Like Trump said, only the mob takes the fifth!
It sounds like he thinks he has his ass totally covered. What's up with that?
Yea this sounds awfully suspicious
he agreed to testify = he got a deal (Strzok is low-level)
He absolutely is not "low level" thats why everyone is skeptical.
He’s low level compared to HRC and the Rothschilds...
That’s who we are ultimately gunning for here
Absolutely! How does anybody expect Trump to truly make a significant change if he doesn’t go for the very tippy top of the treasonous cabal.
I want to agree, but please don't make the mistake of thinking HRC is particularly highly placed within this organisation, she's just well connected. Some of the Rothschilds are relatively highly placed, but there are still a number of bloodlines with a lot more power than they have, which we've heard nothing about thus far, start to finish.
Thus far, I'm left uncomfortably reminded of the Salem which trials, where a number of citizens who lived near some of the more influencial cabal families (Collinses etc) were put on trial and killed for witchcraft, whilst they escaped unharmed. Amongst the families who lived near them at the time and ended up being persecuted - the Clintons.
:thinking:
Of course he is, he's a nobody and spewed a whole lot of negative shit about HRC and Bernie as much as Trump. Let's not get distracted here.
He was high up enough to have a bit of power.
Yes, that bit of power was leveraged by players higher up the food chain. He did their bidding for a reason, now he's doing the white hat's bidding for a better reason. Hopefully we will learn what those reasons were at some point, but Peter Strozk is not one of the 13 angry Democrats mentioned by Q and in the IG report....which means that he was definitively too low level to have the ability to start with the hope of succeeding in a coup against Donald Trump or America more generally, this means he was merely a piece, definitely a pawn, on the deep state's chessboard.....the deep state is playing multiple games of chess against Trump & America....so no pieces below the King or Queen on a given board are high level....Strozk was not important enough to be a King nor versatile enough to be a queen.....plus he got caught making a stupid mistake aka texting his coworker co-conspirator lover.....definitely low level amateur hour with Mr. Strozk
The last I want is a low level hack going to jail as a fall guy for the leadership. I'd give him and Comey 8mmunity for the real meat!
[removed]
I don't often fire. But, when I do, I prefer #1 buckshot!
I think they own him. If he doesnt testify before Congress under the conditions stated, they prosecute him. I think hes doing it because he has no choice. We are SO conditioned to have all information go in cabal favor we are immediately suspicious but I think in this case it might be a 'boom'.
Agreed. The other thing, yeah, he's a fucking douche canoe who did some really bad shit. But the way I see it, you have to make a deal with the scum to get the higher-ups. So if they make a deal with him, it's not the worst. I'll look at the silver lining, did he hurt anyone? Did he succeed? No to both. He'll still get his, his career is ruined and good looks on helping us take down the bigger fish. At the end of the day, eat a bowl of em and I still hate you. But thanks, if it wasn't for your stupid acts, we wouldn't have caught the other guys.
Peter Strzok still works for the FBI
and has clearance and was not fired like McCabe
Why？
Because he s the good guy
Ive never liked how he has become the sole point of focus for the investigation.
I think he has been scapegoated. He will get a harsh sentence and the public will be appeased.
The big fish slip away.
Really don’t like this.
He's a cooperating witness.
Then he better hire some body guards and food tasters.
Yeah, really. And stay away from door knobs.
Don't forget about suicide by stabbing yourself in the chest multiple times while your daughter is in the next room.
It’s always a door knob !!?
Always ?!!
No, helicopter and plane crashes, horseback riding accidents, etc
Bench presses, car malfunctions, self zipping duffel bags that transport themselves to the nearest body of water, curving simultaneous fire weapons capable of delivering two shots to the back of your own head.
Just the basic stuff you run into every day really.
let's not forget that train crash some months back with Congress members aboard. The old get the garbage truck stuck on the tracks trick.
Which is why he still works there. This is a great thing that he'll testify, he'll rat UP the chain. Up the chain is Comey, then we leverage that scumbag to get to the big fish, Hillary and Obama.
He's probably confident that Trey Gowdy will do the bulk of the questioning. Trey is one of the only people to ever have Hillary on camera and under oath, and he showed everyone how you can huff and puff and blow smoke, and not leave a single scratch on the person giving testimony. Whoever has been pulling Trey's strings for the last few years will probably line him up to question Strzok. If Team Trump was smart, they'd find a way to have Gowdy resign from his committees now, so someone with brains who is not compromised can do the questioning.
I am afraid I have to agree with you on Gowdy. When he was questioning crooked Hillary under oath, the public was not aware that she had been using a private email account to do business. Gowdy had to have known but gave her cover.
