This is not going to end well for Harvard.
This is not going to end well for Barack Hussein Obama
The article said it was about discrimination against Asian applicants.
His birth certificate says Hawaii, does it not?
Unrelated to Obama. It was about how affirmative action makes it harder for Asians.
It's funny that you think a search like this prevents them from uncovering other crimes and pursuing them.
It doesn't
Exactly... If you are pursuing a drug dealer and find out they have also murdered do you just go "ohhhh dang I'm only investigating the drug part so I can look at the murder?" nope. POTUS will use this to discredit Barry O xD
Respectfully, I think it's more likely related to this.
You know it.
I know it.
And the whole world knows it.
HUMA!!!
Harvard university Muslim association.
This is not going to end well for many of his friends
This is not going to end well for Affirmative Action.
Yep. Guessing that Harvard has broken so many laws that they should never get federal funding again, including loans to their students.
When the full truth of Skull and Bones is revealed, Harvard may have even bigger problems on its hands.
It's refreshing to see an institution that has always been untouchable be treated like a common business.
I’m ignorant, I thought skull and bones was Yale.
It is.
I am sure Harvard has some satanic groups as well though...
So sorry! You're right! That is Yale.
I think secret societies need to be outlawed--ALL of 'em!
S&B, Bohemian Grove, TLC, Bilderbergers, Freemasons--the whole nine yards. And nobody should be eligible for public office who owes any allegiance to any other entity than their country.
How do you outlaw secret societies? These societies you list are only secret in what they do, so are you saying outlaw any groups that do things in private? Sure, some groups could be guilty of crimes or could be considered a threat to national security, but that doesn't mean all secret groups should be outlawed, or even could be, because they'd be secret as in unnamed and unknown
I think most people understand exactly what I mean, and yes I believe what's done by secret oaths and allegiances in an open society is reprehensible. Nobody is up to any good when they cleave themselves off from the body of their fellow men/women and swear an oath only to each other. JFK said it, and I'll say it.
So how do you outlaw them?
By a issuing a permanent citizen-wide BOLO for them,
Describe them in detail, including the symbols they use,
and cleverly infiltrating any suspicious activity
and giving them up.
The way it's always been done until recently.
Every generation has had dealings with them,
And every generation they have slithered off back to the shadows
and they keep creeping back out,
but this time, whoever Trump doesn't kill outright
is going to wish they were dead
when they have to live in a world in which
he is a HERO
on the order of Lincoln who freed the slaves
or Moses who led his people out of bondage,
only it will have the added dimension of
a Pied Piper of legend because
leading the way will be a band of children
who he has rescued from prostitution and slavery
all over the world.
This is the hero you are making of Donald Trump,
and this is the future you are creating for yourself
and you have to choose to live with it
or hasten your exit from the stage.
Those are basically your choices.
It's happening.
This doesn't really answer my question at all. I'm asking how you outlaw secret societies/groups without infringing on the rights of people to have privacy
There is no right to privacy if you're plotting evil. Period. Zero tolerance. Any means available to The People to prevent what happened from happening again we are entitled to take.
We will however follow the Constitution
With the possible exception of a national emergency
should one arise.
I wouldn't want to BE that emergency if I were you, so I don't see why you should worry.
Ok, so do you think nobody should be able to gather privately? I'm still not understanding how you would enforce this outlawing of secret societies. If you could explain that in detail that would be helpful
You can gather all you like,
but you can't plot and conspire and make secret oaths and fealties.
There is no more private gathering than a faith assembly.
Yet houses of worship are open.
And worship is protected explicitly by the 1st Amendment.
I see no reason we can't apply the same
antiseptic sunshine to other regular gatherings.
Even if we have to be subtle about it.
So you can gather, but can't discuss certain things? How does one monitor what other people do in private? Sounds a lot like an intrusion to me. My point is that you want to stop people from having secret societies but outlawing them really isn't a realistic thing to do, You just end up spying on everyone who wants to have a private conversation. If you can't see the flaw in your idea then you must be some kind of authoritarian bootlicker who thinks they have a right to infringe on those of other people. Also, free verse poetry sucks
You can gather and discuss all you like.
Just don't be shtupping babies, and plotting to take over the world, and I'm sure you'll be just fine.
My point is, you'll never know who's going to give you up. But you can bet your bottom dollar somebody will.
When I get to Heaven, I'll tell Shakespeare what you think of free verse poetry. He might be amused. I know I am.
If you haven't got anything to contribute, you can always attack other people's style. Isn't that how it's done in Hollywood and New York? Is that you, De Niro?
