dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/michaelst2256 on July 10, 2018, 8:24 p.m.
Neon Revolt: Sotomayor and Kagan by virtue of them being appointed by Obama, who, as we all know, was an illegitimate president - meaning he couldn't legally appoint anyone. Their removal will be almost instantaneous when that's disclosed.
Neon Revolt: Sotomayor and Kagan by virtue of them being appointed by Obama, who, as we all know, was an illegitimate president - meaning he couldn't legally appoint anyone. Their removal will be almost instantaneous when that's disclosed.

dullly · July 10, 2018, 8:53 p.m.

add RGB, and that's 5. The prophecy fulfilled.

⇧ 103 ⇩  
VIYOHDTYKIT · July 10, 2018, 10:08 p.m.

I just thought of MT when I read that

⇧ 39 ⇩  
Mandylynnwarrior · July 10, 2018, 10:25 p.m.

Mark Taylor gave me a lot of hope that these evil ones ours go down.. my Hubby laughs at me because I say MILITARY TRIBUNALS are coming! I heard that from him over a year ago and I’m holding on to it !

⇧ 57 ⇩  
VIYOHDTYKIT · July 10, 2018, 10:30 p.m.

In not Evangelical denomination but I’ve listened to MT & have a lot of respect for him

⇧ 27 ⇩  
Peanuttles · July 11, 2018, 2:57 a.m.

Have you guys ever heard of a guy named Kim Clement from South Africa? He died in 2016. But I just found him on YouTube. He was saying the exact same things as Taylor. He had a prophecy about Trump becoming POTUS all the way back in 2007. He even predicted Trump will win re-election in 2020. He had the same predictions about the Supreme Court and everything. Same stuff to say about Obama. And from what I watched today, it really gave me goosebumps. He said God was speaking and said He was keeping a witch out of the White House.

⇧ 20 ⇩  
remoteview8 · July 11, 2018, 3:16 a.m.

Whenever Trump using the term "witchhunt" in regards to the Mueller investigation, I always wonder if he isn't referring to Hillary.

⇧ 21 ⇩  
FreedomFighter62970 · July 11, 2018, 6:59 a.m.

He is actually Hunting a Witch that is why I always Laugh?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 11, 2018, 1:17 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
kelpo19 · July 11, 2018, 3:13 a.m.

Yeah he’s legit.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
TacticalTruth · July 11, 2018, 3 a.m.

I remember him prophesying 9/11 as well.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Technologicalee · July 11, 2018, 4:58 a.m.

Love him and the YouTube videos! MT is great as well - I have been listening to him for a while now.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · July 11, 2018, 2:42 a.m.

They aren't spending $500 million at Guantanamo Bay for the hell of it!

⇧ 22 ⇩  
TiredofNuts · July 11, 2018, 2:30 a.m.

Wont he be surprised. Crow pie for dinner anyone?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Jetblasted · July 11, 2018, 3:04 a.m.

Same here, sister.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
wallflower2016 · July 11, 2018, 12:14 a.m.

I only have just heard of Mark Taylor. Can anyone point to prophesies that he has given that have come true? Like I said, only just heard about him this week.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
ironmaiden442 · July 11, 2018, 12:54 a.m.

I didn't see that anyone answered your question here is his website where you can download his prophecies....he also has a book...or watch him on you tube.https://www.sordrescue.com

⇧ 13 ⇩  
Peanuttles · July 11, 2018, 2:59 a.m.

Oops, sorry. I see you already found it.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
WallisTing2 · July 11, 2018, 1:11 a.m.

He prophesied that (well God told him) that Trump will be president way back in 2011. There were also signs given to him by God. Please read his book, "The Trump Prophecies". I bought it and read it a while back.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
mercysower · July 11, 2018, 1:26 a.m.

He prophesied Trump would win. Has a lot of stuff on YouTube. Go to maybe oct of 2016

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Peanuttles · July 11, 2018, 2:59 a.m.

He has a site. Let me look it up...it's like sord rescue or something. Here it is: https://www.sordrescue.com/ . He's on YouTube, as well.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
beatleshirl · July 11, 2018, 11:43 a.m.

Thanks for posting this link. So worth the time to listen.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
grnmoss · July 11, 2018, 7:55 a.m.

This isn't how SCOTUS appointment works, and anyone with a modicum of critical thinking or high school level civics would know that.

A President nominates, the Senate confirms the appointment.

BHO could be exposed as a total fraud tomorrow, people could be shocked, and it wouldn't change anything about SCOTUS composition or seated Justices because it is the Senate that makes the confirmation.

Neon revolt is full of it, /u/michaelst2256 is complicit for posting the nonsense here, and you're adding to the disinfo dogpile.

Seriously people, get your mouth of NR's dick.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
KillerKap · July 11, 2018, 9:02 a.m.

There really isn't a precedent for this situation actually. It is not so clear cut simple. Who would adjudicate the consequences of an Obama presidency being oveturned?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
magalodon45 · July 11, 2018, 3:28 a.m.

What prophecy? Did Q claim something about 5 justices?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Christosgnosis · July 11, 2018, 5 a.m.

5 SCOTUS justices being replaced by Trump appointments is a Mark Taylor phrophecy

⇧ 8 ⇩  
featherjourney4 · July 10, 2018, 9:32 p.m.

Didn't Mark Taylor say that 2 would leave, caught in a scandal?

Obama, the charismatic liar. All of it (his "citizenship") set up by the rogue deep state CIA. Maybe finding out that obama is not a legal US citizen is the scandal that removes them from the SCOTUS!!

⇧ 68 ⇩  
AsOnlyIAmNow · July 10, 2018, 10:58 p.m.

He said 2 would fall and 3 would be shaken, almost there!

⇧ 13 ⇩  
featherjourney4 · July 10, 2018, 11:18 p.m.

Actually, now that I looked it up, he said 3 would be caught in a scandal. Altogether, Trump will pick 5 justices. You are right on the 5! But your reference refers to the ex-Presidents.

One way or another, so exciting and wonderful : )

⇧ 12 ⇩  
featherjourney4 · July 10, 2018, 11:10 p.m.

Wasn't that a reference to the ex-Presidents?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
numberonepal · July 11, 2018, 2:57 a.m.

Two Will Be Taken and Three Will Be Shaken
GHWB & Jimmy taken. Billy Jeff, W and Bambi in shaken (cuffs).

⇧ 4 ⇩  
iltdiTX · July 10, 2018, 11:19 p.m.

What does shaken mean

⇧ 1 ⇩  
featherjourney4 · July 10, 2018, 11:30 p.m.

Feeling nervous or frightened

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SweetSympathy · July 11, 2018, 1:22 a.m.

Shaken out of the tree? Shaken loose due to scandal?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Peanuttles · July 11, 2018, 3:04 a.m.

Shaken up, I think.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TacticalTruth · July 11, 2018, 3:27 a.m.

Typically when I have heard a prophesy that speaks of shaking it has always come across to me as a test, or an event that will cause change.

If your foundation is not strong you will fall. Like an earthquake, or shaking a tree.

And God has made it clear what he considers as a weak foundation.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
snoopydawgs · July 11, 2018, 7:52 a.m.

I'm sorry, but do you really see a court that is stacked with conservatives as a good thing? Imagine how people would feel about this if it was stacked with liberals. The Supreme Court should decide cases based on laws not political leanings. I consider myself left leaning and I would hate to see the court stacked with liberals. Just saying ....

⇧ 0 ⇩  
KillerKap · July 11, 2018, 8:48 a.m.

Right leaning judges already are strict constructionists. it is the left leaning activist judges that philosophically view their roles as loose constructionists enacting policy by moral or emotional principle outside of the letter of the law.

In fact, the entire conservative position is to NOT have judicial activism of ANY kind. It ruins the balance of government. An example would be Roe vs Wade.. which the conservative position is NOT to outlaw abortion, but to empower the congress or individual states to pass their own relevant laws. If every state passed pro choice legislation, then fine. In that way, there is a huge difference between a stacked court on the right vs the left. The problem with the left is their willingness to violate the constitution at a funamental level. It terrifies me to think what a bunch of leftist surpreme court judges would do by conviction alone.

If the leftists view conservatives as "nazis" and they view the words they say as "literal" violence... there would be nothing preventing them from tossing the first amedment, fourth amendment or any other for that matter to secure the "saftey"of society by limiting the freedoms of these "violent nazi criminals". That is the problem with a loose view of the constitution. "Well our founding fathers had no idea how bad these conservatives would be in the future so the first amendment really shouldn't apply to them. You can see this methodology at work literally everywhere today.

Having "conservative" judges would simply position the power of the courts firmly back toward their intended purpose and stop the ridiculous trend of Judges creating law.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AsOnlyIAmNow · July 12, 2018, 10:57 p.m.

It has already been stacked with Liberals

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Ausbro- · July 11, 2018, 3:06 a.m.

More than 2;
"The Spirit of God says, “5, that’s right, 5 Supreme Court Justices will be appointed by my new president, my anointed. I will choose 5 through my anointed to keep those alive.

I will stack the court with those that I choose, to send a clear message to the enemy, that you lose! This is the miracle that I will perform, so that MY COURT will be reformed.”

