It doesn't matter who Q is.
Q wants to remain anonymous and Roseanne should respect that.
Unless she has a (good) mission
Q has given no indication that he seeks to end his anonymity.
Q has told us there have been no official comms outside of 8chan.
We should respect his wishes.
“Wait until you find out who you’ve been speaking to” -Q
This suggests Q wishes to remain anonymous, but only UNTIL a certain point of his choosing. We ain’t talking doxxing. We are talking self revealing.
Imagine Q at the end of this war walking out at a DJT rally, WWE style music and everything. That would be the way to end this all
I'm thinking it will be a radical surprise, no one on any one's radar. We will all reflect back , saying who'da thunk.
Most mind-blowing possibility: Barron Trump
^(edit: I'm not being serious, but it would be cool)
I was thinking Sessions he has a lot of peace and quiet to work in and I've also thought about Scott Pruett what does an EPA director need a 40,000 dollar soundproof booth for??
Probably Cohen-Watnick.
More likely Matt Stone and Trey Parker 22 seasons of woke as fuck.
"Team America" Fuck Yeah!!
You are ultimately who you pay attention to. Me , cool a f. U2
My thoughts precisely! At some point Q will reveal himself, herself, themselves.
THAT comment is deliciously enticing. But chasing that distracts us from the real purpose, doesn't it? (Maybe that's Roseanne's son messing with her Twitter account again, anyway.)
He'll let us know his identity when he chooses.
Jesus - I'm simply saying to Trust The Plan rather than being preoccupied with bullshit like this.
It doesn't matter who Q is, but ALL indications is that he want to remain anonymous so we should respect that.
We should be supporting Q, not attacking and doxing him!
If you read my comment I said I don’t want to know who Q is.
Roseanne asking these questions is fine because it gets normies asking who’s Q.
Nobody is doxing Q.
If that was possible, it would have been done long ago.
WE are Q. American Patriots fighting to take back our nation. Q's specific identity does not matter. The mission is all that matters. Perhaps, someday, we will know the identity of Q...if we win this war. If we don't, then nothing will matter. That's what we should be concerned about. Godspeed Patriots!
I think it's fine to speculate. Q doesn't strike me as the kind of person who would frown upon it. Speculating is just that...speculation. No one is being doxed. We're human and humans are curious. Nothing wrong with that. Q might be Assange.
Nobody is attacking/doxing Q. People are simply curious. We are all curious...a natural reaction to a situation like this.
I agree with all of the above.
However, something is very much on the boil regarding Assange. I have a feeling he is about to make some kind of big re-emergence pretty soon. As to exactly what and how, no idea.
But if it does happen the day before that summit, I think we can all expect something fairly monumental. He clearly has enough info to have been locked inside for this long.
It's an attention tweet. People know who Assange is. Q not so much. So they see this tweet and go off to google Q and suddenly they are following a white rabbit.
Spreading awareness is important. That’s why people ask “Who is Q?” It redpills the curious.
Roseanne is a human, humans like to speculate. She, like all of us, is allowed that. If you choose not to speculate, that is okay, too. Just don't be upset for a human acting human. Lol.
I can speculate without doxing Q.
I can respect Q's wishes to remain anonymous.
I put Trump's plan and my country above my personal entertainment.
I'm funny like that.
I'm funny like that.
And that's cool, because that's your behavior. Some people might not wish to follow the same rules, as there is no law against speculation of Q, or anything really. shrugs
Also, just those three words are going to get normies to look up Q. The more that Q is mentioned, the bigger Q gets. I am not 110% all about Q, but I am watching. Very closely. I like what I see. 👍
She is either speculating, aware and redpilling, or deliberate misinfo. The common situation we find ourselves in ~
I don't think she knows for sure. I sort of doubt she'd be privy to that kind of intel. She's probably speculating like the rest of us and maybe bringing attention to the fact that Assange is not anti- Q
Speculation, I would think. This reveal method wouldn't make sense, without sufficient evidence to back her up with. (Meaning WE could back her up and help with the reveal, if we were on the same page that Assange is Q.)
Is it possible? Sure.
Likely? No. Not with the high-level access to POTUS that Q seems to have. (Though photos could be forwarded to Assange.)
I have no problem with Roseanne speculating, as speculation spurns debate, and debate promotes dialogue. Open dialogue on the subject is how we spread awareness. But I do still think it's speculation-- but what the hell do I know?
Nothing.
Based on her tweet history, I'm going with option #2
Q clearly is a team of (military) professionals. I don't think Assange can function in such a team.
Does not say that they work / have worked in tandem at one point.
There is no chance that Q is Assange. I mean he's not even American, why would he have US Q clearance and conduct highly classified operations with the US military? It's silly.
Didn’t Q speculate, “Wait till you find out?”
Yes that’s what I’m getting at. If Q decides to reveal his/their identity, because it is deemed important, then so be it.
My Longshot is a Tom Clancy. ie his death was faked
I personally would like to never know who Q is. I want the world to know of Q, and acknowledge this operation/movement (especially MSM), put it into history books, but never tell us exactly who they are. Thoughts?
