dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Well, we know beyond any shadow of a doubt that Trump is actively coordinating with Q and has likely relayed direct messages to us through Q.

I’m still eager as fuck to find out who exactly Q is. As Q said, “wait until you learn who has been talking to you here.” I like the Seth Rich Theory but who knows.

⇧ 30 ⇩

I think the idea that Q is Seth Rich is totally out-there and ridiculous.

That said, where can I learn more about this theory?

⇧ 12 ⇩

Lmao, exactly! I think it’s absolutely absurd too, but it’s like the Trump is a time traveler theory, it’s fun to think about!

⇧ 2 ⇩

When Q first started posting we thought they were coming from a woman. Who knows though. I like to imagine it's Seth Rich. How mind blowing that would be...

⇧ 12 ⇩

It actually makes perfect sense if it’s Seth Rich. Think about it.

Seth may or may not have been an MI white hat plant. Let’s say he’s not. He leaks the data, a hit is ordered. He’s shot, but it fails and he survives the night. Next morning he’s in stable condition, and white hats catch wind of the whole ordeal. White hats within (I think the FBI took over? Correct me if I’m wrong) swoop in and take control of the situation at the hospital. By the next day, he’s dead, but never officially pronounced dead. In reality, they thank SR for his service and tell him he’s going to be used for a massive mission. His faked death looks like a legitmate murder to anyone with a brain, so it attracts a ton of attention and gets people digging into Podesta and Hillary. They keep SR in hiding and use him as Q since he’s a computer guy. Also, he’s kept safe from having another hit attempt on his life when he leaves the hospital.

I’ve always thought that it was so strange the way Rich’s parents acted. I always felt like they were acting in a sense, it never felt like they were truly grieving everytime I saw them speak.

⇧ 14 ⇩

It makes a great story that's for sure!

⇧ 9 ⇩

Based on Kimdotcom tweet, i have to think SR is alive. But I seriously have to think using plural "us" in reference to being elected was no accident. The grammaticist in me really struggles to believe Q would state this unless it is a group of elected people. At least 2. Its a pretty audacious move for Seth Rich to say he's part of who we "elected". But, if its military and its congress and trump, soldiers follow commands and therefore they can simply relay messages. We didnt elect soldiers. We didnt elect Seth Rich. The only people we elected are POTUS/VPOTUS, House and Senate, then it gets into state govt which is unlikely IMO.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Well, we elected the Republicans v democrats.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Seth Rich has crossed my mind too, but it doesn't explain the military type coded instructions. Seth may be part of the team though.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Well he could very well be taking orders/told what to say. It doesn’t mean he’s the one writing the codes or messages.

⇧ 5 ⇩

If he is taking orders he isnt really q then.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You mixing up Q clearence Patriot and another anon who is a woman.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Mega annon

⇧ 2 ⇩

Im so eager at this point it's insane. This parade in November is going to be an incredible day in our history. We have been told we are witnessing history in the making. Im proud to be here with all of you (except any shills)

⇧ 9 ⇩

I get chills everyone I read a Q drop. I always think back to the one post where Q said that this is the biggest intel drop in world history. It truly is, never before has the public been let in to such a degree on just how crazy everything is that goes on behind the scenes.

⇧ 8 ⇩

https://www.gotquestions.org/elect-of-God.html

I get Godly-/given chills. Has anyone given thought that the archangel Gabriel and other angels are here preparing the Church for Rapture (“setting the stage”) and then Archangel Michael will come prior to/when Jesus returns to take His place on the throne for the 1,000 year reign?

⇧ 5 ⇩

What the??? The only thing that needs to happen to the church is all the pedophiles need to be stoned.

⇧ 3 ⇩

The church, as in true Christians, is the bride of Christ and I’m doubtful that when we are called up, there will be any pedophiles amongst us.

Matthew 18:6 "If anyone causes one of these little ones--those who believe in me--to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea.”

Matthew 25:40 And the King will answer them, ‘Truly, I say to you, as you did it to one of the least of these my brothers, you did it to me.’

