Those deleted links(>>4) contained direct U12 child pornography jpg & movie links, and infos where all those jpg & movie a person can get. Sato-san is asking that if he could delete the thread after those repeated offense.
When a board or BBS is moderated, then the moderator takes responsibility. bbspink is to big to moderate. It is impossible to see all the posts that are posted daily. So it is Unmoderated, not moderated. If someone posts a deletion request, then it becomes necessary to check into it. Example: Mr. Smith decides to search through a bbs and become its moderator. He finds many things that are objectionable to him. Since Mr. Smith is a deletion volunteer he is actively looking for things to delete. This makes him a moderator. It is an act of taking responsibility. Here is another example of things that happen sometimes. Mr. Brown does not like Mr. Smith, so Mr. Brown reports Mr. Smith posts as objectionable. Then he requests that they be deleted. This silences Mr. Smith if they are deleted. The only thing wrong with Mr. Smith posts was that Mr. Brown did not like Mr. Smith. We have to use our thinking caps to make sure we don't delete this type of material Only reported posts should be deleted, and the deleter should be able to understand the reason for the deletion. If he does not, then the post should not be deleted.
This is my personal opinion. I think that ［nttcgi046176.tcgi.nt.adsl.ppp.infoweb.ne.jp］ and ［220.127.116.11.megaegg.ne.jp］ and ●[FhtN8KO/nxmOv1kg] had better regulate it. Because the reason is because they talk about the acquisition of the child pornography mainly.
The child pornography problem is important for PINK. It is not likely to be able to solve it only by the deletion. Even a restriction alone will not be able to be solved. Of course, the report system and the release system cannot solve it. If of each cooperates, the maximum effect might be demonstrated. The discussion for cooperation is not done now.
> hmm, this sounds more like you putting words in my mouth. I keep it simple in English > and in Japanese not because of lack of words, but to make certain I am understood.
I am sorry that if you felt that way. I think that your words sometimes too short and lacked specifics. And I would like to show you what kind of action is likly to be expected us to hear from you with those multiple choices.
I am not exactly sure the reasons why those deletion request is not processed by volunteer deleters.
But I supposed it might be : 1) The lack of a deletion leader - 79-san almost handled all priority deletion request by herself - Deleter's motivation is dampened with lack of a person to get advise frankly in Japanese 2) Few active volunteer deleter - It seems even an old and experienced volunteer deleters hesitant to handle Priority deletion request because of its delicacy - Too few active deleters makes the experienced deleters to handle too much regular deletion requests first and exhausted to do others.
>>71 This is a better venue for the discussion. Thank you for moving it here. I am sorry that I am not so elequent. Your english is completely understandable. It is doubtful that 79 will return to deletion. I would not keep your hopes up on that. In time someone will come along that will enjoy doing that and will get along well with others. That person should be wise, kind, and able to make decisions that are both popular, and correct. They also need to be than ななしーさん to me. Thank you for your well thought out input 名無しーさん
>>102 >Could you make yourself useful and tell me what this means? Hmm. I can advise you about the virtue which of Japanese has. The most of Japanese do not make it a virtue to act for their profits. They make it a virtue to act for those whom themselves own believes.
Jim. Are you those to whom they are sufficient for believing?
>>127 ＞ Are you insinuating that I am making a huge profit off ＞ of the backs of the Japanese? No. I am not interested in your profit, even if you are making a huge profit off of the backs of the Japanese. hehehe
I think the reason why you are not trusted by many users of BBSPINK is >>103. It is too abstract what you said for us, and we cannot understand them well.
In addition, be careful. Because most of Japanese are very earnest, they translate your black-jokes to the worst meanings with hatred.
Mr.Jim I have made a mistake. I'm sorry. I was working on deletion, and I should have deleted "a reply" and have deleted "a thread". I'm very sorry. I want you to return it to a state before I delete the "thread".
>>154 [Lady's only] Masturbation Image/Movie [Movie/Image] It is the thread which does repeated Megami act and unexpurgated genitals image/movie uploaded links, both against the board's local rule.
(Local Rule: Okazu(Fuckalicious thing, or any sexual material for use with male's masturbation) thread is prohibited)
>>156 Megami act is prohibited except in megami board in 2007 and existing megami board was moved to the megami board on a mandatory basis. Threads doing megami act which was created after that in other boards had been deleted. The requested thread is the Megami thread. Plus I understand that the uploading unexpurgated genitals image/movie with megami's self-responsibility basis is permitted only on Neet4pink board. Lastly, local rule of the Onatech(Masturbation technique) board states "Okazu thread is prohibited"
If Jim-san allows unexpurgated genitals image in the board , will it be same with Megami board?
>>157 Somebody comes up posting "uploading image/movie is prohibited" whenever someone uploaded an image or a movie in the thread.
A question arise "why nobody comes up saying the same thing whenever someone uploaded an image or a movie in the [Men's Only Masturbation image/movie] thread. There must be some kind of unknown intent under that.
Jim-san >>154 states that the thread is for those people who want to see somebody(megami)'s images and for those megami who want to show herself's images. So, he would like you to move the thread from onatech board to the megami board.
As for the moving a thread to different board,
Somebody post the moving thread request in the Deletion Request board. l A deleter carefully examine the request for validity and ask to the rightful person. l The rightful person re-examine it for validity and pass the request to Jim-san with special CAP. l Jim-san re-examine it again and does the moving.
That is the procedure, which Jim-san and Ero-san agreed.
I have mailed to you because I was told that I need a special CAP in order to do the thread moving request to you. Have you read my mail?
Hi，Jim_san. http://babiru.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/housekeeping/1255952997/l50 The thread mentioned above. This thread is.... Only the person who got approval beforehand can write to this thread. The person who got approval from Jim_san. I want to know the name of all members who got approval. Please teach the name of people taking approval beforehand.
There are considerably many voices to expect the deletion work start of the reply of the contribution to promote the public performance act of the thread of Jim さんへるす (reply deletion), but does think in a direction done how?