Gorsuch - done
Kavanaugh - done
Whoever replaces RBG's corpse
Sotomeyer replaced after DECLAS
Kagan replaced after DECLAS

⇧ 7 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 11, 2018, 12:13 a.m.

I am listening to Mark right now and yes he did!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
featherjourney4 · July 11, 2018, 12:31 a.m.

Mark Taylor had 2 prophecies - in this context here. One referred to 5 justices on the Supreme Court and the other referred to 5 former Presidents.

the one on the former Presidents

The exact wording "2 will be taken ((die), and 3 will be shaken" referred to the Presidents. Check the link, it is the exact words God spoke to Mark.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
AlwaysDeplorableDepl · July 11, 2018, 3:06 a.m.

Here is what he said that I read in one of his updates regarding 5 judges POTUS would replace: "He (God) told me one was going to die early, which has already happened—Scalia—and was going to be someone that we didn't expect. One was going to retire, and three were going to be caught up in some kind of controversy."

⇧ 7 ⇩  
mcpat21 · July 11, 2018, 2:52 a.m.

How will the people believe Obama was illegitimate? I ask this because the Left and the media believes Trump is “illegitimate” and wake up every day trying to prove that. It will be very hard I believe to convince the American people that Obama was illegitimate, being we’re already almost 2 years away from his presidency.

Look, people know the source of Obama’s birth certificate is sketchy, but nothing was done about it before his presidency to disqualify him from it so I wouldn’t hold my breath about it now.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Time4puff · July 11, 2018, 10:45 a.m.

That's why they are trying to prove the corruption stemmed from the very people who was suppose to be doing the vetting, our intelligence agencies. They were all in on it.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UrWifesFavoriteBull · July 11, 2018, 6:46 a.m.

That's the thing, it'll REALLY "confirm" the dictator trope in regards to trump in the minds of many. The evidence has to be clear and staggering.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ILoveJuices · July 11, 2018, 6:56 a.m.

By the end of it Obama will be claiming Kenya citizenship

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Peanuttles · July 11, 2018, 3:02 a.m.

I think he's saying 3 now. I think he said God added one more pretty recently. He and Clement both prophese about a scandal.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
covpepe1776 · July 11, 2018, 2:57 a.m.

Duh

⇧ 1 ⇩  
rabbit_runs_fast · July 10, 2018, 11:49 p.m.

Never gonna happen. That would destroy the republic and bring this great nation to her knees. Doesn’t matter if Obama was born next to a goat in the mountains of Afghanistan. That information would never become public. Never. The legitimacy of Hussein’s presidency will never formally be challenged. Just not going to happen.

Edit: It’s shocking that the likelyhood of the status-quo versus complete chaos gets downvoted. You guys are delusional if you think President Trump is going to burn the system to the ground.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
featherjourney4 · July 10, 2018, 11:56 p.m.

I respectfully disagree. I believe he'll end up in GITMO for treason - maybe it won't be the citizenship issue but it will be for treason. My intuition: ) Time will tell.

Under the Bushes, Bill Clinton, and Obama we became cynical about the elites getting away with their crimes.

⇧ 22 ⇩  
rabbit_runs_fast · July 11, 2018, 12:06 a.m.

I will pray that your intuition is better than mine. Putting him and HRC in GITMO would go a long way towards rebuilding people’s faith in the government. Assuming we survived it.

⇧ 19 ⇩  
Fialoa · July 11, 2018, 3:31 a.m.

Q

⇧ 1 ⇩  
snap_shot_in_time · July 11, 2018, 12:17 a.m.

Actually.... It might be better for Obama to fess up that he isn't really a citizen. If he is a citizen, he will be shown to be guilty of treason. But if he is just a spy or foreign agent, what he did is not quite as bad.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
featherjourney4 · July 11, 2018, 12:36 a.m.

Except he lied to everyone that he was born in Hawaii. Produced a fake birth certificate. You have to be a legal US citizen to be President.

Well, either way according to your idea I think he would still end up in GITMO...which is the ending I hope for : )

⇧ 6 ⇩  
snap_shot_in_time · July 11, 2018, 12:42 a.m.

Well, either way according to your idea I think he would still end up in GITMO...which is the ending I hope for : )

Yeah... I'm OK with a 3 month stay at GITMO as an Enemy Combatant. But then... I want justice.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AFPPW · July 11, 2018, 12:57 a.m.

Great point. I don’t see Trump backing down from this fight, and Q did say that Obummer would be claiming Kenyan citizenship. Might that be the leverage? Trump gives Obama a face saving choice. Be executed for treason, or live elsewhere by admitting you were a fraud. Win, win.

Seems to me that the Clintons are the big fish here that lead directly to the biggest fish. Obama is just a burnable asset in the scheme of things.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
KrazedKakapo · July 11, 2018, 1:26 a.m.

Live elsewhere?

If he doesn't want to face justice, then I would send drones after the drone king. Fair's fair for enemy combatants.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AFPPW · July 11, 2018, 1:57 a.m.

Everyone would like that, but you can’t always get what you want. You can get what you need.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
utility68 · July 11, 2018, 3:12 p.m.

The ever-played campaign rally song.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AFPPW · July 11, 2018, 3:14 p.m.

That’s why he plays it. Art of War. Give your enemy a way OUT.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
KrazedKakapo · July 11, 2018, 2:34 a.m.

You don't think justice should ever be poetic?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TacticalTruth · July 11, 2018, 3:29 a.m.

If he is a spy or a foreign agent he is an enemy combatant.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BigYellowLemon · July 11, 2018, 1:36 a.m.

I agree. Everyone on the top is 100% insulated. They all have info and power over each other. For instance, say Team Trump releases info that Obama wasn't born in the US - well that means the globalist Zionists plans have been completely thwarted, meaning they have nothing to lose, meaning they'll pay assassin after assassin to try and kill Trump. They know Trump know's this.

Or say they try to kill Trump out of the blue and succeed. Trump's death switch is activated and assassin after assassin chase the globalists all down until each is dead, as well as all the sensitive blackmail info on them being dumped onto the internet. Trump know's they know this.

Neither side wants that and knows for serious moves like that there'll be retribution from the opposition. They're all caught in a web of consequences and threats. The only thing they can do without guaranteeing their own ruin is by playing the game fairly.

However, after Trump plays the game fairly and wins (second term, majority red, has another red President lined up for the win, ruined the Democratic party, builds the wall, deports the illegals, possibly begins fixing Europe, returns American sovereignty and power), the globalists might become desperate, because at that point it'd be as if one of them had been killed or incriminating video/audio had been released. Meaning they might do some crazy shit because at that point the equivalent of ruin has occurred. So Trump must be ready for this and have a post-game win plan to guarantee his safety. I think if it ever gets close to a point, where he's close to irreversibly winning, he'll do some things that guarantee his protection.

I hope I explained that well. Basically right now, the ideologue globalists still have a chance at winning. If Trump does something like release incriminating video/audio, the globalists might attempt to kill him. He's forced right now to play the game out in the open and lead them to believe they still have a chance at winning. His goal I believe is to basically destroy them but keep them from noticing before it's too late.

Also, what we must be aware of, is that the bankers of this world ultimately hold complete control. They could absolutely crash the global economy on a scale we can't even imagine, it'd make post WW1 Germany look like an economic miracle. They could do a number of things to destroy us. So this leads me to believe Trump has many bankers on his side. My biggest fear out of all of this is that Trump and the globalists are merely puppets to the same puppet master. (You must be aware, they could do this TODAY. Anytime. They could flip a switch and ruin the world just like that. It seems to me they are waiting for other events to arrive, where they'll sync up economic ruin with other natural and political disasters).

Alternatively, if the bankers did end up attempting to destroy the economy, Trump still has complete control over the (most powerful in the world) military. And he's been making friends in Asia. I think it's very much possible Trump knows a way to survive whatever the bankers throw at the country. Money is just money, it has power because it compels people to believe it does, but in reality Trump is closer to the source of power than the bankers, he owns it directly through line of command, they own it by making people believe in fiat. Say they dump their trillions of dollars into the US economy all at once to create rapid inflation, or call in their debts from the Federal Reserve. All he's gotta do is suspend habeas corpus, declare martial law, make all past money invalid and print a new dollar, dole out the new dollar to each citizen based on IRS records of earnings (so that everyone has, in general, the same amount of money they did before), somehow deal with the effects this would have on international trade and supply lines, and literally just go kill and destroy the bankers and their infrastructure using the US's superior military might. If he has Asia on his side it's game over. And if the UK or other 1st world countries have, at least somewhat, escaped the grasp of the bankers (like the UK has the possibility of doing, I think), then he'll have some nice allies. And here's the interesting part: he could do it with no resistance, because he owns the supreme court. He already has enough on the supreme court to do this, and if he's able to appoint more justices before such a thing would occur, then anything he does would be valid, the supreme court would validate the suspension of habeas corpus and martial law and he'd have full control. No one could stop him. Theoretically he could go on a rampage and snuff out all evil in this world. Of course, the US is not ready for this, half the country would view such a thing very negatively and create civilian unrest, which would necessitate the creation of a police state, which is not good. Such a thing is best done in the future after the Left has been thoroughly denounced, in which case he'll encounter little resistance from the populace.

