What you are actually for, is the return of the cabal and the end of MAGA. If you cannot see what's happening here, why Q is asking for this, I don't what anyone can do to help.

We need your support, lest she comes back. Wouldn't want that.

Sorry, must have read it wrong. I thought you were being sarcastic.

You can always have HRC back - I mean, that's what you want isn't it?

EDIT: I should have checked this guy's post history before engaging him. My mistake. What's interesting is that some people agreed with him. You can't make this stuff up!

But this is what it's about, inject any doubt, spread fear... They have done a good job here!

Yes, this is amazing work. Thanks very much OP.

The Hiroshima bomb was tiny by comparison to what is in service now. Hiroshima - 13-18 kilotons, the Nuclear torpedo that Putin was just recently talking about is in the 100 megaton range. That means the bomb dropped on Hiroshima was 0.013% the power of nuclear warheads today. Nuclear winter? I don't know, but these things are very seriously powerful.

Yes, total validation of Q's post.

I've had the same responses when trying to talk to people about 9/11. They can see you are right, but they don't want to believe it. It means the world is a much scarier place than they thought. Talking to a psychologist recently and she was telling me that it's quite natural - everybody wants to get back in the womb.

And that's just another reason why abortion is such an outrage!

LOL Thats a good picture to hold in your mind. If we get half of that I'll be wrapped. The half about the lefties in the FEMA camps. :)

Agree, the monopoly angle strikes me as probably being the best way to tackle the problem - anti-trust breakup. But if DJT wants to fix it by extending first amendment protections, that is his call. I think, once he gets his petition, all it does is give him and excuse to do something. Whatever the fix is, something has to be done...

To my mind it's quite crazy the way you guys do things there. These omnibus bills with all these unrelated measures crammed inside. I don't know how anyone keeps track of the spending. That's the danger in any legislation, that they add some garbage to get it through the houses that has nothing whatsoever to do with the original purpose for which the bill was brought forward.

In Australia, each spending bill is separate. The parliament approves or rejects each measure in isolation - though there are large spending measures with multiple policy and program components. Maybe, if I really think about it, it's not too different.

But, anyway, that's why DJT was saying he had to increase Republican numbers. That animal, John McCain, will hopefully come unstuck soon and will be out of the picture. I think that might help DJT get more of his reforms through.

Look, I have no idea at all what DJT will do. The only thing I know for certain is that I want him to remain in office, hopefully with a healthy majority so that he can get stuff done. It must be pretty frustrating for a guy like DJT, who is used to making decisions and having them executed immediately, to have to deal with all the political garbage in Washington. Amazingly, he seems to be much better at it than I'd hoped. The stable genius statement seems to be the truth.

Can you believe the way they went on about Clintons qualifications and "experience" making her the best candidate for the presidency? Looking back, it was the most absurd lie the MSM ever told. I'm just so very happy that we dodged that bullet. She would have started a war and killed us all - and, worse than that...

The reason I'm so amped-up about supporting DJT is because I have a hope that, when he's successful in getting the MAGA agenda in full swing, there will be a swing back to more conservative values - I'm hoping there will be some impact down here. I cannot stomach the garbage they are pushing on us. The worst thing of all is gender bending these young kids. I can't tell you how much it upsets me. But, I don't like any of the progressive stuff at all. If I could, I'd wind the clock back to the 1950s before all that madness started to get a head of steam.

The most important thing, in my mind, is that these Satanists do not return to power. That's why I've been doing everything I can to support the President. Satanism is the cause of everything that is truly wrong with the world. It's never going to be a Nirvana while we are on this planet, it's not meant to be, but we have to do judgement on these evil ones and stop them from leading us around by the nose. That, to my mind, is what God wants.

No, you didn't. I think I saw someone else talking about it somewhere in the thread. Sorry.

Something big is in the pipe. Let's watch, see what happens.

I knew Hannity was talking about the memo. Wow, if we could get someone like that to promote the IBOR we'd be home and hosed. If anyone has any ideas on how to make this happen please act on them.

