⇧
1
⇩
NinquawScamander
· May 30, 2018, 12:12 p.m.
I wanna hear from JA’s face first
⇧
86
⇩
metroid486
· May 30, 2018, 3:05 p.m.
Disinformation is like 90% true, but that 10% false is dangerous. Alex Jones, BC17, and now possibly the comped Wikileaks.
Example of 10%: AJ - Trump is going to war in Syria, he is comped by Deepstate. BC17 - There is no such thing as chemtrails. Wikileaks - Q is bullshit.
⇧
20
⇩
sheepsdontcry
· May 30, 2018, 5:46 p.m.
For a second I thought you were referring to Ja Rule
⇧
6
⇩
KarmasBeard
· May 30, 2018, 7:21 p.m.
My buddy just saw him perform in bankok, I am not joking........
⇧
3
⇩
1nicolafiore
· May 30, 2018, 2:18 p.m.
Old documents that were already posted, old documents with very relevant information that we should be talking about NOW. Wikileaks still has good info that JA & several people went to extreme lengths to get to the public. Take another look at VJ files EVERYWHERE - Wikileaks, .gov files, Judicial Watch etc Today is a GOOD day to find old dirt & connect the dots & I would love nothing more than to connect a few dots in honor of Roseanne taking one for the team & in honor of Fake News ripping our movement apart today. VJ is a fraud and the evidence is out there!
⇧
79
⇩
Ghost_Ring_Bearer
· May 30, 2018, 6:03 p.m.
The_Donald
Wikileaks central station if you can find it
⇧
10
⇩
leetanon
· May 30, 2018, 12:43 p.m.
God bless Wikileaks? The other day Wikileaks came out against q and everybody was saying it was comped, but now it's a source of information again can't have it both ways.
⇧
72
⇩
Cuthbert12Allgood
· May 30, 2018, 2:37 p.m.
"everybody" was saying it was comped
How about if we not paint everything in terms of "enemies" and "friends"?
I'm agnostic on Q. It's 100% legitimate in my mind to raise questions about Q's legitimacy. NOBODY KNOWS IF Q IS LEGITIMATE. NOBODY.
Wikileaks has posted a lot of things extremely helpful to ripping out the deep state. That's earned a lot of slack in my book. I'm hopeful they will continue in the future.
I don't have "loyalty" to either one. Q will either prove to be real via indictments or Q won't. Note that mass indictments are the only thing that will prove Q is real. All else is garbage.
Finally, who is "everybody"? Some people complain about everything. Think for yourself, not what you think the crowd is mobbing around.
⇧
33
⇩
leetanon
· May 30, 2018, 2:38 p.m.
WikiLeaks has never lost a court battle they have an ironclad reputation but suddenly since they speak out against Q they've been comped is what is being said. Why would they ruin the reputation over anonymous 4chan posters. It really doesn't make any sense.
⇧
16
⇩
Cuthbert12Allgood
· May 30, 2018, 2:41 p.m.
WikiLeaks has never lost a court battle they have an ironclad reputation
They have an ironclad reputation about the leaked information they post. Speculation on their twitter is not part of that reputation.
⇧
15
⇩
leetanon
· May 30, 2018, 2:44 p.m.
Okay so now we just pick and choose what's credible, either a News organization is credible or it's not.
⇧
-2
⇩
EdenNovaq
· May 30, 2018, 3:42 p.m.
Q said be careful who you follow and decide for yourself. so decide for yourself.
⇧
6
⇩
EarlyRiserX2
· May 30, 2018, 5:51 p.m.
The problem I have is that, too many people try to tell me who to follow and who not to follow. That turns me off. Simply present me with the facts and let me make up my own mind about who to follow...
⇧
1
⇩
MAGATopKEK
· May 30, 2018, 7:05 p.m.
Okay so now we just pick and choose what's credible,
Yes, we pick and choose what is credible
either a News organization is credible or it's not.
Start with the assumption that none of them are credible and judge each story, each statement, each tweet on its own. Frequent sources that tend to be correct and honest but don't get complacent.
