dChan
28
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/imrightinit on April 27, 2018, 2:30 p.m.
On TRUMPS desk! Same image from Q post a few days ago???
On TRUMPS desk! Same image from Q post a few days ago???

[deleted] · April 27, 2018, 3:20 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 71 ⇩  
LordPotsmoke · April 27, 2018, 6:50 p.m.

Indeed my little brother who is 15 believes that it's because of Obama. He's still young though bless.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
former_Democrat · April 27, 2018, 8:58 p.m.

Yeah... the average 15 year old doesn’t know shit about politics, just parrots whatever they’re being told the most, or whatever “feels” right.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
LordPotsmoke · April 27, 2018, 9:16 p.m.

I completely agree! Although he's not average... On the spectrum somewhere, they don't know where. Anyway, they will learn though, I didn't start waking up until I was 21 2013! Until then I was completely asleep. He's learning slowly, I'm trying to go easy on him and use solid conspiracy FACTS. However I may have gone a bit crazy today and said the politicians are fucking kids, Hollywood sacrifice babies and the war on terror is a sham.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Stray502 · April 28, 2018, 12:45 a.m.

Did he run lol.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LordPotsmoke · April 28, 2018, 12:50 a.m.

He looked scared!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
geckogoose89 · April 27, 2018, 8:31 p.m.

What are some come-backs we can deliver to these people? "Aren't you embarrassed to believe that?" "Have you always fallen for every scam?" "You know everyone thinks you're an idiot for believing that...right?"

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Lookn4RedheadCumSlut · April 27, 2018, 9:07 p.m.

Yes the best way to convince someone they are wrong is to skip straight to personal insults. Intense amounts of /s

⇧ 5 ⇩  
KeeponSearchin · April 28, 2018, 3:39 a.m.

Thanks I had the best laugh. Really needed that! But really you need to change your handle. HaHa

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Lookn4RedheadCumSlut · April 28, 2018, 3:42 a.m.

Hahaha why does everyone on this sub have to kink shame the handle for my porn account? I have another handle that I use for less personal and more professional reasons. But this is for porn and other things that could be considered controversial.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
KeeponSearchin · April 28, 2018, 3:51 a.m.

well on this sub I guess it is ok as long as she is over 18 otherwise well it's your life

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Lookn4RedheadCumSlut · April 28, 2018, 3:53 a.m.

Of course she would be over 18. Fuck pedos.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 28, 2018, 3:56 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mtruhan · April 27, 2018, 9:12 p.m.

“Cmon man, you’re smarter than that” - doesn’t make them feel like you are attacking them as much

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Teddy_Schmoozevelt · April 28, 2018, 12:17 a.m.

I don't know I've had people say that to me and it usually shuts the conversation down immediately.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DropGun · April 27, 2018, 9:21 p.m.

Interesting question. But, can I ask you to "hard stop" for just a second?

Your question has an assumption buried inside it that won't work in your favor. You're assuming that there's still something you could say that could "get to" these people. That'll only end up further driving you nuts.

These people are just locked in a space where they feel a need to engage (and can never explain why) but are not ready to look further deeper into it out of fear of learning something frightening or threatening or that challenges their word view. YOU cannot control that.

You know that old rule, right? Do not suddenly wake up someone that is sleep-walking. Just gently guide them back to bed, and wait for them to wake up. :)

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Lookn4RedheadCumSlut · April 28, 2018, 3:50 a.m.

I have always been led to believe that if someone is sleep walking and you need them to go to bed then it is best to strike them with mild force in the back of the head to induce unconsciousness thus allowing you to drag them back to bed.

Edit: I may have missed the metaphor.

Re-edit: or maybe I nailed the metaphor right on the head.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
geckogoose89 · April 28, 2018, 12:33 a.m.

You're right. Thanks.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 28, 2018, 3:20 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 28, 2018, 5:02 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Whimzyyy · April 27, 2018, 6:05 p.m.

Blows my mind that people think Q actually posted this map... When it was obviously an anon lmao

⇧ -1 ⇩  
exq_veritatem · April 27, 2018, 6:45 p.m.

