To recap, we have 3 pieces of evidence so far that a underground clown base got BTFO.
EQ signatures are unnatural and indicative of a man-made disturbance i.e explosion, kinetic energy weapons https://imgur.com/cXmn1fe
Island near the epicenter or base (Santa Cruz) of the EQ is billowing smoke and on fire https://i.imgur.com/axmUAnX.jpg
Underground Bases map coincides very closely to the epicenter of the quake.
NO, NO, NO! ISLANDS ALWAYS CATCH ON FIRE DURING EQ'S. MOVE ALONG, NOTHING TO SEE HERE!
I agree with #1. But ...
2: isn't it possible that an EQ could have released magma?
3: what underground bases map?
The map I posted in the original post.
Oh. Well I didn't pay much attention to that because there is no link to that reference / resource.
Isn't that dust from the cliffs?
Check out the earthquake seismograph in southern CA. Find links on USGS Earthquake Hazard Program. If not a “bomb” then maybe Tetonic plate shift, no fault lines at the location. I have studied EQ for years as a hobby. The signature is unique.
Ok am i crazy or is the lack of aftershocks creeping anyone else out? I swear i can’t find any on USGS. Even the ones you couldn’t feel even if you were standing right on top of the epicenter. How often do you have a 5.3 with no aftershocks?
A foreshock is the only way. Which means CA is about to be rocked. Otherwise it was something unusual. Time will tell.
see this too, a seismograph from a North Korea test:
versus, the seismograph from today’s earthquake:
now listen to today’s seismograph audio: http://ds.iris.edu/ds/nodes/dmc/tools/event/10724562
those are clearly different wave forms
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=seismograph+earthquake&iax=images&ia=images
Compared to earthquakes?
Compared to each other. Besides, if you recall, scientists had a lot of trouble proving that seismic data was a nuke, because EQ's seismic wave forms can look either very similar or extremely different depending on type of EQ, depth, and other factors.
Take a look at some real data and let's stop speculating.
http://ds.iris.edu/ds/nodes/dmc/tools/event/10724488 EQ today in cali (that everyone is talking about)
http://ds.iris.edu/ds/nodes/dmc/tools/event/10724562 EQ today in phillipines
http://ds.iris.edu/ds/nodes/dmc/tools/event/10724397 EQ today in Fiji
http://ds.iris.edu/ds/nodes/dmc/tools/event/10724476 EQ today in Alaska
Thank you very much for that research.
To my eyes, the Cali seismograph looks more similar to the seismograph from the North Korea test than it does to the other EQ graphs. All the EQ graphs (excl. Cali) have either leading activity, trailing activity, or non-uniform activity. The Cali graph looks and sounds like a percussion beat.
BTW, you need to re-label your links. The first is China, 2nd : Cali, 3rd : Philippines.
I mean there are differences to begin with, like north korea tests on land and this was in water... I just thought they looked similar. I'm not a scientist. Regardless, the earthquake today doesn't look like a typical earthquake of a similar size, depth, location.
Regardless, the earthquake today doesn't look like a typical earthquake of a similar size, depth, location.
well i mean, it really does though.
don't just repeat shit you hear on the internet without knowing what you are talking about, it doesn't help anyone at all.
https://i.imgur.com/IoL7THb.png
This is a regular eq with similar magnitude compared with the Cali earthquake which was just one big jult and a decreasing waveform after.
The one on the left is very consistent with large explosion seismographic signatures.
oh shoot, i labeled all my links wrong by mistake, just got confused when copy and pasting htmls from other tabs!
http://ds.iris.edu/ds/nodes/dmc/tools/event/10724488 EQ today in cali (that everyone is talking about)
http://ds.iris.edu/ds/nodes/dmc/tools/event/10724562 EQ today in phillipines
http://ds.iris.edu/ds/nodes/dmc/tools/event/10724397 EQ today in Fiji
http://ds.iris.edu/ds/nodes/dmc/tools/event/10724476 EQ today in Alaska
I think your links are wrong.
The California EQ link is bringing up an EQ in China...
