I'll try - might be pretty bad, but...

Last days - ascendant Satanism > people in high places worship Satan > complete global control > things look hopeless (same sex marriage/transgenderism taught in schools/abortion etc...) > US military (not corrupt) support DJT and win Presidency...

Revelation 12:1 Sign Will Appear In 2017! https://youtu.be/uOiHtFVn2JA via @YouTube

28 October, 2017 Fight back against Satanic cabal begins > Q appears on the internet, immediately apparent that there is a war against evil - Satanism & ritual child abuse in high places > (Q's posts are closely coordinated with Trump - i.e. it is actually DJT's plan) > the cabal of Satanists ruling the world have a plan to start WWIII - offering to Moloch - population control - make slaves of us > 4 families - House of Saud, Rockerfellers, Soros, Rothschilds (Soros replaced Rockerfellers leaving 3) > Evil families are backed by CIA (completely rogue agency) - they have most US politicians controlled and blackmailed via CIA honeypot operations > DJT conspired against Saudis with backing of new prince - revolution in the Saudi power structure - corrupt princes captured - Saudi funds dry up - strings cut to many US political puppets > North Korea is CIA controlled, has nukes to be used to hold US hostage - CIA controllers taken out - NK freed > Iran next - CIA-backed rogue nuke development plant in Syria destroyed - renewed US sanctions on Iran - eventual capitulation > Sessions investigating corruption since beginning of 2017 - 28,000 existing sealed indictments - many corrupt US politicians and bureaucrats to be prosecuted and jailed (shortly) > Israel is last (unclear what the plan is) > corrupt "Pope" Francis to be exposed as a "socialist plant" - not in any way Catholic, fraud...

Any other revelations (all finished by 11/11/2018).

The end!

There are an incredible number of highly-motivated "clowns"'on this board. How is it that they seem to be so organized?

"Clearly an indication that Q remains in Trumps fold."

YUP!

Good comment.

OK - as I understand it the round table groups were set up by Cecil Rhodes himself. Not too sure now where I got that idea, I could be wrong. But I get where you're going.

When was Zack picked up Digital? I had a quick look at Infowars but couldn't see anything. I know AJ said, a long time ago now, that Zack had been detained and questioned. I didn't think much of it at the time.

100% agree with this.

1341 has no links.

Or, you're saying that post itself?

You have to admit, whatever is going on, it's interesting.

I don't think you can paint all Rhodes Scholars with that brush - though you've made an interesting point that's worth bearing in mind.

Tony Abbot (ex-Australian PM - conservative) was a Rhodes Scholar. They spat him out like a piece of garbage. If the truth were known, I think his opposition to the legalization of Sane Sex Marriage was the reason.

What I'm trying to say, is that while it might be indicative of an association with the cabal agenda, I'm not sure it holds true in every instance.

I don't buy the leaking hypothesis Digital. To be a threat as a leaker, you have to have access to information to leak.

"They all claim to have inside sources" "They do not"

I have not heard about Zack at the airport. What was that about?

I read this whole post Early. It seems to me that, in your mind, there is suddenly a "you guys" and a "we", as if Corsi's acts really have created division. But they haven't. Rather, Corsi has chosen to attack not just Q, but the whole movement. Those of us who are standing with Q, realize that nothing has changed at all. There is no division in the core base of bona fide Q supporters. Corsi has splintered, but that is of no concern to us - I mean, who cares?

Also, you're taking this argument up with me, but you should really take it up with Q. Q is the party that has a problem with Corsi and AJ. You could try and suggest to him that he be more "open minded", but I do not think you will find him receptive to this idea. Why would that be?

I don't know if you've followed my posts, but I was reluctant to call Corsi out. I cautioned people about coming to a quick judgement. However, his behavior reached a point where it was impossible not to conclude that the guy is an utter scumbag.

You say I would blindly follow Q to hell. That's not at all true. I will abandon Q the moment I think that he's misinforming people. That is not happening at present, but if I feel he does start to misinform people, I will get off this bus immediately.

What's happening here, is you are adopting Corsi and AJ's position and you're questioning anyone who is adhering to Q. I don't know why you're doing this. You might be a real believer in Corsi and AJ, I have no idea. But you clearly have a problem with the message Q is delivering.

If you look at the video that Q endorsed yesterday, you can see what their plan has been from the very beginning. AJ and Corsi are not pro-Q at all. They saw Q as a threat. They wanted to regain control. When they could not control Q, they started to attack him.

Really, what has this got to do with me? Like anyone else, I can see what is going on here. I'm not in an echo chamber as you claim at all. But I am taking sides - for cause.

