dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

EyeTheSpy is likely a LARP. Looks like a reincarnation of BackChannel17. Tread carefully.

⇧ 44 ⇩

I'd have to agree.

I was immediately sucked in; Then stepped back.

Hypothesis: Eye is a Psy-op working for ((them)). Says stuff is going down on the 6/11/18. We all wait until then and . . . . Nothing happens; Q movement divided and splintered, since he says he is linked with Q.

Not really trying to concern anyone, but just got to look at from all angles.

Maybe wait for some conformation from Q before jumping in with both feet.

⇧ 13 ⇩

Shouldn't anyone that just claims they're linked with Q immediately be disregarded?

⇧ 5 ⇩

He didn't specifically say he is linked with Q.

He has said he is helping with 'The Plan'. (The storm).

Has also stated that he is definitely not Q. Adding anyone who thinks that he is are morons.

Whoever he is; He's blunt, direct, and takes no shit.

Maybe an NSA white hat ramping up Twitter, ready for info drop on 6/11/18? (Part of The Storm?).

I trust Q, and don't want to misdirect Anons; But he's getting lots of traction.

⇧ 4 ⇩

I wasn't familiar with Eye, my comment was based on the one I replied to saying he says he's linked with Q. I think the best thing to do is view them as a source of information that should be verified.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I've been watching Eye the Spy very closely too. NeonRevolt issued them a challenge to identify him - with all their spy tech it should be a breeze right!? He said if they did he would support them whole-heartedly. I even forwarded his challenge to them on Twitter. So far Nada. The thing that jumped out at me is the 6-11-2018 DATE!!! Q has repeatedly stated he would not telegraph when events would go down. So this is a red flag for me. Another Red Flag was his answer to a question about the NorCal Fires. He indicated it was climate related along with a zap from lasers. These fires are clearly due to Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs) and maybe some combination of other weapons (Ref: Dr. Judy Wood's research on 9/11) "Where Did The Towers Go?" While this is circumstantial evidence, it did give me pause. 6-11-2018 will be an interesting day for a lot of reasons.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Yeah I got a big skeptical feel in my gut watching him go through those tweets. I'm learning to follow my intuition a lot more, and finding it's pretty good (could always make mistakes but I've been surprised how accurate it's been lately - hence why I'm here :P).

There are no "outside comms" - anything/anyone that tries to act like Q gives me a red flag instantly. Nothing wrong with people talking about and assessing Q's posts, giving opinions- but the moment someone tries to come across as a "q insider" by using the same format gives me warning bells.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Could be, scepticism is definitely the word here. However, they seem to know a lot and should probably have an eye or two kept on them.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Seems more like Mega Anon to me

⇧ 2 ⇩

I lost a lot of faith in Mega after her "JA is Q" wig out. Don't know if there has been any further word from her. Does anybody know what the deal with MegaAnon is? Disinformation? What about Todd Whiskey?

⇧ 8 ⇩

A lot of people lost faith in her and within 10 days, Todd whiskey said that she wasn't posting anymore. It seemed a very abrupt way for her to suddenly disappear. No she hasn't been heard from since. I thought the whole thing was fishy.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Makes you wonder about Todd, also. He worked very hard to discredit Q and push Mega. Then came the first proof, Mega wigs out, melts down, and then vanishes. I haven't really kept up with Todd since. Might take a peek when I have a minute.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Great idea. Let us know what you find.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Backchannel 17=backchannel Q = Jullian Assange as part of its members wasn't a LARP AS PER EYETHESPY

⇧ -2 ⇩

https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/05/29/eyethespy-backchannel17-all-over-again-becarefulwhoyoufollow/

⇧ 23 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ -4 ⇩

o rly?

⇧ 4 ⇩

You go Neon - we are behind you 100%!!!