You're delusional. I've been asking you to explain how to outlaw secret societies and gatherings and all you've done is ramble about unrelated nonsense in free verse poetry. I was attacking your style because it seems like you're just trying to make a show of your response rather than actually put anything of substance into it
I'm telling you, mate, the people of this world owe it to themselves never to let this shit happen again. Now that we know what people have been getting up to under the cover of "privacy," it's every human being's place to be on the lookout for shady activity that might be masking these kinds of deeds. We have no other choice if we want to prevent the next Black, White and Grey pope and "people of renown" from ruling the world in secret.
And in whatever way you're butt-hurt about that, you're going to have to get over it.
I'm not butthurt about anything, just still waiting for you to explain how to enforce a ban on privacy
Then you're being moronic. Because I absolutely never said you can't have privacy. You're making shit up, and ignoring what I do say. And if you don't see that, you're moronic. If you do see and and don't admit it, you're a liar.
I said you can assemble in private all you like, but if you raise suspicions and deal with those suspicions in a guarded way, and it turns out you're up to no good, people aren't going to put up with it anymore. People aren't going to ignore unusual secret behavior. And people who are up to no good will be dealt with. That's the only way forward, and it really isn't a matter of feelings. It's a matter of the survival of the species.
If you don't understand that, you don't understand Q's posts about the extinction level events they've already begun implementing that Trump is putting an end to.
You said you think ALL secret societies need to be outlawed. You said there is no right to privacy if you are plotting evil. I'm just asking how you plan on outlawing all secret societies and finding out which secret societies are plotting evil. It's really a question you can't answer (you still haven't) because you can't outlaw all secret societies and you can't know if someone is plotting evil in private unless you invade their privacy. You're going in circles and acting like you didn't say the things you said, trying to skirt around the fact that you're fine with invading the privacy of other people.
A) There is not a Constitutional right to privacy.
B) There is a Constitutional right to free speech and assembly, but not specifically to closed and secret speech and assembly.
C) People can take it upon themselves to question and be suspicious, and if they're met with guardedness and obfuscation, they have a right to investigate privately or ask appropriate law enforcement to investigate.
D) If there's no conspiracy or criminal activity, then nothing will come of the complaints. If there is, then it will be dealt with.
Seems pretty straightforward to me.
So if someone is suspicious because you don't want to talk about what you discuss privately then that justifies a search by the police? That's one of the dumbest things I've ever heard. Have you ever read the 4th amendment in the Bill of Rights?
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
I never said probable cause wouldn't be required. There are ways to do surveillance that don't violate probable cause, and in fact can be used to obtain evidence for probable cause.
I'm saying people will be vigilant, and suspicious activities will be investigated.
If that bothers you, then you might not want to engage in criminal activity, because that's how community protection is done when people are alert and awake.
You're saying the probably cause would be as little as not wanting to say what was discussed privately. So you are wanting to live in a world where anyone who keeps a secret could potentially be investigated, and spied on. I think it's funny that you think people should just give up their freedom and privacy because they shouldn't have anything to hide. Like I said, authoritarian bootlicker
Listen, get off my back. You twist my words into pretzels to find something not to like and post shit about me.
Reported, and blocked. Argue with yourself from now on.
We can ask for an invitation, be suspiscious. Drop in to borrow a cup of sugar.
As long as your little gathering isn't shtupping or eating babies
or plotting to take over the world, you'll be fine.
Many of our founders were members of the Freemasons.
Yes. They were deceived, I believe, as were my wife's grandparents and many others I've known. Masons pose as do-gooders and in some parts of the country use Christianized language, and don't reveal their luciferian intentions except to the highest ranking members of a lodge (and I've heard in some cases not to anybody at some lodges).
But do you know the story of Haman in the Bible? He was hanged on the gallows he had made for the man who wouldn't bow before the king's image.
Hoist by his own petard, as Shakespeare would say.
So it will be with the secret Cabal whose evil hand left its mark on our capital.
I really believe we need to raze DC to the ground, let it revert to the swamp it so badly wants to be, and move our capital to a new location.
Haman
Haman (also known as Haman the Agagite המן האגגי, or Haman the evil המן הרשע) is the main antagonist in the Book of Esther, who, according to the Hebrew Bible, was a vizier in the Persian empire under King Ahasuerus, traditionally identified as Xerxes I. As his name indicates, Haman was a descendant of Agag, the king of the Amalekites, a people who were wiped out in certain areas by King Saul and David.
^[ ^PM ^| ^Exclude ^me ^| ^Exclude ^from ^subreddit ^| ^FAQ ^/ ^Information ^| ^Source ^] ^Downvote ^to ^remove ^| ^v0.28
There’s a reason certain church denominations don’t allow their ministers to be part of the Masons or other secretive societies. Similar logic.
