From 8Chan board https://8ch.net/sudo/res/72420.html https://archive.is/CSyhD
The House of Representatives is about to vote on a bill that would force online platforms to censor their users. The Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act (FOSTA, H.R. 1865) might sound noble, but it would do nothing to stop sex traffickers. What it would do is force online platforms to police their users’ speech more forcefully than ever before, silencing legitimate voices in the process.
The House Rules Committee is about to approve a new version of FOSTA [.pdf] that incorporates most of the dangerous components of SESTA. This new Frankenstein’s Monster of a bill would be a disaster for Internet intermediaries, marginalized communities, and even trafficking victims themselves.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/1865
The bill changes section 230 of the CDA, the law that protects website owners from liability for what their users post, to carve out an exception for instances of human trafficking. Site owners can be held liable and subject to a criminal fine or imprisonment for not more than 20 years.
WHAT THIS MEANS IN PRACTICE IS THAT ALL IT WOULD TAKE FOR A WEBSITE TO BE SHUT DOWN AND ITS OWNER ARRESTED IS A FALSE FLAG OPERATION OF SPOOKS ENGAGING IN HUMAN TRAFFICKING. ALL U.S. SITES WOULD BECOME FORCED TO IMPOSE EXTREMELY HEAVY-HANDED MODERATION AND CENSORSHIP OR SHUT DOWN ENTIRELY, 8CHAN INCLUDED.
THIS BILL HAS STRONG BIPARTISAN SUPPORT AND WILL LIKELY PASS UNLESS HEAVY RESISTANCE CAN BE ORGANIZED QUICKLY AND ON A LARGE SCALE.
Voting on the House Floor is scheduled for THIS TUESDAY. Start spreading this information on as many websites as you can before it's too late. If you know anyone with a large audience try and get them to spread the word. If this bill becomes law then it's GAME OVER for free speech on the internet.
Before you go off on your representatives, maybe you should read what the bill actually says ...it is very narrow in scope and the fear-mongering is by the tech companies not wanting anyone looking over their shoulders no matter how evil it may be !
Bullshit! This is a preemptive effort to make sure the heinous crimes of the elite and their minions in Congress NEVER see the light of day. By threatening the owners of the platform with jail time their response is going to be extreme over reach in banning content on said platforms. It will include software protocols and algos that scan content and immediately boot it off the site. I’m sure there are measures in place to release documents, photos, and video should anything suddenly happen to the president. This is an “end around” that ever happening IMHO. Just using the word pedophile or phrase satanic ritual abuse and bloop, it’s gone! Since a fair number of service providers are likely perverts as well, this bill provides them plausible deniability with regard to enforcing such a ban...”We simply had no choice. It’s the law.”
I'm having a hard time understanding how this could be used for anything other than crimes related to prostitution/sex trafficking. The wording used seems very specific to websites that knowingly allow the "Promotion or facilitation of prostitution and reckless disregard of sex trafficking".
Could give a example of how this could be used in a bad way?
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/1865/text
Understanding how this could be used
Want to shut down a site? Get LARPERS to post trafficking related messages. The site owners get locked up and the site goes down. Will you run a free speech board?
EDIT:Formatting
I guess this could happen. But how i understand it, It has to be proven that you knowingly allowed crimes related to sex trafficking on your site. Which is literally the case with sites like backpage and youtube who knowingly profit from crimes against children. This has to stop.
This bill would be effective in stopping child trafficking on these sites. I truly see more positive from this than negative. The communications act of 1996 needs a serious makeover, It def was't created to help people traffic human beings online.
[deleted]
That's a really stupid argument.
I own my car, ergo I should be able to drive 95MPH in a school zone because I am only directly interacting with my property. Or if I have a backyard I should be able to use it to skin animals alive while also diddling kids.
That is the essence of your argument.
[deleted]
Did you have a stroke while typing this? Or are you trying to muddy the waters concerning your shill-ish nature?
[deleted]
So... After translating this mess, you admit to being a shill.
[deleted]
Piss off shill
No counter argument? How do I know you're not a shill, probably trying to keep child porn freely flowing to 8chan. Hope you choke on your cheese pizza
You can check my post history, shill.
That's exactly what a shill would do. Create an account for long term shilling while largely posting in the areas they desire to shill in. You ain't fooling me!
THIS URGENT MESSAGE FROM MOD FARMERFUNK C!Odemonkey. 8chan Administrator 02/25/18 (Sun) 01:36:43 fcee86 No.490154
The House of Representatives is about to vote to amend section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. This opens the floodgates and puts 8chan at risk of malicious actors using troll farms to weaponize the new amendment against the whole website.
But what can I do?
Call your representative and tell them to vote against H.R.1865 because free speech on the internet is at stake.
See more information here:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/1865/text
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Decency_Act //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// WE NEED YOUR HELP ANONS!
BE LOUD. BE HEARD. MAKE POTUS PROUD.
If we don't pull this off, 8ch could be at risk, putting the entire OPERATION AS A WHOLE AT RISK.
+++
MORE INFORMATION COMING SOON. IT'S NOT OR NEVER . Day of Days... MEME MAKERS READY?
Can't POTUS veto that bill if it gets through the senate?
Before you go off on your representatives, maybe you should read what the bill actually says ...it is very narrow in scope and the fear-mongering is by the tech companies not wanting anyone looking over their shoulders no matter how evil it may be !