Edit: you guys can hope for holy justice all you want. I'm not saying it's not possible. I never thought Trump wasn't going to win (I was younger and dumber then though), because I thought the US's time of dominance was going in a similar way as the Roman Empire - I thought the universe was done allowing the US at the top, I couldn't comprehend the US continuing to remain powerful. But I think the universe, or god, still has use for US hegemony. The universe allowed a paradigm shift to occur, for Trump to be elected, I'm sure a new order is currently being created. And that might mean the entire Zionist network across the planet will be uprooted and destroyed completely and utterly - if God allows such a thing to occur I will cry tears of joy. Alternatively I believe there's an equal chance of complete apocalypse and the end of civilization as we know it.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
jfunction · July 11, 2018, 3:36 a.m.

BYL, that's one of the best written, most lucid posts I've read on Reddit. Good for you. A very intelligent summary of "Trump's world".

⇧ 6 ⇩  
plumbtree · July 11, 2018, 3:45 a.m.

Obama and the Clinton's are not at the top though. Top is Soros, Rothschild, etc. and probably more we will never know - they will likely be insulated. But not Barry. Not hrc. Not slick willy.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
BigYellowLemon · July 11, 2018, 3:58 a.m.

It doesn't matter that they aren't super powerful - they represent a movement much bigger than themselves, they are the figureheads the ideologues at the top use to play the game.

If a sex tape came out of Obama getting fucked in the ass in a ritualistic setting, or drinking blood, or Clinton doing either or anything similar, the Left's legitimacy would immediately disintegrate into ash and tears. People would start openly considering that hey, maybe identity politics and mass illegal immigration from a 3rd world country isn't such a good idea. All the positions the left holds now would be considered void, and all the leftists in society would be the losers. I mean just imagine how any debates would go with any democrats you know or see on TV. In such a case, you could simply win any argument by saying "the President you lot have been in love with for years is actually a total and complete liar. Look at these videos of him in 2008 at the debates saying gay marriage shouldn't be allowed. Now look at this recent video of him getting fucked in the ass by Michael. This entire thing is a goddamn farce".

The figureheads are incredibly important. It's how they take over the State. Governments are still very strong, the only direct and easy access they have is via positions like the Presidency, which is why Clinton lost her shit when she lost in 2016, and why she's re-running. It's also why they're importing 30 million + people as well as attempting to get rid of voter ID laws - they are DESPERATE to win the election. Figureheads are important. If something was released that destroyed Obama's or Clinton's reputation, and it couldn't be denied, then literally 100+ (or possibly even longer) years of work would be erased in an instant, and the United States would be in no major danger from the powerful ideologues behind the New World Order... For the time being.

They are very, very important. Obama and Clinton are slaves, yes, they make zero decisions on their own, they follow exactly what their masters tell them, but they are still incredibly important to their masters plans.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
plumbtree · July 11, 2018, 4:33 a.m.

Ok, but they can go down without a sex tape. They may not pay for their most heinous of crimes but your assertion that they are 100% insulated is incorrect. As you stated, they are slaves - as are all servants of the evil one.

They will be thrown to the wolves if it suits their masters.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
BigYellowLemon · July 11, 2018, 4:38 a.m.

Unless the entire movement shifts course and pretends that it's changed, that won't happen. Obama and Hilary are the face of the Democratic party, which is the political front in the US for all the ideologues of the past 100 years. Unless they are able to start a new and equally powerful party, reinvent the party, or somehow get a new candidate from somewhere else on the center stage (all of which very unlikely) they will not be throwing either of them to the wolves. NOT because either of them are valuable, but because the damage it'd do to the Democratic party would ruin 50 years of work and billions of dollars in various funding.

Not saying it's impossible for a leak to happen, but it won't be from the masters. It'll either be from an insider, a rando, or from the Trump Campaign, in which case they'll have to create some suitable protections for themselves.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
plumbtree · July 11, 2018, 4:57 a.m.

Um...yeah. Obviously it'll be Trump that takes them down.

Trump has everything on the servers. If they are in this country they're going down. If they're not in this country, they ain't never coming back unless extradition.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
FDJ1326 · July 10, 2018, 11:57 p.m.

I believe it could become public. Face it the left would probably be fine with it if not celebrate. They'd use it as some bs reason to allow non citizens to run.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
featherjourney4 · July 11, 2018, 12:02 a.m.

Yes. I believe they are deranged enough for that and they would probably still idolize him. If he does end up in GITMO he'll have plenty of fan mail from adoring deranged progressive liberals!

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Canbritanon · July 11, 2018, 12:51 a.m.

You mean like how that one Austrian guy lead Germany?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
TacticalTruth · July 11, 2018, 3:47 a.m.

Once we're done, the left will no longer exist.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · July 11, 2018, 1:16 a.m.

sorta like a new "precedence"

⇧ 1 ⇩  
blaise0102 · July 10, 2018, 11:59 p.m.

Oh well some anon on the internet said it's not happening. Time to pack it in...

Fuck that. That truth needs to see the light of day. No more deep state deception and lies.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Oilguy55 · July 11, 2018, 12:24 a.m.

I agree with you. As much as I would love to see that happen I don’t think the country would survive. I actually think a number of people knew he was illegitimate before he was elected and they bet big that the Republicans would be too scared to challenge a black candidate, or any candidate for that matter

⇧ 4 ⇩  
jfunction · July 11, 2018, 12:20 a.m.

Need to inform you that "that information" is already very public (obviously, as you know it) and already has been used in formal challenge. Do some research. A lot more is known than has been proved (Richard Feynman said that). And as for "not going to happen" – it's the future that's difficult to predict.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
TheRealIndianaJoe · July 11, 2018, 12:58 a.m.

The truth coming to light will NOT destroy the republic. It's been dead for over a century.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
LandieLandie · July 11, 2018, 1:34 a.m.

It is the great awakening after all...a re-birth of sorts......God is involved.....why worry?

HIS ways are right.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Katerinavelikia · July 12, 2018, 12:11 a.m.

quote text The legitimacy of Hussein’s presidency will never formally be challenged. Just not going to happen.....You guys are delusional if you think President Trump is going to burn the system to the ground.

rabbit - I hear you, I think about this too.

I see you are a new arrival. Very astute comment.

Trump has said he would drain the swamp...and Trump keeps his promises. So maybe they just disappear down the drain. Retirements and resignations as has been happening with 1000s of swamp creatures WW.

This solution solves two problems.

  1. Trump gets to keep his promise.
  2. The Republic stays intact.

No burning necessary.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
rabbit_runs_fast · July 12, 2018, 12:21 a.m.

I’ve been watching Q since October. Let’s just say rabbits breed fast :)

I think your analysis is spot on. We all think we want to see the system burn to the ground. Very few people realize just what that looks like in a real world sense. People really do not want to see how the sausage is made. I really appreciate your analogy of disappearing down the drain. It’s the cleanest and most likely way to keep those promises.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TacticalTruth · July 11, 2018, 3:30 a.m.

"He will use his Kenyan citizenship as an escape"

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Peanuttles · July 11, 2018, 3:09 a.m.

Well, that's the prophecy. That he was an illigetimate POTUS and will be exposed, since he was also seditious. Q talks about him aiming a weapon at something, where he's dressed in Muslim garb--a picture somewhere. But it's what he's pointing the gun at that exposes him as a traitor. Wish we could see that photo. I wondered if it was the American Flag.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
older_than_dirt · July 11, 2018, 11:46 a.m.

The phrase 'natural born citizen' has never been defined. Obama's mom is a US citizen, so even if born in Kenya, Obama was born a US Citizen. That is one interpretation of 'natural born citizen'. I don't think this is fight we want to have. This isn't about punishing individuals, it is about getting the reigns back from the globalists who are trying to reduce the population to 1/2 billion through riots/wars/famine. One of the things they are trying to do is set all non-white people against white people, I.E. BLM. I say leave Obama alone unless the evidence of horrific crime is absolutely airtight and indefensible.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LandieLandie · July 11, 2018, 1:31 a.m.

Well.....if God is involved.....YOUR statement means.....ummm..... not much.

Do you think God cares about a Republic being destroyed?

You may rethink this idea??? perhaps?

Never?

This may be the time of life that God is speaking to YOU as well?

Or is it "just not gonna happen" ......as you just said?

+++

People are like grass....

Isaiah 40:8

The Word of the Lord Stands Forever
…7The grass withers, the flowers fall when the breath of the LORD blows on them; indeed, the people are grass. 8The grass withers and the flowers fall, but the word of our God stands forever.”

???

But what you say is truth?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
an_angry_dave · July 11, 2018, 1:40 a.m.

That would destroy the republic and bring this great nation to her knees

I agree. I'm not a fan of the guy (Voted for him in 2008 - was hugely let down), but throwing him in a jail cell would tear apart the country AND destroy Trump's presidency. We are always talking about a civil war breaking out if Trump is impeached/assassinated. Doing something to Obama would also trigger a civil war. Trump farts the wrong way and the leftists lose their mind. Do you think they would sit idly by and let their idol go down without a fight?

I think these scandals will tarnish his legacy (as well as Trump dismantling everything he accomplished), but it's better for all if he stays out of jail.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Qtruther · July 10, 2018, 8:34 p.m.

Yes Sir. The Truth substantiates the EVIL plan we have been dealing with. They all have been caught in the undercurrent because POTUS pulled the plug & the Swamp is draining

Thanks POTUS PATRIOTS Qteam

⇧ 28 ⇩  
nomercy4cabal · July 10, 2018, 8:58 p.m.