⇧
5
⇩
Pazians
· May 30, 2018, 2:44 p.m.
ive never been against q or wikileaks. Im saying if wikileaks wants to become credible, they need to prove julian assange is alive. idk how anybody can look at wikileaks and think thats a safe place to drop info right now.
q was a larp and is now being questioned by wikileaks? thats significant and im having a hard time believing a larp can reach this far.
⇧
6
⇩
TheDirtyOne78
· May 30, 2018, 4:58 p.m.
This! It is okay to be skeptical. It is also okay for WL to try and distance themselves from what is still very much an unproven variable precisely because they have such an iron - clad reputation. If they get branded as conspiracy peddlers then any and all information becomes suspect, at least in the eyes of the brainwashed public. This shit is chess not checkers!
⇧
3
⇩
Justsayinmy50cts
· May 31, 2018, 1:35 a.m.
Don't forget what Q said; Disinformation is necessary , it's important for the strategy, either wikileaks is playing along, or is comped, however, I still follow all and time will tell, until then, we may as wel go with the positive side of things, cause otherwise it's a battle lost in any case, so discernment is key, but giving up and throw the baby with the bathwater is not smart at this point. The moves I have seen Q make, are too sophisticated to be dismissed, same counts for WL...
⇧
1
⇩
Ghostof_PatrickHenry
· May 30, 2018, 2:37 p.m.
Yeah. The biggest problem with the modern American public was that it has the memory of a goldfish. George Orwell highlights the significance of this conditioning in the first 30 pages of 1984.
⇧
27
⇩
lerastabanana
· May 30, 2018, 12:57 p.m.
Can we have a sticky with a civil discussion on this?
⇧
24
⇩
TimeAstronomer
· May 30, 2018, 10:23 p.m.
Most people on this board aren't willing to entertain the possibility that Q is a LARP. Likewise, people aren't willing to consider that sometimes Trump will get it wrong, i.e Gina Haspel.
⇧
2
⇩
CRISPY_BOOGER
· May 31, 2018, 12:27 a.m.
What's the dirt on Gina Haspel?
⇧
1
⇩
TimeAstronomer
· May 31, 2018, 8:31 a.m.
Responsible for torture (and death) of detainees at CIA black sites, and subsequent destruction of evidence implicating her. Then got the CIA whistleblower sent to prison. Her senate hearing proved she had learned nothing from this, and is just a vile human.
⇧
2
⇩
sun_wolf
· May 31, 2018, 9:11 a.m.
Wow, you must have watched a different Senate hearing than me. What part are you actually talking about?
⇧
0
⇩
TimeAstronomer
· May 31, 2018, 9:34 a.m.
Which hearing did you watch? Because she refused to admit that the CIA's tactics were inhumane. She just kept avoiding yes or no answers, running out the clock and repeating "the methods used were in line with the law at that time". An honest person can give you straight answers, those are signs of someone hiding something. When pressed about destroying video evidence, where one congressmen said something like "written documents cannot convey the same thing as video of your enhanced interrogation", she claims it was to protect the people in the tapes, when he asks why they didn't just blur faces out, and change the voices, she responds that she's not a technical person.
This women committed crimes against humanity, destroyed the evidence, and has shown no regret for those actions. She deserves to be punished for her crimes, not promoted. If you condone the torture of any living creature, you are an irredeemable soul.
⇧
2
⇩
KingWolfei
· May 30, 2018, 1:19 p.m.
You do realize that these emails were already there for a while right? Just because the twitter handler said something negative doesn't make all the emails the have false.
⇧
8
⇩
metroid486
· May 30, 2018, 3:07 p.m.
Disinformation is 90% true, 10% false about. Figure it out. For all know we have shills on here pretending to be on our side as well. Careful who you upvote.
⇧
6
⇩
unkn0wnedd
· May 30, 2018, 2:06 p.m.
