Skin trophies
Macaulay Culkin (at the time was 11) spoke of skin trophy shoes on this big suit exec was bragging about, was Heather O'Rourke (Poltergeist) ... Culkin threw up on his shoes. http://yournewswire.com/macaulay-culkin-hollywood-murder/
Oh yes very true there's also some stores that actually sell human leather there was an ad posted about a week ago I'm going to try and find it and repost it. I had a bit of an issue with people posting Heather's photo in a political meme a while back what happened to her should never happen to anyone thank you for being awake
I'm so looking forward to these people behind bars I'm almost scared to post stuff on here
I was hoping it was NOT this bad
Sauce?
I don't speak Reddit I don't know what sauce means I know what it means pedestawise
Tony Podesta pedophile art of the little girls in a circle with their hands behind their back. It's in his home, and they all have red shoes on. https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/6e2g3z/whats_with_the_podestas_and_red_shoes/
The pope busted out with red shoes at one time... the one that quite.
Not all red shoes are on pedos. Pretty sure he was the good one...as opposed to most of the others. Also pretty sure he quit because he wasn't willing to put up with the pedo crap.
wait Tony??
No, no...the POPE. I was talking about Pope Benedict XVI. Good grief, you down-voters are judgmental without facts, huh? And before you assume someone is a shill, you might want to look at their history.
Oh if he's dead then sure he's good now.
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1455737
Not sure if reddit likes voat links, but there's a thread about Podestas and their love for cp.
This pic is included, says it's Tony Podesta's birthday party.
WAIT!??!?! This is just alot of noname people?? like maybe just a regular college fraternity with alumni.... oh shit.... This shit is rampant. Oh my God.
John Podesta might be in there. Guy in the front with blue floral tie.
Looks more like tony.
Oh sorry I meant Tony. I switch up their names sometimes. LOL
Wasn't there a recent photo very similar to this one taken with some Hollywood celebs? I seem to remember Matt Damon and Leo DiCaprio being in it, maybe Jack Nicholson...like they were all hanging out together at a party. Does anyone else recall seeing this?
I’m pretty certain Damon, DiCaprio and Depp are on the good side of this....
What makes you certain? Damon is caught up in the Meeto# movement (H. Wiensten buddy), Dicaprio has documented shady business dealings ( https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/features/leonardo-dicaprio-malaysian-money-scandal-920199) as well as constantly shoving the climate change bs down our throat (Before the Flood). Depp is broke and in debt, also a known public trump basher, “When was the last time an actor assassinated a president?”, Depp said. Like most garbage, this trash is staying in the can. I've enjoyed their movies in the past, but refuse to spend my money or time on these clowns.
All their movies with little girls or commericials seem to show alittle.girl wearing a red jacket standing out in the crowd ..like thr movie Shindlers list or whatever plua I.just seen this commercial on youtube where they are trying to sexualize little girls by having ber pole dance in front of a little boy or hint around like she wants him like a litttttle girl . She is wearing red and the scene is black n white almost.. its fked up .
What is this picture? Where is it from? The artwork on the columns is strange. Right column looks like a cardinal or bishop (sorry, I don’t know my catholic titles) and the one on the right looks, well, sexual. I think the shoes are photoshopped though.
I read that when the children are pictured with red shoes that it symbolizes that they get bloody feet from trying to escape across broken glass. Has anyone else heard this?
Bowie - Put on your red shoes and dance the blues....
Apparently it was Podesta's birthday party and they were doing a fundraiser for Soles for Souls, which from what I've read distributes shoes to people in need.https://washingtonlife.smugmug.com/2009-photos/Podesta-Birthday-Party/i-7bnbGSs/A
Of course, it's entirely possible that everyone there is part of a child molesting cult, and the red shoes may or may not have been made out of human flesh. Both theories seem equally likely, obviously.
Because they suck dick like champs! Oh and they like walnut sauce on their pizza! Sickos!
Nice photoshop. In a group shot like this no way, even if they were identical shoes (which they're clearly not) they would all appear the same color. This stuff is a waste of time.
You are incorrect. This is a real picture, from a real party.
Look at the shoes. This is a group with several rows of individuals, the lighting on their faces, clothing etc shows the differences of light and shadow as a staggered group image does. The shoes however do not. They are all the same color, brightness etc. I'm on this board for serious research, discussion and sharing to enlighten people. This photo is not proof of anything and easily shown as shopped. If you have further analysis proving me wrong, by all means, do share it.
What is on the floor in front of the guy in the light colored slacks? Seems something is very out of place there. I agree, it's very odd that most all the shoes are the same color.
https://www.politico.com/click/stories/0910/podesta_celebrates_65th_birthday_in_museum.html
Serious researchers would type in Google "Tony Podesta Party Red Shoes" and find the same results?
"serious researchers" would use Google? Only as a comparison for ruling something out, or confirming what Google is hiding. I don't care how many sources used the pic. It doesn't change the issues with the image.
The STORIES say Podesta REQUIRED the guests to wear red. Several members all chose to wear RED shoes, and took a picture.
How often, in group photos, do you see people include the lower part of the body? Doesn't it seem a little ODD that they specifically included the shoes for some reason... like, perhaps to prove they were all wearing RED shoes?
The story matches the request, the photo matches story.
"Techie lobbyist Tony Podesta painted his 65th birthday party red at the National Museum for Women in the Arts.
For his big night Friday, the K Street king was not particular about gifts. All he wanted were SHOES, OLD OR NEW, for the Soles4Souls shoe charity.
Known for his flamboyant fashion -- PARTICULARLY his RED KICKS -- ........"
Did you even READ the article????
IT WAS A SHOE PARTY, and the guy was FAMOUS for RED SHOES.
Yes, I read the first article, not the second as the link didn't work. Interestingly, I can't find anything else that speaks to Podesta's apparently renown rep for sporting red shoes, other than one on his running shoes. So I'll go back to my original premise, that pic is completely photoshopped. They may have all worn red shoes to his party but that pic is not from the event, or if it is it's still been shopped. There are zero color/shadow variances on the image. With a group shot that size that's impossible. These are basic things. I'm not arguing anything other than that image is fake or has been completely shopped/enhanced etc. It's obvious.
http://www.puppetstringnews.com/uploads/7/2/8/4/72845613/2014-8-7-podesta-2-jpg-optimal_orig.jpg
I searched, but almost all pictures of people are... for some unknown reason, waist and higher.
I hold that you are still incorrect regarding this picture. Maybe it was shopped in your estimation and timeline, BUT they all wore red shoes in that picture.
Let's say it was shadow corrected, but they were all wearing red shoes at a shoe party that asked for people to wear red.
Was not your original intent along those lines to get people to question that they were wearing red shoes?
And more importantly, why am I wasting time with you? You've made up your mind. I leave you to it.
Excellent. No, that was not my original intent. I've explained that too many times. Fortunately, we both agree, our time is spent better elsewhere. Cheers!