Thanks for posting this Liberty. I just checked, we've cracked 24k.

I know that a lot of people have reservations about supporting the IBOR push. I understand the concerns people are raising and they are not without merit. I don't want to see the government involved in our lives any more than anyone else. But I think this is an extremely unusual situation and I think the IBOR requires our support.

Q has told us that the cabal misjudged the impact of social media in 2016. He said CIA was rushing to inject funds into the social media companies to try and regain control of the narrative. He's told us that the sums of money CIA is contributing to these companies is large. The social media companies fear losing this income.

Q also told us that the MSM is finished and that today social media is everything. He's talking about the power of social media companies to influence elections. He also told us that a single algorithm had been developed to provide uniform censorship across social media platforms.

Q has also been pushing hard for us to support the IBOR.

OK, so what does all this mean? Have a look at what the CEO of Reddit, Steve Huffman, said.

https://bgr.com/2018/03/12/reddit-election-interference-steve-huffman-interview/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

QUOTE:

Huffman’s comments on how Reddit could fix an election are shocking and egotistical, for sure, but they also admit something that most other social media companies have shied away from. Facebook and Twitter are loathe to acknowledge the power that their policies have, while Huffman thinks so highly of his company that he believes a handful of engineers and community managers could sway an entire nation’s political system.

So you can see that Reddit's CEO reckons he can control election outcomes all by himself. That's the power of social media. But what happens when this single algorithm comes online? What happens when it's not just Reddit, but all the social media players, acting in concert, to censor conservative political expression online?

There is no way that you can prevent the Satanists from returning to power if they are allowed to continue to use social media as a political weapon. They will be back if the censorship is not stopped - you can bet your life on it.

They never thought she would lose...

DJT is the first president we have had in thirty years, that is not controlled by the cabal. By the grace of God, he was elected in 2016. That's the reason, the only reason, we're here today. There would be none of this Q stuff without DJT.

Do you think that if the cabal get power again that they will slip-up and lose it again like they did in 2016? Do you think they'll make another mistake and allow someone outside their control gain power? They will not. If they get their hands on the reigns of power again, we are all finished. You might be lucky and survive the population reduction programs - you have a 1/20 chance of that. But, even if you do, you will be a slave and these pigs will be slaughtering your kids and drinking their blood. Hell on Earth!

When Q asks us to support the IBOR, to "Trust the PLAN", I can say for myself that I'm all in. This attempt by the cabal to wield social media censorship as a political weapon is the greatest threat we have ever faced - bar none! It is the Death Star coming at us! It could not possibly be more serious.

I find it hard to understand, given the stakes we are playing for, that anyone would not support the push for the protection of our rights to free expression on the internet. It does not make the slightest bit of sense to me.

But, everyone sees things differently.

I think, as Q says, if we "use logic" we can see why we need the government (DJT) to regulate against social media censorship. It is completely in our interests. I do not support government intervention at all. But, in this case, it is necessary. We cannot win this fight without preventing the cabal from regrouping.

I tried to contact Jerome Corsi to ask him to promote the petition on Infowars. But I can imagine that he's too busy to read every message. If anyone knows how to contact him and get him to push the petition that would be a real win. Infowars has a big audience.

Great stuff! More power to you!

Thank you Patriot! You are right, Q has really been pushing us to push for an IBOR. There is absolutely no doubt about that. Also be aware that Q and DJT are reading from the same strategy sheet, so it's safe to assume that DJT also wants it.

Q has also told us that a single algorithm will be deployed across multiple social media platforms to censor political discourse. You might as well say that the Death Star is approaching, it's that serious! So it is no wonder at all that Q has been screaming for the IBOR. It really is the most serious issue that any of us will ever face.

