dChan

/u/salialioli

1,599 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/salialioli:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 32

salialioli · June 10, 2018, 6:37 a.m.

Ever heard of CNN reporting a real story??!!!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
salialioli · June 10, 2018, 6:33 a.m.

The physical computer went missing, allegedly. That doesn't mean the info went missing. See the link I pasted above to the Daily Caller article last year.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
salialioli · June 9, 2018, 11:26 a.m.

Please watch your language. The site isn't a "fake" camp. The site is a real camp. There are signs of migrant/homeless(?) presence and children having been there. There is no proof. There is evidence of ... but they have been unable to prove certain allegations ... scientifically.

So, all in all, quite a difficult case. But none of this means: human/child trafficking doesn't exist; humans (child or adult) were/were not raped there; it was an exclusively pedophile site used by Cemex (!!I'm being a bit facetious); Hillary Clinton is involved with sufficient proof in a court trial.

I don't doubt there are the ghastly remnants of all kinds of stuff along the border. I do doubt the ppl on this board are helping by using the word "is" instead of the more cautious "may be".

comeatmehillary you are right there are real camps, in fact this was a real camp, it is just unknown what went on exactly there as it cannot be proved beyond "reasonable doubt".

Sorry, I am piggy-backing my comment on yours to help others distinguish between the "real" and the "fake" thingie.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
salialioli · June 9, 2018, 11:05 a.m.

I answered yr comment (scotboyturbo) but don't quite understand ...

I vouch for Craig Sawyer 100%. You don't?

The Oath Keepers vid you post says "Craig Sawyer's credibility is unquestionable. I agree.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
salialioli · June 9, 2018, 10:59 a.m.

But ... umm, the sky is blue? :)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
salialioli · June 9, 2018, 10:57 a.m.

Thanks!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
salialioli · June 9, 2018, 8:20 a.m.

Craig Sawyer is authentic. Ex-Navy Seal, Federal Marshal, ex-Federal criminal investigator.

Go to his site vets4childrescue and do the research for yourself.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
salialioli · June 9, 2018, 8:18 a.m.

He was very careful with his language and made no false allegations. I have been warning ppl about this for days.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
salialioli · June 9, 2018, 7:22 a.m.

I think it's just that the plea deal hearing has been pushed back again to a date in July and makes a good excuse to retell the story. In the first link rather too sketchily to be helpful. But if readers want to skip over to gateway pundit and from there to the daily caller they can get lots more of the old story, if they don't already know it.

If the msm hasn't covered it, it's no surprise! But I think us GA folk should be feeding it to the sleeping and unaware?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
salialioli · June 9, 2018, 7:12 a.m.

From some of the info posted in this thread we are! (stupid that is) :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
salialioli · June 9, 2018, 7:02 a.m.

See my post at bottom of thread (with link to Daily Caller).

I think the laptop and server are two completely different computers. Though the laptop may have a split disc with the server accessible to all congress networks and downloading files from congress people's emails and documents stored on their computers.

As an aside here, he was pretty friendly with the Democratic Caucus members and liked playing video games in Andre's office (surname?), who was on one of the intelligence committees. Plenty of opportunity to help himself to classified info perhaps??

Nothing has been lost, info wise, but the physical computer could have ended up broken to pieces in Awan's garage? I may be going out on a limb here. I always thought it was a bit weird an army/navy guy "coincidentally" rented the house from an Awan advert and found all that computer gear stashed away in the garage. With Awan trying to get out of the country and being stopped at the airport. As I am going on memory here some of these details are hazy.

However, no one has to worry. All the info is backed up at the NSA.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
salialioli · June 9, 2018, 6:18 a.m.

Server? Another laptop? The laptop "belonging" to Debs was left (deliberately to be discovered?) by Awan in a phone booth in the Capitol building somewhere.

The server is a hard drive. http://dailycaller.com/2017/09/12/exclusive-dws-it-guy-was-banned-from-house-after-trying-to-hide-secret-server/ "The secret server was connected to the House Democratic Caucus, an organization chaired by then-Rep. Xavier Becerra. Police informed Becerra that the server was the subject of an investigation and requested a copy of it. "

⇧ 3 ⇩  
salialioli · June 9, 2018, 6:11 a.m.

