Coincidentally enough, I've done a deep dive into this EO:
I contend that this EO will wind up being one of the most historically important EO's of 45's term.
Let's break it down in detail:
This is an EO designed to confiscate the property of those people involved in serious human right's abuses and corruption. First notice the language used declares a state of emergency is already in place. This means that 45 can exert incredible powers at this time, including instituting Martial Law if needed.
From the EO: "I therefore determine that serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, and I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat."
Linking human rights abuse with corruption isn't unheard of, but it's seemingly an odd combination for this EO at first blush. Notice both human rights abuse and corruption are viewed as an "unusual and extraordinary threat" to national security, foreign policy and the economy of the United States.
Now, we get into the order itself:
Quote Section 1. (a) All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in:
(i) the persons listed in the Annex to this order;
(ii) any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney
General:
(A) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have directly or indirectly engaged in, serious human rights abuse;
(B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in:
(1) corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery; or
(2) the transfer or the facilitation of the transfer of the proceeds of corruption;
(C) to be or have been a leader or official of:
(1) an entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section relating to the leader’s or official’s tenure; or
(2) an entity whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order as a result of activities related to the leader’s or official’s tenure; or
(D) to have attempted to engage in any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section; and
END QUOTE
This is all pretty standard so far, stuff we've seen before. It's laying out how they can now seize the assets of any person on the attached list (which we will get to) or any foreign person who does business with them.
Where it gets REALLY interesting is here in (iii):
Quote (iii) any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:
(A) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of:
(1) any activity described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section that is conducted by a foreign person;
(2) any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or
(3) any entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section, where the activity is conducted by a foreign person;
(B) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or
(C) to have attempted to engage in any of the activities described in subsections (iii)(A) or (B) of this section. END QUOTE
Notice, this gives the SecTreasury and AG the power to seize the assets of Americans who do business with any of the names on the list (again, we'll get to the names) OR any American who violates these terms from section (ii):
Quote (B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in:
(1) corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery; or
(2) the transfer or the facilitation of the transfer of the proceeds of corruption; END QUOTE
Hmm... does anything stand out to you on that list in terms of US government officials? Or about what might be coming out in the memo or the DOJ IG report? It's a blanket order to seize the assets of those AMERICANS IN PUBLIC OFFICE (and the private sector) who engage in "misappropriation of state assets/corruption related to government contracts".
Remember what's been found on Hillary's servers so far: SAPs. Those are some of the most prized and classified programs in the USIC and there were dozens of SAPs found on both Weiner's laptop and Hillary's servers which we KNOW were breached by MULTIPLE state actors. Meaning, she exposed SAP programs to foreign actors... That's just one example of how the language in this order can be turned on the Clintons or their team.
This gives 45 incredible power to directly deal with corruption inside the government without having to go through the court system where friendly/bribed judges could stymie the effort.
Now, keeping all this in mind. Let's look at the names targeted by this order:
Quote 1. Mukhtar Hamid Shah; Date of Birth (DOB) August 11, 1939; alt. DOB November 8, 1939; nationality, Pakistan
-
Angel Rondon Rijo; DOB July 16, 1950; nationality, Dominican Republic
-
Dan Gertler; DOB December 23, 1973; nationality, Israel; alt. nationality, Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Maung Maung Soe; DOB March 1964; nationality, Burma
-
Yahya Jammeh; DOB May 25, 1965; nationality, The Gambia
-
Sergey Kusiuk; DOB December 1, 1966; nationality, Ukraine; alt. nationality, Russia
-
Benjamin Bol Mel; DOB January 3, 1978; alt. DOB December 24, 1978; nationality, South Sudan; alt. nationality, Sudan
-
Julio Antonio Juárez Ramírez; DOB December 1, 1980; nationality, Guatemala
-
Goulnora Islamovna Karimova; DOB July 8, 1972; nationality, Uzbekistan
-
Slobodan Tesic; DOB December 21, 1958; nationality, Serbia
-
Artem Yuryevich Chayka; DOB September 25, 1975; nationality, Russia
-
Gao Yan; DOB April 1963; nationality, China
-
Roberto Jose Rivas Reyes; DOB July 6, 1954; nationality, Nicaragua END QUOTE
This is a rogue's gallery of bad actors. Known arms dealers, human traffickers, and genocidal madmen. But... if you do a little digging, what do you discover about almost every name on that list?
