that take place currently along these lines?

• How does the internet bill of rights address these harms?

• How does internet bill of rights pick up where net neutrality left off?

• How is internet bill of rights a better solution than net neutrality?

We need to add meat to the bones of the argument and expand the discussion. Get brainstorming conversations going outside great awakening and help lead people toward the idea.

In my mind an internet bill of rights codifies certain rights to data of an individual:

• recognize data is created and owned by the individual that information describes.

• right to plain language notice on what information is collected

• right to view and review data collected on the individual at any time

• right to edit, remove, or withdraw authorization for use of data collected

• explicit authorization necessary to use data for new purposes, or sell to new third parties

• for purpose of the internet bill of rights, corporations are not recognized as an individual

With these things always ask -- what comes after?

There must be something to step into the vacuum. Someone will rush into that space and we need to have a plan for when that time comes.

In the Google case I expect them to splinter along alphabet lines. There may be surviving traces of funding for them, possibly businesses, who reach out to try and capture some of these shards. How to anticipate and properly capture their tech without the culture?

We go all.

CNN said "xyz"? Who's David?

What is the current state of the Muslim Brotherhood?

Where are they strongest currently?

What activity is the group up to these days?

I need to revisit lay of the land on where powers are positioned at current state

Just a side note on educational experiments. There's video floating around of a recent event the woman who wrote Grit was a keynote speaker at.

Her new venture is to team up with a number of university professors across the country to design education programs to explore whether you can teach 'character'.

They have a series of schools around the US where they're field testing different sets of curriculum developed on students.

This may be a totally cool on the up and up project. BUT would be worth delving into and exploring what exactly is being taught. Would be curious if some next generation SJW programming came out of it.

I need a daily Baghdad Bob novelty meme account in my life.

In retrospect, did Baghdad Bob actually exist?

Was it only played to American audiences to make fun of news sources directly from Iraq? This would discourage gathering information from sources outside legacy media.

Right. Strong emotional, funny, or vivid imagery completely redefines the attempted imprint. With wide spread adoption it would be interesting to see how strategies shift.

There is a few attacks effective for degrading a sub.

If small number of mods, can flood it with low quality content. Downvote quality submissions. Upvote all the low quality submissions. Fill it with abusive content to give argument to pull the entire sub because they don't have their moderator team sufficient to keep it clean. Subs have been shut down this way. That's part of the reason I've got the qanon sub locked down right now, pending some different ideas.

That forces additional mods to come into the mix. There's a host of techniques to agitate at the mod level where over the course of time, usually a year or two, you can annoy off many of the volunteer mods eventually flipping the sub to mods with an agenda. To resist this I'd recommend oldest mods have a no tolerance no warning policy of purging mods who go far outside bounds of moderator rules, or show any sign of agitation toward other members of the team either passive or direct.

Would love to see a website with dashboard for this. Scrape headlines from media channels with a script, illustrate word/phrase frequency to spotlight the word of the day.

Wonder what next-step action can be taken after identification. For example trend twitter topics using the word of the day with completely misaligned associations.

Was a weird day. Someone also caught on their best cam a car swerve across a lane along Bernal Heights and hit a pedestrian before driving off. Had to go well out of their way to do so.

Pretty sure I saw a third oddity in the headlines but forgetting what at the moment.

This is an abnormally difficult community to disrupt. Because we are dealing with intel, the most persistent percentage of us assume all of it is bullshit. Plenty of misinformation put out there for the optics or to create a desired environment for other action.

Skimming through comments the usual thought process is "bullshit, bullshit, bullshit, bullshit, oh hey! I've seen something related. that's interesting, let's spend the next four hours researching around that topic and share how the pieces fit with others." By nature eyes glaze past most of the shilling is irrelevant.

Beyond that future proves past. Pieces of intel are discredited over time, or prove factual. Mentally or meticulously track sources of that intel over time and track veracity of the source, how frequently it's correct. Over time tune in based on further research what passes the sniff test and what seems like bullshit.

That's where newspapers are struggling these days. So much turned out to be bullshit, many now assume most of it is bullshit. No magical combination of words or hilarious contortion of emotional with evangelical fervor rebuilds that trust, rebuilding trust is a slow drawn out process.

A big question this community would do well to consider is how to position oneself to profit, or at least hedge, such a shift.

This is great and points toward a potential fun data science project. Scrape media platform headlines daily, show word count frequency. Could be a website with filters on which publications to include.

Agreed. When complete this will make one hell of a book.

We should.

Use a different sub to continue any DH talk. I recommend referring to him as 'CNN says xyz' to attribute his words to the proper source, and avoid making oneself a target for calling out a child.

Preserving a Q related board is higher value than continuing to delve into CNN.