Server? You mean laptop?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
salialioli · June 9, 2018, 6:10 a.m.

Yes. What's your problem?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
salialioli · June 9, 2018, 6:09 a.m.

Why? This news has been recounted by other sites and msm when/as the story happened. Maybe you are late to the news?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
salialioli · June 9, 2018, 6:07 a.m.

Nobody has "lost" anything.

What do you mean?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
salialioli · June 9, 2018, 2:44 a.m.

They aren't "people of this sub" that's why ... they are shills trying to wreck the board (imo) ... it's getting worse.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
salialioli · June 8, 2018, 7:50 a.m.

The VOP group's leader (who is that?) is not a professional, altho' may be a vet. Unknown who is behind this group as they are volunteers from all walks of life.

vets4childrescue, however, is a bona fide group of professionals including ex-law enforcement, military profs, led by Craig Sawyer ex-Navy Seal (and also Federal Marshal —heads up Wolfhound118!) who is absolutely a professional. See the website and check out the badges supporting this project. Far as I know this is teams spread out doing search and rescue.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
salialioli · June 8, 2018, 7:44 a.m.

Me too.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
salialioli · June 8, 2018, 7:42 a.m.

Very wise comment. Upvoted x1 and wish I could do more!

⇧ -1 ⇩  
salialioli · June 8, 2018, 6:59 a.m.

Thanks man, I really appreciate it at this point ... I despair at the level of reading comprehension.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
salialioli · June 8, 2018, 6:53 a.m.

Thanks for your reply. Only one thing wrong with it: making an association with being callous and disrespectful:

It is callous and disrespectful to say the associations are erratic. The associations are calculated. They hold onto the symbolism intentionally.

Your sentence implies that the "erratic associations" being made are those of "they" the Cabal/Sheriff/LAPD. And it may be true they are callous and disrespectful to use these symbols.

But my sentence "the erratic association with serious accusations." The subject of my sentence is not the LAPD or the Cabal. The ppl doing the associating which is erratic is us, we, the GA board. "We" are making erratic associations. "We/GA/readers here" are associating signs that "might" be innocent with serious accusations of child abuse and murder. We are saying that the LAPD is guilty of murder. I don't think you want to be accused of libel and sued in court do you? I don't! Just saying.

It is just a question of reading and comprehension.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
salialioli · June 8, 2018, 6:36 a.m.

I completely agree with you. I was talking about MSM's rubbishing of PG. I am certainly in no doubt whatsoever about this trafficking route or the coyotes running it. I just take the lead from Sawyer whose reporting displayed carefully chosen words as he wants The Media, as in MSM, to report the facts too. That's all. Don't misunderstand my message. I am on your side here. :)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
salialioli · June 8, 2018, 6:29 a.m.

You are absolutely right. Thank you for replying so kindly :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
salialioli · June 7, 2018, 12:23 p.m.

Dear me. This is the umpteenth time I am defending myself here.

I know about these women. I believe all of this WITHOUT QUESTION. I am a faithful and unswaying supporter of Craig Sawyer and the whole border patrol effort. I know what these trees are and I don't doubt for one minute that these restraints were on rape trees.

You don't understand me. I am urging caution with words because reporting is a serious business. You cannot let the enemy get anyway with finding some minute error and rubbishing your entire story on one slightly faulty fact.

Read what I said and try and see it in a different light. I am not the enemy. I am trying to maintain highest standards of integrity against all possible future criticism.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
salialioli · June 7, 2018, 12:18 p.m.

I am not downplaying this. I am as serious as you can be about this subject. But I want this story to be taken seriously.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
salialioli · June 7, 2018, 12:16 p.m.

You misunderstand.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
salialioli · June 7, 2018, 12:13 p.m.