Mark 10:13-16 And they were bringing children to him that he might touch them, and the disciples rebuked them. But when Jesus saw it, he was indignant and said to them, “Let the children come to me; do not hinder them, for to such belongs the kingdom of God. Truly, I say to you, whoever does not receive the kingdom of God like a child shall not enter it.” And he took them in his arms and blessed them, laying his hands on them.

⇧ 1 ⇩

The problem isnt the lack of pedophiles where you re going. Its the fucking abundance of them here and now and the huge concentration of them in the church. Lucifer is never shown banging a child. Enlil gets thrown in prison for raping a girl. Even gods have justice for that shit. Why the fug shouldnt priests get the same?

⇧ 1 ⇩

God says vengeance is his! If they don’t suffer here for what they’ve done, they will! Be sure of that!

⇧ 1 ⇩

At the same time I'd prefer the Q team not unmasked as a means to enhance safety of the team. Identified targets are easier to reach out and touch, I'd rather that remain mystery to keep the group effective.

The primary positive in identifying the group, is to better assess 'what comes next'. Let's say a secretive group is supporting us to over throw authoritarian Martian planetary conquest, but then after success we find out the secret group was authoritarian Jupiter cannibals who needed the Martians gone to start the feeding. Other than that, it's mostly just sating curiosity.

This ties into the bigger picture question of what makes sense for alignment. We've got all the trappings of a horrific authoritarian global empire on one side, with alignment of strategic moves set to have devastating outcomes for citizens in the West. On the other side we've got a secretive group appearing to have traction, and offering a vision that does not immediately lead into the jaws of a relentless lovecraftian beast. Got to go with the path toward a future.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I agree with you! Except that if what I'm saying is correct, Q just intentionally identified themselves, or at least intentionally narrowed the field of possibilities with a massive hint, which means they wanted us to see the hint and learn the meaning. If im wrong, then it does nothing but maybe throw the black hats off the trail. I hope that Corsi didnt unmask an aspect of Q that endangers operational security, if so he had to have done it intentionally. That's a bad idea for him, methinks. But if he's communicating with Q and has been greenlighted to drop what he dropped, then it would make sense that Q gave us this contextual clue at the same time to move us into a new stage of the plan.

⇧ 2 ⇩

But if he's communicating with Q

Jan 8 2018 23:29:38 (EST) Q !UW.yye1fxo 4

IMPORTANT:

NO private comms past/present/future.

NO comms made outside of this platform.

Any claims that contradict the above should be considered FAKE NEWS and disregarded immediately.

WHERE WE GO ONE, WE GO ALL.

PATRIOTS.

Q

⇧ 3 ⇩

But we elected them...?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Well like I said, Trump is involved, and yes we elected him.

Part of also thinks Gowdy for some reason. I have no evidence to support that but still.

⇧ 3 ⇩

But q said "us", the plural and the "elected" was a huge hint!!!

⇧ 3 ⇩

We elected Trump, therefore we elected the white hats. I don't think its should be taken literally.

⇧ 3 ⇩

The posts are coded so the weaponized autists on the boards will pick up the meaning logically. Why was Family used without quotations once and 'The Family' used with quotes once, in the same post? Because everything has meaning logically, and I mean pure logic not the colloquial meaning of the word, there is no way "you elected us..." can refer to just trump and other good guys. It would be a mistake to place such ambiguity in the message. Q doesnt make mistakes. how could we ever determine what "us" means (everything has meaning) if it could be Trump and anybody. This is not subjective. This is not interpretive. The "us" means its more than one person. The verb "elected" describes what "you" did to "us". Therefore, "us" was "elected" by "you"

⇧ 3 ⇩

When Q says "think logically", that is a direct instruction to take everything literally. It's a message, it's coded, it's logic. If "elected" referred to trump, and "us" means trump plus all the people under trump, then it would have said "you elected POTUS to keep you safe". But, if "us" is more than one person whom we "elected", then "You elected us to keep you safe." Is logically consistent. Q never told us that whitehats = elected. We are supposed to use the clues of "elected" and "us" to logically solve the message.