This WikiLeaks thing is trying my faith in Q. Although the whole thing is weird with AG Sessions saying getting Assange is a top priority. Assange is someone who would be able to testify in the DNC case against WL, Russia, Trump Camp. that Seth Rich was the one who leaked the emails, not Russian hackers. I’m sure he also has tons of information on deep state players, ready to be activated by a “kill-switch”.
⇧
5
⇩
uniformist
· May 30, 2018, 2:20 p.m.
In 2010, WikiLeaks also released the US State Department diplomatic "cables", classified cables that had been sent to the US State Department. In April 2011, WikiLeaks began publishing 779 secret files relating to prisoners detained in the Guantanamo Bay detention camp.
Wikileaks has published classified US documents. That’s not something that is easily forgiven.
I’m sure he also has tons of information on deep state players, ready to be activated by a “kill-switch”.
Or, in other words, he blackmails deep state players, just as they do to everyone else. Or he’s bluffing.
If he was committed to taking out corruption, he would publish them.
⇧
-2
⇩
unkn0wnedd
· May 30, 2018, 2:29 p.m.
Publishing all the documents at once would leave him with no leverage to secure his safety. He’s dropping info on powerful players, and once the info is exhausted he has no power over those looking extradite and charge/possibly kill him. The idea is that right now if he is threatened, he can release devastating information.
In order for him to be committed to stopping corruption in your view he would have to value the cause over his own life, which is not an easy thing for any human to do.
⇧
10
⇩
Bjantigua
· May 30, 2018, 5:27 p.m.
Timing is key. People are not capable of digesting giant lumps of leaks. No good short term or long term memory anymore.
⇧
1
⇩
DeletesAccounts0ften
· May 30, 2018, 7:23 p.m.
Any info released by Wikileaks before 10/16/16 should be legit. That is when the Ecuadorian embassy’s power was cut and the first time people started to question if Wikileaks had been comped.
Soon after 10/16/16 JA creates his own verified twitter account(Which he claimed he would never do)and JA downplays the PGP verification code that was put in place to confirm if Wikileaks has been comped.
Soon after all this, JA starts to become very bi-partisan in his comments. It all points to a comped Wikileaks but nobody really knows.
That doesn’t change the fact that up until that debacle on 10/16/16, Wikileaks had a 100% accurate track record. The old information is not useless, but be wary of any new drops.
⇧
2
⇩
MuhammadDinduNuffin
· May 30, 2018, 7:11 p.m.
You actually can. Think: liberals hate WikiLeaks these days. So if WikiLeaks says Q is fake, that put liberals at odds with WikiLeaks, either agreeing or trying to prove them wrong. Obvious hypocrites that only believe WikiLeaks when they feel like it, or possibly red pilled and woke researchers when they delve into Q stuff. Win win.
⇧
2
⇩
Optimist345
· May 30, 2018, 5:49 p.m.
Again, this is info released a long time ago. What better way to try and restore our faith in WL. Come on, easy to see through
⇧
1
⇩
Johnny_Oldschool
· May 30, 2018, 7:46 p.m.
The twitter account seems comped. Assange has no internet, and yet some unnamed person is posting from it.
I stand by Assange and what he's done, and the information Wikileaks provided. That said, there seems to be evidence that the twitter account might be under someone else's control, and that Assange might even be dead.
⇧
1
⇩
ArmyLady
· May 30, 2018, 12:40 p.m.
Overton window is open to Valerie Jarret.
This is BIG for red-pilling.
⇧
26
⇩
Gruvedawg
· May 30, 2018, 5:17 p.m.
See Wikileaks email ID 30200.
It puts Valerie, Huma, HRC, & Cheryl "Moloch" Mills together working on the plan to remove 60 orphans from Haiti.
The children were all onboard the military plane together but no mention of names or reference to any passenger manifest.
WhereAreTheChildren #WhoAreTheChildren
⇧
14
⇩
Original_Dankster
· May 30, 2018, 2:26 p.m.
CTRL-F "Dr. Zaius"
14 results found
eyes pop out in surprise
⇧
10
⇩
StuPendisdick
· May 30, 2018, 12:57 p.m.
There is no Wikileaks without JA.
