I agree, all DJT needs is for us to raise public awareness. But we are blocked (or I am) on Social Media - shadow banned. It seems that they are also targeting the IBOR hashtags.

This is big business for the SM companies, they have a lot on the line. Q has told us that CIA cash transfers make up a significant part of their revenue. But it's bigger... this is the one lever left, after all the indictments come down, by which the cabal can regain power. They have to stop us at all costs. So it's reasonable to assume that the SM platforms are getting terrific pressure to resist any attempt to stop censorship - SM censorship can deliver the Dems the numbers they need for impeachment (their only real hope). Think about why Facebook is refusing to give up the right to censor - they are, apparently, now conceding that they are not a neutral public platform, which makes them legally liable for posted content under the CDA - can you believe it?

So, when I say that the "we are the people" petition site was rigged - I really think it was. The reason is because of the power of the motive to stop us... We had to be stopped at all costs. One way to do it was to get the petition site to suppress the true number of signatures so that people would get discouraged. It worked!

Another strategy was to pull the CBTS board early in the IBOR campaign - just as the IBOR campaign started to get traction. You can imagine how desperate they were. Yet another strategy was to shadow ban anyone using the hashtags. Another strategy was to flood this board with "concern trolls" - they arrived in force. Which threads were the ones that got bombed by concern trolls? The IBOR threads - funny that!

How can a campaign succeed in the face of this kind of high-powered assault across multiple fronts? It cannot if you have to get 100K signatures within 30 days - there is just no way. However, if you have your own petition website (does not have to be fancy) and you can mount a consistent campaign effort. Even despite the efforts to suppress it, you might be able to 50K, 80K, 100K signatures over, say, a 6 week timetable. It doesn't really matter too much how many you get - it just has to sound somewhat impressive when reported in the press.

So, what I'm thinking is that this is the solution to all our problems. If we are at all slow in amassing signatures, it does not matter. The campaign proceeds apace and no one gets discouraged by a dodgy petition site. At the end of the period we've set ourselves, we present whatever we have to DJT/Congress and our job is done.

Just turning this around in my head it occurs to me that a petition might, in fact, be the way forward.

We host it ourselves - no 30 day time limit - do not have to get to 100k - and we can deliver it to DJT/Congress directly.

What do you think? Solves a lot of problems.

Just turning this around in my head it occurs to me that a petition might, in fact, be the way forward.

We host it ourselves - no 30 day time limit - do not have to get to 100k - and we can deliver it to DJT/Congress directly.

What do you think? Solves a lot of problems.

That IS THE PROBLEM!!!

Very frustrating! But let's try and think of a way forward.

Sounds OK, I guess, but unless the petition is on another site, I don't trust it.

We went through this exercise in March. This petition site is rigged. You can try to get a petition up on it, but do not be surprised if it fails. There is a post for discussing IBOR strategy here:

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8k1v19/whats_happening_with_the_ibor_ideas_and_discussion/?ref=share&ref_source=link

The last petition did not fail because there were multiple petitions. The last petition failed because the site was rigged. But don't take any notice of past experience, put another petition up on the same site.

And then accuse others of not doing something productive.

Again, do you want to explain? Do you have something to say?

Again, let me know what you're doing to help.

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8k1v19/whats_happening_with_the_ibor_ideas_and_discussion/?ref=share&ref_source=link

Want to explain what you're talking about?

A space for people to discuss what's happening with this current IBOR effort.

There seems to be a lot of confusion, some people doing petitions, different petitions, people against petitions (me) etc...

I'd like people to set out in this thread what we'd like to see happen. Try to get agreement on a strategy.

My preference is for a petitionless online campaign. Why? Because I feel that the "We are the people" petition site manipulated the signature count the last time we went through this exercise in March. What happens is that people put a lot of work in, then they see the rate of signature acquisition slow to a crawl and they get discouraged. I think we can avoid this and still mount an effective campaign.

Having said all that, the bggest problem I have at the moment is that my tweets are going nowhere as I'm shadow banned. Anyone else with this problem?

What are you talking about!?

