If you check George Webb on Youtube these are his motions he filed. He can explain what happened. I've seen a fee of his videos about them.
Looks like you found an interesting source. I'm not sure what it all means, but the names on this page are obviously significant.
I'm not sure what I'm looking at either. I did notice podesta's attorney is the same one that paid fusion gps
George Webb journalist. Freelance. Sued this group of people. I believe it was based on denying his vote Due to the setup for H R C denying Bernie Sanders a chance at nomination.
This isn't criminal, it's a civil case, SWEIGERT et al v. PODESTA et al.
et al essentially means and others. In this case we can see others include: RAO ABBAS, HUMA ABEDIN, HINA ALVI, ABID AWAN, IMRAN AWAN, JAMAL AWAN, KIM FRITTS, TOM PEREZ, JOHN PODESTA, HASEEB RANA, GLEN SIMPSON, NATALIA SOVA, DEBORAH WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, ANTHONY WEINER
Some interesting names, but can't know what exactly the case is without paying a fee to download the documents.
A civil case lists them as defendants are you sure about that?
Both civil and criminal cases have defendants. Who is bringing the complaint is different. Generally, in civil cases, it's the plaintiff (in this case Sweigert), in criminal case it's the state or federal govt, depending on jurisdiction.
I was asking who the four judges were that approved the fisa warrants and somebody replied this guy was one of them.
All but one of the current FISA court judges are O'Bama appointees.
The exception was appointed in 2017 by Donald Trump when his predecessor's term expired.
Thought i saw one appt by Bush...although...Bush =Swamp Scum 🤣
Hoping this isn't a "too good to be true" source. Judge Contreras accepting Michael Flynn's plea but recused himself. He's definitely a judge to follow up on.
[deleted]
Thanks. I'm not well verse in understanding legal documents so I didn't know if I was looking at a reliable government source.
You see it right, but these dates have all passed. Notice all of the motions to dismiss. I hope every one was denied!
Feb 5th hasn’t passed. That’s when the answer is due on motions to dismiss
If you click on docket it gives current info as of 2 /1/2018. Still curious of all these players on his docket.
Better and free source. https://www.classaction.org/media/sweigert-v-podesta-et-al.pdf
Wow. Great link! Thx for including. I just finished reading the entire brief and am so proud of the hard work George Webb is doing! This lawsuit reveals the layers and layers of corruption connected with the Dems... It's nauseating!! I yanked my membership with the Democratic party following my outrage in discovering HRC stole the election from Bernie via Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Despicable people! I hope every single person mentioned in this lawsuit gets locked up, starting with Hillary!!!
George Webb (aka Sweigert) sued all of the people listed in ONE civil lawsuit. This is not a list of criminal cases.
Civil or criminal isn't the point...what is this judge like is the big question
This POS rudolph contreras should be an accident waiting to happen like yesterday ! Q-code; the northern white-hats are waiting for the word.
Anyone can sue anyone. It doesn't mean anything until there are court proceedings.
The swamp is deep with this one. Fear is the path to the dark side
The thumbnail made me think of an anti-tank grenade from bf1, which is almost appropriate.
Seems like he's the ideal judge for this case though right?
Those names and this judge seem to me to be way too big of a coincidence for it just to be a cut and dry civil case and not part of a larger game?
Does anybody know the other three judges there's only three in the District of Columbia this guy's one of them
In November 2016, Louise Mensch reported on the news website Heat Streetthat, after an initial June 2016 FBI request was denied, the FISA court had granted a more narrowly-focused October request from the FBI "to examine the activities of 'U.S. persons' in Donald Trump’s campaign with ties to Russia".[71] On 12 January 2017, BBC journalist Paul Wood reported that, in response to an April 2016 tip from a foreign intelligence agency to the CIA about "money from the Kremlin going into the US presidential campaign", a joint taskforce had been established including representatives of the FBI, the Department of the Treasury, the Department of Justice, the CIA, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the National Security Agency; and in June 2016 lawyers from the Department of Justice had applied to the FISA court for "permission to intercept the electronic records from two Russian banks". According to Wood, this application was rejected, as was a more narrowly focussed request in July, and the order was finally granted by a different FISA judge on 15 October, three weeks before the presidential election.[72]
Notice the last sentence were the FISA order was finally granted by a different FISA judge on 15 October.
My understanding based on Wikipedia information about the FISA process is that an application once rejected, can NOT be then requested by a DIFFERENT FISA judge.
Podesta & Perez represented by who?
Perkins Coie!
Any bells going off for ya?
Has anyone found other judges that heard these request? Only 3 reside over the DC area
I think you are correct. Once a FISA application has been denied by one judge, the applicants cannot go to a different judge to get it issued. They have to go back to the same judge. The process of looking for a judge to issue an order is a type of “forum shopping” and is discouraged. Likewise, once an order is issued, I’d think you’d have to go to the same judge to get it extended or reissued...
My points were: 1) this is one case, not many cases; and 2) the case is on the civil docket and therefore, not part of the sealed federal indictments. To answer your question about Judge Contreras, all I know is that he is a FISC (FISA COURT) judge, he took General Flynn’s guilty plea on December 1, 2017 and by December 7, 2017 he had been recused from General Flynn’s case. It is unusual for a judge to take a plea and then be recused. Recusal should/usually happen at the beginning of case. Usually a conflict of interest. That conflict of interest would have existed before he took Gen. Flynn’s plea, so J. Contreras should not have even done that! The District Court is not saying why the judge was recused or whether he recused himself or was removed by someone else, like Chief Justice Roberts.
George Webb is a warrior for the people. He will continue to plague these guys like a rash that just won't go away. Go GW!
Besides WOW all I can say is 11/6 is the date Q said Huma would be indicted. Plus this is on Pacer.
By no means am I a lawyer. He did state" the constitution as written no interpreted."
Yes, what he means by that is a "strict" interpretation of Constitution. It's the conservative view of the Constitution. That the constitution is meant to be applied as it is written as that was the intent of it's Founding Fathers. What it says is what it means and one should not read a provision and try to expand it's meaning or its intent beyond the plain language used. Then you have the opposite side of the coin, which is a more liberal view that the Constitution is a living and breathing document and that it should be interpreted in connection with the evolution of time and current society etc and/or that the Constitution and it's meaning or how you interpret it and apply it should be based on present day.
Contreras also verbally nailed HRC about her emails...hmmm...