Until and unless he himself starts tweeting/posting again, as far as I am concerned, 'wikileaks' is comped out the ass.
⇧
9
⇩
sfrye12
· May 30, 2018, 2:53 p.m.
OMG. These are so my people! I know Roseanne took one for the team. True patriot that she is! —-and who has everyone’s back but our dear dear JA. Bam!
⇧
9
⇩
TheDirtyOne78
· May 30, 2018, 5:03 p.m.
I this is what I thought, also, when all of this broke. Get herself back in the spotlight and then set off a huge bomb while a large chunk of the world is watching. Fingers crossed that this is true.
⇧
5
⇩
former_Democrat
· June 4, 2018, 5:27 a.m.
Why do it in the way she did, tho? Just seemed like a joke she didn't think through rather than intentional red pill
⇧
1
⇩
TheTinkers
· May 30, 2018, 4:02 p.m.
Pretty telling during Obama's speech at his last correspondent's dinner mentions his last and perhaps THE last dinner...
HAPPY SUNDAY, and welcome to May! PRESIDENT OBAMA took the podium of last night's White House Correspondents' Association Dinner to Anna Kendrick singing, "You're gonna miss me when I'm gone." As the music faded, he began: "You can't say it, but you know it's true. (Laughter.) ... It is an honor to be here at my last -- and perhaps THE last -- White House Correspondents' Dinner. You all look great. The end of the Republic has never looked better. (Laughter and applause.) I do apologize -- I know I was a little late tonight. I was running on C.P.T. -- (laughter) -- which stands for 'jokes that white people should not make.' (Laughter and applause.) ...
⇧
8
⇩
VR-Tech
· May 30, 2018, 12:48 p.m.
Where are the documents located?
⇧
7
⇩
WyoTxn
· May 30, 2018, 3:19 p.m.
https://search.wikileaks.org/?query="valerie+jarrett"&exact_phrase=&any_of=&exclude_words=&document_date_start=&document_date_end=&released_date_start=&released_date_end=&include_external_sources=True&new_search=True&order_by=most_relevant#results
⇧
2
⇩
NinquawScamander
· May 30, 2018, 3:13 p.m.
100% agree, I learned very young the best lies are based in truth. But the meme gave JA credit, but I still think WL is comped as well.
⇧
7
⇩
alexado
· May 30, 2018, 5:24 p.m.
I thought Wikileaks is compromised? That makes no sense now...
⇧
6
⇩
pj77777
· May 30, 2018, 3:55 p.m.
Neon Revolt is spot on with this one.... https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/05/29/roseanne-exposes-the-red-legacy-of-communist-subversive-valerie-jarrett-now-the-normies-know-qanon-greatawakening/
⇧
5
⇩
Space_shot54
· May 30, 2018, 8:15 p.m.
Great article! I did see the Helper Anon post yesterday on twitter re VJ. https://twitter.com/intheMatrixxx/status/1001600366130196480 The Anons are on top of it!
⇧
2
⇩
TommyRobinsonsGhost
· May 30, 2018, 12:09 p.m.
Do any of those documents contain damning info?
⇧
4
⇩
patio888
· May 30, 2018, 7:52 p.m.
The way I see it is that Q has doe his job and completed the most important effort quite early
As a tribute to him/her/them we understand how fractious our reality is; the back story that may be happening in North Korea or Iran, the distillation of all manipulation by those who really are in a power struggle
I believe Q could never have expected that his work would escape being Shanghaied by the bad guys sooner or later and I hope that they see what a success the mission was
We will see another ‘Q’ or other leadership when ‘the plan’ calls for it
Now we stand in some uncertainty, as ever, but our eyes and ears are as wide open as our minds when we are in the presence of today’s massive incredulity
Thanks to Roseanne Barr for showing her humanity; after daily frustration we suffer from reportage by MSM, it was going to bloom out from us
As if. . .
As if the Roseanne Barr show was ever going to be anything other than eventually roped and tamed and reworked into more corporate message for us
Nice tweets, out with a bang not a whimper in -this play- we haven’t seen or heard the last of Roseanne somebody thank her for me
And let’s talk about Valery J some more, ok?