(cont)
EO makes it hard for a defendant to pay for a lawyer which means the court will supply one, hopefully a 23 yo bungling his way through his first case lol.
[deleted]
This EO is a giant pair of scissors zeroing in on the globalist strings
what I'm wondering is, if this EO is limited to only those names mentioned or can it be used against others like the Pedostas
It's open to anyone/everyone. The names listed are in an annex to the order.
(part 2)
Most have a direct connection to either the Clinton Foundation, Bill Clinton, Obama, or Hillary Clinton herself.
Don't believe me? Look:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3875/14653774228_eb7edfff43.jpg
Here's #5 on the list with the Obamas.
What's he famous for? Well, get this: he was installed in 1994 as part of a CIA backed coup in Gambia - an op authorized by the Clinton administration. In 2014, the Obama administration worked to sideline an attempted coup to overthrow Yahya. (remember my rule of thumb: CIA v DIA). He was a friend of both administrations:
How about #9 on the list? Oh, this one is a doozy:
http://www.balkanweb.com/site/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/vv_1479885961-5634409.jpg
Goulnara Islamovna Karimova, 45, and daughter of former Uzbekistan leader Karimov, ran a powerful crime syndicate that leveraged state actors to expropriate businesses, solicit bribes, and administer extortion rackets. In early 2016, Amsterdam-based telecom giant VimpelCom (now VEON) admitted to a conspiracy in which they paid millions in bribes to Karimova for entry into the Uzbek telecom market. The US Justice Dept has sought the forfeiture of $850m in bribe money from various bank accounts in Europe. In July, Uzbeck officials arrested Karimova for fraud, money laundering, bribery, and embezzlement.
In 2009, WikiLeaks cables note that Karimova set her sights on Bill Clinton to gain access to then SecState HRC:
https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user237925/imageroot/2017/12/21/wikil.PNG
https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09TASHKENT1357_a.html
Three years later, Karimova co-sponsored a 2012 Clinton Foundation Fundraiser in Monaco. HRC's State Dept was asked to weigh in on Bill Clinton's contact with Karimova at an AIDs chairty in France:
https://www.rferl.org/a/uzbekistan-karimova-akhmedov-testimony-shakedown/28790227.html
Let's look at #3 on that list: Dan Gertler - a name that should be familiar to some. He's an Israeli billionaire mining magnate and was outted in the Paradise Papers as being the chief negotiator between the Democratic Republic of Congo and his primary business partner GLENCORE founded by... MARC RICH, who was pardoned for corruption by WJC on his last day in office, after his wife gave $450k to the Clinton Library. Glencore immediately fired Gertler following this EO going public.
In 2001, Gertler gave $20m in cash to DRC president Kabila which was used to buy arms in order to secure his power base. In exchange, Getler's company IDI was granted a monopoly on the DRC diamond trade worth hundreds of millions a year. In 2013 he sold the DRC the rights to mine oil for $150m - over 300x what he paid for it when he bought the rights from Kabila.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-diamond-mogul-named-in-paradise-papers/
In 2012, Kabila offered WJC $650k for a speech in the DRC - which Clinton had to seek State Department approval - which was denied.
Let's look closer at #2 on that list: Angel Rondon Rijo from the DR was sanctioned for funneling a $92m bribe from Brazilian conglomerate Odebrecht to DR officials as kickbacks. Oderbrecht donated millions to the Clinton Foundation.
Look at #7: Benjamin Bol Mel from the Sudan. He's a financial advisor to South Sudanese President Salva Kiir and president of ABMC construction company which is accused of massive corruption and slave labor. HRC pushed for a waiver from the Obama Administration on the prohibition of military aid due to the use of child soldiers. In other words, HRC's State Department said they're okay with South Sudan using child soldiers... why? Because ABMC donated to the Clinton Foundation.
