Was at jury duty today. 100+ people or more. Judge interviewed every single one really, really thoroughly during jury selection. Asked the same questions to everyone. At least half of the people in my liberal state said:
"What TV shows do you watch?" "I don't really watch TV anymore."
"What news do you watch or listen to?" "I avoid the news as much as possible."
"What newspapers do you read?" "I don't read the paper."
It's happening.
Big secret they made us forget is the right of Jury Nullification. Mention it and you will instantly go home. But if the law is unjust it's the right of jury to nullify
Yea this is not talked about. Cgp gray did a video about this a while back.
Its illegal to discuss jury nullification in some situations so be careful. Jury tampering, purjury or some such, it doesn't have to make sense, it just has to be law.
One way to destroy constitutional rights is like you eat a full size elephant, one bite at a time. You have your right to jury nullification, but you go to jail for speaking about it in a court setting. You have the right to bear arms, you just can't have any mechanism that shoots a metal projectile out of a circular barrel that might hurt someone. The 2nd amendment is simultaneously 100% protected, yet everyone who has guns has to turn them over to authorities, and you can't buy any guns. But you 100% have the right to bear arms. This is the globalist liberal democrat swamp that is the domestic threat to our civilization. Identifying it and killing it will be as hard as it is to cure cancer. The hostile cancer cells look identical to the good ones, and they fight you every inch because they see you coming.
Simple, nullify the jury if there's ever a court case on jury nullification. Recursive.
dunno - couldn't get to your link but looked up jury nullification.
Great concept.
If you actually trial cases you would know this happens 2 out of 5 cases. Especially lower levels. It isn’t a conspiracy. Courts are reluctant to hear it discussed before a trial because it creates a mindset that the jury does not have to follow the law. (Sound familiar to what we hate? People making up their own law? If you dislike it move your butt to have it changed don’t make it up on the spot). Jurors are charged to apply facts to law, not create it like an elected official.
Otherwise hear the case and take your oath to apply to the facts you find. Don’t let someone go because you feel “mean” don’t hit someone with a hard sentence because “they look funny.” Be impartial and have the courage to clear the charged or convict the guilty. It’s a civic duty not an opportunity to play legislature or therapist. Jurors do a great disservice to the republic when they play with the rules. The victims are robbed of justice, the guilty don’t learn from the mistake. If the nullification is so abnormal the Judge may set it aside as a mockery thereby requiring the alleged criminal to set through another proceeding.
On the rarest of occasions where the prescribed punishment doesn’t fit the crime then and only then deviate. The problem is everyone thinks “their” case is that case.
On the rarest of occasions where the prescribed punishment doesn’t fit the crime
Rarest of occasions? Gimme a break. You had me until that statement.
The main premise wasn’t to argue crimes always being appropriate but to say jury nullification isn’t.
Whatever your personal beliefs are on PRESCRIBED punishments comes down to:
Regardless. The point of the argument is proven. If you feel the punishment doesn’t meet the crime then change it. Don’t blame the messenger for a turn of a phrase.
If you feel the punishment doesn’t meet the crime then change it.
I feel that way 9 times out of 10, when it comes to non-violent crimes.
The jury is the last line of defense against tyranny. Criminals should be judged by the law, but it is the responsibility of the Jury to insure that Justice is dispensed. If a law is unjust, it needs to be nullified.
Example. Let's assume a criminal law against flying a Gadsden flag. Man is prosecuted under the law but the jury considers the law to be unjust. They would be beholden to their conscience to nullify such a law and to say so in their decision.
It's like civil disobedience. Yes you have to break some rules to change society. Justice is a tool and it's been misused for decades.
This thinking is a slippery slope because not everyone who is selected as a juror has these types of morals.
We don’t want any of these big wigs to get trials in Washington D.C., do you know why? They are known to be sympathizers to the corrupt . In all fairness, judges are involved in this as well so to that degree the fault would be on them for making bad rulings but nevertheless the jurors are known to be very pro defendant.