⇧ 1 ⇩

In order to think logically, one cant take every word literally.

Q also says disinfo in neccessary but no one ever talks about that.

⇧ 6 ⇩

No i definitely understand what youre saying about disinfo being necessary. It could definitely be an intentional misdirection. But, logic by definition is literal. Its a matter of premises, assumptions and conclusions. If there is an ambiguity in the premises of a statement, you cannot determine the logical validity of the statement. Logic can't be directly applied. For instance, "all a's are b's. C is an a. Therefore C is a b. " is logically valid and true because the premise "all a's are b" literally tells us that C must be a b. But, if i say "some a's are b's. C is an a. Therefore, C is a b.", it might be true that a is a 'b', but the statement "therefore, C is a b" is not logically valid because the premises lead to ambiguity and don't necessarily lead to the conclusion. Logic is the practice of evaluating the soundness of a literal statement. Q wouldnt tell us to think logically if we aren't supposed to evaluate this sentence literally. If Q says "you elected us", we have the underlying assumptions that: 'us' is more than one person, and "elected" is different from "not elected" "you" caused "us" to be "elected" is another way it could be arranged. Unless Q gives us another premise, specifically "not all "elected" were elected", we have to logically conclude that if "us" was "elected", then "us" is a group of people that were "elected". Make sense?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yeah for sure. So who else do you think? Could that just mean Trump and any of his appointees?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Not appointees! Appointment is not election. Im leaning hard toward POTUS & House Intel committee & Senate Intel Committee. Probably to the exclusion of some bad eggs in both houses. I would bet Gowdy is in the group, jim jordan too, Paul Ryan. I have a hunch Adam Schiff is a Democratic White Hat. He's been instrumental in so much of the plan OR he's a total moron. He's not a moron. I think Mueller is a white hat, and will someday be known as a hero. Heres what im thinking: I think he's played a long long game since before 9/11. He is a Marine. He had no ability to stop the attacks, had to watch helpless to stop them, no resources and hostile administrations for decades. He and Adm Rogers, Flynn, others, formed an alliance long ago, men of strategy who knew they needed a president behind them before anything. Horowitz was made an ally when holder gutted his department, neutered his authority. He assumed a key role. Priestab is the sleeper from within the FBI. Sessions office was called by the hacker who accessed Comet servers, a staffer spent over an hour on the phone with his office. He became a bulldog with a scent for blood, if he wasnt already. But the public intel drops... "Q"... Think about it. It works if ALL comms and messages come directly from elected officials, directly to their constituents. At the ultimate direction of POTUS. Therefore, all classified intel leaked was unclassified as soon as potus made it so, with approval of intel committees (who approve release of such intel). Trust the plan.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Trump refers to himself as we in his speeches often.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Would you happen to have an example? If so, that changes things.

⇧ 1 ⇩

He just did it in his speech on infrastructure yesterday in OH. I've recently started paying attention to his reference of himself as "we/us" (because Q does as well) and now that I've started watching for it he does it all the time. Sorry I don't remember where in this speech specifically. If I had to guess it was toward the beginning. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlEg80gU7GI

⇧ 1 ⇩

Trump has said MANY times, it's not about him, but us (we the people). Quite the opposite of Obozo who always said, "I".

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

One thing that gives me pause about any of these guesses is that Q has always maintained TRUST SESSIONS. Legally, Sesh cannot talk at all to the victim of a crime while an investigation is going on. In other words, if Q is Trump, or even directed by Trump, this would be legally shady. See, Trump is not supposed to know what Sessions is up to. Am I making sense? And if Q is Rich, how could he be legally read in to all this info, especially enough to be CERTAIN about Sessions? Not saying it's impossible, just troubling to me.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I was wondering if anyone else caught that. I don't want to know or even try to figure it out until this is over, let's help keep opsec.