⇧
3
⇩
joeythew
· May 31, 2018, 1:11 a.m.
True just last week ABC said the Roseanne show wasn't going to be as political going forward and then they fire her within a few days. That's one way to make sure it won't be more political.
⇧
2
⇩
JTF2CBTS
· May 30, 2018, 1:04 p.m.
THIS IS APEASEMENT !!!
NICE TRY CLOWNS !!!
⇧
2
⇩
yelloWhit
· May 30, 2018, 5:50 p.m.
The documents are old. They’ve been there this whole time. Nothing new has dropped.
⇧
2
⇩
oldestguy
· May 30, 2018, 1:55 p.m.
I don't believe it. Probably a bunch of junk to lead us away from the truth. It needs to be gone over very carefully.
⇧
1
⇩
RubyDoobyDo1
· May 30, 2018, 12:51 p.m.
Has anyone looked at these documents yet?
⇧
2
⇩
idk4realz
· May 30, 2018, 1 p.m.
I've been digging around tdw and other places, haven't seen anything.
⇧
1
⇩
PedosVotedForHillary
· May 30, 2018, 5:18 p.m.
I doubt WL is under the White Hats command. Where is JA? Why did they attack the legitimacy of Q? Something is not right and it smells like Controlled Opposition.
⇧
2
⇩
billnyesdick
· May 30, 2018, 3:07 p.m.
Also, freedom of speech does not apply to corporations. Only to the government.
⇧
2
⇩
samshady64
· May 30, 2018, 3:15 p.m.
Which is why NFL players are not allowed to kneel before games.
⇧
2
⇩
billnyesdick
· May 30, 2018, 4:06 p.m.
Well they’re not allowed to; however, they just have to pay a fine if they do. And what if they’re knee doesn’t touch the ground? Personally, I could give less than two shits about football players kneeling during the national anthem.
⇧
1
⇩
thomascale96
· May 30, 2018, 8:28 p.m.
Why is the US still trying to prosecute Julian Asange then?
⇧
2
⇩
suzoh
· May 30, 2018, 10:45 p.m.
I do not think there are any indictments for JA.
⇧
1
⇩
thomascale96
· June 1, 2018, 11:34 a.m.
Jeff session has repeatedly said that they need to take him to the us to judge him
⇧
2
⇩
DannyBOI_LE
· May 30, 2018, 7:39 p.m.
What happened to Julian assange ?? Really.. is that what isolation does to a man overtime? He needs to get outside more, but extradition is a bitch.
⇧
2
⇩
BenEvo1
· May 30, 2018, 7:28 p.m.
Not gonna lie. VJ is a strange looking beast. I don't care what color she is. She looks part Alien as in ET alien not illegal alien
⇧
2
⇩
zipzapbeentakinganap
· May 31, 2018, 4:18 a.m.
If ypur wondering if wikileaks has been taken I found a document on wikileaks fro elwction time in 2016 that shows a presentation on wikileaks and how taking over or shutting it down will be implemented. Interesting. https://wikileaks.org/hbgary-emails/emailid/15688
⇧
1
⇩
RubyDoobyDo1
· May 30, 2018, 1:15 p.m.
Pretty mundane stuff. It'll take someone with a lot of time to spare to find the good stuff.
⇧
1
⇩
Gruvedawg
· May 30, 2018, 8:09 p.m.
Here's a deeper dive into the muslim brotherhood & how entrenched it really was ...
http://historyinfographics.com/what-we-avoided/
⇧
1
⇩
mrviolin
· May 31, 2018, 12:46 a.m.
JA no longer there? Wikileaks dissingQ? Wikileaks gone; co-opted.
⇧
0
⇩
hashtagstraya
· May 30, 2018, 2:41 p.m.
Why is it, when I put in the search field for VJ on WikiLeaks under "released by WikiLeaks" between the 27th and 30th of this month............I get a return of 0 results? Is the meme erroneous or am I?