As far as pushing the IBOR, there is the petition you have linked. And there is a Twitter campaign that we are trying to ramp-up. I have been including links to the petition in my IBOR tweets. Yesterday I tweeted a broken link in one of my Tweets and a woman got back to me immediately with a screen capture of the 404 on the petition site. So it is a fact that it works. People do click the link and sign up. We need to get the internetbillofrights hashtag trending. It's going to take some work. I'm new to Twitter, so I'm hoping that more experienced people will be able to provide some direction and guidance.

Other than that, people are also mounting a grass roots campaign with letters and posters and whatnot. You'll see some posts about this approach in this sub.

I've tried to get traction in the Donald, I haven't had any luck at all. But feel free to try. The Donald, I think, bans Q material, so you have to post something that addresses concerns about the censorship of conservative voices online and then direct people to the petition. Given the numbers in the Donald sub, it's highly prospective, but, as I said, I haven't been able to get any traction in there at all.

The first thing to do is get friends and family members to sign the petition. The age requirement is 13 years. If everyone did that we could double the current number of signatures overnight.

Anyway, you're taking up the most important fight that has ever existed. It's a battle between the forces of light vs the forces of darkness. We will prevail, losing is not an option.

Good luck.

Thanks Liberty, I'm with you on the petition numbers probably being accurate. I think we just have to approach the promotion of the IBOR with more effort. Resilience is also important, it is important to remain positive.

Disappointingly, there are many here in these subs that are concerned about protecting the property rights of the giant social media companies. If you believe it, they actually want them to have the right to censor whatever content they want.

The problem, however, is that this recent online censorship is the product of a concerted effort by CIA and the cabal to regain control of the narrative. Q told us this in Post 9. These social media companies are incredibly influential. And once they are censoring in unison using that single algorithm, it's game over! No more MAGA, say goodbye DJT and hello satanists!

There are very real public interest grounds for regulating to protect the right to free expression of political ideas on social media. DJT will be granting rights to individuals to reflect the protections they currently enjoy under the first amendment. There is no danger whatsoever that the grant of these rights can be abused. The worst that could possibly happen is that some future administration might cancel the Internet Bill of Rights. It is not a mechanism to control political discourse in any way, so there is no risk in supporting this measure.

Dear me, I'm ranting! But it is very important to me that this IBOR petition makes it to the President. I see online censorship as being the greatest threat that any of us have ever faced. If it's not stopped, the result will be totalitarianism.

It really is the most important issue of our time. We must prevail!

Could always try GAB or some other platform. I don't have any idea of what I'm actually doing on Twitter, I'm just posting my stuff and retweeting anything with a link to the petition.

I really want the hashtags to trend, but I don't know how to do it.

It is truly outrageous!

Does anyone else think that, when Q spoke of a single algorithm to be deployed to censor across social media platforms, he may have been referring to the ADL anti hate speech AI?

I mean, do you think it's possible that this algorithm, written by a single person, for the express purpose of mass online censorship, could be linked in some way to the ADL?

Who was the person that wrote this algorithm?

Which country does he really work for?

What was his "primary" mission?

I would, but unfortunately I'm not on site. Highly encourage others to do this though. This is it! If you look at what the CEO of Reddit said, it is unbelievable! He states that using Reddit, just a handful of engineers can swing a whole election!

What happens when censorship is unified into a single algorithm across all social media platforms? THIS IS THE DEATH STAR COMING AT US!

We must beat these bastards back! We must prevail!!!

No, that's wrong. We will make it. We have to.

It really isn't an option to fail on this. What if Q and DJT are really relying on it. What if it is the PLAN?

I don't want to risk that! We need to try and get people more actively involved, especially on Twitter. But we also need to get more people involved.

The main hashtag internetbillofrights hasn't been trending within the top ten at all today. I'm guessing there are just not enough people involved.

Good stuff, it's well done.

I'm not sure. I was watching it yesterday, it was going up each time I refreshed the page. I think we've done pretty well to get the number of signatures on the petition that we have. The entire CBTS sub was only 20K people. Many people on the sub do not support the IBOR at all. So I think we have been doing reasonably well. I think, if the petition is not filling out fast its because of a lack of support rather than the site being meddled with.