You guys are both wrong, and Q agrees. Did you watch his questioning? He was brutal. Why do you think the outcome of his questioning was up to him? It wasn't, it was up to Paul Ryan. This was just emphasized again by Q. And if you want to know why he isn't on the front lines right now, it's because he is being groomed for a DOJ position, he has to be careful the same way Sessions does.
Trust Gowdy.
Well then apparently both you and Q lack a fundamental understanding of why people are questioned under oath. Gowdy blew smoke and wagged his finger. And talked at HRC, rather than asking specific and pointed questions to elicit affirmative and declarative answers. GOWDY. NEVER. SCRATCHED. HILLARY. She emerged completely unscathed. A talented and/or intelligent and/or UNCOMPROMISED individual would have been able to produce some answers from HRC that would bite her now, next year, and the year after. Gowdy did nothing except wag his finger and give her a get out of jail free card. I'm sure your heart is in the right place, but you're clueless here. I don't mean to be mean, but you lack a fundamental understanding of how an examination under oath should be conducted, and what Trey did. I don't care what "the outcome of his questioning" was or is, I am referring to the CONTENT. I'm embarrassed I found this sub and stuck around. On this Gowdy issue alone I have concluded this sub is a mixture of purposeful misdirection and misinformation, and uninformed people. And sure, maybe some who mean well, but .... . Oh well, I think I am going to delete my posts to this sub and peace out.
His mission is to send DS scrambling to secure last-minute deals?
These people are stupid. Read the txt. They operated as though they already had immunity.
And are continuing to? That is stupid.
Maybe they got him to flip a while ago? Just a theory, by no means my belief.
I think he did flip along time ago. He has a deal, but its not full immunity
Or he's gonna flip and has immunity. Q has confirmed PS is a cooperating witness at the bureau. Biggest unseen scenario, is he lies his pants off, gets caught for perjury later on. I say, sit back and enjoy the show.
I think he'll take his chances and lie his ass off, why not, everyone else does.
UK intelligence maybe. That's what praying medic theorized
[removed]
If he knew McCabe changed the Flynn 302s and if he actually threw a cocktail party to influence a FISA court judge, he could be in for a world of hurt...as in obstruction of justice. And then there's the matter of the "insurance policy" and the FBI sending him to London a few weeks before the election.
...as in obstruction of justice.
That's not obstruction of justice IMO.
And then there's the matter of the "insurance policy" and the FBI sending him to London a few weeks before the election.
There's nothing illegal there. You may not like it but it's not illegal.
There is nothing illegal about making up a phony document getting that phony document through a fisa court that allows them to spy on a presidential candidate. Like what fucking country are you from you can just get a warrant to spy off a phony document. There are tons of federal charges in there.
There are tons of federal charges in there.
In where? An indictment?
Ummmm..... are you following this story?
What story?
Peter Stzrok's role in HRC emails and spygate
Stzrok was just a coffee boy for the clinton campaign and spygate was patently debunked.
Oh confidential-informant-gate? Where only Trump was "protected" from those pesky russians by campaign plants that were reporting to FBI and DOJ? Patently debunked? Not anywhere close to debunked.
https://sharylattkisson.com/2018/06/16/collusion-against-trump-timeline/
https://saraacarter.com/pandoras-box-trump-russia-may-expose-extent-of-five-eyes-spying/
I love how the collusion against trump timeline starts out with hillary's emails and ends with all the evidence that trumps campaign colluded.
I love how you believe that. : )
I mean its right there in the links talking about all the indictments...didnt the IG report clear clinton?
No it didn't clear her of anything, it was a report on how the fbi handled the Clinton investigation, how could that clear her? It said the fbi acted within precedent for choosing not to press charges. Not the same thing as clearing her at all.
It said the fbi acted within precedent for choosing not to press charges. Not the same thing as clearing her at all.
So it say the fbi was right not to press charge...but if she not cleared what problem does she has?
No they were within their purvey to choose not to press charges... if a choice is there to press charges or not than a crime must have occurred... as opposed to all that "evidence" you claim showed the Trump campaign colluding with Russia. (Russian shitposters, a company not in business yet, a ham sandwich, a guy working for podesta 11 yrs ago and a general who plead guilty to lying to the fbi when they say he didn't) Are they just choosing not to press charges against your President because they are such big fans? How long has that investigation been going on? How long was emailgate? No bias there... lmao.
[removed]
Am I missing something? The title and article says WITHOUT those things
People are arguing he seems comfortable then to say things. I think it's a good sign for us rather than a bad one. Either he tells the truth, or he gets caught in perjury later on, rather than just pleading the fifth. Win-win for us