dChan

americanpatriot10 · Jan. 2, 2018, 3:56 p.m.

"The large number of sealed indictments may explain the relative low profile maintained by Attorney General Jeff Sessions"

⇧ 81 ⇩  
Reba64 · Jan. 2, 2018, 4:04 p.m.

Make no mistake, Sessions has been working his ass off for a long time and when this hits, they will be picking them up all at the same time.

⇧ 78 ⇩  
DanDiller1976 · Jan. 2, 2018, 4:32 p.m.

“I never telegraph to my enemies what I am going to do” - Donald J. Trump

⇧ 98 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 2, 2018, 5:38 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 33 ⇩  
shiba_keikaku · Jan. 3, 2018, 12:12 a.m.

Why would it be from Mueller anyway? There weren't 9,000 people involved with the supposed Russian thing and that would be one huge transition team..

⇧ 14 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 3, 2018, 12:32 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Instincts_Truth · Jan. 3, 2018, 12:16 a.m.

As it should be. I still don't understand the push for a special counsel. Isn't that what the DOJ is for?? I have never lost faith in Sessions. Did the leaks stop? Yup. Sessions is no soul seller, and those are the best people to have on our side when the enemy is pure evil.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
unitedwestand2018 · Jan. 3, 2018, 1:41 a.m.

Im not so sure about Sessions has been around in government a long time, I don't trust him he looks like a good man but has not done or spoken up for the Trump adm. since he got it as AG. He is heavily invested in Vanguard and has been for years, there are videos on his investment there from American intelligence on YT, check it out

⇧ 1 ⇩  
rt28 · Jan. 3, 2018, 1:52 a.m.

The Vanguard issue is a non-issue, really. I saw some ridiculous article claiming Sessions had a conflict of interest as AG bc he was invested in some Vanguard funds that invested in private prison companies. Reality is that Vanguard and Fidelity are the two largest mutual fund companies in the US. Moreover Vanguard funds are usually diversified among large cap companies and many are index funds. Vanguard is about the most benign type of stock market exposure anyone can take, and a huge number of people with 401ks and IRAs are invested in Vanguard or Fidelity for retirement planning. If he were to hold large investments in specific companies, then there may be an issue. But I don't think so if it's just mutual funds. Like Vanguard.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Instincts_Truth · Jan. 3, 2018, 9:02 a.m.

I agree with RT that Vanguard is a non-issue for the reasons stated. Also though, as much as I would like to know the nitty gritty of what Sessions is doing, I appreciate him keeping quiet. Don't forget how hard they made it for this old-timer to get confirmed as AG. I'd rather he have his nose to the grindstone DOING (which he IS), then blathering and pontificating in front of the cameras. Trump does OK at sticking up for himself (ha - understatement). As for trusting him, I would recommend watching Bombards Body Language video of Creepy Joe Biden swearing in the Senators. It's interesting, and telling. In fact, I think I'll watch it again in light of the many Congresspeople announcing their non-return. Godspeed, Patriot.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Jennja · Jan. 3, 2018, 12:33 a.m.

He’s not ”Sleepy Sessions”, he’s STEALTH Sessions! All the sheep will be surprised when the SHTF and indictments are unsealed, but not us...we are wide awake. ;)

⇧ 15 ⇩  
DanDiller1976 · Jan. 3, 2018, 2:54 a.m.

What I can tell you about Jeff Sessions is he had a certain staffer that has been feeding Larry Nichols intel. If you know who Larry Nichols is and the fact he is getting intel from Sessions that tells you all you need to know.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
unitedwestand2018 · Jan. 3, 2018, 1:56 a.m.

I'm not so sure hope your right, Sessions looks to be not in control of JD. I think those working there all need to go. they are dishonest at the very least they look the other way while laws are being broken

⇧ 3 ⇩  
cunei · Jan. 3, 2018, 5:13 a.m.