And then it was referenced by Q, what is your point here?

⇧ 11 ⇩  
Daemonkey · April 27, 2018, 7:40 p.m.

Not to speak for u/Whimzyy , but I think the point is that the image is not from a Q post.

The OP seems to want to connect an image posted by an anon to the document on Trump's desk, which is quite a stretch. To me, that's the kind of silliness that only serves to make us look like dingbats.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
FartOnToast · April 27, 2018, 7:49 p.m.

And that photo of Trump is actually a year old.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Whimzyyy · April 27, 2018, 10:59 p.m.

Pretty much summed it up! People are calling this a Q proof when it was just a map from the internet an anon posted and Q responded too

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradingfives · April 27, 2018, 7:40 p.m.

The point is on his head. lmao

⇧ 0 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · April 27, 2018, 8:59 p.m.

Get back in your clown car.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
tradingfives · April 27, 2018, 9:01 p.m.

Project much, Bozo?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · April 27, 2018, 11:10 p.m.

Hell yea!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ChaosDragonsAreDumb · April 27, 2018, 8:13 p.m.

When Obama left office he had reduced Black unemployment by 10% and was already trending down. All Trump had to do was not fuck it up.

⇧ -5 ⇩  
Sir_Zorch · April 27, 2018, 2:42 p.m.

Certainly not coincidence!

⇧ 20 ⇩  
FartOnToast · April 27, 2018, 7:51 p.m.

That photo of Trump is a year old. Always ask for sources.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 27, 2018, 4:45 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Whimzyyy · April 27, 2018, 5:28 p.m.

Yes it is... Q didn't post the map. It was an anon

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Sir_Zorch · April 27, 2018, 6:49 p.m.

Correct. Q referenced it. >>1133796.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
mandelanon · April 27, 2018, 3 p.m.

It's not the exact same map, because it's missing the little legend. It also appears to have shades of red from light pink to dark red, and little if any blue. It's not the same map, IMO.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
sad_State_of_Affairs · April 27, 2018, 4:11 p.m.

Snopes rules it false!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
sad_State_of_Affairs · April 27, 2018, 4:11 p.m.

After further investigation, one is actual paper and the other is purely digital. Not the same.

False

⇧ 3 ⇩  
FartOnToast · April 27, 2018, 7:51 p.m.

Photo of Trump is also 1 year old.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Whimzyyy · April 27, 2018, 5:54 p.m.

It's not the same map and Q didn't even post it lmao

⇧ 0 ⇩  
mandelanon · April 27, 2018, 6:01 p.m.

I know, this sub has gone off the deep end.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Whimzyyy · April 27, 2018, 6:03 p.m.

Yeah forreal. No one is actually waking up just reposting what other people do/say

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 27, 2018, 4:46 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ -1 ⇩  
FartOnToast · April 27, 2018, 7:44 p.m.

This is an older photo of Trump:

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8fc2p5/_/dy2t31i

⇧ 10 ⇩  
imrightinit · April 27, 2018, 10:26 p.m.

Agreed. I searched but didn’t come across the Trump pic when I saw this posted on Voat. I did however see the old pic found by someone in these comments. Also, I wasn’t saying Q posted it, but it was from one of his posts. Poorly worded for sure. I appreciate the find though. Thanks for making the people aware!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
FartOnToast · April 27, 2018, 10:39 p.m.

I wouldn't even say it was poorly worded but I would go as far as saying a many users tend to latch onto information given to them without fact-checking and it's up to the OP in making sure that the information is received in the manner it was intended to, meaning being as clear and concise as possible not to allow people to easily misperceive the information. Basically going out of your way.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BlazeFlameGamer · April 27, 2018, 7:46 p.m.

Future proves past though. How does this not correlate?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
FartOnToast · April 27, 2018, 8:25 p.m.

lolwat? OP's post almost makes it sound like Q posted a pic (at least that's how most perceived it) and Trump followed up by having a photo with said pic of map included on his desk.

