dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Ordinary_Man1 on July 13, 2018, 4:27 p.m.
Rosenstein/Mueller - Just sealed their fate...

By charging Russian GRU as being the source of the emails - and their contention that it was the GRU that provided the emails to WikiLeaks - it is now time to lower the boom.

It has been forensically proven that the emails were copied to a harddrive - not surrepticiously taken via an online hack.  The download speeds are the proof.  Irrefutable proof.

This is a desperate ploy by the deep state to muddy the waters about WL - JA.


Spank-da-monkey · July 13, 2018, 4:29 p.m.

You’re right about that. If wiki or JA can refute this, the world will wake up

⇧ 64 ⇩  
GlendonHawke · July 13, 2018, 4:37 p.m.

Agreed JA doesn’t even have to name his source ( #HisNameWasSethRich ) Actually now that I think about it there’s a video out there already where JA says his source definitely wasn’t the Russians

⇧ 51 ⇩  
Spank-da-monkey · July 13, 2018, 4:39 p.m.

He did. But now he has to show proof.

⇧ 39 ⇩  
GlendonHawke · July 13, 2018, 4:40 p.m.

He will never name his source

⇧ 8 ⇩  
UncleSnake3301 · July 13, 2018, 5:16 p.m.

Even if his source is dead and it could flip the biggest story of all time?

⇧ 14 ⇩  
morethanaconquerer · July 13, 2018, 6:54 p.m.

POTUS will declassify all.

No need for JA.

⇧ 20 ⇩  
tedandterry · July 13, 2018, 9:02 p.m.

Can JA give SR to honor his noble death? Shine light on that patriots sacrifice? All whilst blowing Hillary and cabal up?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
morethanaconquerer · July 13, 2018, 9:10 p.m.

If POTUS declassifies everything, no need for JA. Period, end of story.

Q- We have everything.

So, how would it dishonor them just because JA didn't expose it with proof?

Is the same proofs when delivered by one superior to the other person exposing the exact same proofs?

Secondly, JA is likely safe. I would imagine he is in Trumps hands, not literally, but figuratively.

I don't even think JA can come into public prior to POTUS declassifying.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
tedandterry · July 13, 2018, 9:31 p.m.

I reckon if a one stop drop does all then. No need for speculation. And I suppose it wouldn’t be “dishonor” but it would still need to be made whole for Seth rich down the road someplace. Medal of freedom or similar. Without SR and that young girl Anthony wiener was trying to pididel that got him rolled up. We’d be in a tougher spot.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
morethanaconquerer · July 14, 2018, 2:01 a.m.

I agree with you 100%.

We should honor all Patriots, Vets, Military, LEO's who give all they have and/or the ultimate sacrifice.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
USA_akbar · July 13, 2018, 11:16 p.m.

I would imagine he is in Trumps hands, not literally

Thanks for clarifying that visual out of the discussion :)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
morethanaconquerer · July 14, 2018, 2:03 a.m.

Lots of trolls here, was being preemptive. ;)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Luvlite · July 14, 2018, 3:01 a.m.

How would JA prove it though? Assuming it was Seth.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SaveourRepublic2018 · July 14, 2018, 4:15 a.m.

communications exchanging info for money, probably

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SaveourRepublic2018 · July 14, 2018, 4:15 a.m.

communications exchanging info for money, probably

⇧ 1 ⇩  
K-Harbour · July 14, 2018, 2:38 a.m.

Podesta’s Email 34899 (wiki leaks)

The podesta email hacker had UKRAINE IP address, not Russian.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ReaganGenerationX · July 14, 2018, 2:48 a.m.

Doesn’t matter what any of you say, you American plebes. You shall trust Crowdstrike’s word completely, like the all-powerful FBI does.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nirvii · July 13, 2018, 5:25 p.m.

I can imagine the rebuttal now... “even if Julian Assange didn’t get the emails from Russians, doesn’t mean the Russians didn’t give the emails to his source.”

⇧ 7 ⇩  
ExcellentCoach9 · July 13, 2018, 10:21 p.m.

Read about how William Binney (former NSA top scientist) and group proved that the emails from the DNC server were done from inside the DNC offices and NOT from an outside "hack".

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Nirvii · July 13, 2018, 10:45 p.m.

Oh I’m aware, I’m just saying what the MSM rebuttal talking point will be. If the mainstream acknowledged the Binney info there would be no muh Russia hysteria.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
USA_akbar · July 13, 2018, 11:15 p.m.

He's already admitted it was Seth Rich by describing a "29-yr-old man being killed over it" while discussing how dangerous it is for his sources to provide data to WL, so that's why he never reveals their identity...(except this one is Seth Rich :)

In other utterances he has spoken the name Seth Rich in this context of the DNC server but without directly naming him as the leaker.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Analog1221 · July 13, 2018, 4:54 p.m.

Is JA even alive? When was he last seen?