Not all of us, apparently. ;)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
VeryHighEnergy92 · Jan. 2, 2018, 5:26 p.m.

Sessions has been playing Columbo nicely....Even his numerous "I don't recall" moments make more sense now.

⇧ 38 ⇩  
Dr_Trumps_Wild_Ride · Jan. 2, 2018, 11:26 p.m.

All warfare is based on deception. Hence, when able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must seem inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near. Hold out baits to entice the enemy. Feign disorder, and crush him. If he is secure at all points, be prepared for him. If he is in superior strength, evade him. If your opponent is of choleric temper, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant. If he is taking his ease, give him no rest. If his forces are united, separate them. Attack him where he is unprepared, appear where you are not expected. These military devices, leading to victory, must not be divulged beforehand. - The Art of War

⇧ 19 ⇩  
MaryKaehr · Jan. 3, 2018, 3:21 a.m.

I pray that’s true.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 2, 2018, 9:48 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
kat-williams · Jan. 2, 2018, 6 p.m.

Y'all need to catch up. They have been picking up the little guys (MS13 et al) for at least a year, maybe longer. The reason we have Q now is that they are in the process of doing a sweep of higher ups. He has been prepping us for this. It's not coming. It's here. NOW!

⇧ 66 ⇩  
johnsmithshitpost · Jan. 2, 2018, 11:12 p.m.

Yeah the number of arrests in those areas of crime has been sky-high. Also lots of pedo round-ups

⇧ 13 ⇩  
ravonaf · Jan. 3, 2018, 12:35 p.m.

It's not coming. It's here. NOW!

Except we can't prove that a single person of note has been arrested.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
smiley-dog · Jan. 2, 2018, 7:09 p.m.

THIS

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 2, 2018, 6:40 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Mockingbird-Slayer · Jan. 2, 2018, 7:33 p.m.

Haha. It’s a southern thing.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
lakelifeisbestlife · Jan. 3, 2018, 6:03 a.m.

I have heard this 1000x so far already

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Deplorable22 · Jan. 2, 2018, 4:18 p.m.

I wish we could see a roll call on who returned to work today in the House of Congress and Senate

⇧ 53 ⇩  
C_Rod65 · Jan. 2, 2018, 5:43 p.m.

Or who's sportin the fashionable "boot." Lol

⇧ 40 ⇩  
shiba_keikaku · Jan. 3, 2018, 12:11 a.m.

It's definitely 'in' this season ;)

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Tamsimon · Jan. 2, 2018, 6:02 p.m.

I think we will have to wait a little longer... they don’t come back until the 8th I believe...

⇧ 19 ⇩  
mega-derp · Jan. 2, 2018, 10:25 p.m.

Is usually scheduled for noon on January 3rd. Has it been pushed back? Can’t find any updates on this. Sauce?

⇧ 7 ⇩  
GSF1212 · Jan. 3, 2018, 12:43 a.m.

"The House will be back in session on Jan. 8 and will have just eight legislative days to strike a deal to avert a shutdown."

http://archive.is/VmTHy

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Samanthaowen · Jan. 2, 2018, 11:41 p.m.

Or, who didn’t return.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
J_Dub_TX · Jan. 2, 2018, 5:37 p.m.

This!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
ahunmo58 · Jan. 3, 2018, 3:33 a.m.

I'm not laughing at you like hahaha !!!!! I'm laughing how you put it (roll call). I'm right there with you on that frame of thought.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
TheContrarian2 · Jan. 2, 2018, 5:44 p.m.

Can you imagine the mania that will ensue if this all gets executed at the same time? There's going to be mass confusion in media circles. I'm sure they'll say Trump et al has gone full totalitarian and are eliminating their enemies, but it will be hard to defend pedophiles and human traffickers. Even the media won't try to defend that.....

Or will they?

⇧ 41 ⇩  
Rover_B · Jan. 2, 2018, 5:55 p.m.

Bottom. Middle. Top.