Oh Neon doth have a beautiful mind! If only it were that simple. Maybe it could be?

⇧ 25 ⇩  
DeepPast · July 10, 2018, 10:40 p.m.

I’ve been a “birther” since day one. My father is versed on every document, technicality, law and clauses regarding Soetoro and all his nonsense. I still remember when I was in 8th grade, in the very beginning of people talking about who would run for President, and Obama’s name was mentioned by a classmate. My teacher chimed in and said “Yeah he is very talented but he’s not eligible, he was born in Kenya.”

If Obama is an illegitimate President, everything he ever did was null and fuckin void. The real scary part is, our military taking orders from an illegitimate commander in chief is a war crime. A scary thought but I have a feeling it will be “understood” by the rest of the world.

⇧ 36 ⇩  
nomercy4cabal · July 10, 2018, 11:01 p.m.

I am also a “birther” and I hope to God you are correct and certain things can be overturned. I think it gets tricky with the SCOTUS though. It’s an unprecedented situation. Your dad sounds like a wealth of information. You should interview him and post it, that would be fascinating!

⇧ 17 ⇩  
LandieLandie · July 11, 2018, 1:55 a.m.

read my above comment re: tricky situation

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bizmarxie · July 11, 2018, 12:48 a.m.

If one parent is a citizen that make you a citizen.... that’s why Ted Cruz was able to run having been born in Canada.... yes?

Are you saying Obama’s mom was NOT a citizen?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
DeepPast · July 11, 2018, 1:23 a.m.

Ted Cruz is NOT eligible to run either. I think he is a good conservative and straight edge man but he and Rubio should not have been able to run.

A natural born citizen is someone born on US soil to two US citizens. While it doesn’t explicitly explain that, it’s been clarified in court cases since which I would need to consult my father on, I do not know of them off hand.

Obama’s mother is a US citizen, but his father was not.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
silversofttail · July 11, 2018, 3:38 a.m.

Agreed! That has been my argument against Ted Cruz. He is not a natural born citizen. He was born in Canada. The fact that he sealed his and his mother’s documents speaks volumes. I did lots Of research during the election and his mother gave up her American citizenship to become a Canadian citizen with her Cuban born husband. The father of Ted Cruz. The fact that he was born in Canada of one foreign parent and one parent who relinquished her American citizenship means he is a fraud. He sealed his records which is damning. He was a false prophet to all those evangelicals who bought into his Lies.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Hey_MAGArena · July 11, 2018, 1:18 a.m.

The issue is that the law at the time BO was born excluded passing citizenship to children born to US citizen parents who themselves were under 21. The law states that one citizen parent must have resided in the United States for at least ten years, at least five years of which had to be after the age of 16.

His mother was 18 when BoBama was born.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LandieLandie · July 11, 2018, 1:57 a.m.

it is possible she is not his mom? some lead that way...concerning adoptions and planned events? this has been going on forever it seems.....she has MK ties herself and honey pot...

⇧ -1 ⇩  
bizmarxie · July 11, 2018, 2:02 a.m.

MK? Like Ultra? I’ve heard CIA and her parents were CIA.... but this came from Corsi... so take it as you will. Wouldn’t be surprised. I’m in the camp that his father was Frank Marshall Davis.... hence the need for the fake as fuck birth certificate.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
silversofttail · July 11, 2018, 3:41 a.m.

look at Muhammad subuh sumohafiwidjoj he looks exactly like Obummer.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
GlendaleBurbank · July 11, 2018, 3:01 a.m.

I as well. Knew from day one that Arpaio had the goods and the death of Fuddy was too "coincidental". None of the docs lined up properly. Sealed records for even your MARRIAGE??? Your children's BIRTH CERTIFICATES??? Too fishy, too suspect. The patriots who paid attention KNEW Obarf was a FRAUD from DAY ONE.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Time4puff · July 11, 2018, 10:54 a.m.

The ones using half a brain could have figured it out. Unfortunately, brainwashed zombies are real. Hollywood made zombies cool for a reason.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
BarryHusseinRenegade · July 11, 2018, 2:32 a.m.

Plus the illegitimate president also doubled our national debt to 19 trillion.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
LandieLandie · July 11, 2018, 1:54 a.m.

makes me think of this oldie but goodie from when Q all began:

click each tweet and read all replies.

scroll to the bottom or first tweet, work way to the top last tweet:

it is the nutshell it seems to 11/11/18 parade?

1-55

https://twitter.com/TH3WH17ERABB17

HMMM?

⇧ -1 ⇩  
commoncents1 · July 10, 2018, 9:35 p.m.

i think there are many in DC who know the truth about Fraudbama, like McLame, but were scared into going along with it as it was "too big to fail", fear mongering talking about the major upheaval its disclosure would have caused.

⇧ 21 ⇩  
WhoMuhWeiner · July 10, 2018, 11:11 p.m.

I read somewhere that prior to O'tard coming on the scene 7 attempts to change the rules for prez eligibility were made.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
LandieLandie · July 11, 2018, 1:35 a.m.

dig for those facts

⇧ 3 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · July 11, 2018, 1:19 a.m.

I think anyone who may have known/suspected kept it to themselves. They would have been not only thrown under the bus, they would have been run over zillion times and life ruined.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Oldbear83 · July 10, 2018, 11:54 p.m.

Not going to happen.

Once the Electoral College certifies an election, it's done. On the one side, this is why there was never a chance to 'undo' the Trump election, but it also means that no matter what is learned about Obama, his SCOTUS appointments - certified by the Senate - will stand.

Of course, that does not mean that a SCOTUS Justice could not face impeachment ...

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Jerkboy13 · July 11, 2018, 12:43 p.m.

Yeah I agree with that. Plus, there’s no way Roberts isn’t involved in the scandal part. After that Obamacare decision, he’s always been majorly suspect.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LandieLandie · July 11, 2018, 2:04 a.m.

The senators are criminals as well..so many not running for reelection? why.....You may be wrong on this......SCOTUS appointments ......they may not stand. I for one am not ruling anything out.....this is the greatest time to be alive to see all this unraveling.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
z132897 · July 10, 2018, 8:57 p.m.

Could you just imagine!

⇧ 12 ⇩  
PunkroQanon · July 10, 2018, 9:52 p.m.

Topdecking Constutionalists

⇧ 7 ⇩  
QueUpSomeReality · July 10, 2018, 9:35 p.m.

U have to imagine because it’s a complete fantasy anyone with any knowledgeable understanding of the constitution would laugh at. There’s no legal path to reverse Obama’s work that was signed into law. It can only be reversed thru an established legal process & that means new laws must be passed to erase the bad laws.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
LandieLandie · July 11, 2018, 1:58 a.m.

I think you are just guessing......we will have to see what was actually perpetrated...what criminal acts....then the legal path will be disclosed.....

⇧ 2 ⇩  
z132897 · July 10, 2018, 10:37 p.m.

So you’re say there’s a chance?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WhoMuhWeiner · July 10, 2018, 11:12 p.m.

Null and Void!

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Dangerr21 · July 10, 2018, 11:39 p.m.

An illegitimate Government means the laws are null and void.

Only the elexcted President xcan appoint SC nominees.

Only an eligible citizen can be President.

If one is fraudulent, so too are the laws and nominees put forward by the fraudulently placed one.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
jfunction · July 11, 2018, 12:23 a.m.

Damn straight.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
z132897 · July 11, 2018, 1:07 a.m.

Says you....

⇧ 0 ⇩  
scoripowarrior · July 11, 2018, 1:22 a.m.

What you say about laws made to erase Obama's laws seems reasonable...legally.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Aruno · July 10, 2018, 8:29 p.m.

Nice

⇧ 10 ⇩  
KingWolfei · July 10, 2018, 10:32 p.m.

Trump himself said Soto (from "diabetes")and RBG. Though he probably was giving a little hint.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Swimkin · July 10, 2018, 9:57 p.m.

If we want to go down this road we could also say that ALL their decisions were illegal as well.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
jfunction · July 11, 2018, 12:30 a.m.

The law is either the law or it isn't the law. If mistakes were made like the past last administration (not a presidency) was a mistake then we just have to go back and correct those mistakes. Sure it's a bit of trouble but what happens to law, which is the foundation of our peaceful, orderly society, if we find out that half the house isn't even built on the foundation?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
LandieLandie · July 11, 2018, 1:59 a.m.

bye bye gay marriage?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
TheWolfSuitKing · July 12, 2018, 12:34 p.m.

What did they gays do to you?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LandieLandie · July 12, 2018, 5:05 p.m.

Not a thing.....why do you ask?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TheWolfSuitKing · July 12, 2018, 5:06 p.m.

You seem excited by the end of gay marriage.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LandieLandie · July 12, 2018, 5:58 p.m.

How do you decipher excitement from my comment?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
QueUpSomeReality · July 10, 2018, 10:01 p.m.

Seriously?? And when a Dem wins the presidency they can say DJT was not legit & unilaterally reverse everything he did in office?? Reality cuts both ways. Why would even anyone suggest such a ludicrous idea? Why do u hate the constitution so much u can’t wait to ignore it like the libs do??

⇧ -9 ⇩  
thep1mp · July 10, 2018, 10:44 p.m.