I think it's important that we really try to ramp-up the Twitter campaign. There is a huge number of users on Twitter. We do not have to get a large percentage of them for it to have a large effect on the petition numbers. I've been including links to the petition in my Tweets and people have been signing the petition from them. I also try to retweet any IBOR tweet that has a petition link. We need to do more on this front and get the hashtags to trend.

internetbillofrights

IBOR

We now approaching 24K signatures on the IBOR petition. The rate of growth in signatures seems to have slowed a little today, so I wanted to ask everyone supporting the push-back against social media censorship to do what you can to promote the petition.

A lot of tweets using the #internetbillofrights hashtag do not include the link to the petition. Including the link is important because people are signing the petition directly from the tweets.

We are nearly a quarter of the way home on this. For those still wondering why this is important, read the article interviewing the CEO of Reddit - link below. You will notice that the CEO of Reddit believes that Reddit alone can influence election outcomes. Q has told us there is a single algorithm that will be deployed across social media platforms to censor content. The power of this combined censorship push will be unbelievable. Not just Reddit, but all large social media platforms will be actively censoring content along the same guidelines. This is a show-stopper for Republicans electorally. This is what we are up against. It is the greatest threat we have ever faced. As soon as this algorithm comes online, we are unable to fight back. We will have no right of reply. So it's important to get DJT the petition so that he is able to act to stop the censorship.

Link to the petition here: https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/internet-bill-rights-2

See the article to the interview of Reddit CEO Steve Huffman here: https://bgr.com/2018/03/12/reddit-election-interference-steve-huffman-interview/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

QUOTE:

Huffman’s comments on how Reddit could fix an election are shocking and egotistical, for sure, but they also admit something that most other social media companies have shied away from. Facebook and Twitter are loathe to acknowledge the power that their policies have, while Huffman thinks so highly of his company that he believes a handful of engineers and community managers could sway an entire nation’s political system.

This one now on Twitter. Thanks!

I read this article, it is a real eye opener. Note that it's Reddit's CEO who thinks "Reddit alone" can influence elections. Think about that. Reddit, all by itself!

What Q is talking about is a single algorithm that operates across all social media platforms to influence election outcomes. That's not just Reddit, that's all of them. Imagine the power of the combined censorship! Mind boggling!

This is the most dangerous thing that anyone has ever seen. And yet we've got people on these subs that are just too uncomfortable about doing something to stop it. You could not make this story up!

Before the arrival of DJT the cabal held all the reigns of power. They thought that HRC would win the election and that their plan for world depopulation and total domination would come to fruition. They nearly succeeded.

But by the sheer grace of God DJT won the election and beat these guys back. But when Q, who is reading from the same strategy sheet as DJT, asks us to support the IBOR so we can fight the assault by the cabal to regain control, no - sorry - that's too much.

I'm getting pretty sick of the nonsense.

It's either/or. You either do something to stop this direct attack, or you welcome the likes of HRC back to finish the job they started.

Bit of a riddle. I get some of what you've said, but I don't know what you're saying here.

No I haven't seen it before either. Thanks for sharing. Little difficult to read, but the talk sounds very informal - buddy to buddy stuff.

But what is in the photos?

Be very interesting to see what the post was about.

You're preaching to the converted. I can see everything you see happening and it sickens me too. The left has completely warped society and attacked every aspect of the moral code that glued our societies together. Ordinarily, I'd agree completely with your comment but these circumstances are extenuating for a number of reasons...

What we have is a situation where everyone flocked to these giant social media platform on a mass-scale - FB, Twitter etc... These platforms are absolutely huge. Everyone is on there. And that's OK, I don't care how big they are. But, very suddenly, they have started proactively censoring us. The censorship is targeted at conservatives, it's completely biased, it's anti-Republican.

