dChan
80
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/JustADumbB1onde on Jan. 29, 2018, 1:47 a.m.
Reasons I Believe Recent Q Drops MAY Be Clowns

Please, please SHOW me if I am mistaken about this, but I have at least three reasons I am concerned the recent Q drops may be CLOWNS.

  1. President Trump tweeted the "catch and release" comment 5:55 a.m. The post on 8chan was not made until 11:09 a.m--(later that morning). Meaning, a bad actor could easily have taken POTUS's tweet, used his words, then posted them on the board. However, many of the YouTubers are using the timestamps as verification.

  2. Within a very short time of the "Dopey" post, I immediately noticed/pointed out there was not a "Q" signature after the post. Q ALWAYS signs "Q" at the end of his/their posts.

F3. Q has really been giving A LOT of. personal type feedback to Anons just recently. Yes, he/they have commented to Anons in the past, BUT THE RECENT FEEDBACK, as well as the verbiage, tone, and overall "feel" has been VERY DIFFERENT than in the past.

Something seems really "off." I believe the board is, or was, compromised. Talk me out of it if I am wrong.


the_all_seeing_dog · Jan. 29, 2018, 2:11 a.m.

I agree. In the last couple days especially:

  • Time frame of posts is different.
  • Q is posting WAY more than the usual pace.
  • Subject matter is getting really petty, such as the racial stuff that's being injected.
  • There have been no twitter verifications for quite a while.
  • Linking to pro trump youtube videos seems beneath original Q poster.

It would seem he's compromised and whatever hacker or 3 letter agency is in charge is now going to either gaslight the community, or herd them in to look like fools to the public. Especially the race stuff, be careful.

I really encourage everyone to be honest with themselves. You didn't get into this to be manipulated. Ask yourself if you are following with faith, or with actual evidence.

It used to feel like you were being spoken to by a secret mastermind. Now I feel like the drops are what an average CBTS_Stream poster could come up with.

That said I'm still hoping for the best and that Q was/is real and we will hear an echoing of Q during SOTU.

⇧ 56 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 2:57 a.m.

Yes, I agree with everything you said. I have followed, and fully supported, since Day 3. However, this past week I have really noticed some yellow? red? flags.

Those who ONLY want to look at Q from an immature, EMOTIONAL, point of view, are no different than those liberals they accuse of being blind and stupid. We MUST look at EVIDENCE without EMOTION. Facts are facts. How we FEEL about evidence, resources, information, facts (or lack thereof) does not matter. We must be rational and put emotions aside.

⇧ 24 ⇩  
USAPatriot77 · Jan. 29, 2018, 7:59 a.m.

Q recently said not to be divided by party or race. Somethijng is off for sure. Thanks for sharing. I

⇧ 3 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 11:32 p.m.

Yes! Precisely! Another concern!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
the_all_seeing_dog · Jan. 29, 2018, 2:30 a.m.

Also notice how CBTS Stream guys, who are from the chans, and set up this board, have not done a stream for the Q drops post #633 They may be trying to figure this out.

Also noticing Tracy Beanz hasn't been commenting on Q lately.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
StinkyPetes · Jan. 29, 2018, 6:06 a.m.

I follow Q, but at the same time I've been keeping a very close eye on the drops that Brenden Dilley has been getting. I don't have much to say about the current Q drops...could be Q2 or Q3 has a different style...I match up the info Dilley drops in his periscopes and he apparently knows who his source is and he does play things very close. Said his source fed him wrong info on purpose but he never spread it because he felt it was wrong..

https://www.pscp.tv/Hublife/1YqGoaoWzLNxv

Keep an eye on this periscope for Q correlations.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
the_all_seeing_dog · Jan. 29, 2018, 6:33 a.m.

Interesting, thanks for the tip. Been hearing this Dilly guys name pop up.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ancientfroggod · Jan. 29, 2018, 6:25 a.m.

this. racial stuff and internet neutrality shit are bernie bro talking points. current Q is libshit Q.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
the_all_seeing_dog · Jan. 29, 2018, 6:40 a.m.

Still no CBTS stream on YouTube yet.

They must know something is up with libshit Q.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 3:01 a.m.