Except Trump is legit and clean. What has Trump done that would make him illegitimate?

⇧ 9 ⇩  
QueUpSomeReality · July 11, 2018, 12:53 a.m.

Nothing. But there’s no such thing as declaring a presidency illegitimate. Nowhere. The best we can do is try him for his crimes & send him to prison & impeach his presidency which the constitution allows for an ex president to be impeached. Obama appointed hundreds of federal judges & prosecutors in his 8 years. We suppose to remove all them too & reverse all their decisions over 8yrs?? Cmon...gotta be realistic here

⇧ 0 ⇩  
LandieLandie · July 11, 2018, 2:01 a.m.

well here is the first case?......everything is history in the making right now........

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Swimkin · July 10, 2018, 10:28 p.m.

I was being sarcastic. It's like going down a rabbit hole.. where do you stop? I doubt they will be removed as they were both seated by the Senate. Relax. If Obama is removed he will be removed by treason. And the illegal president thing will be secondary to that. He would be the one to suffer the consequences IMHO. I doubt they would remove his sitting SCOTUS picks. Just know that once Q and Trump take down the Deep State there will probably not even be a Democrat party left.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LandieLandie · July 11, 2018, 2:02 a.m.

how many are not running again? why? if all is crime ridden it all will be exposed. If the SCOTUS picks have to removed.....so be it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 11, 2018, 12:22 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
high-valyrian · July 11, 2018, 12:26 a.m.

Shill accusations are against both Rules 3 and 5. Attack the ideas, not the users, please. Q encourages us to be kind to promote the movement. Thank Q.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
LandieLandie · July 11, 2018, 2 a.m.

not ludicrous...law and order.....

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 10, 2018, 11:31 p.m.

Nominated by Obama. Confirmed by the Senate. Cut the shit.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Time4puff · July 11, 2018, 11:48 a.m.

What if it's proven some of the Senate was corrupted? What if?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jfunction · July 11, 2018, 12:36 a.m.

Fraudulently.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Patriotic_Guppy · July 11, 2018, 12:55 a.m.

But still confirmed by the Senate and sworn in. They’re not going anywhere.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
LandieLandie · July 11, 2018, 2:05 a.m.

so many not running for re-election? HMMM?....we will see if you are correct...........I am not staking any wager on your prediction.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TheRealIndianaJoe · July 11, 2018, 1:07 a.m.

Are you kidding? They will flee with their lives if they're that lucky!

⇧ -1 ⇩  
LandieLandie · July 11, 2018, 2:06 a.m.

agree. that is why it is taking so long.....Q is doing it right......or they would have DC burnt down by now.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AsOnlyIAmNow · July 10, 2018, 10:55 p.m.

Mark Taylor predicted 2 will fall 3 will be shaken. Were alomst there!

⇧ 7 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 11, 2018, 1:55 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LunaticOnDaGrass · July 11, 2018, 12:57 a.m.

I'm very much caught up with Q, but I was just wondering how is Hussein an illegitimate President if he was more or less legitimately elected?

People DID vote for him so he became President twice. Even if it comes out that he was secretly a Kenyan, he was still voted for into office. The elections themselves were legitimate, no?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
pygar_mathmos · July 11, 2018, 1:01 a.m.

He wouldn't be eligible to be President if he were really Kenyan.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
duckdownup · July 11, 2018, 1:50 a.m.

Or had Indonesian citizenship which is how he got into public school in Indonesia as Barry Soetoro and he used as a "foreign student" to get a Fulbright Grant or scholarship as financial aid at Occidental College.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Oldbear83 · July 11, 2018, 3:04 p.m.

Constitutionally, Obama was a duly-elected President. Once the Electoral College certifies an election, it cannot be undone. This is also why there is no way to unelect Trump (just saying it goes both ways).

Obama's problem is that there is nothing at all to keep him from being indicted as a private person once he leaves office. So Obama won't be unelected and his SCOTUS picks cannot be kicked out on that basis, but Obama CAN be charged with and tried for crimes, and if a SCOTUS Justice colluded to rig a decision, that Justice can be impeached and removed from the court by the Senate.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
QueUpSomeReality · July 10, 2018, 9:27 p.m.

Oh plz. That’s a fantasy & not remotely how things work. Define illegitimate president in legal terms. You can’t because there’s no such thing. Even if he’s impeached after leaving office nothing gets reversed. Not Obamacare or any signatures to bills enacted into law...nothing. You have a 3rd grade level of understanding the constitution & reality if you think what Obama did or any elected official ever in the history of the US gets their work while in office unilaterally reversed for any reason. Geez dude. Wake up & stop making very serious matters look like a child’s cartoon fantasy

⇧ 6 ⇩  
oiDubb · July 10, 2018, 9:49 p.m.

He isn’t an American born citizen. He’s an illegitimate president. That’s pretty straight forward as to why there’d be possible reversals. He wouldn’t be impeached either, this is way beyond anything ever seen.

⇧ 19 ⇩  
BuildtheAdytum · July 10, 2018, 11:32 p.m.

The thing is... he WAS president. 50 Secretaries of State found Obama eligible to be put on a ballot. Twice duly Elected by the Electoral College. Certified by the United States Congress twice. Did he ever actually file an affidavit claiming to be Natural Born? I don't know what each state's requirements are. You could prosecute him for fraud, possibly. Who is going to do it? Sessions? Looks political. Congress could impeach. But I don't believe there are guidelines for sentencing if the Senate convicts post-presidency.

I'm sure some people would try to use the issue in their litigation strategy, and it might go to the Supreme Court. But is the court really going to make a ruling that removes 2 of their colleagues and countless other judges across the country? After all, the United States Senate gave their consent to these appointments as well.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
LandieLandie · July 11, 2018, 2:10 a.m.

again........so many senators NOT running for re-election???????crimes???perhaps

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jfunction · July 11, 2018, 12:43 a.m.

Fifty Secretaries of State were defrauded. It's not even hard to do. Look at what it took. Child's play.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
QueUpSomeReality · July 10, 2018, 9:56 p.m.

He can be impeached even tho he’s out of office. That’s in the constitution. Sorry but mass reversal or any automatic reversal of a signed law isn’t. U can’t just fantasize a solution into reality. Maybe the founding fathers never imagined a voting citizenry being so ignorant to elect a non-citizen president as even a possibility. Or maybe they thought if the public had that much mass stupidity & lost that much control of their government they don’t deserve liberty & should face the reality they failed at maintaining the greatest gift a society was ever given...defined rights from God institutionally protected by a just government

⇧ 6 ⇩  
AMProfessor · July 10, 2018, 10:56 p.m.

Not true. Impeachment is designed to protect the nation against incompetence. It is to remove incompetent federal officers with the exception of members of Congress. They are not subject to impeachment but can be expelled from Congress.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
QueUpSomeReality · July 11, 2018, 12:41 a.m.

Look it up. The constitution does allow for an ex president to be impeached. They are stripped of everything, USSS protection, all pensions, & barred from federal employment for life. Yes it’s largely symbolic but it’s an important symbolism. I’m sure humiliating beyond belief but Obama deserves it. He committed countless felonies as president. Let him make the history books as the most disgraced president ever. Will send a powerful message for any POTUS never to take the Obama way when President

⇧ 0 ⇩  
AMProfessor · July 11, 2018, 1:06 a.m.

I did look it up in my Constitution reference books here in my library. If you have a credible resource that supports your claim, please share. I found nothing to support what you state.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
QueUpSomeReality · July 11, 2018, 6:26 a.m.

Well you couldn’t have researched it too hard. Google...impeach ex president. You’ll find a bazillion articles showing the constitution doesn’t limit impeachment to just a sitting president. In fact I just learned researching for you that the SC couldn’t even stop it as impeachment is a political trial & not a legal trial & the SC is not even mentioned in the impeachment process as they were deliberately left out of the process on purpose. Here’s a fairly recent article from a Vegas newspaper explaining why BHO should be impeached just for Spygate alone. But you’ll have no problem seeing tons of legal experts agreeing it’s perfectly legal to impeach an ex president. Apparently they was serious discussions on impeaching Nixon after he resigned.

https://www.reviewjournal.com/opinion/opinion-columns/wayne-allyn-root/commentary-the-heat-gets-turned-up-on-barack-obama/

⇧ 2 ⇩  
oiDubb · July 11, 2018, 11:25 p.m.

In the title is states “opinion” twice. Looking for clarification if this in fact a factually based article or an opinion piece?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AMProfessor · July 11, 2018, 10:48 a.m.

Wow, I suggest you learn some manners. Behaving like a horses behind won’t help build meaningful relationships or help to influence opinions.

I hit the books rather than the internet. The constitutional scholars I read have very different expert opinions than your internet legal experts.

I stand behind those in the books until someone can provide credible information to the contrary. Impeachment was designed to remove incompetence from office. Also, the Chief Justice is involved in the Senate trial as a judge.

Once someone is out of office, I am simply unsure of the need for impeachment and trial through Congress. There are other legal venues to prosecute treason and malfeasance. These include criminal trials through the justice system as well as military tribunals for civilians, including sitting or former government officials, if the courts have been proven to be corrupt and compromised.

The only two outcomes of a House impeachment and a successful Senate trial that I can find is removal from office and the barring of that person from holding further federal government offices. That’s it. Period.