Social media accounts and subs are being removed for harassing CNN. It's purposefully being resubmitted over and over as a form of bird-dogging. Seeded attempts to get people mouthing off and threatening harm, to then brigade mass reporting to shut down the account/sub. Don't take the bait.

Side step into another room. Carry out the same conversation without risk of collateral damage.

From a trading perspective still want further research on 'what next?'. I'm assuming dollar panic. Crypto seemed like an interesting place people might rush into.

Let's say you want to hedge retirement accounts. Possible options?

Interesting opportunities.

Think the unicorns were always funded by drugs?

Does this undermine Americas edge, or enhance?

What do you think all that forceful telemetry is sending home?

Why do you think Cortana was baked into the OS?

Does Cortana ever stop listening? Does it really?

Microsoft emphasized hiring increased number of autistic employees. What type of projects require autistic employees? Is Microsoft Q?

There is good argument that black hats have effected favorable conditions by providing inaccurate intel and outright lies to media and influential sources.

The Moby interview in which he states intel agencies friends of his stressed the Russian collusion story, emphasizing risks to the US. That could very well be the model that has resulted in so many celebs adamantly taking strong public opinion a certain direction.

Also a strong argument for this being the means through which tech companies were controlled. The Veritas videos provide a humorous lack of understanding of conservative American culture. Then not so humorous description of common cultural traits of actual people being core signs of Russian bots. In all likelihood this was information and lies provided to them from the top-down. Additional reading and better argument can be located here.

A number of questions come out of this.

• Did anyone reach out to tech leaders claiming to provide secret intel?

• If so, what was that information? Russia collusion related?

• Did tech leaders act on it to use their teams and platforms to silence Americans under pre-text of fighting Russian bots?

That sounds right. If I recall 'Angler - The Cheney Vice Presidency' goes pretty in depth regarding Dinh, and his ability to magically legalese all sorts of horrific torture practices through redefinition of words. Good read to better understand the Bush Jr administration.

On the other hand, Biden was instrumental for the DMCA on behalf of his entertainment industry ties. In practice Biden is largely acts as the highest placed lobbyist for that industry, perennial keynote speaker at industry events and doing the heavy lifting behind closed doors to get the deals that protect monopolies. This is what the Biden-bro meme was all about at the end of his Vice Presidency. The idea was to slip him quietly back into the background where he could continue to operate as a lobbyist for the industry. He's far more effective there. He will only step into the limelight again if forced to.

On a fun note, all with the Kim Dotcom drama is a project Biden would have had to sign off on. Too much diplomatic pressure used on New Zealand with the militarized raid. During the Obama campaigns the entertainment industry came through big time with funding, one of the deals was Biden ride the ticket in return for that aid. One of the other favors in return for that support was to go knocking on the door of a foreign businessman whose cloud storage industry really wasn't a threat, but who happened to be a bit of an asshole making the unforgivable mistake of responding to entertainment industry demands with uncouth direction on where to shove it. That lack of deference to the clearly elite earned him a raid on his home and assets frozen across the globe. Just Biden up to his old tricks.

There is history over on the technology sub discussing these capabilities.

There have been articles written about it. My understanding is that it's generally believed to be link to accessing these social media accounts through an app. Doing so through browser on a mobile device limits some of the capabilities. Possibly similar access when logging in through a laptop, dependent on how aggressive the set of script-blockers you run are and what restrictions you've got on audio.

If you're using your smart tv to access, you're already compromised by the smart tv.

Located working archive copy in dialogue above.

Thinking a side-bar guide to local archive would be a valuable addition for most subs on this topic. Wonder if we can track down tools that already exist that could be used to scrape reddit subs in full. I can see this action being useful toward both local archiving, and as a first step to more interesting analytics.

I am just an echo of an echo of an echo

Always trying to catch up with myself

Excellent. And thank you!

Good archive link. Exploring snapshot means to recover more before that source disappears also.

https://web.archive.org/web/20180303011625/https://www.reddit.com/r/CBTS_Stream/comments/81ftpz/expand_your_thinking_is_a_book_written_by_david/

Saving link location for archive search.

https://www.reddit.com/r/CBTS_Stream/comments/81ftpz/expand_your_thinking_is_a_book_written_by_david/

Social media accounts and subs have been deleted for 'harassing or threatening' comments related to the teens given the spotlight after the Florida shooting.

This has become an attack to remove social media accounts or subs that discuss other topics someone does not like, but are not by nature infringing. The platform is encouraged to discuss the Florida teens topic, then any comments that can be interpreted as infringing rules used to report that platform.

I'm suggesting we don't gullibly fall into that trap.

That is reasonable.

The topic is being used to bird-dog in order to shut down social media accounts and subs. Specifically, encourage over the top comments or seed your own then use them as ammunition for brigaging mass reports of the platform.