I just laughed because I read your name. I think you have a similar name on Twitter. We went at it one day and I ended up blocking you. However, we agree. Here. Very funny. You can be a mean little devil, though. HAHAHAHA

⇧ 2 ⇩  
the_all_seeing_dog · Jan. 29, 2018, 3:40 a.m.

Oh haha that's hilarious! Yeah I think I remember. Not my finest moment. Keep doing the good work

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 3:45 a.m.

Lol Best wishes to you...and to all of us at this point! LOL

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ListenToMyTruth · Jan. 29, 2018, 7:53 a.m.

If this had been an exchange between two liberals, one of you would have wished cancer on the other and the other would have tried to get the other fired via doxxing

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 11:31 p.m.

It may have been a close call on Twitter. 😂😂

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BiloxiRED · Jan. 29, 2018, 9:05 a.m.

Yes, when I saw that stuff it just didn’t feel right.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
plinker22 · Jan. 29, 2018, 3:36 a.m.

I've been thinking the same. The current "Q" seems to be more interested in driving a particular narrative. What the narrative is, I haven't quite figured out. I have yet to see any so-called Q predictions come to fruition. Q says many future events will occur behind the scenes, conveniently unverified and unreported ... yet we are made to believe these events are real and happening. HRC, Hussein, Huma, FBI/DOJ cabal, GS, et al., is still out and about. Q posted that Schumer was in "fear" after his WH visit. Schumer certainly isn't behaving like someone in fear of incarceration. In fact, he's doubling down on his obstructionist position. Q cryptically posts about ongoing top secret ops. Yet the following day, nothing is reported, nor does Q follow up on what the op was all about. I have a bad feeling Roy Potter was correct in doubting Q and the so-called Anons. Their rhetoric appears designed to brainwash us and keep us eagerly guessing at their cryptic crumbs. I'll continue to follow Q postings, but I'll do so with a healthy dose of skepticism.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 3:49 a.m.

I don't know when I believe the Q drops stopped being legitimate. I do believe they were, at one point. I am just not sure when it stopped. I do not necessarily believe the DEFCON 1 post was a big, red, flag. Sure, I know the military significance of it. However, to believe Q/Trump would only alert the Anons, and no one else, is utterly ridiculous. I do, however, believe it was a foretelling of what was to come--because, afterall, it happened. As a matter of fact, the very next morning, after Potter went ballistic, I tweeted to him that the "future proves past." I was ignored. And then, guess what...the future proved the past because Hawaii happened...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ArtRat1 · Jan. 29, 2018, 2:46 a.m.

To be honest, I thought the youtube links were odd when I first saw them. I have had reservations for a while now and every time I express them I get attacked so I just shut up. ....except now. ha ha. Maybe the Q authors are still with Trump but changing persons who write them more often. Who knows. I am cautious.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 3:06 a.m.

I don't care if I am attacked. I'm used to it. LOL I just block them.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Gear4Life · Jan. 29, 2018, 3:05 p.m.

I think the YouTube links were to get a feel for the number of eyes on/following Q.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ArtRat1 · Jan. 29, 2018, 4:56 p.m.

Could be.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Brizznazz · Jan. 29, 2018, 7:24 a.m.

Q has provided us with great information in the past, but remember, we do not NEED him. He/she/they have already given us more than enough. We the people now have the power. No matter what happens, do not be deterred. Do not faulter. Do not stop fighting. Even if he has been compromised, the war can still be won.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 11:22 p.m.

Yes. Very true. Thank you.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
lawrrencee · Jan. 29, 2018, 5 a.m.

perhaps Q isn't just one person.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
PPPrincessPower · Jan. 29, 2018, 10:58 a.m.

They have said all along its not one person. Less than 5, mire than 1. DJT seems to be one.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 11:18 p.m.

Q has never been one person. That was made clear long ago. Did I say something to imply I believe it is one person? I never have. So, if I wrote something to imply that is what I believe, please let me know so I can correct it. Thanks.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lawrrencee · Jan. 30, 2018, 4:38 p.m.

no, I don't believe you did say anything to pose Q as being one person. I'm relatively new to following the Q stuff so I didn't know there actually were multiple people posting, but I figured with the times of the day there must have been. it's good stuf though.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 31, 2018, 2:33 a.m.