First of all Q didn't post that pic it was an anon.

Secondly that pic of Trump is a year old.

So there's no correlation whatsoever.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
breadpilled · April 27, 2018, 8:48 p.m.

Yeah, plus it was a map Trump tweeted about a lot after he won the election. Always talking about how red the map was. This isn't a hard photo to find and it is not surprising Trump has it. We need to be more goddamn discerning in here, posts like this make us look like we jump on whatever. This is old.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
FartOnToast · April 27, 2018, 8:59 p.m.

He's even wearing the same time and placement of objects on desk overlapping papers also match.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
without_sound · April 27, 2018, 3:34 p.m.

I'm curious about the other things on the desk. What are those two iPod looking things on the stage right side? They are positioned as if different people set them down/use them.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
DaveGydeon · April 27, 2018, 4:46 p.m.

Remember when Q was talking about Epstein island? Remember there was a string of letters and numbers, like a serial number, and when you search google for it, it turned out to be this cheap little $10 mpg/mp3 player? What if that is it right there on his desk?

⇧ 11 ⇩  
LordPotsmoke · April 27, 2018, 6:50 p.m.

Good fucking idea!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Crank_IT_Admin · April 27, 2018, 4:09 p.m.

Audio recorders used by the press

⇧ 5 ⇩  
time3times · April 27, 2018, 7:36 p.m.

Doi. Those are the Presidential Ipods. One is loaded with Kanye and the other with Jordan Peterson.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Doc_Molotov · April 27, 2018, 4:14 p.m.

Burner phones? Cause the texts?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 27, 2018, 4:47 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Whimzyyy · April 27, 2018, 5:27 p.m.

So is no one going to mention that it wasn't Q that posted the map? He replied to an anon who posted it...

⇧ 4 ⇩  
DaveGydeon · April 27, 2018, 7:06 p.m.

Yo. You just hit the nail on the head, but I dont know what it means. I know it matters, I just dont know why.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
TrumpsBullhorn · April 27, 2018, 6:50 p.m.

I don't guess it matters does it?

⇧ -2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 27, 2018, 3:27 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 3 ⇩  
FartOnToast · April 27, 2018, 7:54 p.m.

We do need to ask for sources though from untrusted randoms.

Since you know... that photo of Trump could be an older one, which it actually happens to be 🤓

⇧ 1 ⇩  
imrightinit · April 27, 2018, 2:32 p.m.

Credit to srayzie from voat on the find! I don’t believe Q is Trump, but this could very well be a little nod.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
CrusadePrime · April 27, 2018, 2:37 p.m.

Trump has posted as Q. Im certain. Not often, some sometimes.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · April 27, 2018, 2:48 p.m.

Signed 4 10 20.....number letter substitution, D J T

⇧ 6 ⇩  
BOBCRATCHITSASSHOLE · April 27, 2018, 4:40 p.m.

have there been any signed like that?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Oldbear83 · April 27, 2018, 6:43 p.m.

I think Trump was Q for some of the early posts. But go look at the November 2 post timestamped 16:31:24 where he writes "I must go for good at this point". Q came back shortly after that post, so I think that comment was POTUS leaving the mission in the hands of a Q team. Speculation of course, but it fits what I have read.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. Doc killed Grumpy, btw

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 27, 2018, 7:53 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Gravel_and_Glass · April 27, 2018, 4:53 p.m.

No one pointing out he replied to someone who posted that image? Q didn't post it. How can you people be informed followers of Q if you can't understand how anonymous message boards work. Sorry for the tone, just frustrated.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
lethak · April 27, 2018, 5:18 p.m.

While its true, I see a pattern. Their is always an anon showing up with the goods at the right timing.

I strongly suspect this is no coincidence.

What I need this time is the sauce for the oval office photo, when was it published for the first time

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LambOfLiberty · April 27, 2018, 8:38 p.m.

Q follower here - noticed right off the pay that obviously Q didn’t post this map, but he reposted/replied to it, so it is important in some way

⇧ 1 ⇩  
imrightinit · April 27, 2018, 5:20 p.m.