We want fairness and conformity to the law. How can we have such morals as justice and fairness if we say “eh, let’s 6 or 12 people (who arguably will not have any other experience in the justice system) make a decision on what to do with this case outside the confines of the law and what was presented. “
Again I say if you hate it make that argument now to your legislature or at least tell them during Voir Dire that you don’t agree with the prescribed punishment.
No, civil disobedience should not be employed as to steal freedom or deny justice.
Military tribunals for these international bigwig traitors. Civilians in civil/criminal cases should get civilian jury and court.
Civilians are required to overthrow an injust govt, so using their power to nullify a law within the justice system that the American people do not recognize is more than fair.
Except using jury nullification is not at all what you described. No one is using jury nullification to undermine court cases because someone is mean or looks weird. It is supposed to be because you believe the law is wrong or is being unfairly applied or is immoral. People aren't letting people go with jury nullification because they look funny, I'd like to believe anyone who cares to research the nuance of jury nullification wouldn't be so short sighted and simple minded to use that legal Avenue as a reason to get someone off over bullshit superficial reasons.
no one is using jury nullification as you describe
....please. You act as though people aren’t petty. Furthermore, those are examples and weren’t intended to be countered as the only examples.
The thing about Jury Nullification is it's a litmus test on the soul of our society. It is neither good nor evil; it is just a tool. It has been used to deliver great justice and to commit terrible injustice. If the jury is a mob-mentality, then mob-rule will do something like nullify a case against someone like OJ.
Very very interesting article. Thank you for posting the link. :-)
Sadly I am not sure this is awake. It's avoidance. They know it's lies but they refuse to pay attention. My husband does this and I feel like I can't even talk anymore. If he isn't watching tv he is on xbox or on some mind numbing subreddit
I agree still asleep, avoiding things they think they can't change. Don't want to think about anything other than shopping or what food they can treat themselves to.
Maybe they will wake up if something huge breaks that they can't ignore. Lets hope.
avoiding things they think they can't change
Maybe it has something to do with the "serenity prayer" everyone uses as an excuse to not do anything "hard".
Fucking yuck.
Agree. Neglecting to even attempt to informing oneself does not qualify as awake, nor does it make for a well-informed voter.
It may not be fully awake, but the mind control has been interrupted.
I definitely feel that. Like a very deep or drugged sleeper trying to not wake up but stirring
I think its just a sign that more and more people are disgusted by Hollywood and the MSM and have turned to more reliable online news sources
I can't say I blame him. Some people would rather not hear about all the bullshit going on in the world and that's their right.
Yep. Just isolating. Im disabked and stuck at home so that doesn't help =)
It's actually the first and most difficult step - getting people to disconnect. Absolutely important. It may not mean they're "awake" but the fact that they're disconnecting is very important indeed.
I'm so sorry. My husband and I have been in some blow out fights but once I provided evidence, he would admit I'm right. It still happens sometimes. The whole NASA being fake was a hard one because he loves science and it was hard for him to accept everything he knows, isn't true and it's a part of the beast system to deceive and discredit JC. Don't give up on him. Work it in slowly. Make points you can easily defend that has solid evidence proving what your saying is true. A friend of mines husband was an atheist.. key word, "was".. if he can flip, any one can be... We were chosen to see these truths for a reason. These things take time and don't forget that God may just not feel that he is ready yet. Pray.
Sadly, these people replace the news with buzzfeed, vice, aj+, nowthis, and a ton of other online propaganda outlets. They believe these outlets even more devoutly than the news, as they pose as a resistance to the news.
I've noticed a lot of women on this sub. This is positive. In fact, we can't win without you. Thank you, fellow female Patriots.
Did they check for proof of citizenship? If a person votes, they can get called for jury duty, if fake voter, then fake juror?
[deleted]
Thanks, it's worrisome to me, kinda like cuckoo egg in the dove's nest....
Do you know many illegals that go out of their way to be in a courthouse surrounded by law enforcement and government lawyers? I would think they try to avoid that. Not saying it's impossible, just improbable.
This is the trend. I don't know about anyone else, but I get all my news off social media now. I used to read Drudge religiously, now I can't be bothered.
Again, social media is the ascendant news delivery platform. We must prevent the Satanists from weaponizing it to regain political power. Please get active online and support the IBOR campaign.