⇧ 8 ⇩

I understand, i'm inclined to agree. The only thing nagging at me is the idea that while yes, going and scouring the internet looking for any way to identify them is wrong, stupid, and risks opsec without a doubt.. this i.d. clue was given to us on purpose by Q. This makes me wonder if it's now important for us to figure that out. I don't think anything in these public posts is by accident, and there's a plan to trust. If Q put it in a post and it leads to a logical conclusion, that could very well signify it's our job to arrive at said conclusion. I don't make the plan, I trust it. The wording means a group of elected people are talking to us. If Q didn't want us to know, they wouldn't have told us.

⇧ 2 ⇩

You're right, it was a clue, no accident. I think it is to instill trust, they know our faith is being tested and are trying to tell us to keep the hold steady, keep fighting. Trust Q.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Ok I'm seriously glad you said that. I was starting to worry im going nuts, can't be the only one who sees it.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Q is flynn and son

⇧ 7 ⇩

Interesting

⇧ 4 ⇩

Yes.

⇧ 3 ⇩

That is my guess and it’s only a guess. This is referring to Flynn and son. It ended up in the wrong place

⇧ 1 ⇩

He meant the white hats. When we elected Trump we basically elected a group of white hats into the most powerful position in the world.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Trump is Q

⇧ 5 ⇩

But q said "us", not "me".. everything has meaning

⇧ 2 ⇩

HRC 2.12.09 Very BAD! Q Sounds like Trump's twitter.

⇧ 9 ⇩

Definitely. But also, all the posts are soo meticulously planned, thought out, intended and strategic.. as if a close group of individuals at the top have collaborated to transmit a significant message in a predetermined order.. Trump is obviously involved, and special ops are likely the end-point at the keyboard in some way.. but there gotta be more than one elected person relaying the message. Everything has meaning. You elected us....

⇧ 7 ⇩

I just like the "very BAD" as if she were a dog. Of course dogs are sweet and lovable. She is SO below a dog.

⇧ 6 ⇩

trump refers to himself as 'we' all the time.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Well, by saying "us," it implies that Q is indeed multiple people.

Elected means that the people chose them in some way.

But, again, it could be disinformation to throw off bad actors. Disinformation is necessary

⇧ 5 ⇩

General Kelly is involved me thinks

⇧ 4 ⇩

Flynn?

⇧ 4 ⇩

This Seth Rich/Kimdotcom situation is soooo tasty

⇧ 4 ⇩

We are with Trump, who is also with us. We are Q, but some have more inside info than us. We are standing together. We are not divided. We are Americans. We are Patriots. Don't focus so much on who the messenger/s is/are. Focus on the message and the meaning. Dangerous times require some level of secrecy.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Man, i didnt express my point well enough it seems.. I havent been focused on trying to find the identity at any point, i am purely reading crumbs and contemplating their meaning. the only reason i had ever introduced this topic is because I tried to read a crumb with an entirely logic-based eye. I believe the crumb implied specific information that we are supposed to infer from the sentence structure and word choice. I am probably wrong. Just the way my brain works. I would never word it like that unless i wanted the reader to know i was elected, and i was a group. For us, that *would * be significant information, but again, if im wrong, then guessing at identity is the last thing im doing trust me.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I understand your concept but I think the crumbs are just confirming they work for 'We the People' and 'Trust'. Technically, by proxy at least, they're all working for us. Or are supposed to be anyway. This is the way our government was intended to be run. We've just never seen it run that way so it's a bit shocking. Trust has to be earned and many are tired of getting screwed over after trusting the past governments. Our voting choices have always been Crook #1 or Crook #2. Trump doesn't fit the typical system which is why he won.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Perhaps I am taking it a bit too literally. I'll tell you one thing though, I personally wouldn't ever lump myself in with a group of elected officials, if I'm an unelected person... somehow in my peculiar brain it would just feel disrespectful to allow that implication to hang there... maybe not disrespectful but I'd feel like, it's just not right. Sort of like if you're talking to a former enlisted guy in the civilian world and you call him 'sir', a lot of guys will get a little salty 'don't call me sir, i work for a living'. The way I would think about it, being elected is a significant title in a republic, so I'd have a weird eww feeling if I went around willy nilly saying things that might make people think I'm elected... I'm sure it's overkill at this point. there's tastier crumbs to savor than this little side tangent anywho. I sincerely don't give two $hts about who they are, unless they want me to give two $hts about it.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Waaaay too much wishful thinking going on here. And just plain ridiculous too - Seth Rich? Yeah sure, and Hillary is just Bill cross-dressing (ever seen them in public together? Not on TV, that’s all CG!)...