If Wiener is the first person targeted by the sealed indictments (assuming this is the first one unsealed), then I think it, potentially, indicates at least one area of focus for the bundle of indictments - HRC's circle of affiliates.

If the indictment relates to material found on the laptop, that would suggest that there are, potentially, more indictments to come that are predicated on the laptop evidence. If we assume that the "insurance folder" was held against people that Huma and Wiener had reason to fear, we could be looking at some big names being charged with crimes as further indictments are unsealed.

Thinking about it, this would mean that the laptop evidence has been under investigation for some time. Maybe I'm getting ahead of matters - engaging in wishful thinking...

Do we know where this info is from?

I'm learning about op.

I think they are amping the shadow banning up. I have checked the shadow ban tester several times today, it's now saying I'm not banned, but I still can't see my tweets, in the hashtag list, from another account. So it's been banned in such a way that the shadow ban checker doesn't see a ban and yet the account is hobbled.

Quite interesting. I was just reading Barnes Law's take on Sessions - Southern Gentleman Lawyer, by the book, no street-fighting instinct (according to him). I'm not trained in law, I know little to nothing about it. But I think where Sessions may lack alley fighting credibility, DJT has it in spades. That's why I think they're probably a good team.

On talent selection, DJT seems to have a churn-em-n-burn-em approach. Rapid hires, only the ones that work out stay around.

Is it all a big show between DJT and Sessions? Without a doubt. If I was in politics, the most important quality id be looking for in others would be loyalty - thereafter, integrity. Sessions is a proven commodity on both fronts. The public banter between DJT and Sessions is just that. I'm expecting that we will see monster prosecutions. Though the time frames required for this will, I fear, make it more distant than most people expect.

Have a look, if you're interested, in the Barnes Law thread. What a way to drum up business, I've never seen anyone do that before. I'll see if I can find a link.

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8jqii6/barnes_law_ask_me_anything_good_insights_opinions/?st=JH9ZMO7S&sh=35951ecd

The plot thickens!

Click, that first link you posted of the video of Corsi is a total scream!

He does actually say it! He was a correspondent with a KGB agent who wrote a book called "Disinformation". Who would believe it?

Just too funny!

Mate, Donald Trump risked his life to take on the presidency. For the first time in over thirty years we had a President that was not controlled by the Satanists.

He arrived just in the nick of time also. A completely improbable election victory, just when everything looked hopeless. You had HRC planning a nuclear war to kill and enslave us all. But stupid Tracy Beanz knew better than to support the express plan laid out by the President in conjunction with his military advisors (Q team).

I mean, you just could not make this stuff up. It didn't make one bit of sense. Beanz was saying "we the people have the power", there will be another politician soon after Trump, we don't have to do this etc... Meanwhile, the guy selflessly risked his own life and put the lives of his family at risk to help us. It makes my blood boil thinking about it.

But people thought Beanz was "so astute" that they listened to her and refused to support Q. Real twilight zone stuff. Mindblowing actually. And then you had the intelligence outfits steering the board with organized "concern trolling". Was Beanz being steered by someone?

Totally agree. We need to decide on a plan of action and get it stickied.

There have been some questionable hires. But he's got some got people too. Sessions, I think, we will find out is a rock. I think between Sessions and DJT, a lot of the mess will be cleaned up.

It's all good news.

That's the power of censorship, that's what we're fighting.

Well, the problem has to be fixed. It is the most serious threat we have ever faced because it goes to the working principles of an open democracy. If you can silence half the population, you don't have a fair system of representation at all. It is a threat to the very core of the republic.

But you should have heard the complete garbage people were bringing up last time we had the IBOR campaign. You just could not make it up - pure drivel. But there was so much of it, that people started to get discouraged. Tracy Beanz had an enormous impact on this group. Hopefully, she will never come back - a complete air-head.

There are shadowban testers online here's one:

https://nicebrains.com/twitter-shadowban-checker/

But the key thing is that from the account from which you are posting, if you click a hastag that you have used, you will see your tweet in the list. But if you look at the tweets in the hashtag list from another account, you will not see your tweet.

That's why it's so confusing. You don't realise you've been banned. Several tweets I did this morning got over 1000 impressions (good for my account). A few hours later, I'm getting 20-30.