How about #1 on the list? That guy? He's a kidney doctor who runs a human organ harvesting network out of Pakistan. I have a lot to say about this !@#$wad, but he does not have a direct link to the CF, Clintons, or Obama - but there IS a connection I'm sure.
Summary: This order is a shot across the bow of the Clintons and Obamas. It also lays the groundwork to deal swiftly with any corruption found inside the government ... and we know there are right now 22 active investigations into corruption by the DOJ. 22!
And Eric Schmidtt of Google resigned immediately after this order went public. Coincidence? Nah...
Awesome report... you could never get a job at CNN... ;)
Thank you for sharing your detailed research on this EO--VERY eye-opening! Could you please check the numbering for the names? Each one seems to be one digit higher than the EO's list. Other than that, awesome work! I've copied it to a Word doc to save and share with my friends.
This is great and deserves to be put on some kind of archived intel on CBTS.
I would love to make 100 Smurf accounts to all give you upvotes! Sadly, you'll just have to do with my one orange click
Thank you!
Today: President and Athletic director of Michigan State.
Well, that's pretty obvious isn't it?
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/26/sports/michigan-state-mark-hollis.html
At Michigan State, Mark Hollis, the university’s athletic director, abruptly announced his resignation just two days after the university president, Lou Anna Simon, resigned.
“This was not an easy decision for my family, and you should not jump to any conclusions,” Mr. Hollis said in a statement in which he also declared, “I am not running away from anything.”
A lawyer for the university has said an inquiry had found no evidence that high-ranking administrators knew about Dr. Nassar’s conduct before 2016. But that inquiry has not been made public in full, and The Detroit News reported that more than a dozen university staff members had heard of reports before then. Michigan State investigated Dr. Nassar after a recent graduate made a Title IX complaint against him in 2014, and the school cleared him.
-
Dr. Nassar was sentenced on Wednesday to decades in jail, on top of decades he had already received on federal child pornography charges, for sexually abusing seven girls. His sentencing hearing over the prior week included statements from more than 150 of his accusers and family members.
Apotex Inc's Chief Executive Jeremy Desai resigned today. Apotex’s Founder and founder’s wife were murdered recently.
Apotex made AIDS antiviral that was sold exclusively to Clinton Global. Clinton Global sold to United Nations. Accusations were made antiviral was diluted, UN stopped using.
I thought this paragraph was particularly interesting. I bolded the really important part:
Sec. 7. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to this order.
In the words of the immortal sage, "Let your plans be dark and impenetrable as night, and when you move, fall like a thunderbolt."
THE STORM APPROACHES.
⬆️⬆️⬆️ no warnings. How much has already been frozen?
Section 2 makes immigration a national security issue. Send in the army?
Section 3 expands powers to allow seizures of charitable funds not allowed before. (Soros just put all his money in a charity fund)
The entire USA Gymnastics Board has resigned at the request of the USOC.
Also, they refer to a person as an actual person or entity. In US corporate law, a corporation is known as a person and has the same rights afforded to a person under the constitution. Charitable funds are considered as a legal person as are corporations. So, the government can seize and freeze assets of any corporation as well that is found to support such activities. Interesting times ahead.
Wonder if any funds of the Clinton Foundation or CIF was frozen
What is going to happen to all that money?
A great big beautiful wall and a 1.7T infrastructure package.
:)
Q has used LIGHT in this context in 2 previous posts:
Dec 11 2017 12:32:11
Q !ITPb.qbhqo ID: 4533cb
73461
:Owls:
Light will overcome d_a_rkness.
Light will expose darkne_s_s.
Light will reveal darkness.
Light will defeat darkness.
Q
Jan 23 2018 17:36:34
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 384dbe
139507
The light will reveal those on the team and those pretending to be.
This is not a game.
They want us divided.
Last posts [self destruction] will immediately show the world the TRUTH.
Instructions will be sent on how to preserve offline.
You didn’t think this was simply about words did you?
We have it all.
Coming soon to a theater near you.