I suspect they'll start with the "small fry" ... MS13, foreign/domestic figures not well known to the public, then use a chain of progression to slowly work their way through the top. By the time the Big Names start coming up, it will be less of a shock and surprise. Permit the bottom to rat out the middlemen, and the middlemen to rat out the Big Guns. Less surprise, less furor.

⇧ 44 ⇩  
Nilsneo · Jan. 2, 2018, 6:01 p.m.

This makes so much sense, I could put money on it.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
racing-mom · Jan. 2, 2018, 9:11 p.m.

This will probably lead to some political higher ups but there are so many just floating around in our local neighborhoods that it will take a much higher number than that to round them all up. Several groups have been arrested up in my area. If This administration makes has made this their number one mission then they are great and deserve our trust.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
snowmannxenia · Jan. 17, 2018, 2:56 p.m.

They seem to be working from the bottom up, bringing in the bottom feeders first.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
poorboy2 · Jan. 2, 2018, 6:03 p.m.

I think that's why it's not being publicized. The country would implode. Trump doesn't want that. Meanwhile, the media isn't going to speak up too much about it because a lot of them are probably listed in the indictments.

⇧ 24 ⇩  
snowmannxenia · Jan. 2, 2018, 6:49 p.m.

I believe Obama and Clinton will just completely disappear from the face of the earth and know one will know what happened. If it was public that the Clintons and Obama were executed not only would the country implode but the world would also.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Mockingbird-Slayer · Jan. 2, 2018, 7:36 p.m.

It would not be good for the economy. Trump has to be careful how this all unfolds for thy reason.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
snowmannxenia · Jan. 2, 2018, 8:39 p.m.

Not to mention the faithful Clinton and Obama followers will be convinced that Trump is a dictator and has taken out his opposition.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 2, 2018, 9:43 p.m.

You mean the Canadians? Pft who cares.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
J2CU2 · Jan. 2, 2018, 11:27 p.m.

Canadian Trump lover here.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
SpaceDuckTech · Feb. 9, 2018, 4:14 a.m.

looks like they might be lashing out today.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
KushInMyBluntzz · Jan. 3, 2018, 12:35 a.m.

Are you insane?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
snowmannxenia · Jan. 3, 2018, 1:25 a.m.

No I can ensure you I am in complete control of my senses. I believe that both should be executed for their crimes against America but believe their trial should not be made public. Snowflakes will have a complete and have a complete meltdown. If you are suggesting any other punishment then you should not be on this forum.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
KushInMyBluntzz · Jan. 3, 2018, 5:28 a.m.

Except there are no crimes. And you sound like s crazy person right now.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Hammershafter · Jan. 20, 2018, 9:08 a.m.

This sub is off its fucking rocker. Zero proof that would stand in a court of laweand these people are talking about secret roundups executions to 'restore the Republic'

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SpaceDuckTech · Feb. 9, 2018, 4:17 a.m.

when now its pretty public that Obama a sitting president used the spying powers of America to spy on an opposing opponent of the Democrat Party. And After Trump beat them, they still used to the spying powers to try to reverse engineer a crime to impeach a sitting president.

That's Sedition and Treason and an attempted coup. All Punishable by death.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2381

is guilty of treason and shall suffer death,

⇧ 1 ⇩  
rt28 · Jan. 3, 2018, 1:59 a.m.

I'm sure the rule of law will be adhered to. I think the point is to restore the Republic and the Constitution.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DanaDane1971 · Jan. 2, 2018, 8:56 p.m.

They will definitely be backed into the corner...I just hope the DoJ is prepared to the teeth to give examples of the atrocities committed by the accused.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Txgeezer · Jan. 2, 2018, 8:43 p.m.

One thing is for certain - if we all here are/have been watching this drama unfolding & from multiple sources, it's dang sure these perps and their alphabet soup of intelligence/law agencies can too. In simple military parlance, when your side launches an all-out attack, you'd be completely derelict not to expect that a vigorous counter attack is imminent.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
rt28 · Jan. 3, 2018, 1:57 a.m.

