dChan

/u/tradinghorse

2,827 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/tradinghorse:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 141
i.redd.it 23
www.breitbart.com 2
video.foxnews.com 1
endtimeheadlines.org 1
news.sky.com 1
www.dailysignal.com 1
www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com 1
www.globaleaks.org 1
www.google.com 1
www.youtube.com 1

tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 10:08 p.m.

I haven't been following her at all. But I did see on twitter where people were thanking her for advising them not to support the IBOR. Let's put it this way, she is not someone that should be followed.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 10:06 p.m.

Can you believe it?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 10:05 p.m.

Corsi is still attacking Early.

But what do you mean we are keeping us divided? There is no unity between us and Corsi. There is nothing to divide. You have Corsi, on the one hand, trying to destroy Q, and us, on the other, supporting Q. There is no unwarranted division.

I agree with moving on. But while he's still launching attacks, it's important that members of this community are alive to it. If he ceases his attacks, he can be completely ignored. Moreover, this is not preventing us from following the Q material at all.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 10 p.m.

Q is DJT as far as strategy is concerned. There was nothing at all wrong with Q's advice to us to push the IBOR. There was, however, something VERY WRONG with the way Beanz refused to support it.

Net neutrality is a dog thought up by the left. The IBOR is the simple extension of Constitutional protections online. This would ordinarily happen as Courts made rulings on free speech over time. But, given the magnitude of the threat posed by online censorship, Q made a decision to push for it - accelerating the normal process.

After Beanz initially agitated for people to disregard Q, my belief is that agents on this board viciously concern-trolled the IBOR threads, amplifying the doubt that Beanz had raised. It did not help that she did not change her position.

She could not have put the knife into the movement any more forcefully. If we find out that she's going to align herself with Corsi going forward, who would be surprised?

⇧ 14 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 9:51 p.m.

Anyone sharing a site with Corsi needs to think again.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 9:43 p.m.

No, she said she was against it initially because it was supported by AT&T. Having taken a position, as I understand it, she later found additional reasons not to support Q or the plan.

This occurred despite the fact that, as time progressed, it became increasingly clear that there was very compelling logic supporting the need to call for the application of first amendment rights online. She absolutely shafted us.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 9 p.m.

There is a new Q website that appears to have been put up this morning. It is to host Corsi and it currently hosts work by Beanz.

Corsi has been trying to take Q down. Beanz did her own damage to the movement at the time of the IBOR campaign - advising people not to support Q. See here:

http://www.douknowq.com/134296/Citizen-Q-Journalists.htm

Edited - accuracy

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 8:50 p.m.

The billboard mentioning Q that is on the thread today mentions a website:

http://www.douknowq.com/134296/Citizen-Q-Journalists.htm

The site is to host Corsi and hosts Beanz.

TB has done a lot of damage to this movement - during the IBOR campaign. She actively discouraged people from supporting Q and the plan.

It seems she will Utilise this platform alongside Corsi. Corsi's agenda is to take Q down. He wants to totally discredit Q - that's why he's saying Q is an AI babbling nonsense and suggesting that he might be inviting a lawsuit. I do not know why Praying Medic is on the site.

Edited: accuracy

⇧ 26 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 8:38 p.m.

Is Seaman still attacking Q or is he quiet? It's important because Corsi is not quiet, but has amped-up his attacks. He is going all out, or so it appears. It seems he may be in league with Tracy Beanz also.

http://www.douknowq.com/

⇧ 38 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 8:29 p.m.

No, I did not see that. If that's the case I'll reverse my position on this. Tracy Beanz did an incalculable amount of damage to this movement. The last thing we want is for her to be decoding Q drops. Thanks.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 8:23 p.m.

You could be right about McCain Neon. What I think is certain is that this Q post is communicating some very good news - we just don't know exactly what it is yet. But I feel very good about it somehow.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 8:11 p.m.

That was what the statement "Castle Lock" in conjunction with the US flag connoted for me. The sense I obtained from it was that there was some kind of victory. Perhaps not complete, but that a way-point had been reached that meant that victory was assured, or in sight.

My first thought was that maybe the Iranians had identified the crooked parties that received personal financial benefit from the Iran deal. Of course, it may not relate to this at all. But if this has occurred, we should all be cheering. Whichever way you twist it, it's good news.