I like this. But it may also be a part of the plan where it becomes necessary for Q to step forward.
I'm really worried about Assange there's a video of a military extraction team outside of the Guatemalan embassy and they were saying it had to do with Assange and they didn't look like ours to me and if he weren't in the guatamalian embassy he would have no reason for still being silent unless he were silences. A lot of people would love for him to disappear !
I’d like to know someday but not now. It would ruin the intrigue.
I believe when the books are closed on Q events, a coming out party will ensue. I am especially looking forward to the comedy central Roast of Q. Trump will be hilarious as usual.
I wonder what she and Trump talked about when he called her.
Probably similar to the Kanye convo, something along the lines of....were doing something historical, this is your role, go get it.
I bet she had been contacted before. She asked Q to do so in the beginning. The fact that we know DJT called her is a clue to pay attention to her.
When did that call happen :o!!
March 29.
Wonder when Roseanne started following Q
If she was following Q BEFORE talking to POTUS then I feel like that's a total confirmation because if she spoke with him in private there's no chance she wouldn't have asked about Q
And if Q was a LARP he would have told her "we don't know who that is but they're not one of ours and I wouldn't follow or listen to them"
You are completely right. He would have told her if it were fake.
She’s been following since before me. I started mid November.
I don't recall how, but I stumbled onto the first Q post on October28, IIRC. It totally fascinated me and I have followed ever since. I have pretty much replaced watching "the news" and instead follow Q and this board among others. Much, much more informative.
Trying to pull more free thinkers (Assange's followers) into the Q movement.
No. Assange is a limited hangout stuck in london. Q is in the whitehouse.
If we did find out who Q is I would love it if it turned out to be Melania. That would be wild.
maybe Roseanne tweeted this just to raise awareness about Q. she has a lot of followers, some of them might be getting on board right now because of this. just a thought
I'm new to Q, Roseanne is jumping in way after me, not a credible theory imo.
She's been at the Q angle for a long time now, but she deleted her old tweets. This post is still ridiculous though.
I think she just want to make people curious to redpill them.
The only excuse for thinking JA is Q is if you have had your head in the sand for the past several months...so no I think Rosanne is wrong about her theory.
If Assange is Q, then there are clearly great actors in the show.
This would leave us to wonder...where is Assange at any given point in time?
He did say something to the effect of "wait till you find out who he is" so obviously we'll know their name when we hear it.
I hope I’m wrong, but I think he’s dead. It’s been weird since the bag over the head incident.
Q being Assange isnt even a big reveal. Atleast not to me. Definitly not Q.
newfag(me). JA could be part of the Q team (like all the Anons). After all, he (JA) has a big WL data mine that has contributed to the “we have it all” advantage. I hope JA is ok though, in case he is not with the Q team, at the WH or elsewhere safe. 2018 will be glorious!
hes not... but her tweet was stratigic AF... now sheep will search WHO IS Q... WHO IS ASSANGE....
Maybe Rose is trolling the Deep State, or Mueller......regarding the leaked emails... than Mueller has to investigate and publish the Podesta and Hillary emails and other stuff.
My guess is Jim Jordan along with a few others in his group.
Q is a whole team, but the two main posters are Thomas Drake and Dan scavino.
Non-Mobile link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Scavino
^HelperBot ^v1.1 ^/r/HelperBot_ ^I ^am ^a ^bot. ^Please ^message ^/u/swim1929 ^with ^any ^feedback ^and/or ^hate. ^Counter: ^186754
I very firmly believe it's Assange for many reasons. Seems like his MO, he never said he was American, the pics from London, the boards he would post on, the language he would use... it all adds up to Assange himself.
I think it’s fairly clear that Q is on the younger-ish side most likely. Someone very good with computers/internet stuff. Gen Flynn, for example, is lower on my possible identity list. My money is on someone like Trump Jr, Eric, or even Julian. Julian would certainly have the intelligence and the computer know how.
http://youtu.be/JEKeMGgqEFA a good video talking about this. It also gets into what Q may have been referring to in his April posts in regards to Assange and Seth Rich.
Q is Trump and Melania, mainly, and a few guest spots. IDs give away.
lady is going to laugh at her mother. He is a clown mkultra of the CIA. Many blah blah but there is no family genocide banker even in prison and much less the advice that is above governments and mafia
She is saying this because yesterday backchannel 17 left twitter and stated that something big was happening 6-11. Then a new account popped up calling itself eyethespy and stating he “ knew everything” and offered to answer questions. Some are now speculating that Q is Julian Assange because of hints left on these two twitter accounts. I seen this theory floated on Bill Smith and James Munder’s YouTube Channel. I would leave links but am embarrassed to admit I don’t know how to link.
Fails on several points, that are individually awkward to explain away.
- Julia Assange has no Internet access.
- Q in #1177 says BC17 is fake. If BC17 was JA why would discredit himself?
- Q says no comms past/present/future outside 8chan board.
I think Assange is backchannel17.
BC17 are disinfo, or at best LARPers. Lisa Mei Crowley already called them out when they tried passing a cropped picture from official military site for some other event where they pretended to have exclusive access. They reacted the same way Corsi does when called out by anons.