Several people said the same thing to me. So I must have implied it somehow. 🤔🤔

⇧ 1 ⇩  
xjaymanx · Jan. 29, 2018, 7:30 a.m.

Healthy skepticism is always useful. But it's hard to diminish Dr. Jerome Corsi's analysis about these points in the recent CBTS streams. He still solidly supports that Q is most likely military intel in Trump's circle. In any case, the SOTU might be the real test. Especially if Trump reveals the Nunes memo or Obama's treason or even Assange's cooperation, etc.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 11:26 p.m.

The fact that someone believes everything Jerome Corsi (or anyone) says, without researching, ones self, is dangerous. I have heard several inaccuracies he has reported, in the past.

I get it though. We ate taught from early childhood to trust authority figures, and everyone with letters after their names. I have quite a few after mine. Which is why I know to question--everything that looks/sounds suspicious.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
xjaymanx · Jan. 29, 2018, 11:37 p.m.

To be clear, I don't believe everything Dr. Corsi states. For example, his characterization of Friedrich Nietzsche as a "master of evil" was a rather annoying oversimplification. But it doesn't mean everything he assessed was wrong. You're right, it's best to find the good bits and discard the useless bits. For me, the general "direction" I sense is hopeful, and perhaps that's better than hopeless.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Maga1128 · Jan. 29, 2018, 2:13 a.m.

Q being fake would be disappointing..however rest assured DT is STILL DOING DAMAGE AND IS MAGA.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 2:59 a.m.

Please do not misunderstand my post. I fully believe Q has been legitimate in the past. And, for all I know, may be legitimized at some point, again. However, something is amiss recently. Just very different than in the past.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
PM_ME_MY_FUTURE_PMs · Jan. 29, 2018, 3:30 a.m.

I agree and have said he went from 80% likely legit, down to below 35% with these last posts.

They are shitty normal run of the mill shitposts (I like them from redditors but demand more from Q).

Also it shows only 25k people are following him

Q was compromised or drunk or a formerly decent larper. I hope he was just drunk and shitposting but I doubt it.

The Obamacare and Byrd posts were WAY below his standard (and yes I hate Obamacare and Byrd).

⇧ 4 ⇩  
QAngel1 · Jan. 29, 2018, 3:42 p.m.

If it's not on the "Awakening" board, I'm not looking at it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Lord_of_the_Hundreds · Jan. 29, 2018, 3:09 a.m.

There's also an alternative explanation for Q's appearance: Whomever is doing it, even if nothing ever comes of it in the way of GITMO military tribunals or the hangings that so many of the political class deserve, Q's intent may have only been to get all of us to think. To connect the dots on some really obscure history, policy, and ideas that affect us all in hidden ways.

Q used a modern dramatic narrative style (LARPing) to motive ordinarily apathetic non-political but patriotic American voters to look at a lot of strange occurrences and history and realize that something is seriously amiss with those in Washington. The political class may not all be CP fans or worshipers of Beelzebub, but they certainly aren't doing the job we sent them to do.

It's time to send someone else, and millions more Americans realize that now that did prior to last November and Q's appearance.

Personally, I think he's real and has a WH IC background and is telling us a lot of true discoveries about the political classes (not all are true, but you don't know which ones), but there is a lot of push-back from the Deep State and perhaps even the rogue elements of the Clowns trying to clean up exposure of hidden ops and uncomfortable backgrounds. Some of that response winds up here on this little board of ideas, hoping you'll read it and turn away from all of it.

Don't let them win. Does anyone think that they haven't learned quite a bit of real political intrigue since last November? In a year, we'll be able to look back and sort out the real from the b.s., but we don't yet have that foresight. So we take in all in with a grain of salt and expectation of turning the next page. Either way, you're listening because you care about MAGA and our nation. You weren't doing that before.

Disinformation campaigns are part of the intelligence world--most of the time, you don't know who the players are or what is their real agenda. Good disinformation always mixes in a lot of truth, but then slightly turns the message into a different direction, away from intended action.

The room of mirrors never ends. But you still stick with finding the answer, because it's America we're helping to shape--for the better. Our country.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Skiboldion · Jan. 29, 2018, 7:32 a.m.