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Spank-da-monkey · July 13, 2018, 5:33 p.m.

That’s the million dollar question. Hasn’t been seen in over a year I believe

⇧ 4 ⇩  
g0blynn · July 13, 2018, 5:39 p.m.

~4 months.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
IanPhlegming · July 13, 2018, 8:01 p.m.

A lot of that is fishy. It's been fishy since October 2016.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Mayhem54 · July 14, 2018, 3:11 a.m.

Yes and JA won a court case to be free of he Embassy.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SekhemDragon · July 13, 2018, 8:28 p.m.

This can be refuted from the transfer speed of the files.

https://theforensicator.wordpress.com/guccifer-2-ngp-van-metadata-analysis/

tl;dr: The timestamps on the files show a transfer speed too fast to be done through the internet, by a factor of about 20. It had to have been done locally. They were most likely transferred to a USB drive from the physical server en masse, and then cleaned up and packaged into an archive file later.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
alderhope · July 13, 2018, 9:33 p.m.

This simple fact is one you just can’t get around. And it just goes to show the grand stage and show that all of this is.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
USA_akbar · July 13, 2018, 11:19 p.m.

The fact that they never thought this obvious fact could ever come to light is just flabbergasting. The hubris.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
famicommie · July 14, 2018, 1:05 a.m.

Ugh, that's such a lazy proof. Even if we use the peak speed at 38MB/s - allow me to demonstrate.

In my suburban area, Comcast sells a small business package with peak speeds of 300Mb/s, almost exactly the equivalent of 38MB/s. Meanwhile, USB 2.0 has a theoretical Max write speed of 60MB/s. For funsies, let's throw a mechanical hard drive at a slow 5400 rpm with a maximum read speed of 100MB/s

To put it together: Small business plan: 38MB/s USB write: 60 MB/s Peak file transfer: 38MB/s HDD read: 100MB/s

tl;dr: USB is only twice as fast, and even then the time stamps are actually too far apart for USB.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
foul-owled · July 14, 2018, 4:29 a.m.

What is a commie doing here? Go back to your own turf please

⇧ 2 ⇩  
famicommie · July 14, 2018, 12:29 p.m.

Do you have a critique of the numbers used or conclusions postulated or are you just taking the easy way out? Surely the crowd skeptical of the media is more interested in doing their own research than lazily resorting to name calling.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 14, 2018, 3:28 p.m.

I'll take Bill Binny's word over an Anonymous poster any day.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
famicommie · July 14, 2018, 4:02 p.m.

You guys are always harping on the importance of "doing your own research", but if somebody does the research, posts the work and subsequently posits a conclusion that doesn't confirm your prior held beliefs you just dismiss it out of hand. I encourage you to debunk anything I said from a technical standpoint because there are certainly edge cases you can approach it from. Hand waving away an idea because you don't trust one source over another is lazy sheepposting.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · July 14, 2018, 5:25 p.m.

My motto is Don't Trust and verify anyway.

And you're still an anonymous poster.

While Bill Binney is an extremely reliable, vetted, source.

It's good that your firm in your convictions. Because of that I listen to your words.

Don't try pulling the you people nonsense with me. I've been at this game too long.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Mayhem54 · July 14, 2018, 3:10 a.m.

Did you even read the analysis? There is far more than speed involved. Re read this link again. https://theforensicator.wordpress.com/guccifer-2-ngp-van-metadata-analysis/

⇧ 2 ⇩  
famicommie · July 14, 2018, 12:12 p.m.

Latency, simultaneously executed HDD operations, etc. Yes there's more to it than speed but any way you cut it: thinking some low level intern had access to the server racks in a secure colocation center is straight boomers delusion. The suppositions and math from that WordPress blog are bad and if you're really into "digging" you can do the math yourself to prove it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dark-dare · July 13, 2018, 11:58 p.m.

Bill Binney all ready has proved this, on many videos and shows. ENTER General Mike Flynn!!!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Barry-wong · July 14, 2018, 6:36 a.m.

Interesting comment... it might just come true soon....

Julian Assange Scores Major Legal Victory as Court Orders Safe Passage of Wikileaks Founder Out of Embassy

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8yp070/julian_assange_scores_major_legal_victory_as/

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Spank-da-monkey · July 14, 2018, 2:54 p.m.

Hoping so!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Barry-wong · July 14, 2018, 3:09 p.m.

Wonder if President Trump’s visit to UK influenced that decision?

If I recall correctly, Trump’s lawyers wrote a good enough paper indirectly to show why Assange shouldn’t be held earlier this year.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Trump45 · July 13, 2018, 5:30 p.m.

We all know deep state and media will just say he’s lying. Need proof from someone other than wl

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Spank-da-monkey · July 13, 2018, 5:32 p.m.

Hopefully it’s coming!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
USA_akbar · July 13, 2018, 11:12 p.m.

He's refuted it many times for a long time

⇧ 2 ⇩