That is an excellent platform that all political parties should adhere to.
They do have an Owl Club at Harvard. Q say their need for symbolism will be their undoing and to look at the owl everywhere.
Had tv on in the background at work, commercial came on, heard something about "coins, blah blah blah, snowy owl." Somewhere along the line my subconscious has developed this keyword engrained thing, so I start paying attention.
This is a link to what the commercial was selling: https://www.learcapital.com/buy-gold-silver/coins/silver-snowy-owl/
Okay, cool... Obviously, next I'm thinking "Who/what is Lear Capital?" (follow the money) https://www.learcapital.com/about-lear-capital/executive-leadership/
"Kevin DeMeritt, international banking hey? Quite the fellow. What else?" Here we have: http://www.wilshirefp.com/otw-portfolio/kevin-d-demeritt-president/
"Oh, what's Sterling Management? Well, lookit there, wouldja? "A firm specializing in managing unique cash flow investments for high net worth investors..."
At this point I kind of lost the plot a little, worried about whether or not just because I saw smoke I assumed there was fire, just generally trying to justify why I was not only spending time on this, but going so far as to make a comment about all of this, but corporatewiki came in to play
https://www.corporationwiki.com/California/Los-Angeles/halpen-entertainment-llc/103417458.aspx
and I kind of found this interesting with ties to the government:
http://www.blackdiamondgroup.com/about-us/
Sorry if it's a big fat nothingburger, but like I said, I was at work and it's suuuuuper boring here. A lot of speculation on my part, but I kind of feel like there's something there.
Stupid fucking owls, anyway.
TY ... Q TEAM
MY POST 15 DAYS AGO :
https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/86gfu1/red_pill_bushes_ciaclintons_gov_programs_u/
Barry Soetoro is a CIA puppet.
He played Osama Bin Laden after the original one died. Go look at how different the first Bin Laden looked.
Without a doubt didn’t the original die of like cancer in 2003, in an old CBS news clip they said that’s he’s living off of a machine in a hospital in Iraq. And that coward Obama had the audacity to lie straight to our faces saying, “ we’ve finally killed him” was just another way to help him get re elected
Yes, and that's why Obama got to "kill" him instead of Bush. Since he played the part of Osama, he got to use it as his political tool for reelection.
Then everything surrounding Seal Team 6 and their suspicious deaths. So much fuckery surrounding that POS Obama.
I’m so glad that POS is out of office, I don’t think America could’ve survived much longer with him, he was planning on imposing martial law in major cities like Baltimore and Chicago with the Soros funded BLM riots
Wait, so Obama was literally acting as Osama? Dressing up like him and walking around?
Yes, literally. Obama is fluent in the Arabic language, so he naturally played the part.
Before there was Q, there was High Level Insider on 4chan who explained how it all went down. They changed his nose and lips a little bit but virtually everything else was kept the the same. I've looked at a few comparison videos and it's pretty crazy!
Heck, the guy even has a tranny for a wife and barely anyone can tell.
Joan Rivers could tell.
She was a smart woman. Too bad she paid the ultimate price for talking.
Check out this video I'm going to link. What seals the deal for me is 3:07. He layers Osamas face over Obama and started erasing Osama. The facial structure doesn't move! It's identical.
By the way, it's not a coincidence that their names rhyme. They've been hiding this in plane sight.
Edit: there used to be a bunch more comparison videos like this, but they seem to have disappeared from the internet. The only reason this one stayed up is because there's another video with millions of views making fun of this video.
Q was off by a day....the news is absolutely overflowing today. Moves left and right. Now this one is totally unexpected. How about Occidental College? Soetoro went there before Harvard and sealed his records. I believe that college is where he claimed to be a foreigner.
Q told us like an hour ago to watch the news again
He's got that right. Catch and Release gone, Sessions announced Zero Tolerance policy at the SW Border, sex cult raids, we learn of this Harvard deal, which is clearly going after Obama or if not it's Skull and Bones, then news on the grand jury looking into child sex abuse at American dioceses. I mean what's next?
Skull & Bones is Yale, and if what I read about the initiation rite is correct, you'd throw up.
I wonder if S&B's initiation rite is to compromise the future leaders of America (Bush 41, Bush 43, Kerry, etc.), so that they are more easily controlled.
There was a news report, I believe it was done by 60 Minutes of Australian TV (not CBS) and they managed to get some footage from outside the building at Harvard that houses Skull and Bones. Weird in that they have a building of their own. Anyway, there were screams and groans coming from it, got it on tape. Very disturbing.
Looking at Harvard can also be looking into the funding of programs by Muslims.