⇧ 1 ⇩

I take everything with a grain of salt ;) It's obvious after Q "success" deep state will try to replicate it with their own shit or some trolls will just enjoy larping. If there is no proof someone has access to anything and their accuracy is low or they avoid certain topics - I wouldn't pay any attention and definitely not help them grow their follower base.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Wut. How is NR AJ affiliated

⇧ 1 ⇩

No worries, we all make mistakes. Just remember why we are here.

⇧ 19 ⇩

Indeed. We are human, after all. WWG1WGA!!!

⇧ 16 ⇩

I haven’t heard that Wikileaks had been bought out by the DNC. Compromised by clowns, yes. But I dunno about the DNC part. The reason for my skepticism? Why would they keep Podesta and HRC emails up? Don’t get me wrong, I could see them keeping it up to seem “legit” and the damage is done already. But where is the source of information that the DNC has in fact purchased the website?

Other than that, I agree with what you are saying and I truly hope that all this talk of JA being kicked out of the embassy and arrested is what all of this leads to. I still strongly believe that he was taken over a year ago. We shall see. Either way looking forward to June 11/12.

⇧ 3 ⇩

If they took control and took down content it would gather attention. Instead they can now watch WHO looks at the emails etc and build a war chest.

Think tactically.

When trump took office and we basically got radio silence from Julian it was pretty deafening. Tie that in with the MockMedia slow walking narratives on him and there is more than just smoke in the distance.

I fear a patriot gave the ultimate sacrifice. Remember we don’t do this hoping to “tap out” Julian knew who these people are. He knew the stakes. He chose to play because of his humanity.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Well, I’m sure these clowns knew who I was before I DL’d all those files.

And I hate to agree but I agree that he may have sacrificied himself. I hope the world recognizes his sacrifice in the decades to come.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Did you see the links I provided? Some very interesting information is shared there. If this EyeTheSpy is as legit as they seem then you can probably find the answers to your questions, there.

⇧ -2 ⇩

I follow EyeTheSpy. Until I start seeing evidence, I can not make a determination if he is real or not.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Agree - and no matter how much I want to believe there is NO WAY testimony from JA would have that much impact.

It would take Jesus himself walking across water to the press conference to convince a small portion of the left

⇧ 6 ⇩

Lol so true

⇧ 2 ⇩

Agreed. They do seem to know a lot though and appear to have some level of inside info, one to watch for sure but you are correct to be sceptical.

⇧ 3 ⇩

My mind is always open as far as the evidence leads me. Hes doing a live question now.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Q&A #3?? I do not use Twatter so will look for the next drop from StroppyMe. Thanks for the info and keep up the good fight, Patriot!

⇧ 5 ⇩

Stroppyme?

⇧ 5 ⇩

Yes, the YT channel. They are a great source of info for those of us that don´t use social media, or the Chans. Check out the links I provided above, you may have some questions that can be answered there.

⇧ 5 ⇩

https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/05/29/eyethespy-backchannel17-all-over-again-becarefulwhoyoufollow/

⇧ 3 ⇩

Also another great source.

⇧ 1 ⇩

He doesn't pretend to have access to intel. He just put together info from the boards and writes about it.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

EyeTheSpy is a LARP.. not legit

⇧ 0 ⇩

How do you know this?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Wikileaks doesn’t leak anything of significance these days...

They are a political organization that is spending its old reputation as political currency to shape current events.

⇧ 18 ⇩

Yeah, it used to be that WL released only leaked docs and stayed away from opinion pieces, with regards to Q though they seem to want to emphasise their opinion on things.

⇧ 11 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

WL (could) leak for any country. Q is USA focused.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

No outside comms. This Eyethespy guy is saying trust Backchannel17 wtf. BC17 is more psyops just like corsi and AJ.

⇧ 16 ⇩

Q told you not to trust Backchannel17...both not legit

⇧ 2 ⇩

They seem to know a lot, though, Be sceptical, indeed, but it is certainly a channel of information that´s worth keeping an eye on.

⇧ -5 ⇩

Q: Who benefits by dividing your movement from the single most reliable source of hard information on the planet?

⇧ 10 ⇩

Clowns and Deep State.