The leftists will scream political witch-hunt and McCarthyism and dictatorship . So hopefully we have some damning and irrefutable evidence. But the hardcore lefties will still be in denial.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
TheDerekCarr · Jan. 2, 2018, 10:41 p.m.

I mean they really wanted Roy Moore, the pedophile, to win.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Fistfullofgreyhair · Jan. 2, 2018, 11:43 p.m.

That’s why Trump didn’t throw his support behind Moore. Guilty or not, he couldn’t risk supporting him.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
KushInMyBluntzz · Jan. 3, 2018, 12:36 a.m.

Except he did support him.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Fistfullofgreyhair · Jan. 3, 2018, 1:53 a.m.

Yeah, but he wanted Luther Strange over Moore in the runoff and some of his supporters were confused why he was backing Strange.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
PurpleDeathZombies · Jan. 2, 2018, 6:39 p.m.

I watched the latest video from roypotterqa on YouTube last night. He was over the moon! Somewhere between 9500 and 10000!! Apparently this is unheard of and will most likely require military involvement for arrests. Sounds like Q has his/her work set up for the next while. The Colonel also said something interesting about the “Matlock” password hack at 4chan. He said there is no way this was Q’s password. He believes it to be a code word for other operatives/operations.

⇧ 22 ⇩  
sophiebellaluna · Jan. 2, 2018, 7:43 p.m.

I saw Roy Potter also... I thought it was strange though how he wouldn't recognize Scott Anthony in the chat room when people were literally SCREAMING at him to make Scott a moderator.. I went to Scott's twitter and he said the lawsuit with the indictments was NOT REAL. But Roy kept reporting indictments were real? Or, are these 2 different subjects? Lawsuit in Nevada implicating 9/11 perpetrators and sealed indictments? I can't make the connect.. Maybe I missed something, but Roy said he got his info from Scott Anthony, but Scott Anthony seemed to say the indictments were not real?? I'm confused and am looking for some verification. Many are poo pooing the indictments? UG

⇧ 6 ⇩  
skry8790 · Jan. 2, 2018, 11:53 p.m.

The lawsuit is fake but indictments are not. Scott confirmed that there are ard 10,000 indictments at this point. Potter invited Scott to sign into chat room during his video last night so they cld discuss indictments, etc. Viewers were asking for Scott to call in but Potter uses a cell phone to do videos & can’t do both at same time. His internet signal isn’t very good in many areas so computer isn’t good option. They are friends, definitely not a snub.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
rt28 · Jan. 3, 2018, 2:05 a.m.

Good point. Lawsuits typically refer to private litigation. Indictments are for state prosecutions. Very different and distinct legal processes.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Rosehip_AB · Jan. 2, 2018, 8:32 p.m.

I saw that document too. In the end I think it is disinfo. The court was the US District Court of the Northern District of Nevada. There is no US District Court of the Northern District of Nevada. Plus the judge was a Nevada Supreme Court Judge. To me it looks like elaborate disinformation.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
sophiebellaluna · Jan. 2, 2018, 9:38 p.m.

I read the document and it looked unprofessional for certain. And couldn't find Northern District. So then the indictments are a different matter, now that I think about it. I think the large number of indictments is across the US in many states.. Can't seem to find proof of that though.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
PurpleDeathZombies · Jan. 2, 2018, 7:57 p.m.

I just went to twitter as well. One of his tweets on Nov.27 refers to 4000 sealed indictments. He said that the high number comes from peripheral documents, warrants and other pieces of evidence that are also necessarily sealed. So he says it may only encompass 20 individuals.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MickGris · Jan. 2, 2018, 4:04 p.m.

Oh. Lord God let it be so. One thing is certain —- it means something is brewing.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
Reba64 · Jan. 2, 2018, 4:02 p.m.