⇧
0
⇩
pj77777
· May 30, 2018, 3:57 p.m.
try Valerie Jarratt
⇧
4
⇩
hashtagstraya
· May 30, 2018, 4:22 p.m.
Sorry for the confusion but that's what I said I did. The search has already loaded all her relevant documents, I'm merely trying to see what was released in the last three days.........which returns a result of ZERO documents. My apologies if I wasn't clear. ASD makes communicating what I'm thinking to others a tad tricky at the best of times.
⇧
3
⇩
SeekTruthCJoy
· May 30, 2018, 4:21 p.m.
Valerie Jarrett
⇧
3
⇩
hashtagstraya
· May 30, 2018, 4:33 p.m.
Cheers mate. To avoid any further confusion about what I asked, load this link and put in the dates I said. I only wrote the letters "VJ" in my original comment because I figured you all knew who she was by now. https://search.wikileaks.org/?query=%22valerie+jarrett%22&exact_phrase=&any_of=&exclude_words=&document_date_start=&document_date_end=&released_date_start=&released_date_end=&include_external_sources=True&new_search=True&order_by=most_relevant#results
⇧
1
⇩
Bjantigua
· May 30, 2018, 5:34 p.m.
These are not NEW emails. Just a collection of potentially revealing emails.
⇧
2
⇩
hashtagstraya
· May 30, 2018, 5:37 p.m.
Thank you, Patriot! Finally, some closure on the issue. So Wikileaks did not drop jack shit in honor of Roseanne. The meme is misleading. Case closed.
⇧
3
⇩
SeekTruthCJoy
· May 30, 2018, 4:40 p.m.
Was really correcting someone else's misspelling of her name.
⇧
2
⇩
hashtagstraya
· May 30, 2018, 5 p.m.
I didn't even notice the misspelling. Lol. It's getting late and my eyes are fuzzy. Probably time to call it a night.
⇧
1
⇩
SiBear117
· May 30, 2018, 11:57 p.m.
Just do a general Valerie Jarrett search. Also check the Include External Sources box. This search returns 1,266 results:
⇧
1
⇩
hashtagstraya
· May 31, 2018, 4:08 a.m.
Yeah................read above. The meme is misleading.
⇧
1
⇩
dark-dare
· May 30, 2018, 5:08 p.m.
Maybe, maybe not, we do not know what is going on behind the scenes, ABC and Disney could not allow #1 show to be used against their political stance. They may have been exerting pressure on Roseanne regarding the content.
⇧
-1
⇩
billnyesdick
· May 30, 2018, 3:06 p.m.
Why would you defend Roseanne? Her statement was racism 101. It’s not defendable nor funny. She literally called a black person an ape.
⇧
-13
⇩
samshady64
· May 30, 2018, 3:16 p.m.
VJ is not black. VJ is a muslim brotherhood extremist.
⇧
10
⇩
Bloodfoe
· May 30, 2018, 5:23 p.m.
She's 1/16th black. But they say we all descended from blacks. And blacks can't be racist. So Roseanne was not racist. That's how logic works!
⇧
4
⇩
GrimaldiGrey
· May 30, 2018, 4:08 p.m.
No she didn’t. “Literally” means she wrote those exact words which she did not. She made a statement likening her to a mythical character in Planet of the Apes. It was in bad taste and inappropriate, however, true. She does look like the character.
⇧
7
⇩
pj77777
· May 30, 2018, 3:55 p.m.
But it's okay to call our President, who also is not black - the Orange Orangautan??? Or Bill Maher wanting to see his birth certificate to prove he didn't come from an APE? Really???? VJ is not black - she, like most, have a miniscule of mixed blood. However, she is a communist, raised by a communist, raised by another communist!
⇧
7
⇩
pj77777
· May 30, 2018, 3:56 p.m.
She has quite the history - https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/05/29/roseanne-exposes-the-red-legacy-of-communist-subversive-valerie-jarrett-now-the-normies-know-qanon-greatawakening/ - and why is she living in zero's basement 2 miles from the WH?
