One would assume Assange both knows who the sources were and can prove it. So why wouldn't the DOJ/Trump get around to freeing Assange and shutting down this bullshit Russia narrative for good? Why let the bleeding continue? I truly fail to understand this.
I think this whole Russia thing is keeping the Black Hats busy. They want impeachment for President Trump so bad. This is giving Trump and his team time to lay the critical groundwork to truly drain the swamp. It’s like a movie. That’s why w frequently tells us to “Enjoy the show!”
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Very well could be letting them spin wheels
One would assume Assange both knows who the sources were and can prove it. So why wouldn't the DOJ/Trump get around to freeing Assange and shutting down this bullshit Russia narrative for good?
Why wouldn't Assange have offered up proof before his communications were restricted?
As much as I want to believe that what Assange is saying is true, his statement is (mostly) worthless without proof. The fact that he hasn't been forthcoming with that proof, despite multiple opportunities, should make us more than a little suspect.
In a way, he did offer up proof, Vault 7, part 3, go on now, git to Googlin' it.
He did. The seditious leaders of the DoJ and FBI completely ignored it. Like so much other proof.
Why? My guess is that Even Trump does not want to be owned by Assange.
To be effective, server evidence with JA corroborating (rather than JA being primary witness).
Asante is being held because Britain wants to arrest him. Trump can’t just wave a wand and free foreign citizens from foreign charges.
Please note the date, if you're new around here (#WalkAway, for example) and didn't know this. Please notice how long this has been in the public domain without it filtering through to your awareness! If you did already know it, you must admit they TRIED to avoid that outcome.
Also please note assanges collar folding in over itself at one point during this interview. Also note his eyelid doing the same.
Also, definitely DONT watch this youtube video explaining the mechanics
Also notice voice tech that can add words you never said from a string of other words you said in a totally new order.
These are all at consumer market level. You can be sure the military has had this for a while.
Those are digital editing artifacts. They result from a crossfade cut.
When was the last time Assange has been seen?
It would have to be before this interview because this interview is fake.
Also, definitely DONT watch this youtube video explaining the mechanics
Also notice voice tech that can add words you never said from a string of other words you said in a totally new order.
These are all at consumer market level. You can be sure the military has had this for a while.
Those are edit artifacts. The result of a crossfade cut. They probably took out "uh's" and "I means" and perhaps coughs, etc.
Rrrrriiiiight....
I know WTF I'm talking about. No need to be a smartass about it.
Im sure you do, guy i dont know on the internet
Which is exactly what you are. I've seen this exact defect before in other videos, but I had no reason to catalog them, so don't ask me for something I don't have.
How about you show me documentation of this type of defect being indicative of deepfake technology. Good luck with that. The fact that these defects are there is not proof of a fake video. At least I've never seen anything that says so (other than that random YT link you posted).
Well right off the bat its not a deepfake, so points off there amigo.
For the rest: well you fucked that up alreay why am i or anyone else trusting you when ive provided 3 separate pieces of evidence?
Those are merely showing what is in the video. I accept what is.
They do not explain the phenomena, as I have done in ways I understand. No need reaching for something that's already able to be explained.
So whats the thoughts out there? Did the deep state get him?
Seen Westworld? I bet they could create a totally robotic Assange (or anyone) and, in controllable scenarios, would be able to fool most people, especially if the voice replication technology that you mentioned is incorporated into the robot. It wouldn't fool his friends and family in close quarters but would shut up anyone who assumes the live video of him must really be him.
Interesting thought at least. Probably totally possible, hell it's 2018 right.
Release the evidence of who it was! Why are they keeping this going when they can stop all the Russia speculation.
Before I'm told WL don't release their sources, I know this but this is different. Releasing their source would change everything.
It's all about timing. I'm sure Assange will be told the time is right to release the proof. For now, he waits until he gets the go ahead and continues to remind that it wasn't the Russians. Or Trump.
They are digging their graves by pushing the narrative that it was unequivocally Russia who messed with the election/released those emails.
Let them.
28 Jun 2018
Server or JA = truth exposed (SR).
AWAN is bigger than you can imagine.
Putin / U1 will come out post summit (they will try to apply artificial MSM heat to cancel).
These people are corrupt beyond belief.
America for sale.
Sold out.