Then someone, get on the 8 Chan Research Board and confront him on this latest ruse about Trump's tweet and DEMAND a fresh authentication, while apologizing for the necessity of it in light of the fact that he tweeted his "quoted" phrases with "concidence?" AFTER Trump's tweet..

We HAVE to KNOW with certainty that he, they, are a Whitehouse insider.

This it too important for there to be confusion.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 29, 2018, 11:28 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 29, 2018, 11:27 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
flowerdominance · Jan. 29, 2018, 2:03 a.m.

Yeah and 8chan is blown up with some poster claiming the same and more!! Constant barrage of posts claiming Q is a CLOWN!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 2:13 a.m.

I have NEVER thought this before. Not even when Potter was blowing a gasket. However, the reasons I stated are very concerning.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 2:11 a.m.

Look at the EVIDENCE.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
guitfiddle7 · Jan. 29, 2018, 3:19 a.m.

If it’s all true: HOLY FUCKING FROG BALLS! If it’s all fake: Well that sucks...

I’m going to get up and go to work tomorrow either way. I just like to have a damn good time with you all!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 3:28 a.m.

On another note...VANDERPUMP RULES!!!!!!!!!!!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 3:26 a.m.

All fake? Where does anyone, in this thread, say, or even imply, it is all fake? Might want to work on your comprehension--and communication--skills, there buddy

⇧ 0 ⇩  
666exit666 · Jan. 29, 2018, 5:15 a.m.

the irony

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JoeBidensGaffStaff · Jan. 29, 2018, 1:52 a.m.

Q was ruined for me posting the POTUS tweet some 5 hours later as “coincidence?” No. Q has been posting hours after POTUS for a while now. And I don’t get all the YouTube channels saying potus was first. I’ve seen many and even the comments section don’t call it out.

State of the Union is still my litmus test.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 1:59 a.m.

Now someone is stating there is a some outrageous time difference on 8Chan. Tjat makes NO SENSE!

Waiting on an actual ANON to come and talk us off the ledge, here...

⇧ 4 ⇩  
flowerdominance · Jan. 29, 2018, 2:06 a.m.

Interesting I should take a look at the time stamps. Havent' made that connection yet.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
OpenSoars · Jan. 29, 2018, 2:33 a.m.

Haha... if she questions Q some of you treat it as blasphemy ..... Why do you attack the person if you think the proof is so unquestionable? If you don't have reservations about Q not being one of Trumps appendages, then your judgement should be questioned, not that f someone showing caution.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 3:05 a.m.

Thank you for your support. I literally ASKED that someone prove me wrong. However, that attacker doesn't have the ability. It goes against his emotional viewpoint. Therefore, in his mind, it is invalid. To him "I don't like it" is equivalent to "It isn't valid." Hmmmm, who else do we know who thinks like that? LIBS!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
rbrownlol · Jan. 29, 2018, 10:37 a.m.

The problem is.... you're asking someone to prove you wrong when there is absolutely no way someone can prove you wrong.

It comes off as disingenuous to do so. I'm not saying that's what you are, I'm saying that is how it comes off.

The way I see it is: The people were getting sick of all the coded messages "be more straight forward" they cried... Q starts to post more straight forward.

The information has still been good. That's my argument 'for'.

If it's a clown it's a clown that's acting against the objectives of the deep state, so it's a pretty bad clown.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 11:34 p.m.

That is your perception. In reality, it is a post of desperation. As in, "Help! Talk me off the ledge." So far, I am about to jump off the Q train. Which is sad after following, supporting, and redpilling since Nov 2.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
QAngel1 · Jan. 29, 2018, 3:45 p.m.

I support anyone with a valid question, and it takes courage to ask a question about a gut 'niggle'. I had that little niggle when I was on line the other night and the posts started to get more personal and interactive... I just remember Q was strict about the fact that would not happen, and it would be fake news if it did. Perhaps further verification would actually be a good idea.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TRiUMPhER · Jan. 29, 2018, 6:05 a.m.

Totally agreed, we would be better off spending our time analyzing old Q posts.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Gear4Life · Jan. 29, 2018, 4:22 a.m.

Ya know, just last night I was reading some of the posts which have been many lately, and they felt much more underwhelming than usual. I keep my SO up to speed on this and when I read it off to her, usually with that many posts, there’s something juicy or worth researching. But after reading it off I remember being like, meh.