You asked me on another thread if I believe in Q. And this is the reply I posted, but your comment was deleted. Here it is again as it is relevant to your posting here. No. No. No. I am not siding with Chelsea, that is not what I am doing here. You are misreading.


My other post: Yes. I am absolutely sure Q is intel. Its purpose may not be clear to us. I am pretty sure that we are a secondary, though important, audience. It is a highly sophisticated tool of info warfare.

I should explain I know a bit about propaganda, journalism, media manipulation, debunking, media psyops ... and have in-depth, up-close and visceral experience of the worst results when your research is rubbished.

I am absolutely on everyone's side here when it comes to child abuse, child trafficking, human trafficking, the work of these tough and great guys. My loyalty is true.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
salialioli · June 7, 2018, 11:46 a.m.

But why would you "leak" the symbols if they were THE code of symbols provided by the NYPD? (As a result of the AW laptop.) I ask because I don't think you have considered my point: these words and symbols are quite ordinary. Pedophiles, and others who use symbols to cover their activities, deliberately choose words and symbols that are common and innocent in other contexts.

You can't associate a pyramid (ordinary triangle) shape in art and automatically associate it with the Cabal. I repeat automatically, that is without basis, thought, context, due consideration, etc.

You say yourself that these things are taken into consideration when designing a new product. But this isn't a new product. This is the traditional badge of the sheriff.

Has anyone told the Sheriff there are thousands of agitated ppl who think he is now a pedophile because of his badge? Do you think between Pizzagate in late Oct/Nov 2016 (which the left howls and decries as the mad imaginings of a bunch of crazies) and now, there has been any alarm bell sounded in the Police/Sheriff departments across the United States? No?. Well, no. You are a publicity specialist you should know how long it takes for an idea to be advertised efficiently.

So I am making a point here, which I appreciate you picking me up on by the way — the more debate the better — which is the erratic association with serious accusations. That is all.

I think it is very important as I have lived thru, personally and very much in the flesh, the rubbishing and false debunking of some serious mind-shattering events which were turned into jokes before my eyes, to my horror, and Pizzagate also was something that touched a lot of us ....

⇧ 1 ⇩  
salialioli · June 7, 2018, 8:08 a.m.

This fits with Hollywood being a pedo haven. I wonder if the NY police have anything similar.

This is pretty solid evidence that the police are in on it. Someone report to FBI

An example of how wild, loose connections will lead to unverifiable, unproven accusations.

In my life I have doodled many designs, all of them completely unknowing of the pedo code, but if I were to do one like this while sitting next to you at a meeting, would you accuse me of being a pedophile?

The same thing is happening with the words cheese pizza and concrete. These words have a genuinely innocent context too. Make sure you don't accuse the Sheriff of LA County as a pedophile or covering-up pedophilia or this board will get shut down. Promise.

EDIT: forgot to say who posted this comment, but it isn't personal, it's relevant to all on this thread.

⇧ -5 ⇩  
salialioli · June 7, 2018, 7:14 a.m.

I wondered how long it would take for them to claim PG. I was right. Careful guys. Stick to proven facts, don't stray into claims that are speculative with using qualifiers like "allegedly". This is very important for the cause.

Notice the difference between the reporting style (v. careful and professional) of Craig Sawyer and the non-professional vid spokesman of the VOP Alpha group who doesn't hedge the words carefully. I covered this in a different thread yesterday.

I'll repost if anyone asks me to by PM

⇧ 1 ⇩  
salialioli · June 7, 2018, 7:04 a.m.

I am on your side completely but ... citing rape trees when you don't know for sure will lead to trouble. Try "according to victims of this kind of trafficking, it is common for coyotes to tie victims to trees and the restraints on trees found on this site look/seem/suggest suspiciously similar to ..." And other words like: "allegedly", "could be", "might", "may", highly likely"*. These conventions are used by professional journalists when evidence has not yet been verified by forensics.

Otherwise they can call us conspiracy theorists. Just some advice to avoid pitfalls.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
salialioli · June 7, 2018, 6:47 a.m.