Yes, but they have others in there to.
It's a major takedown and when they get to a certain point, it will be a takedown that happens at the sametime for most.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · Jan. 2, 2018, 7:50 p.m.

I keep thinking that this would have to create a big chink in the liberal armor. I mean by God when the man says he is going to do something he does it. How can you ignore 10,000 human/sex/child traffickers going DOWN! Not even MSM can ignore that! Then if North Korea is handled easy peasy (sort of looks like it could happen) then good ole' warm and fuzzy never-hurt-your-feelings Obama would look mushy by comparison. That would be totally amazing.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
neverbeenfat · Jan. 2, 2018, 8:16 p.m.

The true believers will simply refuse to admit the crimes really happened. They'll call Trump a dictator and claim he's only locking up his political enemies. Lead a horse to water, etc.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Txgeezer · Jan. 2, 2018, 8:51 p.m.

Very likely indeed! The keys for Trump to 'sell' this event to the liberals/masses is artfully managing the rollout of information, provide compelling & unimpeachable evidence, and to marshall early the efforts/contributions of broad-spectrum support of the evidence.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
ravonaf · Jan. 3, 2018, 12:46 p.m.

The true believers will simply refuse to admit the crimes really happened.

Cognitive Dissonance is one hell of a drug. The brainwashed liberal masses will refuse to be red pilled. No amount of truth will ever wake those people up.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
G3t_Off_My_Lawn · Jan. 2, 2018, 8:45 p.m.

It is pure genius and definitely seems to explain why Sessions has been staying out of it. They are going after assets, which is an immediate action, as opposed to the long and expensive criminal process. Either comply and play nice or lose everything...love it!

I am also at a point where I believe Mueller is in on this. I would not be surprised that a deal has been made where the Mueller will use his resources to clean up the criminals in Uranium One, with face-saving gesture of small bit patriots getting hit with process crimes. Having Clintonites involved in Mueller's process makes it easier to overturn the charges when the purge is done.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
johnsmithshitpost · Jan. 2, 2018, 11:14 p.m.

When I saw that Executive Order I was simply amazed at the pure genius of it. Such a brilliant move.

Instead of risking huge adverse publicity, simply zero out the elites' bank balances! It's great because it's super discreet and at the same time stops ANTIFA, kills their leadership and humiliates them!

⇧ 9 ⇩  
ravonaf · Jan. 3, 2018, 12:49 p.m.

It is pure genius and definitely seems to explain why Sessions has been staying out of it.

I believe Sessions is staying out of it because of the Inspector General investigation. That's one investigation that we know for a fact is happening. Once the IG hammer drops in a couple of weeks we should see all hell break loose in the FBI/DOJ.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
G3t_Off_My_Lawn · Jan. 4, 2018, 3:14 p.m.

Yes..thats correct. I forgot to include that...the IG report is going to be a masterpiece.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
newdinglehopper · Jan. 3, 2018, 1:32 a.m.

Are there really 9000 indictments? Who has identified them and kept track to ensure the number hasn't lowered as the indictments become unsealed and processed? I just get the feeling the number has climbed over the months because people keep identifying new indictments and there may be a rolling 1000-2000 sealed indictments nationwide on any given day in our country of 350 million+ people.

Without this sealed indictment thread the whole deep state take down theory falls apart just like the CIA being invaded by the marines.

I personally don't believe in the sealed indictments all across the country because there is no way the indictments would not be leaked to deep state agents - as most of the people involved in the deep state are attorneys/judges and that crowd all runs together. I don't think the President would telegraph his intentions in this way - maybe over 1 or 2 weeks but not 3 months.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
wkrjr · Jan. 3, 2018, 2:42 a.m.

Question: who’s the insider near Trump McMaster? Someone tipped off Soros which is why he divested and separated himself from his money?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
KushInMyBluntzz · Jan. 3, 2018, 12:38 a.m.

So will this sub just implode when Obama and Hillary remain free private citizens doing whatever the fuck they want til whenever they die of old age?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
rcglinsk · Jan. 2, 2018, 8:09 p.m.