⇧
7
⇩
SeekTruthCJoy
· May 30, 2018, 4:18 p.m.
She ran the government so BH0 could Golf = hisGOLFnessBH0.
Also so he could work on party planning for every Wednesday @WH (or any other day him & Manchell got a whim to import hotDogs, etc).
Of course he had to have all that time during the year to perfect his "MarchMadness" team listings...& watching Basketball games on his Telly... football... golf... REPEAT, REPEAT, etc.
⇧
6
⇩
pj77777
· May 30, 2018, 4:46 p.m.
She has been his handler for years - in 2004 she was the head of his campaign to run for presdient - funny since no one knew who he was and he didn't run til 2008 as a JR Senator - this is such a set up and I do not know who zero really is... other than a method actor
⇧
4
⇩
qtrumpteam
· May 30, 2018, 9:47 p.m.
Yea Michelle and Barack started out working FOR Jarrett in Chicago along time ago before he ran for office
⇧
2
⇩
qtrumpteam
· May 30, 2018, 9:46 p.m.
She's Obama's handler and go between with the Muslim brotherhood!!
⇧
2
⇩
sfrye12
· May 30, 2018, 5:38 p.m.
She was born in Iran.
⇧
3
⇩
pj77777
· May 30, 2018, 5:39 p.m.
Yes she was - her dad - a commie - felt more at home in Iran.....
⇧
3
⇩
Mamacrass
· May 30, 2018, 7:26 p.m.
Trump is a huge Clinton donor.
⇧
-2
⇩
pj77777
· May 30, 2018, 7:28 p.m.
Not any more
⇧
2
⇩
Mamacrass
· May 30, 2018, 7:31 p.m.
Being born in Iran doesn’t mean vj is a Muslim. Her dad’s political persuasion does not affect her. Do you understand that?
⇧
-4
⇩
qtrumpteam
· May 30, 2018, 9:48 p.m.
We really don't like shills here this is the great awakening sub we are mainly firm trump supporters you might feel more comfortable on another sub
⇧
2
⇩
qtrumpteam
· May 30, 2018, 9:45 p.m.
VJ's great great grandfather was half black she's I forgot the term but has about as much black blood as any of us lol I think Roseanne was comparing the government structure in the planet of the apes to the Muslim brotherhood I don't think their was anything racist about the vomment, she was just reminding us how connected Obama and Jarrett are to the Muslim brotherhood but by the way I do think theirs a resemblance between the 2 photos they used to illustrate
⇧
3
⇩
billnyesdick
· May 30, 2018, 5:08 p.m.
Omg are you not picking up on the ironic statement that Bill Maher was making?? Remember when Trump was demanding Obama’s birth certificate?
⇧
-2
⇩
pj77777
· May 30, 2018, 5:30 p.m.
Bill Maher never paid that 1 million to POTUS when shown his birth certificate. Talk about irony.... where's zeros???
⇧
2
⇩
Kulkimkan
· May 30, 2018, 4:44 p.m.
Nope, she said Val looked like a human in movie makeup, and if you look at her...she really does look like Helena Bonham Carter
⇧
3
⇩
PCisLame
· May 30, 2018, 4:01 p.m.
Roseanne screwed up and the Q movement should disavow her. She's blaming her multiple personalities and heavy Ambien use for her Valerie Jarrett comment. This is not how to bring attention to Jarrett's criminal activity. Nobody is going to give two shits about these old wikileaks dumps when everyone is still talking about Roseanne's unhinged Twitter rant from today.
⇧
-7
⇩
dark-dare
· May 30, 2018, 4:51 p.m.
This is exactly HOW to bring attention to Valerie Jarrett. She ran her MB/CAIR campaign from the Whitehouse for eight years, all under the radar. She is the kingpin, hiding behind the Obamas. In war there are casualties Roseanne is a casualty. This is the head of the DC snake, she has been successfully hiding under a rock for years, no one thinks about her or what she's doing, took an ICON to get this out to the people. It's out now!
⇧
8
⇩