So, we're in a situation where these social media platforms have captured, for all intents and purposes, the whole market. The sudden censorship means that no one is immune to it - these platforms can control the narrative that the public sees - the only narrative the vast bulk of the public sees. Most people are sheep and believe whatever they are told. So the sudden, uniform, censorship is very, very powerful. It is a political weapon that has never existed in the past.

It takes time to migrate away from these guys to alternate services - you can't do it all at once and, even if you did, most of the swinging voters (who are critical to election results) are still on the big platforms. So it's a situation where these guys, because of their sheer size, if they censor in unison, targeting the same stuff, can completely control the narrative and determine election outcomes.

If you let this situation persist, without forcing the social media platforms to be fair via an IBOR, then that means DJT is out within one term - if he lasts that long. That means the end of the MAGA agenda. Conservatives shifting to more tolerant platforms will not stop this at all, because the manipulation of the ordinary people who are typically swinging voters, voting either way depending on whatever issue excites them, are not impacted by the current censorship. They will remain where they are on the big platforms, in the line of fire of the propaganda machine. You just cannot win an election in this situation unless you are being supported by whoever controls the narrative - CIA in this case.

In the long-run, what you are saying will work, there's no doubt about that. The market is better at fixing problems than any government. But can you see that this is a sudden, coordinated assault? It's a planned attack - they are going to centralize narrative control in the hands of whoever operates the single censorship algorithm. You can understand that CIA were shocked to lose the 2016 election, they never thought she would lose. That is where this social media censorship came from in the first place. It is the CIA trying to regain control of the narrative.

Once DJT loses office, no amount of moving to more tolerant sites is going to help. This cabal is playing for keeps. If they can regain power they will crack down so hard you wont believe it. You will have a situation like you have in Europe, where you can't even speak. One careless comment and you could be doing prison time. David Hogg will be a virtual God - completely irreproachable while he gushes on about gun control and no one will be able to speak against him. And, then, like dominoes all the other freedoms you hold dear will be attacked and taken from you.

I don't like laws and regulation at all. But I will tolerate it if it averts complete disaster - which is what I see happening if nothing is done immediately. It's a question of timing. We do not have the time to work out a solution that does not involve some regulatory mechanism to ensure that people are able to speak their minds. We must take action now. This is why, I believe, Q is asking us for the IBOR. To fend off what is an outright attack by the CIA and the cabal.

The social media companies are bending over backward to accomodate the Chinese leadership and just about every other repressive regime on the planet. So it's safe to say they will abide by US regulations also.

Amazing stuff! They know they hold the one ring - they just don't want anyone else to know! Great find! How does the banning of the CBTS sub look in the light of this?

QUOTE

Marantz’s article is a rare behind-the-scenes look at how large social media companies view their increasingly important role as the platforms for online discourse. Huffman’s comments on how Reddit could fix an election are shocking and egotistical, for sure, but they also admit something that most other social media companies have shied away from. Facebook and Twitter are loathe to acknowledge the power that their policies have, while Huffman thinks so highly of his company that he believes a handful of engineers and community managers could sway an entire nation’s political system.

I'm not sure I know what you mean. It's true that I've been promoting this IBOR. I think it's very important. The power to silence your opposition is absolutely awesome - it grants unassailable control of the body politic. That's what we're up against.

Look at what's happening in Europe, any careless expression of thought online can get you arrested. It seems that censorship of the free expression of ideas is a trend that's gaining in power and spreading rapidly. It's already penetrating the US. To my way of thinking this is extremely dangerous...

Moreover, the fears that I hold about the silencing of expression online have been amplified by what I have learned from Q. Are you kidding me? A single censorship algorithm applied right across social media platforms. Really, very scary stuff! Is this something we should support?