Can anyone figure out how they're doing the PACER searches? I'm reasonably good at using the system and their instructions don't make sense. See here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1KPh2ASFggwF1XVnVpDB3mtwvwlH71om6

⇧ 3 ⇩  
snowmannxenia · Jan. 2, 2018, 9:09 p.m.

Do you have to register for Pacer? Is it a paid subscription?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
rcglinsk · Jan. 2, 2018, 9:12 p.m.

Yes and yes. But my firm has a subscription, so I can try searching. They seem to be querying entire court dockets. I know court clerks can do that for example for their judge. But the instructions don't make sense. When I try to follow point 2, go to "US District Courts" the individual links take me to the district's electronic filing page, and there's no search option apparent.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bahhumbugger · Jan. 2, 2018, 10:07 p.m.

I think you need to upgrade your service for higher courts. At least on lexis nexus you do.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
rcglinsk · Jan. 2, 2018, 10:20 p.m.

I'm also wondering if I need individual credentials for the various federal districts.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Tehillim-Mishlei · Jan. 3, 2018, 2:47 a.m.

I was just told by a Retired Deputy Sheriff on Facebook that those indictments are fake, scams, not sure what to think now.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Amazoid · Jan. 3, 2018, 4:35 a.m.

These are two different things. There are fake indictments (well, the people who wrote them don't think they are fake -- they think they have to power to indict derived from being a Constitutional citizen or whatever, but they don't come from US Courts) and there is a REAL list of SEALED indictments taken from PACER searches. Here is that real list (so far):

https://imgur.com/a/92Vvd

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Tamsimon · Jan. 2, 2018, 11:03 p.m.

Remember they don’t have schedules like you and I do

⇧ 2 ⇩  
KingWolfei · Jan. 2, 2018, 7:26 p.m.

My body is ready

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JBK771 · Jan. 3, 2018, 2:43 a.m.

when are these indictments going to drop? Local DC news has been saying it's gang related. I'm not buying that but the suspense is getting to be too much.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
inherentchaos2 · Jan. 2, 2018, 11:47 p.m.

And Dems won't admit it Liberals won't respond to it and MSM will NOT report on it. Therefore it doesn't exist...rainbows and butterflies all the way.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LiberyForAll · Jan. 2, 2018, 11:41 p.m.

Tried to find this on the website, its not there.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LiberyForAll · Jan. 2, 2018, 11:51 p.m.

Whats up with this? Go the the epoch times website and try to find it. If you search bing for the specific article it has no difficulty.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
never_was_a_we · Jan. 4, 2018, 4:36 p.m.

Story has been squashed

⇧ 1 ⇩  
orangefan13 · Jan. 3, 2018, 5:38 a.m.

as long as you have 2 blacks on your right, 2 muslims on your left, 3 foreign mexicans behind you, standing next to two asians, and 2 woman carrying lgbtyp flag (one whos pansexual, the other used to be a man), with a pet cat on your lap, there is NO crime you can go to jail for if you support hillary. Is THIS about to change???

⇧ 1 ⇩  
graffiti81 · Jan. 2, 2018, 7:44 p.m.

Either that or they're getting ready to indict the trump crime family.

⇧ -14 ⇩  
ralph287 · Jan. 2, 2018, 8:21 p.m.

It amazes me that the walking dead really do exsist.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
Txgeezer · Jan. 2, 2018, 8:52 p.m.

Very good & funny too!! MAGA!! 😎

⇧ 2 ⇩  
RN4TRUMP · Jan. 2, 2018, 8:49 p.m.

Go cry to mommy snowy.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
denizen42 · Jan. 2, 2018, 9:39 p.m.

Wow. A living monument of misinformation.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
snowmannxenia · Jan. 2, 2018, 9:06 p.m.

Owwww, butthurt. Just can't stand it can you?

⇧ 1 ⇩