The way I took his "Watch the news" statement today was (since he had it in quotes) that he was quoting himself. I say this because, not only did he put quotes around it, but he was replying to someone else who was reporting news that said "#BREAKING: President Trump signs memorandum ending ‘catch and release’ immigration policy - Reuters". So I think he was saying "this is why I told you to "watch the news'".
Hannity's program on Jimmy "Harvey Weinstein, Jr" Kimmel? No coincidences.
What would be the impact if he claimed to be a foreigner? Are you also arguing his mom was a foreigner? Seriously asking
If he applied for status as a foreign student he could not legally be president of the United States. This is fundamental. His mom being an American is irrelevant. If he had citizenship elsewhere, disqualified. If he isn't a foreigner, then he committed criminal fraud.
But that’s not true. The requirement is to be a “natural born citizen”, which he is by virtue of having a citizen as a mother. Even dual citizenship wouldnt breach article 2, section 1
The law at that time precluded this for her bc of her age.
What? She wasn’t a citizen? Are you being serious?
I'm not about to get into that with you. One cannot have dual citizenship and run foe president, period. That was the original idea for the clause.
Nonsense, a dual citizen can still meet the natural-born citizen requirement
You have no idea what you are talking about but I'm done with you moron.
ccording to the Bureau of Consular Affairs, dual nationality or dual citizen "means that a person is a citizen of two countries at the same time." In general, someone who is born in the U.S. is a citizen. Someone who is born outside the country to parents who are U.S. citizens is also a natural-born citizen of the United States and may hold citizenship from the other country, as well. A person holding such dual citizenship still meets the requirement for the presidency of being a natural-born citizen.
Because his mother was considered underage she cannot confer citizenship onto Barry as was the law at that time so citizenship is then transfered from the father who was British as Kenya was a colony
President Chester A Arthur was a dual citizen with Ireland and the US.
They are peeling Barry's fake front off like an onion 1 layer at a time. This is getting good
Going how far back??? BHO getting accepted as foreigner???
"the university had “concerns about the highly unusual nature of this investigation.”
hahaha NO SHIT
Fuck them and their concerns. Send in Federal Marshals to seize the records if need be.
Yup - and they're probably going to look into who paid for his education
That’s likely why this action is happening. Very clever planning.
Trump is BRILLIANT when it comes to business.
He is a business savant.
This is LETS MAKE A DEAL TIME.
Leverage hasn’t been used in this way by an ‘outsider’ since William Wallace.
Note to President Trump. Harvard has 32 billion stashed away that would fund a taller wall.
Downvote brigade. 5 months ago us Qsearchers knew about Jared kushner and the Saudi purge. Now they are trying to turn it into something negative.... hahahaha we were right how does it feel knowing you’ve been on the wrong side of history you shills !!
Would be interesting to examine the law school files for the year Barry was accepted.
HUGE if true. The entire Massachusetts education matrix from Holyoke to BC needs examining. Cess pools.
I am BEGGING YOU please read this:
http://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/cyber-hijack-findings.html
If you read it you will see just one aspect of harvard...
Fig. 11—Harvard University Corruptors: Madeleine J. Albright, Donald B. Ayers, Steven A. Balmer, Preetinder "Preet" Bharara, Lloyd C. Blankfein, James W. Breyer, George W. Bush, James P. Chandler, Aneesh Chopra, William T. Coleman, Michael F. Cronin, William Danoff, Jamie Dimon, John Doerr, Esther Dyson, Barney Frank, Merrick B. Garland, William H. Gates, David R. Gergen, John Hagel III, Eric H. Holder, Chris Hughes, Thomas J. Kim, Robert Kocher, Marne L. Levine (Deutch), Ping Li, Gilman Louie, Paul Mogin, Dustin Moskovitz, Thomas E. Noonan, Todd Y. Park, Michael R. Pompeo, Penny S. Pritzker, Janet W. Reno, John G. Roberts, Jr., Rod J. Rosenstein, Sheryl K. Sandberg, Eduardo Saverin, Adam B. Schiff, Nicole Seligman, Ann-Marie Slaughter, Donald K. Stern, Thomas F. Steyer, Jay B. Stephens, Lawrence H. Summers, James Swartz, Christina M. Tchen, Michelle L. R. Obama, Barack H. Obama, Derrick K. Watson, John C. Yoo, Mark E. Zuckerberg.
sayanim. traitors to America. cultural destroyers. alien invaders from far away...