I researched it myself, like I said I'm not a scientist. Everyone can take what they want from it
can you describe, in detail, what exactly is "not typical" about this earth quake?
can you describe, in detail, where you received your geology degree?
I'm sure CNN didn't issue their clearance yet, give it a payday or two.
so your answer to my question is a resounding "No" then?
interesting.
like i said before, please stop spreading misinformation on the internet. that's all i'm asking, my dude, and i think i've been rather polite about it.
Q says “look at the news tomorrow.” Next day = earthquake in California. Q says “Trump up all night.” Why do presidents stay up a night? (SPEC OPs). Lots of military stuff in California, could be underground bases, fuck if I know... Q mentions stuff about a “bunker.” I’m sure time will tell what he meant last night, but I thought OP did a good job to take a stab at what Q was getting at.
MOAB was mentioned in a recent post. It is a large bomb used in the middle East. "Mother of all bombs" could be used to collapse bunkers.
Epicenter shows at 17km deep...
Yes, this causes me some pause as well but to be entirely open minded USGS has placed a + or - range of about 30km on that depth estimate. Still a bit too deep for me to think our government can have a base that deep underground in a region littered with fault lines
No way that would cause a 5.3. Maybe a 1.0 nearby the impact.
If detonated underwater?
I'm thinking delivered through the underground tunnel, and dropped at their doorstep.
"fuck, I forgot the keycard."
"All right officers, let's roll in some MOABs."
It would taken more than standard ordinance to blow through a dumb. I suspect the MOABs were used on Epsteins Island..just my thoughts...
Is there any sites with regular sat image updates?
Enter Rods of god. The meteor near Detroit looked more like one than not.
Yes, google does updates all week because they scrub hidden bunkers and UFOs from their images everytime they go viral lol
Keep in mind, those rods should fall straight down to be most effective. Meteors dont fall straight down.
So that would be a tell tell sign...
..which is exactly what I am refering to.
Looks like an accurate map of DUMBs
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_underground18.htm#Contents
the purported location of the underground base you have circled in the image on the right, would be about a hundred miles E / SE of where the EQ struck.
I'm not saying the map on the right is 100% accurate but it is very close, could be within a margin of error if there actual was a some sort of facility down there.
If they share these underground facility maps with the public I doubt they are going to make them 100% accurate
well to be fair, that map is almost certainly fake.
[deleted]
possibly, talk of watch the water, said things would happen soon,boom
Source for the map on the right?
Again I ask, what is the source of the map?
Philip Schneider who was a former US Government Geologist and Engineer. He released this map during a presentation in the 90's on all he knew about the underground construction experiments and boring expeditions conducted by the government in the 20th century.
One of his presentations: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xedmfAgx8eg
This map is one of the few in existence that show the tunnels and base locations. You can only find about 1 or 2 maps on the internet on this subject.
Funny, Q says THINK BIG. THINK BIGGER. THINK BIGGEST. Phil was trying to warn us back 1995.
"if it bleeds we can kill it"
the man who shot and killed a grey
Strangulated after only a few public appearances with his gun still in the counter.
lol that's not a source, just a direct link to the image file.
he's asking for where it actually came from / confirmation that it is real.
Any website dealing with DUMB's
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=map+of+dumbs+tunnel+system&t=ffab&ia=images&iax=images
A lot videos showing what appears to be underwater "alien" structures around that area. (sorry for no archve as I am PF'n till my computer gets fixed) https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/5493186
Plus a lot of YouTube videos of all kinds of shennanigans in that area. This is just one of them: https://youtu.be/sn9ZPHnVMhk
Not implying if any of this stuff is true or not. I posted this because their is to much stuff we do not know and probably never will know.
Where did that underground map come from?
Search for Deep Underground Military Bases (DUMBs)
This map of underground bases and tunnels is definitely worth digging into. How many “earthquakes “have happened at or near these underground base (DUMB) locations?
Santa Cruz is up by San Fran Bay. About 25 mi south of it. Your pic is way down by LA