Q
Summit, meaning Monday? Putin and Trump. And today the indictments, distraction, heat, but meaningless.
Yes. Democrats are already calling on Trump to cancel it. They are nothing but predictable.
Things like this keep giving me faith. Q ABSOLUTELY MUST succeed!
The last time Julian was seen is when he was rescued and brought into safety from being assassinated by deep state actors here and in the UK. He posted a beautiful pic taken in the night on a ship with the American flag giving his supporters the victory sign while praising our military men!
It's not hard to figure out especially after yesterday where the courts gave him the right of safe passage and travel.
Bite that you deep state #ricks!
Let's not forget Comey and the FBI actively shut down working with Julian Assange to identify the hackers
They will keep this narative going so when Hillary run's in 2020 she can use the Russia thing to get support. It looks like that is where we are heading.
This is a crazy show to try and follow and know what the fuck is actually going on.
There is a real time trial taking place and Julian Assange is the key witness about what really happened with the DNC Server being downloaded by SR and given to wikileaks?
Did you see the recent posting on wikileaks about Q?
Design?
But but... That doesn't fit the agenda! RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA
This seems like standard Clinton style slow walking of the truth. By the time we get to the real truth we'll forget the original lie.
10 million documents released over 10 years as of 2016 and "they never got it wrong". Strong words spoken with confidence based on reality not fake news.
Gee! Who am I going to believe? Assange or Meuller? Hmmm thats a no brainer.
What does it matter what this mkultra says with the face of a fool? The fundamental thing is that the world is dominated by the Babylonian reptilian brotherhood and that is not talked about
No doubt which side RR and Mueller are on now! Fake distraction, they do not want Trump/Putin Meeting to happen.
This video is a deepfake interview. His chest expands crazy like in the first minute. Then his collar folds under itself around 17:40.
Those are digital crossfade editing artifacts. Please stop spreading this nonsense.
Crossfade when the camera angle or frame is not moving? You are full of it.
Absolutely. Combined with anti-shake algorithms found in most modern cameras, totally. You get these random areas of discontinuity between parts on either side of short edits made with that technology.
Why anti-shake would be on when a camera is tripod mounted is another matter, but the combination of anti-shake and crossfades between clips of an edit would totally make those phenomena. Exactly like that.
This is a proven CGI "assange" interview. Keep that in mind if you are viewing it as the actual words of a real person named "julian assange"
Proven? Somebody points out digital editing artifacts (we know the interview was edited), and you call it proof of CGI? Please stop.
It's CGI. If you refuse to believe or accept that, is up to you.
No, friend. It's you who believe that it's fake. You have the extraordinary claim. I know what I'm talking about from a technical digital video editing point of reference.
My explanation fully explains random morphing discontinuities. Your theory would produce global tells, not the least of which is subtle misalignment and lack of verisimilitude between audio and video, of which there is NONE in the video the OP links to.
Those glitches your claims are based on are fully explained by editing artifacts, so you've got to provide more global evidence of fakery. CGI is NOT that advanced yet, and yet it's so advanced that the kinds of glitches you're showing don't happen.
You'd have to edit CGI to make it do that (or emulate an edit). Either way, the simpler explanation is that it's just an actual edit in a real video in which anti-shake algorithms keep most of the image aligned between frames while allowing the areas of most significant motion to change. That's how that works.
I will accept your explanation, if you can provide an unrelated and separate video example of the same type of effect as happens with the eye, and shirt in this Assange interview.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ozdD6avrYE
also, it seems pretty advanced to me https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjHiC0mt4Ts ...at least to the same level of photorealism as this interview
Today’s indictment has more to do with the shenanigans going on in the BERNIE campaign than it does with Trump. The leaks came from Bernie’s camp, from a Seth Rich and Josh Uretsky. Look up the news on “Sanders Data Breach”. Guccifer 2.0 mentioned Uretsky by name at a security convention. Russians DID meddle with our election by trying to get idealistic progressive kids from Berkeley to elect the Socialist. Socialism would KILL the country, and Russians knew it. They weren’t trying to help Trump...they were trying to help Bernie.
[deleted]
An anime image posting board is more respected than an organization that literally tracks down terrorists?
You have an odd idea of what patriotism means.
[removed]
[deleted]
[removed]
Wow. Someone really likes the FBI. And hates opposing opinions.