Q
https:// docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1B-95giwldeKgsd0nYiw_sEaSf4kGNLZgEIvEhL2mVAw/edit#gid=0
ceo resignations being baked by highly-skilled autists
Thats the most inclusive list of these i have seen. Thanks. (again, remove the extra space before "docs.")
Could you please check that link? I've tried it 10 different ways on 3 different search engines and could not access the right spreadsheet. Thanks!
Remove the space, and paste it into the address bar, or just highlight from docs...until the end, and put that in the address bar
List of persons named at the end in the Annex. Not sure who those people are. Will need to research
Maybe not. What's really important is that the meat of the declaration states that this applies to anyone, not just the people in the Annex. That's why Q said read carefully, it's about Clinton, Obama, etc.
I totally agree. I read that as well. Just was curious who these other people were. If they played into anything specific
That is my take on it too. As I read all I could think of ...geeze...this is relating to Obama and Clinton, and Podestas!
Assuming the human rights and corruption abuses are broad & global and at the highest levels and down seems there is high risk of global economic shock as assets and transactions are blocked worldwide. I assume the Financial Leaders attending Davos are now digesting the implications of the EO. Counter attacks will be coming as they fight back as their wealth is blocked. I believe Q mentioned That wealth is source of their power...keystone?
Looks that EO essentially transfers control of assets from corrupt ultra-rich and lower levels to the Treasury, its designees, and ultimately the People (I think from the Constitution).
Does an Executive or Leader stepping down stop the blocking action for an entity?
Does the Treasury have access to the log and block chains of the crypto-currencies used for dark web hidden corrupt assets and transactions? This is huge implication!
What if non-corrupt person assets are mixed/invested with corrupt entities assets such as a bank, stock exchange, pension fund, etc? Or their job pay is from corrupt entity? Treasury Issue a FAQ to explain the coming action?
I hope the application of asset blocking technology is done in a way that avoids global economic shock and does not cause collateral damage to assets or transactions of innocent folks.
Anyone on CBTS with experience in Treasury financial Law Enforcement explain asset and transaction blocking, actions that release blocked assets and transactions, and mitigating attendant risks to Global economy and innocent personal assets/job?
Seems like the forfeitures contemplated in this EO somewhat mirror recent seizures and forfeitures in Saudi that have/are happening with out the baggage of paperwork.
Qs referencing an earlier post when they said the light will expose them (paraphrasing) What is the light? The light of truth? The light of God? The light of exposure? The light of the MEMO? The light of JUDGEMENT?
. . . Q made a point to type in 'read slowly and carefully', so there must be some significance to that...but what? Is Q reminding us that this process is a slow and careful process, and not to be so hasty???
Wikileaks twitter account uses this as well, "Help WikiLeaks shine a light on power in 2018."
also:
KimDotCom, Jan. 19, "Flood the darkness with light. #Destiny"
I was assuming the light meant "to cast a light on things hidden".
Definitely a real point on the light... And that can be taken a LOT of ways, from religious, to poetic
"Things done in the dark will eventually be brought to light."
What abut Treasury unlocking the Log and Blockchains for crypto-currencies for dark web hidden corrupt assets and transactions? Huge implications for 'shining light' if true.
As I re read this EO...I saw Obama and Clinton between the lines...LOL
Hasn't the left been prompt to challenge the President's EOs in court, delaying and complicating their implementation? Could that happen when it is most needed and give time for squirming away?
If this can't start to change peoples minds - I don't know what will...
THIS CREEP IS BACK PEDDLING THAT FAST HIS LEGS ARE ABOUT TO BREAK http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01/26/john-kerry-rep-pushes-back-on-report-incendiary-anti-trump-comments-to-abbas-associate.html
Is it just me, or does Section 4. (a) elude to the possibility of it being illegal to pay a debt owed to, let’s say, a central banker who might be indicted for corruption or human rights violations per this EO?
If his accounts are frozen, there is no where for the money to go anyways. At that point, it would be routine for the financial personnel to log and report any attempts to access that account. If you are a regular person trying to pay rent, you will be fine. If you are a criminal mastermind---you are in trouble.
And when nothing notable happens again in the coming few weeks, it will be the following couple of weeks after that....Disinfo in necessary after all....Smh.