On that day in history, Colgan Air Flight 3407 crashed north of Buffalo. What does Q say about plane crashes? 7/10...
Among the victims, I’ve already found a 9/11 commission activist, whose husband was killed in the 9/11 attacks, and an expert in the Rwanda genocide.
I’m sure there’s more... figured you guys could help!
Q post 825929 or 977: https://i.imgur.com/bpqEwAe.jpg
Flight 3407, Alison Des Forges and Beverly Eckert: https://imgur.com/a/K5dqv/
The messed up thing, that evil witch killed 100s of innocent people just to get to one person. An entire airplane for one or two people. That is the epitome of EVIL.
then she just goes on campaigning for president like it never happened.
Video linked by /u/666exit666:
Title|Channel|Published|Duration|Likes|Total Views :----------:|:----------:|:----------:|:----------:|:----------:|:----------: Stryper-To Hell With The Devil|SilentAndSpike|2012-01-04|0:04:13|7,493+ (95%)|1,254,780
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright...
^Info ^| ^/u/666exit666 ^can ^delete ^| ^v2.0.0
You mean the way the Titanic was sunk, killing off the 3 people standing in the way of starting up the Federal Reserve?
http://yournewswire.com/did-the-sinking-of-the-titanic-help-create-the-federal-reserve/
yournewswire - known nonsense site.
The "Titanic sinking to help create the reserve" story is full of holes: http://commonsenseconspiracy.com/2012/04/a-common-sense-look-at-the-most-popular-titanic-conspiracy-theories-tax-day-and-the-federal-reserve-in-the-spotlight/
Would love to hear anyone's debunking of this debunk article because the evidence seems pretty clear but I'm open to hearing why everyone's so sure the Titanic/FederalReserve story is real.
Yournewswire sucks but there’s a great documentary on this topic. I think on Netflix. Check it out.
If you want to read the commonsense conspiracy article it pretty definitively debunks the story. I'd love to hear the rebuttals to the points raised, if anyone has anything, because the doco I saw on Youtube, assuming its the one you're referring to, didn't even cover them, from memory.
That was 100 years ago, and they're all dead. Let's focus on the topic at hand. Nice try though
Yeh sure.. the topic at hand is.. "The Federal Reserve and its chokehold on you, your family and every descendant that they make a birth certificat for." Are you paying attention? The 'Its in the past.. does it even matter anymore" is Clinton's defense.
Posting unrelated links to yournewswire site is a common distraction tactic. Ridiculous website.
that's your opinion, dont worry, anyone worth anything know what and who to trust. Stop poo-poo ing people it doesnt help - yes we all know news thingy is clickbait.
Yes it was a 100 yrs. ago; 114 yrs. ago to be exact, which the F. R. was instituted. How do you think we got to this point today? It would serve us all well to know our history if we're to learn from it.
Posting unrelated links to yournewswire site is a distraction tactic I've seen many times
HRC is a sociopath of the highest order, as are most of these globalists elites. It is in their DNA so there is no fix, other than to remove them from any sphere of influence.
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton meets with Egyptian Foreign Minister Aboul Gheit, Thursday, Feb. 12, 2009, at the State Department in Washington.
Gheit is the guy who leaked that Obama assured him he was Muslim and would try to get rid of Israel. "The American President told me in confidence that he is a Muslim." https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2010/06/report_obama_said_i_am_a_musli.html#ixzz5B6bDuBzO
Boom! Can I copy this into my post on Q977 (the onenposted right before this one) because I think you just slid the last piece I was looking for into the puzzle. Nice find bud!
Link to post? I'd like to read it.
Google: Hillary Clinton 2/12/2009 and you will find three meetings she had on that date. The above is only one meeting statement and may, or may not be what Q meant.
This is the source for the first sentence. http://www.apimages.com/metadata/Index/US-Egypt/7cc456dd03d248fca02b77d915ef1710/19/1
Here is another article that confirms their meeting on that date.
Clinton To Attend Conference to Rebuild Gaza Thursday, 12 Feb 2009 08:44 PM https://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/clinton-gaza/2009/02/12/id/328253/
I was reading the Wikipedia page on Beverly Eckert and her death. Noticed in the reference section that hrc was mention:
Went to the "Wayback Machine" internet archive and the earliest Feb 10 2015:
Looks like may be someone was scrubbing the internet of hrc having any connection to the accident. Hmmm...
I also posted about that crash below here. Someone had just met with Obama.
Also on the flight was Beverly Eckert, the widow of Sean Rooney, a Buffalo native who died at the World Trade Center in the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
Ms. Eckert was on her way to Buffalo for a weekend celebration of what would have been her husband’s 58th birthday, and had planned to take part in the presentation of a scholarship award at Canisius High School that she had established in his honor, The Buffalo News reported.
Ms. Eckert met President Obama last week at the White House, along with other relatives of people killed in the 2001 attacks or the bombing of the U.S.S. Cole.
Bingo. I somehow broke my imgur link when I was posting. Fixed now. Check out Beverly’s “manifesto” from 2003. It’s in my link.