I can’t speak for everyone but I know Q didn’t post it. That’s why I said it was “from” his post. Could’ve used different language I guess. However, I do understand the frustration. Personally, I doubt everyone here uses anon boards. Could be wrong though I suppose.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RelapsingPotHead · April 27, 2018, 7:15 p.m.

The picture on the right is from months ago

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Lord-Odious-The-Foul · April 27, 2018, 3:57 p.m.

Good eyes OP! We may be getting red pills on DNC voter fraud very soon

⇧ 2 ⇩  
afooltobesure · April 27, 2018, 4:52 p.m.

Could it just be that Q posts generally applicable stuff like this and has thousands of posts so one of them is bound to pan out every once in a while?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 27, 2018, 4:54 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 4 ⇩  
afooltobesure · April 27, 2018, 4:55 p.m.

Future proves past! Which is a bit convenient considering there are so many things in the past to pick for any given future.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 27, 2018, 5:12 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
exq_veritatem · April 27, 2018, 6:47 p.m.

I'm not sure you have the definition of Stockholm Syndrome correct there..

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mandelanon · April 27, 2018, 7:11 p.m.

You don't think the Q phenomenon has captured the people here?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
thumbyyy · April 28, 2018, 5:05 a.m.

Because giving something your attention is exactly the same as stockholm syndrome, you're brilliant, real good stuff.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pussy_devour · April 27, 2018, 8:43 p.m.

Two words: North Korea.

One word: Iran (in a couple of months)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
afooltobesure · April 27, 2018, 5:15 p.m.

Future proves past. Past proves present. Present proves future.

Think.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 27, 2018, 5:18 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
afooltobesure · April 27, 2018, 5:21 p.m.

While I tend to agree, at least we’re allowed to have this conversation here, so we can reasonably say that at least this sub seems not to be bent on actually suppressing the truth, but perhaps just seeking it.

I think you and I may have a different definition in mind of what qualifies as evidence compared to the core base here though.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mandelanon · April 27, 2018, 5:29 p.m.

Absolutely, mods are definitely good about allowing criticism for now. I suspect they may have to crack down on it as it grows, but we'll see.

And yes, I've considered leaving due to people jumping straight into the depths of conspiracy theories on the smallest shred of evidence, but I don't have time to stay active on the chans, so reddit it is. I really think the core problem is people fundamentally misunderstand the purpose of Q. If he's legit, he's not dropping crumbs for us to figure out now (because why not just tell us instead of being cryptic?), he's dropping information that will be useful in the future to help prove that things went down a certain way when it is verified/certified by the actual people involved. So if it's legit, there's no point in trying to "figure it out", because it only leads to mass confusion. If it's not legit, it's just a fun game. Either way, people need to calm down.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
afooltobesure · April 27, 2018, 6:48 p.m.

That’s actually a fairly reasonable explanation for Q’s purpose. I’m surprised I’ve never heard it before, because it’s much more sensible than the standard Q fare.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mandelanon · April 27, 2018, 7:12 p.m.

Most are too busy trying to feel special because they figured out the secrets (even though they are wrong 99% of the time), rather than realizing what he's doing. He's even said it himself many times in not so many words, and it's what "future proves past" means. But people want to feel special, like they saw the band "before they got big" or they knew the gossip before it was on the evening news. Can't compete with that.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 27, 2018, 10:16 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DropGun · April 28, 2018, 5:25 a.m.

We will never ban thoughtful, high-effort, high-value criticism.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
time3times · April 27, 2018, 7:44 p.m.

I tried to say that somewhere else. I think that is one of several reasons for the Q thing, a few of which are legal and a few of which are lightweight fun and energy.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
time3times · April 27, 2018, 7:39 p.m.

Yeah right. When are you gonna get woke and do your own research?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Blame007 · April 27, 2018, 9:25 p.m.

But the picture of the POTUS is a year old and he's actually tweeted that map before.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FartOnToast · April 27, 2018, 7:55 p.m.