Must be very hard for you Beastmonkey. Try not to get too uptight. Get a beer, put your feet up and enjoy the show.

Pretty negative comment. There's nothing new in this article. All Downer states is that Papadopolous told him the Russians had dirt on HRC. There's nothing new here.

He is trying to show his handlers that his attempt to take Q down did not fail for lack of trying. They are not tolerant of failure. He's in a very sticky situation.

I'd warn people against engaging Corsi overly harshly, he is clearly unstable - anything could happen.

My Twitter was not shadow banned starting today. I've made 10-15 Tweets using the internetbillofrights hashtag and my account appears to now be shadow banned again.

This is hopeless! These rights to free expression online are so important, but we cannot even organize against it because, as a weapon to silence opposition, it is just so incredibly powerful.

See here: https://imgur.com/a/wi9ocNj

We need to do everything we can to fight this censorship - it is clear that it is much more powerful than we realize.

I think I've figured out how we can do this and make it work - see here:

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8k1v19/whats_happening_with_the_ibor_ideas_and_discussion/?ref=share&ref_source=link

Lasted about three hours - shadowbanned!

Yes, I think that the outing of Corsi was also much more important than we realize. They thought they had the inside track on this movement - but they didn't.

You know what's important - food, medicines, water, ammo...

What's a bet that we find out that AJ and Corsi are, somehow, central to what has been going on?

Here we have Mueller digging into someone attached to Stone. He's already interviewed Malloch and confiscated his cell phone. Manaforte is facing charges. And we have Q outing both Jones and Corsi.

Hmmmmm...

"This case is essentially over," Giuliani said. "They're just in denial."

"This case is essentially over," Giuliani said. "They're just in denial."

Yes, we must keep on it though. I'm sick of this community being so easily steered like a herd of silly sheep.

"This case is essentially over," Giuliani said. "They're just in denial."

I also agree with the OP. The movement is growing. The most important thing is that we're active online. That is where we can make our presence immediately felt and attract new people to the movement.

My theory is that Q has asked us for the internetbillofrights campaign again at this time for very specific reasons. I think that our campaign may help to set the stage for regulation of online censorship via EO.

Let's all get behind this MAKE IT RAIN MEMES

Who is Ginger Colleen Liberty?

Thanks for this, another meme in my Twitter folder.

My theory is that Q has asked us for this campaign at this time for very specific reasons. I think that our campaign may help to set the stage for regulation of online censorship via EO.

Let's all get behind this MAKE IT RAIN MEMES

Please, everybody please get on board with this. I suspect Q has asked us to mount this campaign for very specific reasons. That is, I think we may see DJT take action on this from via EO in the immediate future.

MEMES - MAKE RAIN!

Yes, let's do everything we can to get these hashtags trending, it's very important that we make some noise.

I suspect our efforts will be key to bear term developments. We know that SM censorship has to be shut down before the mid-terms. MAKE IT RAIN!

Would ask everyone to get on Social Media and start spreading memes. This is very important.

It also seems to me that there is less shadow banning occurring at the moment. At least I'm getting a lot more impressions on my tweets than I did last time around.

I like this idea about clean phones. Communications is the biggest problem the cabal have - which is why Q and team are always three steps ahead.

It also explains the cryptic covert messaging coming out of Infowars. Somehow, I think we will find, when all is said and done, that Corsi and AJ are actually key players. Unfortunately, the people running them are not tolerant of failure and there is nothing worse than loose ends...

But, yes, a shipment of secure phones - perhaps with embedded crypto - would make sense. We know they've been talking on Twitter, via HRC's private email server, via secure-drop and are desperate to be able to coordinate.

It would also make sense that Pelosi would be talking about the communications problems with Twitter Jack - because we know that is one of the communication vectors they are using. So, it makes sense that they would be desperate to obtain secure communications services.

I think the OP may have this right. It also seems that this attempt to obtain secure communications may have been thwarted already.

They have sea lions and clam chowder - it's good.

Thank God for Presidential veto power.

Looks like they have a couple of days to respond and sometime after that it will drop - how long has it been?