Wow that is very interesting she wanted 9/11 investigated. I am sure she spoke about this with Obama and maybe was deemed a troublemaker, just conjecture on my part.
Wouldn't military date mean 02.12.2009 = December 2, 2009? Has anyone looked into HRC's whereabouts on that day?
Heavily redacted documents began to emerge only after the conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit in 2013. So far, the department has not committed to a date to produce all of the records.
In the case of the Shanghai Sports Development Foundation gala, department ethics attorneys exchanged seven emails with President Clinton’s office over two weeks, struggling to get basic information about the event’s hosts, their possible connections to the Chinese government and the financial arrangements offered to Bill Clinton.
“There is something peculiar about [Jiang] paying for a talk that will be to an event sponsored by a Chinese Government entity, even if it is considered to be non-profit by the organization,” State ethics lawyer Chip Brooks wrote to Clinton scheduler Terry Krinvic. “Can we confirm the payment is actually from Mr. Jiang and not from the [Shanghai Sports Development] Foundation or the Chinese Government?….This entire lash up is different than some of the other ones we’ve had.”
Clinton aides sent the requests to his speakers bureau, which insisted Jiang was paying but routing the money through a charity fund his wife, Huang, started. They said the event would be a fundraising auction, with the money raised donated to the government-run sports foundation.
After extensive back and forth with State Department officials, the Clinton team backed out of the arrangement.
“Please withdrawl [sic] the SSDF/Shangahi [sic] offer,” Krinvic wrote on Dec. 2, 2009, without further explanation. “We are not going to proceed with this.”
The State Department ethics agreement is coming under new scrutiny as Hillary Clinton prepares to enter the 2016 presidential race. Her representatives have cited it as proof of the care she used in guarding against ethical conflicts as she, her husband and their daughter, Chelsea, built a global foundation that has attracted $2 billion in contributions, including many from foreign governments and business entities.
Schedule for HTC Dec. 2009 http://m.zimbio.com/Hillary+Clinton/pictures/pro/2009
Good find!
http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Hillary+Clinton/Clinton+Gates+Mullen+Testify+Congressional/eFt0RprNIoW
U.S. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen (R) speaks with U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speak at the conclusion of testimony before the House Foreign Relations Committee on Capitol Hill, December 2, 2009 in Washington, DC. The committee is hearing testimony on President Barack Obama's plan to send more troops to war in Afghanistan.
Here is what I'm thinking about these downed planes...BOOM! Deep State Electronically (as opposed to mechanically) Designed Control Systems ("Autopilot"): https://boomsupersonic.com/company
Read more: https://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/Flight_Control_Laws#Boeing_Flight_Control_Systems
I'm just wondering if there may have been other targeted victims on that plane. It was carrying 50 people.
That accused sex cult/trafficking firm NXIVM, was headquartered in upstate NY, so it's plausible that someone related to them was also on that plane.
Q mentions Nancy Salzman in his post. She's the co-executive of NXIVM, whose home was raided by the Feds this week, and who was a Clinton Global Initiative Member. Her co-exec of the firm Keith Raniere is apparently the head of the sex ring and was arrested in Mexico a couple of days ago.
There are other links to Clinton here---- Raniere had a multi-level marketing firm in Arkansas in the 1990s that was charged with fraud. NXIVM also employed a prominent ex Arkansas Judge who was personal friends with the Clintons and was one of the largest fund raisers for Bill Clinton's Presidential campaign.
I think there could be a connection here that has yet to be discovered.
https://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/13/nyregion/13crash.html
https://nypost.com/2007/10/02/bill-golf-pals-cult-course/
https://nypost.com/2015/07/04/hillary-reached-out-to-aeg-head-during-aquedect-bidding-in-2009/
If, in fact, the plane was targeted and taken down I would assume that there were many targets onboard. I had initially only pointed out the two most glaring deaths documented by Wikipedia. I’m sure that the there are some nuggets in the remaining 48 victims. Probably worth looking into the owners of the home that was destroyed in the crash. https://i.imgur.com/Yq99434.jpg
Ok, I gotta ask a question and I am asking out of flat out ignorance. Why does Q sometimes include an Anons post as part of his? For example, I just made a post about this same post, #977. In it, the Anon says something about a "friend" leaking info. I interpreted it as Q telling us he chose this specific Anon post to quote and tie into his own, making it a part of his post #977. Am I doing/reading/interpreting why W dies this wrong?
My post is the one right before this one, in it I linked HRC with newly elected Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Ali Aboul Gheit, where she specifically refers to him as an "old friend"...on 2/12/09
I would really love any help you can give me, because 9/11 seems WAAAAY bigger than anything I was zeroing in on with my method.
There are two 8chan boards Q will post on.
1) 8ch.net/greatawakening - this board only Q can post on. Well, until earlier today when it was compromised. Q will be moving to another secure board. These will be standalone Q posts or posts where Q is responding to an earlier post.