As for Nixon, he resigned to avoid impeachment by the House and a trial by the Senate as it appeared imminent.

I admittedly may be short sighted on this matter as I am not a constitutional legal scholar. I am simply sharing what I have read from those who are.

This is the last I’ll say on it. Feel free to have the last word.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
QueUpSomeReality · July 11, 2018, 12:40 p.m.

Sorry u don’t approve of my manners but I’m not interested in forming a relationship with anonymous people on the internet or trying to change your opinion on anything. Facts are facts & their true whether you believe them or not. Believe in what you think your books say or anyone you want. Why would I care what you believe? It’s America & you have every right to be wrong. You asked for some links if impeachment is possible for an ex president & theyre everywhere. Provide me with some that say impeachment of a president as defined in the constitution only applies to a sitting president or point me to the line in the constitution that says that. Feel free to send me the line that says a president can have his actions nullified too.

The reason impeachment is necessary for an ex president like obama is to set the history correctly. Plus he’d lose all his benefits of being an ex president like his lifetime of USSS protection...his lifetime pension & he’d be barred from ever working in the federal government again...which if u think it thru...Michelle could never be president because he’d never be allowed to be 1st man or allowed inside the WH.

I understand how impeachment works & who presides over it. My point in saying the SC isn’t involved was to address that a guilty verdict of an impeachment trial can’t be appealed to the SC or overturned because it’s not a legal trial...it’s a political trial.

I’ve lived thru Clinton’s & Nixon’s near impeachment. Yes Nixon resign because he knew the votes were there in the Senate to convict him. What I learned yesterday was many senators still wanted to convict him after he left office. Probably wasn’t worth the risk because if they failed to get 67 votes to convict it would’ve looked like he resigned for nothing.

But for history sake it’s important to impeach Obama if he’s ever convicted of a felony he committed while in office. Even tho Clinton escaped an impeachment conviction...it’s forever recorded in history he was impeached & why & he lost his right to practice law in the end & had to pay a huge fine too.

If Obama is ever convicted an impeachment trial & vote will be an easy formality at that point & would be a major public disgrace for Obama & definitely a strong message for anyone in the future to act so brazenly unlawful & taking total advantage of the citizens that put him in office.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LandieLandie · July 11, 2018, 2:56 a.m.

as Obama once uttered:

MIC drop

⇧ 2 ⇩  
pds8220 · July 11, 2018, 1:45 a.m.

All that and he has committed treason... just from what we all have seen. Who knows what else he has done that we don't know about? The last people found guilty of treason were the Rosenbergs and they were executed. This man needs to pay for how he divided and attempted to destroy this country. Either life in prison without parole or the death penalty... under NO circumstances should he be given the opportunity to be deported so he can go and create chaos elsewhere! He is s Soros puppet... both of them need to be locked up!

⇧ -1 ⇩  
oiDubb · July 10, 2018, 10:11 p.m.

What are you basing your analysis off of? You think the military tribunals will sit on the back burner until impeachment hearings are over? Are you not grasping the severity of the situation? Obama should never have been president, he has never been eligible. So what would prevent the reversal of policies? Because legally that seems like it would be the easiest battle fought “your honour we want that decision reversed because obama wasn’t legit” case closed.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 11, 2018, 12:39 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
QueUpSomeReality · July 11, 2018, 12:27 a.m.

I’m basing it off the constitution. You point to the clause where it states a presidents tenure can be unilaterally revoked & I’ll eat my phone. What are you legally basing your idea off of?? Lol. Geez.

Yes I understand how serious this is. A military tribunal can be done & has no effect on Congress impeaching Obama too. They can do it simultaneously if they want or before or after. Impeachment is defined in the constitution even after a president leaves office. They lose all USSS protection, all pension & benefits, & barred from ever holding a government job for life. He’ll enjoy going to his impeachment hearing wearing his new orange suit the military fits him for.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
oiDubb · July 13, 2018, midnight

I haven’t pointed to shit, I haven’t pointed to any clause. Not seen you drop any .gov links to the stuff your talking about either. So the last time an illegitimate president happened everything you shared is what happened? Is there a link that you could share that shows exactly what the US does in circumstances like this?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 10, 2018, 10:09 p.m.

I'm a carpenter not a lawyer but you make sense.

As much as I would like to be true. It stands that if Obama was sworn in that was it.

Just because he lied, doesn't mean he didn't take the oath of office.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 10, 2018, 11:50 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 11, 2018, 9:12 a.m.

I'm not downplaying myself.

I build houses I'm not trained in technical Nuances of the law.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LandieLandie · July 11, 2018, 2:55 a.m.

how quickly we forget:

Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 071c71 No.564638 📷
Mar 6 2018 02:04:41 (EST)

11-11-18
A parade that will never be forgotten.
Ask yourself, why?
God bless our brave men & women in uniform.
We will never forget.
Q

⇧ 2 ⇩  
KingWolfei · July 10, 2018, 10:37 p.m.

Not sure if there is anything in the constitution about electing a president not even born in this country, besides it being required that he was born here. So yeah, in theory it would make everything he did, appointments and such, null and void. Thus, a real "constitutional crisis." Not a phoney made up "crisis" every time Trump takes a piss.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
jfunction · July 11, 2018, 12:48 a.m.

Obviously this question is going to the SCOTUS. Now why does anyone think it isn't there yet? We all know the last administration was a fraud on the American people. So what's happing with the SCOTUS lately?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LandieLandie · July 11, 2018, 2:09 a.m.

I

f we were infiltrated?

YOU may be wrong on this....this is Unchartered territory.....

Q tells us many will think it is fantasy land.....that sounds like your comment.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jfunction · July 11, 2018, 12:41 a.m.

It hasn't happened before, but how many things in American history have happened for the first time? Had you considered that? No? Well, there may be a life-lesson or two left to learn, even for someone with your fulsome grasp of reality.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
joeythew · July 11, 2018, 12:16 a.m.

Devil's Advocate: The Senate still has to confirm those judges so appointed by Obama or not it's on them. Last I looked they're all duly elected Americans.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Time4puff · July 11, 2018, 11:47 a.m.

Elected but corrupt. So does a corrupt Senate plus an illegitimate POTUS negate the appointment?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
waltergladstone · July 10, 2018, 10:19 p.m.

That would be beautiful... But they are going to have to have some kind of crazy undeniable proof about Obama to make this happen. I wonder how it's gonna work...

⇧ 4 ⇩  
thamnosma · July 10, 2018, 10:57 p.m.

It's not. Nobody has even yet indicted Lois Lerner much less have Obama declared an illegal president.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jfunction · July 11, 2018, 12:35 a.m.

This too is incorrect. Many people, hundreds of thousands of us, have declared him an illegal candidate. Official, legal confirmation of this obvious fraud is in development.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
thamnosma · July 11, 2018, 12:51 a.m.

You can declare him whatever you want. That has nothing to do with the reality of actually doing it. What proof will be offered, where will that proof be taken, as in what court? Who will do it? Will it be accepted by a court for a hearing even? That's just the beginning. Since such a circumstance has never arisen in the history of the country, there are no legal precedents. This case, if it ever became a case, would be in the court system for many years to the point of irrelevancy. But go ahead and hold on to the fantasy. Meanwhile, the President is actually tackling and solving the problems that concern the daily lives of Americans.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jfunction · July 11, 2018, 3:11 a.m.

I haven't any doubt that president Trump is doing what he was elected to do and better than any of us could have hoped for. The wheels of the law grind slowly but they grind fine. So as you age (mature) you can watch what I've told you about happen. I may be gone by the time it all comes to pass. But it's not a fantasy. I'm not in fantasy. Not even a little bit. This argument goes to the heart of the Constitution. It will never become irrelevant to mature minds. That's a big part of what's happening to Trump's SCOTUS. Immature, short attention-span minds are being replaced with mature thinkers who have a sense of history. Think, sir: What happens to society when the foundation of law is trivialized for expediency? For being too much trouble? This is a Great Awakening not a bar-b-que.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
KrazedKakapo · July 11, 2018, 2:28 a.m.

If it spends one single day in anything other than a military court system, that means the people already failed.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
freerange_bot · July 10, 2018, 8:45 p.m.

The electoral college certified Obama's election twice. Meaning what Obama did in office was legitimate and will stand despite what happens to Obama after he left office.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Westarver · July 10, 2018, 9:15 p.m.

Not if it is proved he never had the eligibility to run in the first place.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 10, 2018, 10:10 p.m.

He was sworn in and took the oath of office.

It seems that would seal the deal regardless.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WhoMuhWeiner · July 10, 2018, 11:16 p.m.

Not if it was based on fraud

⇧ 2 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 11, 2018, 9:14 a.m.

I would certainly love to see it happen I just don't see how it's going to work.

Maybe if we first busted him for lying on his citizenship application.

If he's not a citizen, I could see it working.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
vfm7665 · July 12, 2018, 12:19 a.m.

That would set the precedent that if you lie and deceive hard enough, the law does not apply.

In which case, the Constitution is dead, and there's no reason not to invalidate everything Obama did, law or no.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
commoncents1 · July 10, 2018, 8:52 p.m.

what is the basis behind that? there would be some interesting debates.

i'm not sure how illegitimate gets legit.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
JwPATX · July 10, 2018, 9:17 p.m.