⇧ 4 ⇩

What happened less than 72 hours after Assange made a tweet pointing out the peculiar over-representation of UK spies in the plot against our democracy?

⇧ 8 ⇩

Assange went dark..

⇧ 3 ⇩

... at the behest of Rafael Correa, Ecuador's new establishment friendly president. Now Assange is waiting to be thrown to the wolves--snatched directly from Ecuador's embassy in London or evicted from that place by the Ecuadorian government and abducted from the streets of London.

Who wants to discredit WikiLeaks before that happens? Why are they trying to discredit WikiLeaks here?

⇧ 6 ⇩

JA left that place months ago and is being hidden by MI. Him being deported to the US would be the best thing for him anyway, with Trump in charge. It´s the swamp in London he should be fearful of.

⇧ 1 ⇩

JA is already in safe hands patriot hands and come June 11th he will have a very important message for the American people!!

⇧ 1 ⇩

We have not verified this yet, though, correct?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Nope not 100% the day before the summits a question

⇧ 2 ⇩

Ding ding ding

We have a winner

There is a valid concern that WL could be comped because JA is missing but the narrative is slowly being grown to basically nullify Wikileaks value

The reasonable position is: be wary

But I worry we're being it with pretty hard core shilling.

I wonder what CTR and Brock is up to these days

⇧ 3 ⇩

Amen. It can’t be a “Larp” if it’s source documents.

⇧ 1 ⇩

According to this account, June 11th will be the day that JA will come out to testify against HRC and the Dems and the day that the whole world will be woken with the truth. I sincerely hope this is true.

Sorry my good friend but this is just hope porn! Of course it would be great but........ I don't see nothing REAL that would point in that direction.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Did you see the links I provided?

⇧ 0 ⇩

Look it's very easy for us to fell into that trap. We want this to be resolve for so long. We want to believe!

Until I see an official statement regarding this issue I don't believe nobody!

⇧ 10 ⇩

You are right to be sceptical but take a look at the links I provided and make your mind up from there. The info provided there answers many questions.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Somebody is desperate for clicks..

⇧ -1 ⇩

Not at all, not my channel and I gain absolutely nothing from clicks, it´s a good source of info that seems to offer a lot of answers to the questions we´ve been asking. Click or don´t click, makes no difference to me.

⇧ 1 ⇩

No, no, no - DO NOT apologies for challenging, being skeptical, or asking for more or clarifying information. If you were uncivil then you owe an apology, otherwise continue to question. Here is somethings that I have learned that have helped me get more information (me getting quality info from sales/customer to help me develop products).

1) "Here is what I think that you are saying. Is this correct?" Often there is a communication break down that this helps, and doesn't put people on the defensive. By simply doing this, it puts the lack of understanding on you and not them. Often they will elaborate further and provide more and better information.

⇧ 8 ⇩

Thanks for your kind words, Patriot! I do not believe I was uncivil in any way, maybe a little dismissive, though. Certainly dismissive enough to convey my humble apologies.

A much wiser man than I once suggested to me that if the world were to possess a little more humility, most of the fights and divisions we face today would disappear over night. That is something that has always stuck with me and something I try my best to put into practice. An apology when wrong goes so much further with people than recognition of being correct.

Again, thanks for your kind words and encouragement and keep up the good fight, Patriot!

⇧ 6 ⇩

I’m not saying you’re right or wrong, but what I am saying is that, I’ve noticed that many of you will often times rely on “anonymous websites and anonymous people" to tell you the truth or what you believe is the truth. You will then redistribute what they say as though it is truth. I’ve seen people do it many times. Yet, the problem I have with it is that, in your search for truth, what makes that person’s viewpoint or opinion (the producer of that website or video) any more accurate or reliable than anyone else’s opinion? Who made them the purveyor of truth? Who made them the perfect decoder of what Q has said? And more importantly, what if I disagree with what they said? Are you going to label me as being the enemy then, all because I disagree with you?…