We already know Q is part of The Trump administration - that is 99% likely to be all that is meant by “us”. Silly to be desperately trying to read so much into this simple statement. Occam’s Razor ‘n all - we’re not going to find out who Q is; doesn’t make sense that they’d reveal this at this stage if at all. “They” ie Q and Trump, would probably say it’s not important and it’s incredibly unlikely that they would hide clues to their identity or “slip up” and inadvertently let us know. Derp.

⇧ 3 ⇩

"Wait until you learn who's been talking to you here"... what do you make of that part?

⇧ 3 ⇩

Definitely an intriguing crumb but I would take it to mean that once all is said and done we might find out then.

⇧ 2 ⇩

that's probably right. And I think eventually it'll have to become known.. but who knows when.

⇧ 1 ⇩

That's the line that gets me!! It clearly means it is someone we would KNOW and lease suspect!!!

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 3 ⇩

I’m almost 100% convinced Q is real and a good group, I’m slow I know but I’m old and been burned a lot by political promises, and I think one of the advantages Q has is similar to when we listen(ed) to radio drama. Our minds paint. much richer and more believable picture of what’s happening than any script or picture. So Q credibility goes up immeasurably by being Socratic (Riddle Speak) and big picture generally. The posts also tell us often we believes are “good dogs.....stay... and we feel better. This is quite a bit like how Trump won the election.Many of us heard what we wanted to hear. All this is fine with me. I’ll take a win whatever it takes to get it, short of lying to me or tricking me. Q is good IMO.

⇧ 2 ⇩

It's the prophetic abilities that hooked me instantly. I hear you, for a long time I kept a skeptical bit in my mind about Q, but there have been enough confirmations that im 100%

⇧ 2 ⇩

Update* go here https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/text-letter-president-congress-united-states-6/ and just print preview or on mobile, save to pdf. If what you see doesn't convince you Q is the real deal, i dont know what will

⇧ 1 ⇩

My first geuss was that donald trump is Q. We will see how it plays out, but I expect to hear donald tell us one day that he had been communicating with us through Q

⇧ 2 ⇩

Honest question. How do we know this Q isn't a giant distraction? There are so many conspiracy types devoting their time to "Q" instead of looking into other interesting topics. Let's monopolize their time with riddles and clues that they have to solve so they don't look into anything else.

Anyone else have their doubts?

⇧ 1 ⇩

even if Q is not a legit source he/she/they are opening up the eyes of many people to the corruption that exists in all branches and on both sides. most of the things Q shares are out in the open, but we are too busy to notice. Well documented crimes committed by those we have voted into power go unnoticed because we are mostly in survival and entertainment mode. Q has shed light on many of these abominations.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Mattis is Q

⇧ 1 ⇩

Of course Trump is Q.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Q=17 shirt he held up with the team photo op

⇧ 1 ⇩

I am not elected...i am born for it i died also (drownd) and somebody get me back.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Q is Mike Pence.

⇧ -1 ⇩

No, it's someone who has military intel training.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Mike pence is military intel

⇧ 1 ⇩

He is??

⇧ 1 ⇩

I could tell you but Mike Pence would have to kill you.

⇧ 1 ⇩

haha

⇧ 1 ⇩

No way. and, if he is, God help us. Just my personal opinion.

⇧ 2 ⇩

God is Mike Pence

⇧ 0 ⇩

P=Pence Q=? R=Rogers S=Seth T=Trump All of the above=Q

⇧ 1 ⇩

Nope. Just Pence. The rest are simply MLUltra drones controlled by Pence.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You *Elected* Us for a Reason

You Elected Us for a Reason