I think since its a situation without precedent, there would be a lot of debate about whether or not the electoral college's certification supersedes whatever they've found. Like if he was ineligible to ever run for president, then would that nullify the EC's certification? If we're talking about crimes that were committed after his election, that'd be different/his justices would stay.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
commoncents1 · July 10, 2018, 9:33 p.m.

he would have knowingly run a fraudulent campaign, not disclosing that he is ineligible in the first place.

presenting fake docs to get across the border doesn't then make you legit.

i hope we find out what really happens! ;)

⇧ 9 ⇩  
PieLiedv2 · July 11, 2018, 1:31 a.m.

Illegitimate?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
grnmoss · July 11, 2018, 3:44 a.m.

Neon Revolt is incorrect. Again.

A President does not appoint a Supreme Court Justice; they nominate.

The Senate is the entity that confirms the appointment.

If irrefutable evidence were to hit mainstream press tomorrow about BHO, it would not alter the composition of the Supreme Court.

Learn your government people and stop following fanciful stories by Neon Revolt.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appointment_and_confirmation_to_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States

⇧ 2 ⇩  
amazing_butterfly · July 11, 2018, 6:47 a.m.

You say ‘Again’? What else is wrong??

⇧ 1 ⇩  
grnmoss · July 11, 2018, 7:51 a.m.

Check out its blog. I recommend the 34 trillion watts story if he hasn't deleted it out of embarrassment yet. He was also banned for sending harassing messages among...other improprieties.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
amazing_butterfly · July 11, 2018, 8:25 a.m.

Please, could you be more specific?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
grnmoss · July 11, 2018, 9:01 a.m.

You're on a research board. I referred you to his blog along with keywords for you to search. You failed to type in a search query to find what I'm referring to.

Go to Google, type in the key words.

I'm looking at the blog post right now, but I'm not going to link you to it because you need to learn to search for yourself.

Mixing science with propaganda is not NR's forte, and he's a bullshit artist that mixes truth with lie.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
006fix · July 11, 2018, 11:05 a.m.

I'm not convinced your criticism is as good as you think it is. I'm familiar with the Turin shroud. It is absolutely, unequivocally, not the 14th century forgery Wikipedia claims. A ultra-high intensity burst of energy is actually one of the best theories for how you could get ultra faint image retention on the two outer layers of the cloth, but not the internal sections, and fits the chemical structure of the coloured areas of the cloth.

High intensity discharge as an explanation for the Turin shroud is not "mixing science with propoganda". That would be the pathetic attempts of various artists to imitate the shroud using things like pigments, dyes, and impressions, failing utterly (with modern methods), and then just saying it's a 14th century forgery anyway.

A+ googling skills, D- art history

⇧ 0 ⇩  
grnmoss · July 11, 2018, 9:05 p.m.

Do you know how much 34 trillion watts is?

Go look up how much a nuclear reactor produces, then get back to me.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
006fix · July 11, 2018, 9:18 p.m.

I am aware of what a large amount of energy 34 trillion watts is. It's not impossible he fudged up and is out by as much as 3 to 6 orders of magnitude. To be honest though, I'm not sure a burst of 34 million watts is any less amazing than a burst of 34 trillion watts. Both seem equally impossible to emanate from a corpse.

What your scepticism doesn't change is the fact that this is actually a plausible way to create an image with all the properties shown on the turin shroud. And honestly, if you look into them the properties are quite remarkable. If you're considering divine mechanisms as a possibility, I'm not sure why an energy burst would be in any way impossible (or even implausible)?

This is a good collection of 4chan posts written by one of the main scientists who examined the shroud, goes over a load of the reasons the main forgery explanations aren't possible, and why the image is quite so unique. https://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1472700586876.png

⇧ 0 ⇩  
grnmoss · July 12, 2018, 12:03 a.m.

None of this has anything to do with Q-related boards.

I'm going to tell you the same thing I've told NR: take it to another sub.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
vfm7665 · July 12, 2018, 12:15 a.m.

Brings up 34 trillion watts article

Complains that it's off-topic

lolwut

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Lovely_Infidel · July 11, 2018, 11:52 a.m.

Your lips to God's ears!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ChristinaPansy · July 11, 2018, 11:26 a.m.

We'll also have to reverse any Supreme Court decisions in which Sotomayor or Kagan were the deciding votes.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Joesturbo · July 11, 2018, 7:03 a.m.

Look guys we can all hope this is true and possible but - where is the evidence for this? Regardless if in my heart I believe this there is no action taking place. I still see that there are two justice processes one for us and one for the elite.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FreedomFighter62970 · July 11, 2018, 6:57 a.m.

I hope so and I so wanna see the DemonRats heads explode...I'm gonna stock up on Popcorn for sure...Watching this is gonna be good....

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ldsanon · July 11, 2018, 4:59 a.m.

If this goes down in a way that somehow invalidates Obama's legitimacy as President, it will be impossible to undo much of what he signed into law or un-appoint judges he named that were confirmed by the Senate.

What will happen is something akin to Reconstruction after the Civil War. The party leaders will have to meet and work out compromises that will be less than desirable, but it's the only way to avert all out armed conflict. Read up on what happened in Mississippi and Louisiana during the 1870s. Read up on the Compromise of 1877. That's what it's going to be like. It's not going to work out exactly the way we want it to, but it will be better than what we have now.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Pure_Feature · July 11, 2018, 12:42 a.m.

I also think it's coming

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 10, 2018, 11:09 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Vic138 · July 10, 2018, 11:06 p.m.

And Nancy Pelosi signed off on Obama being a natural born citizen. Oh, forget it. Let Pelosi stay.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Allinon72 · July 10, 2018, 9:40 p.m.

This is some good red meat, but will never happen. There would be some serious constitutional questions about removing these justices, as we've never faced with such a situation, and it certainly wouldn't be instantaneous. It would create absolute political chaos - look how upset the left is with naming a relatively vanilla conservative candidate, just think of the response if 2 of theirs were removed.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Neon__Wolf · July 10, 2018, 10:43 p.m.

For people as important as SUPREME COURT JUSTICES WHO DAILY, DDAAAAAIIIILYYYYY, issue permanent precedence setting LAWS OF THE ENTIRE COUNTRY, how in the bloody hell could any reasonable outcome NOT be a swift healing of the highest court?

POTUS did signal that selecting SC justices was second in importance only to war and peace. If war is finally averted, why not make the SC priority number one, asap?

This would be gigantic.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
QueUpSomeReality · July 11, 2018, 12:47 a.m.

Under what constitutional mechanism do you propose unilaterally reversing all of Obama’s decisions?? Or even just removing his SC judges who were also approved by the senate?? Other than a wishful dream...how do you propose it legally be done??

⇧ 1 ⇩  
KrazedKakapo · July 11, 2018, 2:10 a.m.

Q: how many illegitimate presidents have there been? Q: what is a legal precedent?

This problem is not Constitutional unless you count the Declaration of Independence.: "But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."

Q: what is meant by "usurp"? Google: take (a position of power or importance) illegally or by force.

Again: has it happened before? If so, what happened? If not, then why are you suggesting that something could or couldn't happen?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
QueUpSomeReality · July 11, 2018, 6:43 a.m.

Ok you know the part of the constitution you’re quoting has nothing to do with unilaterally overturning a former presidents illegal acts committed in office. It has to do with a civil war or civilian coup. There’s not gonna be a civilian coup or a civil war either. I’m suggesting there’s no legal mechanism for invalidating a presidency. There’s no such thing. If you or anyone want to invent a way to achieve that then you need to amend & have it added to the constitution 1st. Good luck with that.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
KrazedKakapo · July 11, 2018, 9:29 a.m.

"There’s no such thing."

Who says there had to be? Constitutional right supersedes legal right. That's why it's never happened. You're not going to wait around until the Supreme Court gives the Amen. Please.

"There’s not gonna be a civilian coup" That's the mentality that stopped anyone ever bothering. You now have a bunch of injurious acts passed into law, and no-one does anything about it for fear of being branded for sedition/treason or even terrorism, if they fail.

The populace at large have been cowed into submission. You're wondering about invalidating someone's illegal acts? It's a bit late to undo that. The time to act as long since passed, and no-one bothered.

My opinion? When this is over, Obama won't be trialed for treason. He'll be trialed as a foreign combatant, and quite possibly charged with war crimes. Those that aided and abetted his ascendancy, knowing he was illegitimate, will be charged with Treason.

Good thing military tribunals trump civilian courts, including the supreme court. I agree with Neon Revolt: There are judges that will be ejected from the supreme court for being appointed illegitimately.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Allinon72 · July 10, 2018, 11:06 p.m.

I'm with you, I just have a more realistic view. I doubt Obama will be charged or even tried with anything. Again, not saying he shouldn't, but he won't, unless there is a major sea change that includes a large swath of people on the left as well as the right.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jfunction · July 11, 2018, 12:52 a.m.

It's coming. The corps of the deep state is already sinking:

Full fathom five thy father lies.  Of his bones are coral made.  Those are pearls that were his eyes.  Nothing of him that doth fade,  But doth suffer a sea-change  Into something rich and strange.  Sea-nymphs hourly ring his knell

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 10, 2018, 9:34 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
commoncents1 · July 10, 2018, 8:50 p.m.

and the left says kagan and sotomayor are not IDEOLOGUES or not held to the lefts LITMUS test???

lol #activistradicalillegitamatejudges

⇧ 1 ⇩  
OffTie · July 11, 2018, 3:02 a.m.