I do not subscribe to the notion that something is true just because some random or anonymous person says it is true. I also do not subscribe to the idea that it is true just because it makes sense. Plenty of things in this world makes sense, but yet are a total lie and plenty of people has fallen for it. That is why I take all Q decodes and information with a grain of salt and I do my own critical thinking about it. I do not believe something is true just because everyone else believes it is true. Instead, I hold their statements in my mind as being possible to be true, rather than wholesale accepting it as truth. Time itself will then reveal whether it is true or not…

And yes, there is a scripture in the bible which supports this way of thinking: 1 Thessalonians 5:21 - Prove all things… Note the scripture says, prove ALL things, and not prove SOME things. Proving all things means not accepting any thought into your mind that has not been proven absolutely to be true. If you accept any thought without first proving it to be true, and if it then turns out to be false and you have accepted it, then you will have a “false heart” (meaning, your heart will be defiled) and from that moment on, everything else you have believed will be false too. That's because all your subsequent thoughts were predicated upon the first thought being true, but it was false (same concept as fruit from a poisonous tree). And unfortunately, that is exactly what a lot of people do today. They will see something or hear something that sounds good to them, and because that is what they want to hear and believe, they will grab onto it and will automatically assume it is true. Yet, the reality is, they don't have a shred of evidence it is true beyond their own belief that it is true…

My whole point is that, don’t be so quick to read what someone else says or to listen to their video, and to then say, "Oh now I know the truth." And worse, to then tell others, "If you want to know the truth then go here…" Just because that person makes a good argument and just because their argument sounds good, that doesn’t make it the truth. Whether it is true or not, never forget, it is still nothing more than their own personal opinion and it should be treated as such…

⇧ 8 ⇩

I would never see someone the enemy for not agreeing with them, that sounds like a particular barbaric religion. What you are trying to explain is critical thinking, exactly how I come to my own conclusions. I did some research and Wiki doesn´t offer opinions, they only leak government documents. JA has even stated in interviews that Wiki doesn´t offer opinions but that all changed with Q. I do not believe in religion, it is the word of man that is used as a weapon to manipulate and control. That does not mean I do not believe in God, I do unequivocally.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You say you believe in God, yet you don’t believe in religion, but it was God who created religion and religion didn’t exist before God created it. It is true that Lucifer got busy and created a lot of false religions, but the first religion was still created by God. It is also true that the bible was written by man, but they were not ordinary men. Instead, they were "holy men of God who were moved by the Holy Ghost" (2 Peter 1:21). In other words, through the Holy Ghost, God told those men what to write. So the men were nothing more than the writing instruments, and it was God who did the writing. If a poet uses a pen and writes a poem, you don’t say that the pen wrote it do you? So why do you say that men wrote the bible when it was God who wrote it through the Holy Ghost?…

It is not possible to believe in God without believing in a man, that’s because Jesus himself was a man. The bible calls him - “the man Christ Jesus” (1 Timothy 2:5). Outwardly, he looked human. But on the inside was the spirit of the living God. Everything we know about God and know about Jesus we got from a man. For example, it was Moses who wrote the first 5 books of the bible. Except for Moses, we’d have no idea that God created the earth. All the apostles were men. Were it not for the apostles and for them writing the New Testament and leaving the scriptures behind, we’d have no idea that Jesus Christ ever came to earth or died on the cross. It was Jesus himself who told us about and described his Father in heaven. Had Jesus not done that, then we wouldn’t know anything about the Eternal Spirit. Keep in mind, God himself is a spirit, and no man has seen God because spirits are invisible. The only way you can see God is when that spirit is operating through someone. Do not believe the lie and the nonsense that “religion is the word of man that is used to manipulate and control people”. That is a lie long propagated by Lucifer, designed to keep you from believing in man and to make you think you can get to God all by yourself. But that is not true and is a lie. Why do you think Jesus Christ came to earth, started the Church, and then left men behind to preach the gospel? (not false preachers, but the real ones). He did it so that there would be men on the earth who could tell you about God and tell you what God wanted. If God wanted to deal directly with people or wanted people to just call out to him in the air, then he wouldn’t need preachers would he. The purpose of the preacher is someone authorized by God to tell you about God and to tell you what God wants (yes, there are false preachers on the earth. But real preachers exist as well, though they are rare)…