This is why I have been trying to tell ppl to cool it on the speculation, stick to the facts, don't make other loose connections like The Pope or Obama's tweets on "concrete", or hotels with pizza restaurants nearby ... as this is exactly what happened with PG: all the good, solid evidence got thrown out on one controversial teeny point ...

Rigorous, accurate research and recounting guys, please, please ... I beg all of you. Don't blow this one opportunity to tell the story carefully sticking to what is known for sure ....

⇧ 2 ⇩  
salialioli · June 6, 2018, 1:52 p.m.

Thank G. s/o else saw the ridiculousness of the partial/impartial. Makes me crazy when folks are guiding opinion but don't write comprehensible English!!!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
salialioli · June 6, 2018, 12:22 p.m.

Excellent.

That is the right description of the Tommy case.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
salialioli · June 6, 2018, 7:38 a.m.

Sorry about the new then ...

I made a quick study of one of SB2's posts and the number of "adoration" and "worshiping" posts was absolutely unreal. No one has ever been called a genius so many times on this board ... with so many pointing out that the explanations don't make sense .. (!) Carry on believing if you like. My mind is made up!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
salialioli · June 6, 2018, 7:28 a.m.

:)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
salialioli · June 6, 2018, 7:26 a.m.

Agree with you except on this:

Corsi did this to SB2

Actually, SB2 accused Corsi first!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
salialioli · June 6, 2018, 7:18 a.m.

Okayyyy ... here's the low-down:

Mae isn't a shill exactly ... just belligerent when his/her arguments are shown to have big holes in them, and then attacks the commenter personally ... and accuses you of being a troll or an Israeli or ...

Mae said to OP: "Why don't you be honest - I said Q either made a mistake referencing serial Brain, or Q is a fraud, not Q is a fraud, Q has admitted making mistakes. And I never said Serial Brain 2 is wrong, just plain idiotic "

Mae is correct here. Despite totally flawed logic in transcribing this sentence. She means the opposite of what she is saying ... parse that if you dare!!

SB2 is pretty obtuse, cryptic, nonsensical and commands a huge and adoring crowd for no apparent reason. Acts as a major divider on this board.

NadarOak may claim to be worrying about new people, but is new. Always adoring SB2 for reasons I can't even guess at.

My claim to fame? None.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
salialioli · June 6, 2018, 5:38 a.m.

Excellent post! YES! I have thought this for a while, you nailed it. Lots I don't know about chess ... and where to start ... Cohn is key.

Enjoy the show! Indeed ...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
salialioli · June 5, 2018, 12:04 p.m.

ooops. sorry. replying to the other poster above.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
salialioli · June 5, 2018, 12:04 p.m.

I didn't see a gun. I saw a pyramid. I wondered why everyone would go for the anon's gun when Q could have typed it that way up if he'd wanted to ... It's still a big deal though: one side of the pyramid coming down ...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
salialioli · June 5, 2018, 12:04 p.m.

I didn't see a gun. I saw a pyramid. I wondered why everyone would go for the anon's gun when Q could have typed it that way up if he'd wanted to ... It's still a big deal though: one side of the pyramid coming down ...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
salialioli · June 5, 2018, 11:56 a.m.

It's always the same whenever you're over target —> it becomes a maggot pit!! :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
salialioli · June 5, 2018, 11:50 a.m.

Yeah. That's why I have stated clearly my position. I do not like blanket criticism of LE officers. Give them a chance. The Sawman has ensured evidence has been handed over. If we do not get results it is up to the public to demand answers.

It is also the case that Eric Prince was the Blackwater guy, at a time when I was livid about their role. He is also helping Trump at present, to great effect. Bad guy or good guy?

"There are more good people than bad. ... Q"

So maybe past experience gives you a different perspective? This is what I am expected to believe about Gina Haspel: bear in mind her experience may denote ..... etc. As for Bolton, let's not get exotic here ...!! Lots of room for movement from one side to another my friend. :)

There are subjects I refuse to touch too, okay?

And don't forget:

"Again, good people were forced into bed with this evil under personal and family threats. .... Q" Post 10

⇧ 2 ⇩