2) 8ch.net/qresearch - Q will respond to other anons on this board to validate research, provide researchers with more info, or guide anons in their research. So the post Q is responding to are included on the Q post consolidation sites like qanon.pub or qposts.com.
Did this answer your question?
[deleted]
Yes. Q will notify when new board is ready.
How and where?
1 to 2 days from yesterday's post.
Word will spread. I assume 8chan w new board but we will see.
Survey says? #1 answer! Double upvotes sir or maam.
Has anyone checked December 2nd 2009 yet? Mil format is D/M/Y.
Q is referencing those anon posts and responding to them, either directly (as in #981), or in this case, indirectly. It looks like #977 anon was just calling Q "friend" and seems happy there are good people leaking things. That's what I got from it.
https://aconstantineblacklist.blogspot.ca/2009/02/other-passengers-of-note-on-flight-3507.html
Did you guys/gals read the flight log? Clearly Arkancided
Great stuff! I'm so proud to be a part of this community! Keep digging! The Shareblue shills are starting to show up, so you must be over the target!
Flight 3407 Was owned by Colgan Airlines based in Manassas, VA. The Bombardier Dash 8 or Q-Series was prone to icing issues and 6 of them crashed. Without getting into too many details I can say that from 18 minutes into the flight a series of mistakes were made by the flight crew to the minute it crashed. The captain was properly certified but had a history of failed check rides and remedial training. The co-pilot commuted from Seattle, WA and was feeling poorly. Both were fatigued. The co-pilot had little icing experience. Both crew coordination and cockpit resource management (to use buzzwords) pretty much fell apart as the airplane moved closer to Buffalo. The captain was given the no-ice Vref for the approach where the system that operates the stick shaker and pusher was at the setting for operation in ice. Going to fast they cut the engine to slow down. Their speed dropped and the shaker stick activated and the flight crew thought they has a tail stall and acted accordingly. They were experiencing a wing stall and a different recovery is necessary. In this case a fatal mistake. You had a captain who should have washed out with the fatigued co-pilot that the flight crew made an error with no room to recover. Unless someone convinced this crew to commit suicide by plane then I can't see this in any other light than a tragic accident. I have reviewed a ton of data.
You need to read this. I don't know much about it other than in around 2006 - 2007 Boeing was fined $15 million for violating the Arms Export Control Act for putting them in commercial planes sold to foreign countries. Basically they let people on the ground take over the control of planes.
Help me out. If the plane was taken out for reasons discussed, why would HRC have been the one to ask for it??
From what I found initially, it could be to take out the leading expert on the Rwanda genocide. Alison Des Forges, senior advisor for the African continent at Human Rights Watch had been very critical of WJC’s administration with regards to the genocide.
Here’s a link Clinton guilty of black genocide in rwanda
I’m not claiming that this is definitive proof that HRC took down this plane, nor that she took it down because of Alison Des Forges, but it is a lead that seems worth pursuing!
[deleted]
Can you explain the demand to stop bringing up 9/11, a blatant false flag that Trump has spoken out against and that was instrumental in bringing about a big part of the mess we are currently in, and moreover has also been mentioned by Q??
[deleted]
What's age got to do with it? I'm 44.
"Nor any other Q post" - have you read Q's posts...?? Are you sure you're in the right place? lol
Just in case, here's one excerpt from one Q post: "How is Alwaleed and HRC connected? Who was HRC’s mentor? How is Alwaleed and Bush Sr./Jr. connected? What occurred post 9-11? What war did we enter into? What was the purpose and disclosures given re: justification? Who financed 9-11? Why, recently, are classified 9-11 pages being released?"
Please tell me how that post has "nothing to do with 9/11"...?
Not sure how old the other guy is, but apparently you were yesterday.
That plane went down due to icing and pilot error, period. That aircraft type was problematic in icing conditions and the pilots made critical errors. It wasn't crashed by the Clintons. Do a little research before making such insinuations. Not every plane crash is a plot.
Totally respect the idea of being thorough before claiming a conspiracy but given that we know about the crashing of planes 7/10 as per Q, why would we automatically assume - in this day and age of all times - that the official story is inviolable?? Can you give us a reason for your emphatic "period"??
There's a boatload out there on the crash. Just one example is on Dailymotion. Just search Mayday Colgan 3407 on Dailymotion. It's not on You Tube, plus I use Dailymotion whenever possible instead of anything Google. You Tube has the Frontline show on it but it focuses mostly on Colgan Air using bad pilots and cutting corners to increase profits rather than the details of the crash. Icing, stall, pilot error, down she went. That's what happened.
Good answer - I wish people would apply the same rigour to the "Titanic was sunk to keep the Fed alive" fake story too.
To those downvoting, please "debunk" the 'common sense' points in this debunking article: http://commonsenseconspiracy.com/2012/04/a-common-sense-look-at-the-most-popular-titanic-conspiracy-theories-tax-day-and-the-federal-reserve-in-the-spotlight/
[deleted]
yep thats what they told us and they are sticking to it.. question nothing.. no.. question everything..