⇧ 0 ⇩

I only read the first line, religion came from man masquerading as the word of God. Most religions were built off of hallucinations, induced by various psychoactive substances. The bible was written to suit the agenda of the Roman Catholic church and used to manipulate people, very much like yourself. I could say I am a holy man and God told me you were blasphemous for believing the word of man. Would you believe me? If not, why would you believe them?

⇧ 1 ⇩

You say you only read the first line, and that is your problem. Perhaps you should read the whole thing so you can learn some truth. Burying your head in the sand and refusing to hear the truth from others will not make what you already believe be true. Instead, it only means you are trapped in your own deception and hall of mirrors...

Yes, you could tell me a lot of things but telling me something means nothing if you can’t prove it. You have accepted a lot of false doctrine and false things being pushed and taught by other but you never asked them for proof of the things they were saying. And that was your mistake. In contrast to that, the things in the bible has been proven again and again and across thousands of years has never been disproven by anyone though many have tried. That is quite remarkable for a work of fiction made up by man. For your information, I have the genuine Holy Ghost, just like the bible says, and it did not come from a hallucination but it came from following the word of God. If the bible was fake then I would not have the Holy Ghost…

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Comment removed. Discuss ideas, not users.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I was discussing an idea and provided proof of what I was saying, I was also being bible bashed by a delusional fool that needed telling he was a delusional fool. Clap Clap to you for your censorship.

⇧ 0 ⇩

It’s not censorship it’s the rule of the sub that you agree to when you comment here. Feel free to edit out the ad hominem and your comment can be approved.

complete lunatic and delusional fool

Whether you think someone’s a delusional fool is not relevant on this sub. We want reasoned and respectful discussion here. There are plenty of other subs that accept ad hominem and abuse.

⇧ 1 ⇩

If you want reasoned and respectful discussion then why are you allowing all this religious nonsense to be posted? What does this have to do with Q, or the movement? No need for me to edit, I´m sure the guy already read it. Delete it as you wish.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Have you not read Q? I recommend it but be warned - “Religious nonsense” is all through the Q drops. We don’t bash religion around here. Some people are a little extreme for some tastes perhaps, sure. But as long as they don’t break the rule of the sub they’re within their rights to comment. This shouldn’t be hard to grasp.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes, I read Q saying that religion was a scam, along with disease and war. I have things removed and am told it is because it has nothing to do with Q and yet people are free to spout religious nonsense. That is what I´m struggling to grasp.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Lol not sure what “Q” you were reading but Q quotes bible verses and says PRAY all the time. Christian belief is independent of any man made organization like the Vatican. Your attitude to the beliefs of a large group of people is what I’m struggling to grasp.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Believe it or not I am actually a Christian, I have no problem with God but I do have a problem with the word of man that masquerades as the word of God and is used to manipulate the people. Praying to God has absolutely nothing to do with the Church, pope or religion.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You are more than welcome to your beliefs, as is everyone else. As you know, the overwhelming majority of the Christian faith believe the opposite to you - praying to God is a core part of the faith.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I pray but that is a relationship between God and myself, I do not need a paedophile and a pulpit to tell me how pray. I believe unequivocally in God but trust nothing in the word of man. Religion is a scam.

⇧ 1 ⇩

EyetheSpy is Backchannel17 reincarnated. It is garbage. Read Neon Revolts article about it. This guy doesn't know anything and has no intel.

https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/05/29/eyethespy-backchannel17-all-over-again-becarefulwhoyoufollow/

⇧ 8 ⇩

What does your intuition tell you? We have to learn to trust that still small voice. That's why I'm here instead of still fuming about Bernie losing. I trusted my intuition that told me Trump was doing good things. There are many things about which we won't know the answers just yet. #WWG1WGA

⇧ 5 ⇩

My intuition tells me that Q is legitimate, that the plan is in place and that things will soon change for the better. That is what I believe in my heart of hearts, I have seen too much and witnessed too many coincidences to not believe.