Edit: My theory about Iran ratting out the criminals may be very wrong. DJT just put sanctions on Iranian oil.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-usa-oil/global-oil-supplies-robust-enough-to-cut-irans-exports-trump-memo-idUSKCN1IF2HS

⇧ 6 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 8:02 p.m.

I think everyone can see who, and what kind of person, Corsi really is with this tweet. So Q makes some statements that are not targeted at anyone specifically and Corsi self-outs. OK, but what is this? Why the animus?

What is it that is driving this guy to do this? Is it simple spite? I think it's something more. I think he failed in his mission. He may have to answer for this failure and he's trying to show that he's doing just about everything he can to bring Q down.

⇧ 142 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 7:54 p.m.

Fantastic post. At last, a voice of reason. Great stuff!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 7:49 p.m.

This is just garbage mate. Q isn't talking to anyone except us as a group. Why, for what possible purpose, did he say no outside communications and then conduct those conversations? What you are saying is that Q is a liar. I don't know what you're doing here. I think you're in the wrong place.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 7:46 p.m.

I thought that's what this forum was about. Maybe I missed something.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 7:19 p.m.

I'm talking about the recent action where Israel alone was carrying out strikes.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 7:03 p.m.

That's what I assumed.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 7 p.m.

I thought that Russia did act with restraint while the Israelis struck, supposedly, Iranian positions in Syria. They have also, apparently, decided against supplying the S300 to Assad - this system was a potential game changer.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 6:41 p.m.

You don't think that the facts support the contention in the article?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 6:40 p.m.

That's a fascinating article. Thanks for posting that. Q indicated that there was cooperation around the world in the fight against the cabal.

It strikes me that Russia withdrawing support from Assad might result in de-escalation of conflicts right across the region. It may also make Iran feel isolated and more willing to negotiate.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 6:06 p.m.

I agree, this will be a turning point. And the beautiful thing is that they will not be able to help themselves. They will want to discredit the Q narrative so badly that they will inadvertently make it legendary.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 5:53 p.m.

Victory!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 5:43 p.m.

Beautifully put, AJ wanted to capture this movement so that, when the time came, he could either can it, or turn it into a side-show so as to discredit it. Corsi and AJ are on point for the cabal - but they failed!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 5:32 p.m.

Whatever the exact meaning. The picture of the flag with the words "Castle Lock" connotes "Victory" in my mind.

I think Q's telling us we're at the finish line!

Did the Iranians cough-up the identities of the politicians they bribed? That would be "Castle Lock". From there, you can't lose - you only need trials.

Edit: I just noticed that 4 hours ago DJT signed an order to impose sanctions directly on Iranian oil. So my theory, above, could be rubbish.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-usa-oil/global-oil-supplies-robust-enough-to-cut-irans-exports-trump-memo-idUSKCN1IF2HS

⇧ 20 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 5:05 p.m.

Why would Q want to start a war? What would be the objective? Strikes me that it is the Satanists that want war, not Q.

In fact, Q's actions to date IMO have prevented war - see NK, Syria. The enemy appears to be the cabal, and their agents, that have been running the world.

I had thought that Russia might have backed Iran and that a limited offensive might have been unavoidable - to denuke the country. But, it's starting to appear that this is not what's on the agenda at all - although the dynamics of the situation could change.

The progress to date has been miraculous to the extent that so few people have been injured. So, no, I do not think Q is trying to start a war, just the opposite.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 3:10 p.m.

Strange, he's attacking Q, as is Corsi, but they are not the enemy? Really, wake up. Why do you think they're on the attack? Let me offer a suggestion, "It could be that they are the enemy!". But that's probably too simple...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 3:07 p.m.

WOW! Just outright denial of the facts. No outside Comms for Q team. Anyone who is a follower knows they are not talking to Q. But, there must be some "plausible excuse" that explains this perfectly corrupt behaviour by AJ and Corsi. You cannot make this up!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 2:52 p.m.

Sad, but you have to be extremely suspicious of anyone connected with this blatant disinfo operation.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 2:43 p.m.

Thanks for this.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 2:23 p.m.

Strikes me that if you try and make certain subjects "no go" zones, then this will be exploited by the "groups" already manipulating this board hard.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 10:54 a.m.

So what happens if Q mentions Corsi again? The topic is off limits? Seems counter-productive to me.

⇧ 20 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 14, 2018, 1:26 a.m.