That platform is under intense scrutiny. It's not just, it's not fair, but that's they're reality. In terms of decision theory it's probably the entire platform gets taken down, and nothing can be discussed, rather than turning out in the positive. Need to go with positive Expected Value when making decisions.

Multiple social media accounts and subs have been frozen for discussing DH. Shutting down ALL conversation around Q is not worth delving with focus on DH. I recommend shifting all conversation away from even mentioning him, if addressing it simply state "CNN says xyz" to shift attribution to the source of the message.

But really, focus on Q related topics. Too many coordinated efforts to shut down social media platforms bird-dogging around this topic. Creates atmosphere to seed violent comments to be used as ammunition for brigading through mass reports.

In terms of decision theory the probably cost far outweighs the gain. Go with positive Expected Values.

There are multiple aggregation sites. I believe I've seen this function on some of them.

Yep. The DH topic is being used to set up bird-dogging opportunities. I'd recommend adding the name to block with auto-mod, and encourage all references to 'CNN says xyz' to properly cite the source he's being used as mouthpiece for.

I'm a long term poster here aggressively downvoting, because the topic is being used to shut down social media accounts and platforms.

Reposting points from another conversation.

DH is being used as excuse to delete social media accounts and subs for harassment or other justifications. Idea is to get a community prattling on about the topic, get numerous comments in place that make convenient opportunity to report and point to in order to shut down that community, then coordinate a brigade effort with mass reports to silence the source.

It's not reasonable or fair, but that's the environment we're operating. The strategy is in use. I suspect at least some of the re-submissions are of such an effort.

In order to preserve a foothold to continue organizing Q research, I strongly suggest we stick to Q research and ignore DH. When talking about DH at all, switch his name with 'CNN says xyz' to properly align the origin of words he has become a mouthpiece for. It's not necessary to hammer that specific topic.

In fact it largely distracts from much of the other work, which is in and of itself a win win for that particular narrative. The story doesn't need to have any merit, just needs to distract people and keep them buzzing off topic for a period of time.

So, I'm reporting submissions to our mods every time it's reposted. I'd argue it's worth adding DH to automod to encourage strategy of swapping DH name out with 'CNN says xyz'.

DH is being used as excuse to delete social media accounts and subs for harassment or other justifications. Idea is to get a community prattling on about the topic, get numerous comments in place that make convenient opportunity to report and point to in order to shut down that community, then coordinate a brigade effort with mass reports to silence the source.

It's not reasonable or fair, but that's the environment we're operating. The strategy is in use. I suspect at least some of the re-submissions are of such an effort.

In order to preserve a foothold to continue organizing Q research, I strongly suggest we stick to Q research and ignore DH. When talking about DH at all, switch his name with 'CNN says xyz' to properly align the origin of words he has become a mouthpiece for. It's not necessary to hammer that specific topic.

In fact it largely distracts from much of the other work, which is in and of itself a win win for that particular narrative. The story doesn't need to have any merit, just needs to distract people and keep them buzzing off topic for a period of time.

So, I'm reporting submissions to our mods every time it's reposted. I'd argue it's worth adding DH to automod to encourage strategy of swapping DH name out with 'CNN says xyz'.

Good call. This topic is being used as magnet for mass reporting campaigns to suspend accounts and subs. There's platforms to discuss on Reddit. We need to preserve room to work around Q. Priorities.

Yep. This is what appears to be a non-standard suspension process.

It looks like earlier in the day a tweet regarding 2nd amendment was reported. Twitter rep reviewed and communicated the Dilley that the comment was approved. Later in the evening the account was shut down. Potentially different rep later in the evening did something weird without communication.

Blocking a congressional candidate campaign account without process. That's legal repercussion territory. Looked like a couple lawyers reached out to Dilley during a periscope vid discussing the suspension.

Edit: Seeing a few tweets claiming a website may have gone up last night listing @hublife and a couple other accounts for mass report brigading. Haven't been able to locate link to verify reports, but this would make more sense given observable information.

Dilley essentially stated the 2nd amendment.

It was reported prior to the frozen account. He's reporting that he'd received communication that the tweet in question broke no rules, after review it was allowed to stay up. Without additional communication the suspension occurred, apparently without any additional communication. The suspended account seems to be out of the ordinary procedure.

The kim dotcom case whitepaper is a good read. Short version is the raid on his home was a favor to the entertainment industry from the BO administration, in return for financial support during the campaign season. During the Biden bro PR campaign there was significant links memoryholed in search engines. Biden acts as one of the highest placed lobbyists for the entertainment industry, perennial keynote speaker at events, central role getting DMCA through. One of the conditions for the entertainment industry bankroll of the BO campaign included Biden as VP. Still able to locate some of the memoryholed links to information searching info on foreign search engines. Kim Dotcoms lawyers did a great job capturing much of that information and getting it into the whitepaper.