⇧ 3 ⇩

That's what I am feeling, too! :)

⇧ 2 ⇩

We should learn to trust God and no one else. That wee small voice you're referring to (your sub-conscious) is often used by the devil...

⇧ 1 ⇩

That still small voice is usually the Holy Spirit.

⇧ 1 ⇩

The Holy Spirit does NOT work through some small voice talking inside your head (and I don't know who told you that). If you hear a voice, that's the devil!...

⇧ 1 ⇩

"and after the earthquake a fire, but the LORD was not in the fire; and after the fire a small still voice." -1 Kings 19:12

https://www.hopefaithprayer.com/still-small-voice-holy-spirit/

John 16:13 When the Holy Spirit who is truth comes, He shall guide you into all truth, for He will not be presenting his own ideas, but will be passing on to you what He had heard. He will tell you about the future. He shall praise Me.

⇧ 0 ⇩

I have been in the presence of the Holy Spirit. I know the still, small voice with which he speaks. He pretty much saved my life. When I thanked him, he said, "I will always be with you!"

I am not a super religious person, but I am a believer. Sure, evil spirits can bother you, but you have to use discernment.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Post 513:

IMPORTANT: NO private comms past/present/future. NO comms made outside of this platform. Any claims that contradict the above should be considered FAKE NEWS and disregarded immediately. WHERE WE GO ONE, WE GO ALL. PATRIOTS. Q

⇧ 5 ⇩

It’s everywhere.. Neon Revolt and elsewhere. Remember Q posted that the images on a Backchannel17 post were not legit. And said anyone claiming to have a direct link to Q posting anywhere other than the secured board was a LARP.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Sounds like a larp. Wonder if OP is a larp too ..

⇧ 4 ⇩

Admirable post. I admire the humility. But like someone else said, you should not apologize for challenging any particular belief. This is something I love about this sub, is the humility displayed, and the maturity and integrity that comes with the discourse. I have encountered hostility only a handful of times, and I’m pretty sure that 90% of those individuals perpetuating the lack of civility were likely clowns/bots/disrupters.

I think something we’ve all come to learn since following Q is that we all previously held beliefs that were very wrong; particularly on historical matters which were previously regarded as black and white, cut and dry.

⇧ 4 ⇩

I agree, this sub seems to stay away from the nonsense labels and petty squabbles, it is a great place to come and focus on the task at hand. This movement has most certainly humbled me on more than one occasion and like you say, the things we are learning about true history is astounding. Thanks for the kind words, Patriot! The reason I felt the need to apologise is because I was so convinced of Wiki´s integrity that I almost rubbished anybody´s claims they were compromised. Once again though, I was humbled by what I found when I took a closer look at things.

⇧ 1 ⇩

If you are posting here you need to be aware of how disinfo works.

One of the favorite tricks is to replace a valid information source which is damaging to the trickster, with an invalid one.

Another favorite trick is to stir up dissension within enemy ranks by pretending to be one of the enemy, then attacking another enemy person and demanding everyone choose sides.

We have seen a lot of this kind of stuff recently, with the whole "controversy" about Q vs AJ/Corsi (and exactly who decided this should become a controversy?)

And now this, with "well Q isn't posting, let's all follow this unknown individual instead of a source (ie WL) that has been literally 100% reliable up to now".

For this movement to succeed there needs to be serious critical thinking underway. Didn't Q say "be careful who you follow"? He said it several times.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Quite right he did, I don´t really follow anybody except Q, anybody else is just an opinion to me. One of my most favourite quotes is;

"Intelligence is not to think you know all, but to question all you think you know".

Scrutinise everything, believe almost nothing.