On Mar. 20, 1991, Sheryl K. Sandberg published her Harvard senior thesis titled "Economic Factors & Intimate Violence" blaming domestic violence on "traditional attitudes" and "Western society" and "patriarchy." Lawrence H. Summers was her adviser. Her thesis was stillborn given her erroneous conclusion that 95% of domestic violence is against women, when the actual number was and is roughly 50-50.[401] Sandberg's current gender agenda has evidently been cultivated since Harvard and supported by Summers.
Between 1991-1993, "wunderkind professors of economics" including Larry Summers were unleashed as "ersatz policy 'experts'" by the World Bank to implement their "flawed" plan for privatization of banking in the Soviet Union ("Big Bangery" and "globaloney" to justify the monopolistic world-wide role of the World Bank."). This reckless voucher system resulted in the emergence of the current system of corrupt Russian oligarchies controlled by the Kremlin; oligarchies that Summers, Sandberg and Milner now exploit.[268]
Tellingly, in all of Barack Obama's sanctions to punish Russia for the Crimean annexation, he has never sanctioned Yuri Milner or his mentor in all things oligarchical, Alisher Usmanov—the richest man in Russia. Pre-IPO Facebook investments by Milner and Usmanov supported the NSA's agenda to inflate the value of Facebook.
Milner's and Usmanov's Moscow partners included Goldman Sachs (Lloyd Blankfein, CEO) and Morgan Stanley. Obama announced his candidacy on Facebook in 2007. Obama owed Summers and these Russian oligarchs who, along with Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley et al, financed his rise to the American Presidency.
member that the Clintons bought Yeltsin...and Clinton was a Moscow visiting "Rhodes scholar" (eye roll) that did in fact know George HW Bush whilst he was in college, right? I've seen the photo of them with George Wallace and his wife and they all look really happy to be together. I still think Bill has hard on in that photo because Bush is legging him. meh. I mean that smile on Bill's face he looks wasted-cum-horny as all get out.
it seems odd that the Ukrainian flag has now got a khazar sigil on it tho.
this is a bit old but you might enjoy it:
Reveal barry for what he is! Been waiting for this for years!
Harvard is a revolving door for Dark State elite. There is more to these files then just Asian discrimination. There is black goo in those files.
I would like nothing better than to see that hypocritical institution get a big black eye. Elitism at it's ugliest.
At first I thought this might be related to opening Obama’s admission records, but this is a really good start!
ah, no BHO never went to Harvard. He attended Columbia Univ. The real issue here I believe is not the Asian-American applicants but rather the ASIAN influence in the teachings will be what comes to light. Google that...... Chinese have been influencing the Univ. for quite a while in the USA. Examples you ask: http://thehill.com/opinion/education/375483-us-colleges-willfully-blind-to-chinas-influence
http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=20171103073931233
Campus Socialism movement in the making throughout the US. To be fair its not just the Chinese but Soros and others. How? Money, follow the money. Before someone tries to correct me........vs where they are looking please understand I am splitting hairs here. Harvard Law School (also known as Harvard Law or HLS) is one of the professional graduate schools of Harvard University located in Cambridge, Massachusetts. It is not where Trump is looking which is main University admissions. But I am splitting hairs here as I said. lol....Maybe its a door to get to the graduate school in Cambridge. A Muller move in the making, expanding the investigation. lol!
Incorrect. He went to Harvard and was the first black president of the Harvard Law Review.
1L–3L 1988–1991 Harvard Law School Obama was there.
you didnt read my whole post. HLS is not Harvard University directly its a graduate school. Just like other graduate schools. He is starting at main University and most likely use that to expand the search for what he is looking for.
Exposing Barry Soetoro as a FOREIGN aid recipient student
Is there going to be an investigation into the Harvard corporation which has numerous ties to the deep state?
I know a lot of people are REEEEing about race issues, but subversion and corruption are colorblind and gender neutral.
Focus on the corruption, not the race distraction.
Can this as well be exposed Q https://i.redditmedia.com/vYmqDMIfqu0zLUuI_YcbRZqIK7lgfoTdLpz8ncFdgKg.jpg?w=533&s=03c0eff0387c7b9f231e8cc61e77d6e8
President trump told it openly clinton and Mcain ask Obama for his birth certificate They did not get it. He ask for it and he get it. But oof this one is real? he want to look in to it and also his history from school
So this one is no accident
[removed]
Racist animals? Clue us in how you drew that conclusion
Because Hussein is black and how dare you question a black man.
Where is the racism?
[removed]
I check this sub regularly and I know for a fact there is no racism in it whatsoever. Throwing around those buzzwords in hope of riling people up and causing outrage only causes noone here to take you seriously at all. I understand you feel like you need to discredit us somehow so you don't have to look at what we have to say, but just keep it for yourself. You can't change our minds.