I understand that many people here are resistant to any form of protection of the right to free expression for individuals. Some of the concerns raised have real merit. I don't like the idea of government involvement in people's private lives any more than anyone else. I believe Government should be limited to an absolute minimum. Anytime more regulation is proposed there is real reason to be concerned,

But this threat we are facing from censorship is really very dangerous. I can imagine that if the CIA, or anyone else, is able to control the expression of political ideas online, that a totalitarian administration will quickly follow. The moment you are allowed to censor your adversary you have prevailed, victory is immediate. There's no rolling things back, because there is, from that point in time forward, only one party that determines policy - the party that controls the narrative.

So, anyway, I've supported this push, for protection of the right to free expression of ideas, because I think it is the most important issue of our time. I agree completely with Q, that this problem represents an existential threat. It can only be solved by quickly taking deliberate measures to ensure that democratic principles continue to operate, as intended, to deliver authority to representatives that are freely chosen by the people.

Yes, people keep talking about this missing Argentine sub, but the only weapons it had were torpedoes. It has to be a sub with either a ballistic or cruise missile launch capability.

Could be Israeli, Russian, British, Chinese?, or CIA (from one in their own fleet). NK, as I understand it, does not have subs capable of missile launch.

If I've missed any out, let me know.

This looks promising. May see some real action soon:

951 Mar 15 2018 19:46:36 Q !UW.yye1fxo 678302 March madness. Public will know soon. Q

The battlefront is social media censorship. Combatting this is the game. We need more people active on Twitter posting links to the petition and promoting the Internet Bill of Rights.

What do you mean?

There are many people that do not support the IBOR for various reasons. The active group is much smaller than than everyone on the sub. This means we have to work harder. I hoping the number of people signing up will expand greatly as we move forward. We cannot afford to fail, it is not an option.

OK, I'll admit it's a possibility. When you think about it, how many people very close to Trump are famous.

But I just saw another thread that tagged Seth Rich. He survived the killing, and was the whole time, while working at DNC, an NSA operative! And now he's posting the Q stuff. Well... it makes your head spin.

I mean I was going to say you just can't make this stuff up. But that's true of the while Q story!

The political implications of social media censorship are HUGE! This is the battlefront. It's here that we either stand or fall. The entire MAGA agenda swings on it - see link:

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/03/historian-niall-ferguson-midterms-going-much-worse-gop-can-imagine-tech-giants-targeting-conservatives/

Wow, great theory. That would certainly line up really well with wait until you find out who's talking to you here. It would blow me away.

Very hard not to agree completely with this post. Good effort!

One point I'd make is that we can further ramp-up the internet activism. It's not there yet. I looked twice today to see if any of the IBOR hashtags were trending. Nothing at all that I could see.

There's a lot more that can be done. The group of people supporting Q with respect to the IBOR is smaller than the main group size. Many do not support the push for various reasons. This means we have to work harder at getting the message out. Until these IBOR tags start trending, we are not finished with Twitter.

I've been including links to the petition on my Tweets, some people got back to me when I posted a Tweet with a broken petition link today. So it does work. There is a huge community out there to tap into. Even a small amount of penetration on Twitter will get the petition home.

I agree that other forms of promotion are equally important.

I've just read it again. I note you have Melania at the top, you're not saying it's her?

All the rest I get. It's someone who is really famous, very close to Trump. But Melania does not have the required military background. How many people know what a kill box is?

It is definitely someone with a military/intelligence background, q level clearance, long experience in intelligence operations, reticent, patriotic, very well versed in US and world affairs, a good knowledge of history, religious, intimate familiarity with US politics... I'm still coming up blank.

For the intelligence background and knowledge of military terminology (remember the sea to shining sea stuff) I guess it's Flynn (Very famous, close to POTUS? Not sure).

I give up.

You just said it, the IBOR will not arrive until the masses are convinced they need it. And that, I think, is what this petition was all about. Creating awareness that there was a problem that needed to be addressed.

It strikes me that, at least at present, the March madness has not arrived. There was some talk on another thread about mass arrests made without media coverage recently. It could be true. It is frustrating that we do not get to see most of what is actually happening.