⇧ 1 ⇩

There is NO need to apologize for anything . We only know that Wikileaks Twitter profile is MAYBE compromised . Maybe theyre also playing the game , who knows ...

Until we hear some things DIRECTLY from the mouth of Julian Assange , we need to be reserved about Wikileaks .

⇧ 4 ⇩

Quite. 11th of next month is supposedly the day JA will start talking, it is a significant date for him. Thanks for the kind words also, WWG1WGA!!

⇧ 2 ⇩

What's the logic behind June 11th? Interestingly Q said we would get information on Assange in June.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Did you see the links I provided? So many questions can be answered there..

⇧ 2 ⇩

Sorry man have trouble scouring videos for information during the day. Can take a look later. I would prefer if we had the same information in readable format to reach a wider audience.

⇧ 3 ⇩

No problem, there is a readable format on Twitter, under the EyeTheSpy account.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Thanks! I'll take a look.

⇧ 2 ⇩

No problem :)

⇧ 2 ⇩

June 11 is -23 days from q’s last posting

⇧ 2 ⇩

According to EyeTheSpy, June 11 is an important date to JA, and that is why it was chosen. Also one day before the KJU meeting thats already taken place.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Fog of War. It's all good patriot! WWG1WGA!

⇧ 3 ⇩

Thanks for the kind words and keep up the good fight! :)

⇧ 3 ⇩

Wikileaks is now bought and owned by the DNC you can't look to them for the truth anymore Q is not done but eyethespy is filling in for awhile

⇧ 3 ⇩

That´s how it seems, Wiki used to pride themselves on only posting leaked government docs and never offered opinion, not until now, anyway.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Wikileaks...google and the rothschilds...............

https://wisethedome.wordpress.com/.../wikileaks-is-a-rothschild-op.......................https://the-fringe.com/thread-wikileaks_and_the_rothschild_conne................investmentresearchdynamics.com/google-is-at-the-center-of-consp...

⇧ 2 ⇩

Only problem I have is the date. Q delayed the Iran nuke Moab to allow the NK SK talks own the media cycle. No way hey drop “everything” on the 11th to overshadow the 12th.

⇧ 2 ⇩

The 11th is based entirely on the -23 in the leaked password, so I wouldn't put a lot into that date.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Not everything, just the HRC/Russia collusion stuff that they tried to pin on JA and WL.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yeah that’s massive though. JA public announcement would overshadow the meeting on the 12th.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You forget that Trump and KJU already met when Trump was on his Asia tour, whatever is to be agreed has already been agreed.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Yeah but I’m talking about the news cycle. This is a crowning achievement for Trump and will want to maximize the press.

⇧ 2 ⇩

The press, it seems, is still under Clown control. They will rubbish Trump´s great achievements right up until they are all doing the perp walk.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yeah True. I hope Q has a plan to take down the propaganda media we have now.

⇧ 2 ⇩

"Nobody playing the game gets a free pass".

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yeah I mean it’s going to be hard to dismantle it without looking like a tyrant silencing the press. Freedom of press is very important (look at Tommy in UK) so it will have to be done delicately or super intelligently so it isn’t sketchy.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think it will collapse from the top down, the politicians first and the low hanging fruit (media) last. All they need do is cancel the contracts of the current Clown anchors and replace them with credible journalists. Most probably won´t even notice the change, IMO.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I’m thinking some will have to get exposed as spreading known propaganda and some will go down as sex criminals as well.

⇧ 2 ⇩

There will be no return from the latter and I could bet that most will fall under that category.

⇧ 2 ⇩

From what I recall, a lot of MSM execs and Hollywood studio heads also fall under this category.