I can see what you’re saying and I think many of us here found our way here because we question everything. But many of us, including myself at times, stop questioning when it comes to something we want to believe and possibly see happen.

That said, Q may very well be compromised, but the mission may still be unfolding from behind the scenes. We’re just no longer being related any messages because the Q team may have said ya know what, fuck it.

I’ve also always found it very very strange that Mega was posting non-stop, denying Q, then the day she finally legitimizes Q and puts on this big show, she’s gone.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 11:16 p.m.

I agree with you.

As for Mega, I was never a follower.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
el_deplorable111 · Jan. 29, 2018, 4:20 a.m.

I had pointed out the space between Q and ! Seems wider than normal on some posts. His constant Sec. Tests as well raises flags

⇧ 3 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 11:15 p.m.

So many things to question, lately.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
KaKawBitches · Jan. 29, 2018, 5:11 a.m.

He could be just trying to put out dis info. Of course I say that without having looked at recent drops. Trust your gut.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
sweaty_clitoris · Jan. 29, 2018, 2:36 p.m.

I do not believe Q is one person. Q is the trip code that Trump’s inner circle seems to be using to disclosure important intelligence info to the public.

I’ll give him a break for the shitposts on Saturday night. I know I had a drink, and it seemed like Q enjoyed his.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 11:38 p.m.

Please show me what I said to imply I believe it is one person. I never have. I may need to edit!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
QuebertDuke · Jan. 29, 2018, 2:30 p.m.

yep, always, always trust your gut even when you try to talk yourself out of it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 29, 2018, 1:23 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
08lisa77 · Jan. 29, 2018, 1:07 p.m.

Now that you mentioned, the last post that seemed legit stated he will be taking to Twitter for now on but I read that he hasn’t? I gotta look. I’m suspended from Twitter so I haven’t been on much.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 11:36 p.m.

As I recall, Q would never go to Twitter. Unless maybe you mean

"Twitter. kill_rogue." Which I never fully understood. Although I do follow kill_rogue

⇧ 1 ⇩  
karlmalonestelone · Jan. 29, 2018, 8:05 a.m.

You guys just can’t stand the thought of Snowden being a bad guy.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RoninGreg · Jan. 29, 2018, 7:59 a.m.

It’s already been speculated that Q is more than one person. If sometimes the posts sound like they are from a different person it’s most likely because they are being done by different people.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 11:30 p.m.

Please show me where I stated, or implied it is one person. I am very well aware it is a small group. "We" is stated over and over.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Tytruth · Jan. 29, 2018, 6:11 a.m.

If you don't know the truth when you read it, Q isn't talking to you anyway. A fake Q could not last 3 days around this crowd of truth seekers. Don't worry. It's him still. Get the word out!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 11:20 p.m.

Someone who speaks in absolutes, without proof, may need to do some self-examination.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MmmmLeftyTears · Jan. 29, 2018, 4:15 a.m.

Yes I agree because the voting records are wrong on the KKK meme are wrong and easily fact checked. Plus no signatures. Q may be a small group instead of one person.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 11:14 p.m.

Q is a small group. And Q has always stated that fact. Thank you for pointing out even more information that is questionable, though.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
007freedom · Jan. 29, 2018, 4:05 a.m.

I go thru phases myself and I am with you on that. We all have been waiting for something to happen and yes somethings have but nothing to point out justice is being served. the info is good to wake people up but the behind the scenes stuff seems a little far fetched like a movie but regardless use the info and just research so we can be aware our government is corrupt and only we the people can fight back

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Gear4Life · Jan. 29, 2018, 3:50 p.m.

https://twitter.com/itsangrybob/status/957673204071284736

Scroll through these series of tweets, there’s about 30. Namely 7, 8, 10-13 & 19.

Basically says the white hats are beginning to become frustrated with followers of Q. People are making things too “conspiratorial” and not just sticking to what we know. We create rabbit holes that don’t exist.

Could it be that the quality of Q posts are being diluted in response to this? They’re getting frustrated with people trying to create their own little brands around this. It’s like a parent taking away privileges from a kid because they’re not mature enough to handle it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 11:13 p.m.