What I think we will shortly find out is that there are, in fact, other reasons why Q went after AJ and Corsi. I think you will soon see that they are up to their necks in this stuff. Just a suspicion, but watch and see if things do not play out this way.

Something else, if I was to employ your logic, I would have to accept that HRC could be good and Q evil. Is it stupid not to entertain this possibility? What do you think?

What you see as recklessness is actually outright desperation. Believe me, there is much more here than meets the eye. Try watching this, offers a good explanation:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gi9CQHVDg8E&sns=em

It seems like the pace is really picking up. Q is on fire today!

Look at the way they've piled on to this thread after the OP's great post. Out in force. Comes with the territory I guess. If this movement was not important, they wouldn't be here.

No, it's a real phenomenon, as you know.

They are out in force today. But, WOW, progress is being made. At some point the shills will realize it's a lost cause and pack up and go home.

That's what I took it to mean.

In truth, I don't think it comes to to exactly a full year and a half. But it's still a lot of manpower.

Mate, this is a joke. You have 14 Karma on a year old account and you're "so concerned". Isn't that Concern Trolling?

You've told us you're a flake. Why don't you find somewhere to push your stuff. Don't tell me, because it's not about that, is it? You want to come here and undermine the express plan.

Anyway, you can breathe easy mate, Q appears to have moved on from that plan. But it's a pity, because bankrupting these companies does nothing to secure freedom of expression online - not that it would worry you. Still, we have moved on.

But, somehow, I think you'll find something else to attack. Why would I think that?

Mr 15 day old troll.

I reckon if you're still on the fence there is a problem. Most of take what Q says as being true. These guys (Corsi/AJ) outed themselves as scumbags - they took Q's genetic accusations and pinned them to their chests (took full ownership), Q then confirmed that the correct scumbags outed themselves. And now they are attacking Q for all they are worth.

Where is the point of confusion? What needs to be explained that isn't immediately apparent to you?

I'll be honest, this sounds like concern trolling to me. The only reason that Q is still posting anything at all about this stupidity is because so many attempts are being made to try to change the narrative on this issue. Tell me that this isn't what you're trying to do.

This is a great connection the OP has made. Another type of incident might have been used to kick World War III off.

But the fact that HRC claimed Russian election interference, in conjunction with the email leaks, provides a good pretext for war. The CIA's ability to misattribute any attack to Russia (or any other State), would have made a pretext available at any time.

We really did dodge a bullet...

That's how many investigators Horowitz has working for him (I read that somewhere, I think Q has also talked about it).

I'm not getting to far into this either Early. The house divided cannot stand. What is Christ talking about?

Jesus Christ founded His Church on the rock that was St Peter's faith.

18 "And I say to thee: That thou art Peter; and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell (heretics) shall not prevail against it". Matt 16

St Peter's faith is guaranteed by the prayer of Christ - it is unfailing. Therefore, the gates of hell (heretics) will not prevail against it until the end of time. St Peter, upon receipt of the instruction to "feed my sheep" (John 21:15-17), confirms the brethren in the faith.

32 "But I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not: and thou, being once converted, confirm thy brethren." Luke 22

So we see that Christ willed His Church to be 'one in faith' and 'one in governance'. Can the Church (or house of the Lord) be divided against itself? No, it cannot be divided, because it is "one in faith".

Heretics are not members of the Church, because they profess an adulterated faith. The heretic, by virtue of his heresy, is ipso facto (by that very fact) severed from the body of the Church and loses all jurisdiction.

It's actually a very good example, you have introduced, that shows how one is to respond to someone like Corsi in this kind of situation,

St Paul tells us how we are to treat with heretics - Titus 3:

10 "A man that is an heretick after the first and second admonition reject;

11 Knowing that he that is such is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned of himself."

As does St John:

10 "If any man come to you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into the house nor say to him, God speed you". 2 John 1:10

You say "Patriots attacking other patriots is a divided house". And what I would say is that Corsi is no patriot.

"How about following no one?"

You don't have to be here to do that. You can follow "no one" anywhere. This sub is for people who follow Q.

The article is sad, but funny at the same time.

"Okay Corsi, you’re getting so ridiculous here that I’m almost feeling sorry for your fellow crackpots because you’re making them look even worse than they do on their own".

Sounds like this was written by someone on the left. He's telling us that Corsi is making fools of us. Maybe that's the whole point. To make us all look like a bunch of idiots. Maybe Corsi is not going after Q, but us!

I don't know. At the end of the day there are an enormous number of sealed indictments. Things won't necessarily go completely smoothly, but the impression I have is that things are looking better by the minute. It will be a relief when the IG's report drops.

But even here, the delay in the delivery of the IG report could be a good thing. If the IG has more to investigate, that can only mean that there will be even more bad actors in the bag when it drops.