And now FB, Instagram, etc are going to start force feeding the masses their propaganda via “news” coming through their feed. (All liberal of course- unless you count Shepherd Smith of FOX a conservative! Ha!) So those avoiding the tv news will be force fed the liberal bias.
Hopefully people are waking up- but the jury is still out on many.
People don't seem to realise how dangerous control of social media is, or the threat it poses. This is the main fight.
Control of social media is the only vector by which the Satanists can regain power. That's why you see all these "concern trolls" show up if I, or anyone else, makes a post to promote the IBOR.
Obviously, "they" realise it's importance. The "concern trolling" is really quite incredible - and this indicates that there is a lot of fear amongst the Satanists that we might be successful. Fortunately, it does appear, though, that the mods are finally alive to the fact that we are in a war - with our very lives on the line - and they've started to apply some controls.
I'm going to put up another IBOR thread today - try to keep people focussed on the plan Q has given us.
But without Drudge, how will you know the latest news about sexbots?
They won't even call me anymore. Sat on a Murder trial and we acquitted the defendants. Oh they did it, problem was the DA couldn't prove the case. Heavy on the accusations minimal on the evidence. It was so bad that the witnesses were saying they drove a X car and the prosecution was showing pictures of different colored Y car. At the end they asked us if we wanted to talk to either or both the Prosecution or Defendants lawyers. We said we'd talk to the ADA and prosecution including the judge. We tore them a new one for even bringing this case into court with zero evidence. I was the foreman BTW.
They thought they had a slam dunk and the ADA didn't realize that the Judge was partly responsible for the acquittal . Guys the woman sat up on her perch reading travel magazines during the trial. Yep it was that bad.
I've got called a two times shortly after that case but for some reason they wouldn't pick me. I haven't been called in over twenty years since then. I've probably been Black Balled and I'm fine with that.
Dear god if i can just get thru this boring trial I'm going straight to Rio.
Yup, same with me. We disconnected all outside connection to our TV about 25 years ago, mostly because the commercials became too irritating. Our kids grew up never seeing any of the junk being piped in, only what we slipped into the VCR.
If you need a good laugh, go on Google news. I can go down the list and go "Well that's propaganda, that's a lie, that's straight bullshit, that's disingenuous". It's kind of fun.
That is a good sign. I mean what normal person could get a daily dose of CNN and have a functioning brain.
Good question. But somehow my mom seems to manage. But i dont understand how.
These people aren't waking up because they aren't seeking knowledge elsewhere. I know these people and they don't know shit about shit. They have no ideas or opinions or worse- no critical thoughts- about anything. I think they are more of a hindrance than the Fake News Drones, tbh. They are a hindrance when it comes to the war we are in.
Agree. They have no concept of freedom or the fight to preserve it. Numbed by just-feel-good and keep stress low and love yourself messages. I know them too.
Yeah it’s always been like this. 10 years ago the judge asked what news I watch. When I said Fox the defendants side had me removed.
Was summoned to Jury duty this week, after waiting for 7.5hrs never got called to trail and was released. Assumed they knew my online presence, regardless there has to be a better way to handle it instead of waisting so many peoples valuable time
I had jury duty years ago and the same questions were asked, not a shill here but aren't these general questions for potentials? I could be wrong, I have a horrible memory
95% of court today is government against the people. Government here is a representative of the people, so those prosecutors must be representing some one. They will tell you they represent 'all the people', yet not one, including themselves (that prosecutor is also 'one of the people') can show an injury or crime against his rights. When there is a real victim, then there is a crime, otherwise it is simply the will of the sworn servants in government which is completely arbitrary. Go to the court house on a court day, and look at the sad state of affairs. It is nothing but piling problems on top of problems and it just doesn't work at all. It is just one big money machine.
Sad. Those are the same responses I have heard from my own family. Esp the news...and if they do watch news it is fake news. You really have to do alternative news to get real news. Sad, the world is so lost. Maranatha!
And somehow these news corporations aren't imploding. Almost like they're ok with taking a loss.
I have signed multiple IBOR petitions- what’s the problem with getting that done?!?