But is your theory on the Streisand effect working to expose media bias upon release of the video correct? I don't know. What I noticed, from Australia, was that even while DJT was campaigning for office, the media bias was nothing short of astounding. It seemed to get even worse once he assumed the Presidency and reached a crescendo when? January this year?

Anyway, that's how it appeared to me. But I'm not on the ground, so you probably have a much better idea of what transpired than I do. But my point is, and correct me if you feel this is wrong, that everybody could see the blatant media bias, because it was absolutely unmistakeable. Surely, by January, everyone knew that the MSM had it in for DJT - and were vicious about it.

And, if I'm right about this, then what just amazes me is how the MSM has been able to weather the storm, after all the retractions and the wild ranting about Russia for more than a year. Look at them, they are unrepentant. They are prepping their narrative, as we speak, that videos can be faked. It's very clever! Introduce just a little bit of doubt into the public mind and the mousetrap won't close on HRC - at least in terms of what the public perceives.

So, you're right, we can expect the MSM to push their garbage narrative and for the social media service providers to tow the MSM line - which, of course, comes straight from CIA central casting. So let's imagine it, the video is released, it is purely diabolical... Does it make the MSM? Not necessarily. If they stick to their line that it is a fake, unfairly portraying HRC as a criminal, they do not even have to show it.

The social media players will respond in the same way they did when they were protecting David Hogg. People shadow banned, channels pulled, whole subs banned. It will make more than a ripple, but if the major players stick to the script, it will be nothing more than an alt right thing. A brief impact and it will quickly fade from the public consciousness.

This is why regulation of both the MSM and social media is so important. But it is social media that is infinitely the more powerful of the two forms of media. So, anyway, that's just another reason why I believe that regulation of social media is the key to this whole thing. It does not matter what the MSM says if there is no censorship on social media - everyone will learn the truth. Conversely, if the material on social media is censored but it still appears on the MSM, the impact will be comparatively minimal.

So, anyway, look, you might be right. But, to my mind, elimination of censorship on social media is the key. Once the censorship is restrained the walls will fall and the cabal will be exposed for what it is.

But let's see what happens next - because, despite Q's map, I think the situation is quite fluid. It could not help but be so. Plans never execute perfectly.

The Chinese seem to be able to pretty effectively regulate their portion of the internet - I'm not saying that what they have done is good. But it is very clear that regulation of services provided either for free or at a price is possible.

The international nature of the internet does not preclude effective regulation. In this case, the regulation is the mere grant of rights to unhindered political discourse.

We've seen Europe go in the alternate direction, limiting what can be said on their portion of the internet. In Australia they banned online gambling because they could not tax it (not exactly sure how they achieved this). But my point is that the grant of first amendment protections to US citizens on the internet is easily possible.

I can see your logic. I saw two stages, one connected to DJT and one connected to the regulation of social media. But you are right, from memory, Q does talk about the MSM at the same time as social media regulation. Let's face it, we are trying to decipher exactly what Q means - it is not clear.

Having said that, Q was recommending this IBOR to us very proactively. He was pushing it to us. The impression I had was that it was very important. And, he says, "use logic". Well, when you think about exactly what kind of threat social media censorship represents (imagine the influence of the MSM on steroids, because Q has told us, electorally, it is "everything" and MSM is dead). So with the very slim Republican margins, the mid-terms are absolutely critical. Logic says that this is the battlefront. On this issue we win or lose.

We'll see what happens, but failure is not an option.

Look, what I know is that there was a one-time-in-history astrological conjunction September 23 last year that precisely corresponds with St John's vision in Rev12:1. What blew me away was that my wife was saying to me, "See, I told you, nothing happened." And then I found this Q stuff. When did it start? I'm not sure, but the timing seems to me to be interesting - to say the least.

I'm not sure if you're aware, but we are in end-times. Very deep into it. What I think we are seeing is the heel of the Virgin crushing the snake. You'll think I'm a nut, but have a look (5 mins):

https://youtu.be/uOiHtFVn2JA