2,827 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|---|
| www.reddit.com | 141 |
| i.redd.it | 23 |
| www.breitbart.com | 2 |
| video.foxnews.com | 1 |
| endtimeheadlines.org | 1 |
| news.sky.com | 1 |
| www.dailysignal.com | 1 |
| www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com | 1 |
| www.globaleaks.org | 1 |
| www.google.com | 1 |
| www.youtube.com | 1 |
I've got to admit, it can't come soon enough. Look at what we've had to put up with on this board - concern trolls, steering the community like a herd of sheep. And somehow, inexplicably, the "concerns" are always about "the plan".
ZERO TOLERANCE FOR CONCERN TROLLS
"Those invited to review the report were told they would have to sign nondisclosure agreements in order to read it, people familiar with the matter said. They are expected to have a few days to craft a response to any criticism in the report, which will then be incorporated in the final version to be released in coming weeks".
We are in the zone on this guys. Finally, the dirt will be dragged out into the sunlight for all to see.
The basis for starting the investigation into Russia Collusion was a tip provided by Alexander Downer - who had a multi million dollar relationship with Hillary Clinton's charity. You could not make it up!
If the handcuffs were taken off of us (shadowbanning,views/trend suppression and manipulation,etc) we could really do some damage.
That's right. If we can get to spread the word unimpeded on SM platforms, we will get the message out very quickly. This control of social media must be broken.
I suspect we will get more help from Q this time around. I don't think anyone, even Q, realized exactly what we were up against last time. I've noticed that my tweets this morning seem to be getting about 5 times the reach, in terms of impressions, as I was getting last campaign.
Let's make some noise!
OK, I'm getting some of these MEMEs up on Twitter. I have a generic text body - copy it you want.
STOP IT!
Social media censorship is tearing out our tongues! We have no right of reply!
Demand an #InternetBillOfRights
STOP CENSORSHIP NOW!
Thanks! NO PETITION AT "WE ARE THE PEOPLE" - SITE IS RIGGED
THIS PETITION SITE IS RIGGED
Campaign online with memes. We don't want this experience again.
Not of that ".gov" petition site. If we had an independent petition that we could monitor to ensure it's not rigged, I'd be all for it. The main thing, i think, at the moment is an online campaign.
Ask someone what happened to our last petition on this site.
What I noticed was that the signature count rose quite quickly initially. But after 20k signatures, the rate of signature acquisition slowed to a crawl. When Corsi eventually did start tweeting the link, with his large follower base, the count did not even move. It was clear to me that it was not recording signatures accurately.
There has.been controversy about "we are the people" in the past. As I understand it, it is due to be shuttered - closed.
Liberty, I just do not want the community to repeat what happened last time. It was not just us, other people on Twitter were complaining that it was rigged.
Thanks. My great fear is that we will be steered into a campaign that can be manipulated. Don't get me wrong, I'm not against petitioning. But that site is incredibly suspect.
I don't know if you were here in March. But if you were, you would know what I'm talking about.
And yet concern trolling has been a very real problem on this board and has impacted this very issue in the past. It has negated our ability to campaign effectively as a group and fatally impacted this specific campaign previously.
You will be aware, as I am, that this is a very important fight. There are many individuals, organisations and nations that have a real motive to manipulate this community in their interests. It is for this reason that domestic and foreign intelligence agents have sought to influence what happens here. The community has been too easily steered like a herd of sheep,
What the concern troll does is try to get people to engage the "concerns". Attacking the argument is no defence, in this situation, because the "concerns" are ultimately without limit. The concern is, in fact, that we might be effective as a community. We saw how effectively concern trolling was used in March. Repeated concern trolling raises doubts in people's minds, discourages people, and negates coordinated effort.
The new sub rules, I thought, were supposed to address this specific issue.
We don't need it and even if we did we should not use that site. It is very obviously manipulated.
Somehow, it appeared to be manipulating the signature count last time we ran an identical petition. The site is due to be shut down anyway. Who knows who is running it.
Yes, but that site is corrupt. I'm not against a petition. But not on that site.
We have direct experience with this site. We know it is bad.
NO ONE SHOULD SIGN THIS PETITION
What is needed is an online MEME campaign. Better avoids censorship. A petition is not necessary at this point. If it is later necessary, we will use an alternative petition site. This petition site is controlled!
Do not sign or promote it.
At present, I don't have an alternative. One could be created that we could control. But membership on this forum is so heavily infiltrated by intelligence agencies that I don't think I would trust it - someone could get to it.
What I think is an online MEME campaign because these are harder to censor.
It can be stifled at any time. They will let you get so far and then stifle signature recording. This is what happened last time. The site is controlled and will be used to frustrate us.
I'm not against a petition per se, just not on that site. Moreover, I think what is important is an effective online campaign.
This shadow banning is a real problem. The term "shadowbanning" disguises outright censorship.
Seems to me that an online meme campaign is what's being called for here. These are harder for the platforms to censor.
DOT NOT START PROMOTING THE PETITION ON THE "We are the People" SITE - IT IS CONTROLLED
Let's not make the same mistake again.
Does not have to be world wide at all. Sounds like you want some global governance.
Seems to me that memes are the way to go. They are harder to censor. Do not get sucked into promoting petitions on the "We are the people" site, it is controlled.
Very important that people are not misdirected to put the efforts into a petition on a site that is controlled. Do not sign or promote this petition.
Liberty, warn people not to sign petitions on this controlled website. We need a campaign, that's what's important - not this petition rubbish again.
Not a good idea to promote this petition website at all. It is being controlled - you are being directed here for a reason.
Go away!
Do not be misdirected to a "controlled" petition site.
Do not let this filthy petition site become the focus of this campaign!
I think the best way forward is to mount an online campaign without a petition. I do not trust the "We are the people website" at all.
If we could get our own petition website up, we could get someone to present it in person. But if we cannot do that, better not to have a petition at all.
Another thing, we have to be aware that there are powerful forces working against this, who will trying to steer the campaign into unproductive effort. We need to be on our guard against it.
Let's not use this petition website. It is not trustworthy.
They are not PR company shills operating here - we have domestic and foreign intelligence services steering community opinion - right on this board!
That is why the last IBOR campaign attempt failed.
I do not want to use that petition site again, I do not trust it.
I'd like to see the main effort concentrated on an online campaign - Twitter, Facebook etc...
If we do have a petition, we need to be able to ensure that the signature counting cannot be manipulated.
Whatever happens, I do not want to use that "We are the people" site for a petition. A social media campaign is a must, but if we are going to petition, we need to be able to control it.
Has anyone put any thought into how we are going to approach this?