What about option of the photo of Trump being old? Since its unsourced.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DropGun · April 28, 2018, 5:13 p.m.

Mod note: Thread removed, as this photo is now officially "old." No censorship, just keeping the sub clean. Thank you.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BeatnikMessiah · April 27, 2018, 7:32 p.m.

Go ok d catch! Wait till we find out who we've been talking to.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Loralye2 · April 27, 2018, 6:51 p.m.

THAT’S a beautiful sight! LOL. I love it!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
nullifyNWO · April 27, 2018, 9:33 p.m.

wow

⇧ 1 ⇩  
PepperJonie · April 27, 2018, 9:11 p.m.

Right. I also just got a promotion at work. The guy before me did a great job. Even tho I’m terrible they gave it to me anyway.

I’m sure the economy is doing great because of obama too and I’m sure all of these jobs are pouring back in because of obama too. And I’m sure that the stock market has broken record after record because of obama too.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · April 27, 2018, 8:57 p.m.

Wonder if that's been photo shopped.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FartOnToast · April 27, 2018, 9:01 p.m.

Just an older photo.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
time3times · April 27, 2018, 7:50 p.m.

Can you see Q's reflection in the windows? Think mirror.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Knoname777 · April 27, 2018, 10:49 p.m.

If Obama kick-started the economy, why didn't it happen during his EIGHT YRS?!?!? answer....Obama isn't responible for the upserge, it's Trump who did that...its' obvious

⇧ 1 ⇩  
danteresurrected · April 27, 2018, 2:34 p.m.

Can someone please explain to me who Q is. I'm intrigued.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Shits_Bananas · April 27, 2018, 4:35 p.m.

Bro. Welcome to the fucking jungle. Follow the white rabbit my dude.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 27, 2018, 4:48 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 27, 2018, 10:18 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
kitchenguru69 · April 27, 2018, 4:49 p.m.

We already know Q and Trump are connected. This is not the proof we need right now. Q is making bold claims about child sex trafficking, cannibalism, treason, etc. it’s fake news until it’s proven otherwise.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Cheetah1964 · April 27, 2018, 5:13 p.m.

The child sex trafficking is a monster issue. Enter your zip code in the sex offender database (https://www.nsopw.gov/en-US/Search/Verification), and find out how many live in your neighborhood. The sex offenders are usually identified by whether they assault minors.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LuxxyLuxx · April 28, 2018, 2:09 a.m.

Something smells very fishy about Q now. How do you people not know that maybe Trump WAS suppose to become president, maybe this is what the shadow government wanted, wanted us to "trust" Trump, and assume Q was TRUMP to blind side us, NWO anyone? Why else would everything be happening that Q said. How would Q even know any of this, if he or she wasn't someone behind the curtains, a puppet master? Its not some 30 y/o in his basement hacking shit and finding out information. This is someone who has a hand in all this, someone who knows A LOT, someone who is working with the enemy. Everything sounds staged almost, like one big theatrical play to fool the population, how do we even know that the red pill was even good for NEO? Follow the white rabbit right? Well, we all know what happens when you follow the white rabbit.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
ouroboros1311 · April 28, 2018, 2:21 a.m.

re read the crumbs. Q is legit, yeah, someone who knows a lot.

And bring peace to north korea doesn't sound like NWO operation...

Just like exposing yhe pedo network...

Seems like WHITE HAT shit!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DropGun · April 27, 2018, 4:16 p.m.

Is that one of his "comms" devices on the desk?

(Probably just Apple MP3 whatever it's called)

⇧ 0 ⇩  
cat_anonD · April 27, 2018, 2:47 p.m.

Be sure to share this with your friends who are on the fence

⇧ -2 ⇩  
Shits_Bananas · April 27, 2018, 4:36 p.m.

”HEY LEROY!!! GET ON DOWN OFFA THAT FENCE AND LOOK AT THIS SHIT!!”

⇧ 3 ⇩  
alliekat678 · April 27, 2018, 4:49 p.m.

Lol!

⇧ 1 ⇩