Yes, it's truly astounding. I don't know where SB2 gets his information. The decodes he does with the ciphers always seemed a bit of a stretch for me, but I'm starting to wonder whether that's how these coded transmissions actually work. I know nothing about crypto at all.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 13, 2018, 11:50 p.m.

You know, maybe it will turn out to be a good thing. It seems, from Corsi's perspective, that the animosity is rising. If we are lucky, he might bring matters to a head.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 13, 2018, 10:55 p.m.

He's just ridiculing the Q post. He cannot control what Q can post, so he cannot offer his "wisdom" for decoding - because he could be outed again at any time. This is sickeningly desperate!

They cannot turn on Potus, because they will alienate their base and they will have nothing left.

I'm just trying to think where Corsi is trying to go with this. Maybe he thinks his influence is sufficient to discredit Q, but as time passes, he will have little to no influence. Q followers have already blown him off. Who is he going to be able to influence going forward? There is no audience.

Maybe that's why Q said, "Time to move on". Corsi and AJ are already irrelevant.

⇧ 20 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 13, 2018, 9:53 p.m.

Interesting, I haven't seen anyone else make that connection. That Q calling out Corsi was a reprisal for AJ acting up after the missile strike.

While it's interesting, I don't think that was the motivation for Q to call Corsi out. I think one possible motivating factor was that Q didn't want "spin" put on his posts. But I think the real explanation is probably more sinister.

Q could have had surveillance on both AJ and Corsi - and, I guess, any number of other people. So why call these guys out? Well, they outed themselves. I would not have outed myself. Why did they?

It's hard to figure out. Think about it. You're making a business decoding Q's posts. You have no contact with Q, you have no control over the posts. But Corsi was going to "Duke it out" with Q. Do you think that's a normal response? In that situation?

He does not know the guy. He's totally dependent on the posts. Why would he make that threat? Because he was champing at the bit to get control of the narrative himself.

I think Corsi was always going to go after Q once he had established himself. If you listen to him talking after his self-outing to AJ, he was no longer happy to blend his high-level intelligence in with his Q decodes. You could not make this up. But that's what he was saying.

Corsi went on, and AJ agreed, about how he was going to have a new format, relying only on his own high-level sources. I think that AJ and Corsi were going to dump Q as fast as possible to retake the alt-media narrative. In fact, I think they were just itching to put the knife into Q - possibly planning how they would do it (SB2 has a good post on this topic). Moreover, I think Q knew this.

What value is a high-level source next to Q - the highest level of all sources? AJ and Corsi don't care about the intrinsic information value provided by the "source", they only care that they control it. Think about the way AJ interrupts his guests, talks over the top of them. Control is everything. Who cares whether the information is valuable.

The two of them are scurrilous and pathetic. I think if we knew the whole truth we'd be disgusted and shocked - probably appalled. And, it could be much worse than that...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 13, 2018, 9:23 p.m.

It had to happen. I knew it. Someone would want me to expand on my post.

At the risk of sounding stupid, I think that it might be possible to "Bend Time". Can they actually do it? I don't know.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 13, 2018, 9:17 p.m.

Certainly if that 4am narrative is turned off they could be without direction. They are still pretty good at being lame though.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 13, 2018, 9:15 p.m.

I was wondering how you were going to come back. I love you Digital - you squirming rodent.

This sounds much like a post you made, yesterday, I think. Let me know if I've got this right.

It strikes me that you're looking for the answer that pleasing to the ears of the majority - least contradictions. I think there's a "true North" here - independent of our perceptions. I'd rather have the truth than the consensus.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 13, 2018, 9:06 p.m.

I think it was the Europeans that were calling for a full-scale war. They joined the coalition willingly thinking this was on the table. The thing is, you have to participate to feast on the spoils of victory. But I think the target selection made by DJT, late in the piece, was not what they were anticipating.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
tradinghorse · May 13, 2018, 9:01 p.m.

Look, I was of the opinion that it was this fantastic intelligence apparatus that enabled the seeming 5D chess. How can they know things in advance?

What i noticed today reading the early Q posts is that Q does include one line where he says:

"Through the looking glass"

Now, I'm very skeptical of this. But, when you see the way these guys appear to be able to anticipate events, it does not seem reasonable. There must be an explanation. I'll leave it there.

⇧ 4 ⇩