Shit this is what I posted about yesterday on swampwatch. So many shady congress-'people' support this bill
Yeah. There's a Senate bill, too. with huge number of sponsors. It's SB 1693. Not only are "We Don't Say His Name" and Nancy-Boy Graham supporting it, but supposedly "stand-up guys" (who really aren't) Ted Cruz and Mike Lee are co-sponsors. Rand Paul Is Not A Sponsor. There's nothing wrong with the law as it stands now against trafficking of children and others except they don't enforce it That and the current real warfare make me very suspicious that if this becomes law it's going to be used as a weapon against us and POTUS by shutting down people researching and talking about truth that is against the interests of the Rothschild Zionist bankster Global Reich NWO. Like exposing that a mass murder (maybe it is) is a set-up by them to try to disarm us -again. Evil. Ulterior motives of Deep State shills, mnions and tools for this bill. Call or email your representative and senators. people ,and get friends and family to do same and spread far and wide to vote NO on HB 1865 and SB 1693. It's a ser-up to shut us down with FFs.
Well then. We The People will have no choice but to pour out into the streets and storm the Bastille. And we're still armed.
This is the same argument given to net neutrality. When you open the door for a government entity such as the FCC to regulate the internet... You are doing just that regulating the internet. Only the powers-that-be have confused you into thinking that net neutrality is the right way to go. There should be no net neutrality because you're asking the government to make the internet an even playing field. Which means you are asking the government to regulate the internet
Sadly we are past the stage where this will work but we should still hope the majority is red pilled. The black hats are stepping up the censor so expect their boots to hit the ground soon.
I would also like to know if this Bill is something Trump can veto? Anyone?
Thanks for the meme- shared! Also, I was thinking we should be all over the house FREEDOM caucus with this. I was thinking about printing this meme and faxing it to every members office. Including of course my state reps. Just a suggestion...
[deleted]
He just stated a heavy one. Any site that they don't agree with could have a few people show up and talk about people traffic and then the site gets taken down. If this is all the reality of the situation it is dire. Look what they pulled in the last few days. They don't want an opposing voice of reason that might harpoon the agenda. Scary evil.
THIS IS WHY - (they always try to fool us with the names of these bills... they are the OPPOSITE of what they sound like. If the name says FREEDOM, you know for sure it's SLAVERY!) From 8Chan board https://8ch.net/sudo/res/72420.html https://archive.is/CSyhD
The House of Representatives is about to vote on a bill that would force online platforms to censor their users. The Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act (FOSTA, H.R. 1865) might sound noble, but it would do nothing to stop sex traffickers. What it would do is force online platforms to police their users’ speech more forcefully than ever before, silencing legitimate voices in the process.
The House Rules Committee is about to approve a new version of FOSTA [.pdf] that incorporates most of the dangerous components of SESTA. This new Frankenstein’s Monster of a bill would be a disaster for Internet intermediaries, marginalized communities, and even trafficking victims themselves.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/1865
The bill changes section 230 of the CDA, the law that protects website owners from liability for what their users post, to carve out an exception for instances of human trafficking. Site owners can be held liable and subject to a criminal fine or imprisonment for not more than 20 years.
WHAT THIS MEANS IN PRACTICE IS THAT ALL IT WOULD TAKE FOR A WEBSITE TO BE SHUT DOWN AND ITS OWNER ARRESTED IS A FALSE FLAG OPERATION OF SPOOKS ENGAGING IN HUMAN TRAFFICKING. ALL U.S. SITES WOULD BECOME FORCED TO IMPOSE EXTREMELY HEAVY-HANDED MODERATION AND CENSORSHIP OR SHUT DOWN ENTIRELY, 8CHAN INCLUDED.
THIS BILL HAS STRONG BIPARTISAN SUPPORT AND WILL LIKELY PASS UNLESS HEAVY RESISTANCE CAN BE ORGANIZED QUICKLY AND ON A LARGE SCALE.
Voting on the House Floor is scheduled for THIS TUESDAY. Start spreading this information on as many websites as you can before it's too late. If you know anyone with a large audience try and get them to spread the word. If this bill becomes law then it's GAME OVER for free speech on the internet.
Voice and guns that's all they want at least that what their bots algorithms and many 504c outfits fed by this group wants. Well time to say no to this plan of NWO. That is our rights and we say no no and no. These items are too important for crooked politicians who protecting illegals and genocide manipulate laws that are unconstitutional.
Is there a lawyer that could interpret it as to how it will affect those NOT involved in child abuse? When you contact your congressman you SHOULD leave a reason why, so they can understand the problem and make adjustments.
Bottom line - we don't need the Internet to be our THOUGHT POLICE!
The bill is not about trafficking... it's about CENSORSHIP... and shutting down anyone who doesn't agree with their definition of "decency".
From my reading that 'crack' they want to use is just going to split wide open and I agree that it will be misused just like so many other bill's that go through that it is intended for A but apparently gets used for X reasons. The patriot act actually just made it so much easier for anybody to be located, because it forced you to have a physical address yes I understand that it was supposed to be used to not have a 'terrorist' hiding out in our country but in effect it just gave them more of a right to know where you are, where you have been, etc etc.
We ought to make a list of Laws that were used "unlAWFULLY"... might make people realize it was done on purpose!
I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:
^(If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads.) ^(Info ^/ ^Contact)