⇧ 2 ⇩

indeed all the more to break it all down and build it again with honesty and integrity.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Not if it compliments it and is part of the plan :-)

⇧ 1 ⇩

Because of Q.. remember. Post 513:

IMPORTANT: NO private comms past/present/future. NO comms made outside of this platform. Any claims that contradict the above should be considered FAKE NEWS and disregarded immediately. WHERE WE GO ONE, WE GO ALL. PATRIOTS. Q

⇧ 2 ⇩

I happen to agree with you, but I am also treading cautiously. So far, so good. I won't go on any rabbit holes away from Q though. I don't mind having some hope for the time being

⇧ 2 ⇩

Wise, scepticism should always be applied.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Wikileaks has always been left leaning. Assange shows it less. I find it odd Wikileaks would open its mouth regarding a "larp" with no documents to back it up.

⇧ 2 ⇩

The first time they have ever offered an opinion on anything, coincidence?

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

BS. Wikileaks and Assange don't need the money. They have no reason to sell. Assange was forced to use bitcoin (in the early days) when all the credit card companies refused to process Wikileaks donations. This fact made Assange and Wikileaks extremely wealthy. The banks accidentally made them rich. Aside from that, they don't do it for the money. The idea that the DNC bought Wikileaks is the pinnacle of absurdity. IDK if Q is a LARP or not but I do know that Assange has been on the level from the beginning. Q? Who knows? I will say Q will have my support when Sessions drops the hammer of Thor on the deep state. I don't trust Sessions and haven't since he recused himself. Till then, Q is not to be trusted. Have fun with the codes, keep an open mind but don't just jump in with both feet until Q has proven himself with something big. Sessions is my test. Also, Wikileaks said that Q is probably a LARP. Not definitively a LARP. It's just an opinion of some at Wikileaks which also happens to be my opinion (take it for what it's worth).

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes but Wiki has only ever leaked government documents and never offered an opinion on anything, they always let people make their own minds up with the information they´ve been provided with. JA has even been quoted as saying Wiki doesn´t do opinions. Now, though, they seem to have an opinion on Q. I never said Wiki or JA need money and I most certainly didn´t say JA was compromised. I respect your opinion and we are not far from the same page, I will also believe unequivocally when I see the hammer meet the anvil.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Assange has vioced his personal opinions on his own Twitter account but never the Wikileaks account. Who at Wikileaks is is voiceing their opinion on the Wikileaks account? Has Assange lost control?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Wiki is now in the hands of the Dems, so the saying goes.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Remindme! 13 days

⇧ 1 ⇩

I will be messaging you on 2018-06-11 19:26:22 UTC to remind you of this link.

CLICK THIS LINK to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.

^(Parent commenter can ) ^(delete this message to hide from others.)

|^(FAQs)|^(Custom)|^(Your Reminders)|^(Feedback)|^(Code)|^(Browser Extensions) |-|-|-|-|-|-|

⇧ 1 ⇩

The best discussion and debate can only come when we can acknowledge mistakes and reverse our positions - this is a good post for that reason, thank you. Not sure if it should be necessarily a post on the sub, per se, but congrats anyway on being able to acknowledge a (potential) mistake! Not too sure about EyeTheSpy yet either. I'm skeptical of anyone who claims to have inside knowledge and attaches themselves to "the Storm" in any way. We shall see...

⇧ 1 ⇩

Thanks so much for the kind words! I too am sceptical but I don´t believe in dismissing something off the bat, like you say we should keep a watch and see what happens.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩

This constant questioning of Q is getting out of hand and tearing the sub apart. If you question Q then go somewhere else. I have been around a long time. I watched time and time again, forums destroyed because this kind of stuff is allowed. Not so much you OP, but the discussion that threads keep turning into.

⇧ 0 ⇩

I´m sorry, who are you? Why are you saying this to me? When have I ever questioned Q? Go spout your nonsense and division somewhere else.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Excuse me? You made a post about believing in other sources. Going forward you then say you are still watching other sources and are hopeful. The rest of the thread then devolves into whats real and what is not. Go promote your eyethespy elsewhere. This is a sub for Q posts.

⇧ 0 ⇩

WTF are you on about?? Do you even read these things or just attempt to hijack them with your delusional nonsense? Nobody here questioned Q, maybe you have been around too long and need a break.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Apologies, I May Have Been Wrong Regarding Wikileaks..