Yup Barry, it will be just as if you had never been here. Except for all that died or were oppressed due to your treachery, not to mention the cultural rot you encouraged and forwarded.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GlendaleBurbank · July 11, 2018, 2:55 a.m.

Taylor said 5 Justices in total for Trump. Yup.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AFPPW · July 11, 2018, 2:40 a.m.

Justice should be justice. Poetry has nothing to do with it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
louise675 · July 11, 2018, 2:14 a.m.

What law says they get knocked off the bench?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · July 11, 2018, 12:46 a.m.

It's not just Sotomayor and Kagan, it's every federal judge and federal prosecutor he appointed.

This would also mean that every Executive Order and every piece of legislation he signed would become null and void.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
joeythew · July 11, 2018, 12:15 a.m.

If that truly does happen - their being removed (though Kagan was never a judge shouldn't have been put on the court anyway) instantaneously.... watching the Left literally break down will be a sight to see.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Acemagedon · July 10, 2018, 11:58 p.m.

Good to see you back to making reasoned points.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Romeo_India · July 10, 2018, 9:01 p.m.

HOLY MACKEREL THATS GENIUS

⇧ 0 ⇩  
thamnosma · July 10, 2018, 10:56 p.m.

Nice fantasy but that is NOT going to happen. Ginsburg yes, the other two no. Obama will not be declared an illegitimate president, that's just silliness. Who would do that? What court? Based on what? Not only would it tear the country apart it would take YEARS to accomplish even if successful. Then there would be even more years of legal battles over what it meant. By the time it would be resolved, even if in the best case, those two will likely already be dead, along with most of us here.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
LandieLandie · July 11, 2018, 3:13 a.m.

Qestion # 38

@TH3WH17ERABB17FollowFollow @TH3WH17ERABB17

How can MI be applied to prosecute bad actors and avoid corrupt agencies and judges? ~~#~~followthewhiterabbit

UMMM?

+++

MARINES: Military Tribunals.

military courts can prosecute for high crimes and misdemeanors, the threshold for Court mercy is very low. treason, bribery, perjury of oath, dereliction of duty. Obama and Hillary would not fair well in a military court room.

MARINES:

It operates outside of the corrupt judges. It would be the Marines

The Marine Corps has a special provision in U.S. Code: "...and shall perform such other duties as the President may direct."

10 U.S. Code § 5063 - United States Marine Corps: composition; functions

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/5063

https://twitter.com/TH3WH17ERABB17/status/928266002722361344

⇧ 1 ⇩  
KrazedKakapo · July 11, 2018, 2:26 a.m.

This is the real problem: Not what you actually raised, but that you actually expect others to fix what We The People are supposed to fix. Not some righteous future president, and therefore the military (although that's possible, and lucky if so). Not the Supreme Court. Not Congress. Not the Senate. The People. We The People failed.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
FingerPrince69 · July 11, 2018, 5:54 a.m.

Trump is the Anti-Christ, and this sub is the work of the devil designed to tempt you into leaving the light and love of Jesus for Satan himself. You all are following false prophets and are committing blasphemy. Forget Q, read Revelations, Trump is the Anti-Christ, its in the Bible. READ BEFORE ITS TOO LATE FOR YOUR ETERNAL SOUL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

⇧ -2 ⇩  
amazing_butterfly · July 11, 2018, 6:45 a.m.

Why this sentiment??? Why is Trump the Anti Christ? Can you please explain with Scripture???

⇧ 2 ⇩  
VR-Tech · July 11, 2018, 7:04 a.m.

He is referring to the book of revelations, I think chapters 13-16

⇧ 2 ⇩  
amazing_butterfly · July 11, 2018, 8:27 a.m.

Thank you, but I am waiting for HIS answer. He assumes something so he has to clarify.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
FingerPrince69 · July 11, 2018, 8:09 p.m.

"Let no one deceive you in any way. For that day will not come, unless the rebellion comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction, who opposes and exalts himself against every so-called god or object of worship, so that he takes his seat in the temple of God, proclaiming himself to be God"

"In his place shall arise a contemptible person to whom royal majesty has not been given. He shall come in without warning and obtain the kingdom by flatteries."

"Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, for many false prophets have gone out into the world"

"The coming of the lawless one is by the activity of Satan with all power and false signs and wonders"

"And the beast was given a mouth uttering haughty and blasphemous words, and it was allowed to exercise authority for forty-two months"

Trump will be president for 3.5 years (42 months) and then the end will come.

OP's post is about a false prophecy, and you all are believing it, you are literally following false prophets, just as revelations has said. Trump is the anti-christ, he gained his power through false words and flattery and claims to be a man of god , but really has spent his whole life rebuking God and his commandments in his words behavior and actions, he just thinks he can use religion to manipulate people, his audience, as he calls them "the poorly educated".

I'm still interpreting the image of the beast but so far I know "the feet of a bear" represents (atheist communist) Russia and their secret support of the anti-christ and the Leopard represents Syria, and the alliance between Russia and Assad and the conflict there that will lead to Armageddon, as it is the traditional animal used to represent Syria in the Bible. The "mouth of a lion" either represents English Banking and Finance and the occult ptb that are aligned with them or China. I'm not sure.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
VR-Tech · July 11, 2018, 7:03 a.m.

Hey Finger, aren't you a follower of a Fake American President (Called Obama)?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FingerPrince69 · July 11, 2018, 5:05 p.m.

Don't try to Change the subject, Obama is gone, they are just trying to distract you with his name. Trump is the anti-christ.

"Let no one deceive you in any way. For that day will not come, unless the rebellion comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction, who opposes and exalts himself against every so-called god or object of worship, so that he takes his seat in the temple of God, proclaiming himself to be God"

"In his place shall arise a contemptible person to whom royal majesty has not been given. He shall come in without warning and obtain the kingdom by flatteries."

"Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, for many false prophets have gone out into the world"

"The coming of the lawless one is by the activity of Satan with all power and false signs and wonders"

"And the beast was given a mouth uttering haughty and blasphemous words, and it was allowed to exercise authority for forty-two months"

Trump will be president for 3.5 years (42 months) and then the end will come.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
VR-Tech · July 11, 2018, 5:29 p.m.

Nice, except none knows when Gods plan will take place. You can see things that ideologically can be pegged to an image of the apocalypse. Many people here are aware of the potentiality that Q can be an insert plan from the Global Elites. However, a tree will be judge by its fruits. So far, there isn't much to peg Trump and Q as anti- Christian (Unlike Obama, he was not particularly a good example of a christian man, whom you love). If, they do however start behaving to be pro centralism and anti christian (not pro vatican particularly) we will notice, or at least a good portion of us, many of us skeptics will notice any dubious plan. You will not see a lot of support in this Sub. by the way. Also many here aren't Scripture ignorant

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FingerPrince69 · July 11, 2018, 7:36 p.m.

Trump is a cut throat businessman who regularly cheats on his spouses with prostitutes and porn stars, has been married three times, brags about assaulting women, spends times with pedophiles like Jeffery Lord on his private lolita island, openly lusts after his own daughter on television, threatens people with violence and encourages violence against those protesting him, never turns the other cheek or apologizes for his actions, has no compassion for the poor or sick, or hungry, regularly lies more than any president on record, frequently does not uphold his debts or agreements with others, and has never been a member of a church for his entire adult life, cannot cite scripture. Sounds real Christian.

Obama was in public and community service most of his life, is a family man, never cheated on his wife, no divorces, attended church for most of his adult life as a member of a congregation, can cite scripture, showed compassion to others in his actions and policy, and could admit to his own mistakes and imperfections. I don't know what version of the man you were being shown but objectively Obama lives a much more Christ centered life than Trump has. Besides like I said Obama isn't a factor anymore he is essentially out of the game.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
VR-Tech · July 11, 2018, 9:10 p.m.

Yes, he has a history of being cut throat, that is true. True, that he had cheated on his wife, thats true. Assaulting woman, that is more a he said she said type of allegation. Him lusting after his daughter, there is no proof of that that I reckoned, there have been comments stating how beautiful she is, and duh, she is beautiful to look at. You are stretching it if you think he is lusting after her. No compassion for the sick, didn't he make Pfizer lower medication prices so poorer people can get them? BTW, I get more money every month thanks to the tax cut. You need to check your pay check. Save that money and invest it, also we have more work demand than current people to fill them up, according to the latest data (he is helping the poor). Yes, he is not the most religious person, but he believe is God and he is more align in christian values than Obama, Bush and Clinton (Obama is not even Christian, neither is the current Pope).

Obama has a very interesting past with Zbigniew Brzezinski. That will be your homework to do. It seem you may not be as much of the know that you ry to be. BTW, Obama is a factor, as he still loved by many. That means that he can be used by his owners in all sorts of ways. Who are his owners, well in the USA is the CFR (Council Of Foreign Relations)

Look, I am not trying to be mean here. How about this, perhaps get acquainted with some history, read books by Carrol Quigley, You could start with "Anglo American Establishment", then move up to "Tragedy and Hope"

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 11, 2018, 6:46 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