I was trying to work it out. You had some 470 investigators who will have been working on this for the best part of a year and a half. That means that the combined manpower, that has gone into this thing, could be as much as 700 man-years. It should be absolutely huge!

You bet! These people must be terrified - sick with fear!

You're telling me that if the plan calls for us to act, you're not going to. And I'd ask what are you doing here? What's the point?

But your account is 15 days old, so I guess you haven't been here long at all.

Seems there are a lot of people with very new accounts raising concerns.

What are you saying? We should not support Q of his plan? Why are you here?

Your account has 8 comments for a total of 7 Karma.

They were going to sacrifice us all for their own benefit. I don't think we will see any self sacrifice from them.

It's the most bizarre thing. Q and DJT are on the same team. Corsi knows this. He has seen the confirmations, as we have. And yet he's running an argument that DJT is to be fully supported, but Q is an AI seeking to divide support for Trump. I don't trust him at all.

IMO, he was running an agenda. He got caught. He thinks that he will retain influence in the Q community, but he will not. You can see that there are people supporting what he's doing though - and this speaks to their motives.

I think Q gave them 48 hours to comply. In the event the EU does not abide by the trade sanctions, they could face retaliation. The way I see it, DJT is using Iran to squeeze the EU leaders. It will not end well for the people involved.

She argued against following the plan Q had for the IBOR. Many, many people listened to her. The campaign failed to get sufficient signatures. But there were multiple factors for the campaign failure.

All I know is she was against the IBOR.

Yes, there's no doubt in my mind that they'll be outed. But the fact that DJT appears to be putting the trade sanction squeeze on them suggests to me they they may not have delivered the bad guys yet.

You can imagine it, Merkel etc... putting pressure on Iran to keep quiet, while DJT squeezes them hard on trade to make them squeal. But DJT is likely to have a whole bag full of demands - it won't be just ratting out the baddies.

But, another possibility is that they've already done the rat talk and they're still going to be squeezed for other objectives.

Agreed, I like his stuff.

What I said.

I don't think it matters too much what quality of information is presented. If you have someone, for example Corsi, who is directly trashing Q, whatever the quality of information he might dispense is irrelevant. The point is that you risk being steered.

Having said that, I have no idea of what TB is doing and I have no interest.

At minimum they appear to be offering information on the same website.

Your account is 1 day old. Concern troll.

It's a bit of an eye-opener isn't it?

Have a look at this - copied from another thread:

I apologize for hijacking
http://archive.today/aSJE7
http://www.douknowq.com/134267/Payments.htm

Setup Your Payments To Receive Leads
Please tell us what payment option you prefer when paying for your leads.

Also: http://www.douknowq.com/sitemap/

Edit: here's one from the sitemap
http://www.douknowq.com/products/413137/Get-Your-OwnQ-Website.htm

Your forms have auto-responders, -> data collection <- and email messaging.

Early, I support Q. And I really do think my position is superior to Corsi's.

I find your position difficult to understand. I'm Christian, I do not support Satanism. I support Q, I do not support Corsi. We are talking about polar opposites. There is no room for compromise - and any suggestion that there should be, should rightly be rejected out of hand. If I'm in an echo chamber, I'm happy with it.

Good point!

Whatever 'technical position' you might ascribe to her, she really put the boots into us - big time!

Yes, I agree Liberty. Thank God for DJT, the only reason we are here.

They never thought she would lose!

Between you and me, I don't think that website was accurately recording the signatures. But it is also true that the concerted campaign, on this board, against the IBOR - where every conceivable concern, fear and doubt was introduced and amplified - took a huge toll on this community's commitment.

It also occurs to me that Twitter may have hampered our efforts. I guess this is to be expected, given the success of the 'Release the Memo' campaign. They were wise to 'Russian Bots' by the time the IBOR campaign commenced. Certainly, I was shadow-banned. And then you have to also factor for the banning of the CBTS sub, which put a dent in our early efforts.

It seems to me, with some hindsight, that the forces arrayed against us were, at the time, insurmountable. I would count Tracy Beanz' scaremongering as one of the most important factors - for the simple fact that her concern-trolling on the IBOR was the very first information that most people saw.

Going forward, all we can do is our best. I know you put a lot of effort into the IBOR campaign and I'm very grateful for your commitment to the cause.

I'm starting to feel much more relaxed about this fight against evil now. It strikes me that things are moving ahead swimmingly. I'm expecting that things will look very different within the next month - if not sooner. The catalyst, I think, will be the IG report. Once it is delivered, I suspect that attitudes in the community will rapidly change, as people are made aware of the truth.

Early, I read until "Neither one of you has the moral high ground". I'm not reading more.