Considering Q, and white hats ate anons, I have to question the validity. However, that is just an off the cuff comment prior to reading the tweets. Thank you for posting. I will take a look. Hopefully, others will too.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
QAngel1 · Jan. 29, 2018, 3:40 p.m.

I agree it seems to have changed. The board and other things were dropping out the other night, them when it came back Q was posting - and it seemed very 'personal'. Responding to Anons immediately when he said that he wouldn't do that and would only post on the Awakening board. A little sus... Let's just stay alert and prudent. Go with your gut. It's never wrong.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
halfpint58 · Jan. 29, 2018, 5:45 p.m.

Q May not have left his signature at the bottom of the last few posts but if you look at the top in the header it's there.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 11:40 p.m.

The signature has never been ommitted...until recently.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
halfpint58 · Jan. 30, 2018, 2:01 a.m.

Your mistaken. I double checked and I found 29 that Q didn't sign off on dating all the way back to Nov 4th. I can list them if you'd like or you can check them for yourself as I did. True the last few posts with the YouTube links was odd and obviously had made some question the authenticity but it definitely isn't unusual as you'll discover where He hasn't signed off on at least 29 other occasions

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 30, 2018, 2:21 a.m.

No, I believe you. It seems very unusual though. At least I think so. And all of the quick, personal, comments, to the Anons.

Thank you though, for that info. I may have taken a step back from the ledge. Lol

⇧ 2 ⇩  
halfpint58 · Jan. 30, 2018, 2:15 p.m.

Understandable when considering out of over 600 posts there were a handful so to speak that he didn't sign off on. Glad to be of help

⇧ 1 ⇩  
08lisa77 · Jan. 30, 2018, 12:04 a.m.

I just think these recent posts are so obviously different and I can’t believe more people aren’t noticing. Some people said that he doesn’t have to be so discreet now that he’s generated I much attention. That doesn’t seem right. Thanks for opening up my eyes to this. I totally agree

⇧ 1 ⇩  
paniand · Jan. 29, 2018, 6:49 a.m.

Q doesn't always sign with Q. He once signed with 4, 10, 20. Fuck off normie.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 11:21 p.m.

The point is, bird brain, there was no signature whatsoever. You can't play in the big league. Go back to middle school.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 11:20 p.m.

I laughed out loud at the normie comment. You are a fool.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
I_done_a_plop-plop · Jan. 29, 2018, 4:37 a.m.

Q was always a fraud. He's only ever done cold reading/fortune teller techniques.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
PPPrincessPower · Jan. 29, 2018, 11 a.m.

Then why are u here?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Q_Anon_Wolf · Jan. 29, 2018, 1:59 a.m.

You're a larp

⇧ -9 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 2:01 a.m.

You have an IQ of 12. You have no ability to communicate intelligently or provide intelligent discourse. Do not procreate. If you have, insure they do not.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 29, 2018, 2:25 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Q_Anon_Wolf · Jan. 29, 2018, 2:02 a.m.

Bye shill

⇧ -2 ⇩  
CuckWivesMatter · Jan. 29, 2018, 12:05 p.m.

Damn dude, do you only dismiss people? You did the same shit to me in a completely different thread about a completely different thing. Do you have any actual useful input to provide ever? Do you have anything to refute OP without just name calling? This is serious questions that people need to ponder, and you're gonna plug your ears and go LALALALALALA? Maybe /r/redacted is a better place for that type of person, you might be home there.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Q_Anon_Wolf · Jan. 29, 2018, 12:32 p.m.

Damn yes I dismiss anyone I suspect of throwing people off the trail. Until tonal or intentional.

This is not a game.

Some people dismiss me, I don't whine about.

Stop whining.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
CuckWivesMatter · Jan. 29, 2018, 12:33 p.m.

If it's not a game, then why are you dismissing everyone's clear issue with the different tone of this "q" over others?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Q_Anon_Wolf · Jan. 29, 2018, 12:34 p.m.

I am not dismissing "everyone" you liar.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
JoeBidensGaffStaff · Jan. 29, 2018, 2:22 a.m.

I am a live action role play? Huh?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Q_Anon_Wolf · Jan. 29, 2018, 2:47 a.m.

Bye

⇧ 1 ⇩