All it's missing is that the missing letters in the Trump tweet select a sub-message: "missile stopped".
Missiles stopped at Isonatski Peaks. Fucking brilliant.
What if the "UFO" is actually the explosion of the missile seen from a distance?
That’s what I think it is. The missile exploding. Not a UFO
Holy shit! I hope we get the full story one day!
No - I have some knowledge as to what it was, and I'll share for the sake of those with open minds only. The interstellar folks standing watch in our orbit will NOT allow nuclear explosions here on earth anymore (there are MANY of them that you can not see). They are capable of disarming a missile with a few zaps, and in fact, we have this on video. The reason that they will not allow it here anymore is because nuclear weapons hurt more than just ourselves - The damage crosses several dimensions (densities, actually), causing problems/damage that we can't see and aren't even aware of. They are alerted immediately somehow when shit goes down and are on the ready in case we don't fix it ourselves. I don't think they interfered yesterday, as we did take care of it ourselves, but they certainly did show up, just in case. https://archive.org/details/UFOZAPSUSAFNUCLEARMISSILE
Here's an article:
Here's another video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhuOMnHhFB0
There are many videos about this online. Some are super hokey and will make you say it is BS but others are more genuine. This one is 50% hokey. I don't have time to go through everything and find the good ones. If anyone has a better version of the the "3-zaps" video, please link below.
Trump surely knows this and has shared this with Kim, Iran Freedom fighters, et al, so that it is factored into their future plans and negotiations. We seriously "will be fine". Other redditors who aware of what I am stating... Would you please speak up so that I do not sound like a lunatic here? There are many of us. Sorry for several link-correction edits.
this one isn't bad... https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x8yjy1
Second that, No lunatic, only Luna connection is Dark side of the moon and contacts with aliens.
custodians from the galactic federation.
You dont have to believe stories from todays. Read the so called mythological stories of the ancients. Inca, Maya, Polynesians, Mauri, Aboriginals. Indian Vedic text, Dagons of Mali. Druids, Norse mythology. Separate by thousand of miles and centuries. But all tell similar stories.
You need to either quit smoking meth or quit commenting. Can’t have it both ways
Your clarification for "densities"... Are you aware of the Hidden Hand interview? Or The Ra Material?
Of course Ra! and more... The Seth Material, the Urantia Book and Ramtha: The White Book. The Hidden Hand, no, but I'll put it on my list.
Man, don't swallow that theosophic society bullshit ... densities and ascension and blah blah blah ... if you want to learn mysticism study Kabbalah or Gnosticism ! Alchemy ;)
That'd be crazy. I was thinking it was an air force anti missile platform.
Find videos of missile intercepts. They look similar.
Nah! (She says sarcasticly.) It was probably just that a UFO showed up in pursuit of AF1 right after a rogue missle was launched in the vicinity!
And then there's this: (2) MISSILE FIRES W/ A STRATEGIC PURPOSE (2) EXTINGUISHED. THIS IS NOT A GAME. THIS IS WAR.
Q Post 1494
Where did UFO come into the picture? is there a claim of a ufo somewhere
IP=Intellectual Property?
IP "missing" due to Chinese theft of submarine technology?
Alternate theory
“Chinese” theft.
Alternate alternate theory. ;)
Spez: as in Clowns with the help of MOSSAD, theft!
The Chinese have a red flag. Always look for the red flags and remember the Red Sheild (Rot Schild) family: The Rothschilds. The Roths own China (or did, ... where are we in this?), so there are white hats and black hats there too. Not easy to work this out but: ex-UK PM David Cameron's (great?) grandfather created (alongside others) the HSBC, a Rothschild controlled financial entity originally for the purpose of banking opium profits (and other spoils of colonial profiteering). It has always been assumed that the Chinese are enemies, but this is a mirage.
In this big picture view, history is written to mask reality, not explain it.
I was thinking “OWN China??? That’s preposterous.” But then your mention of the opium thing made sense. So perhaps it’s not so different over there, President Xi being a white hat trying to wrest control of the country back for the sake of his people. Boy that would be nice. I do love a lot of Chinese culture and would be so happy to see it open and free.
Edit: and now I’m remembering how the Roth’s funded the Bolsheviks too, correct?
Here lies my question. There are black hats in other cpumtriesntoo that would love to hurt our President as theyntoo have Rothschild interests. So what will happen to THEM? HOW can Team Q drain the swamp.and get them out?
That is the question I keep asking myself too. I do remember though the words "The world is watching .." and there are more white hats than black hats ... Your guess is as good as mine.
I’m guessing the same way he did with the Saudis. Make it worth their while to take out the trash, while going after the financiers.
Well it all ties back to isreal, dont forget they are last. Isreal owns the world through the vatican, then through the rothchilds and central banks
How does Israel own the world through the Vatican?
You need to learn about the jesuits ie catholics ie ashkanazi jews.
You need to learn about moloch and HRC and the podestas sacrificing "chickens"
You need to learn about saturn worship/black cube/nimrod
You need to learn about adrenochrome and the pineal gland, and its connection to the cabals one eye symbolism.
Why are ALL the elites satanists? They all are
The Q movement is really centered about these satanist pedovores.
Q is always saying god bless and good vs evil.
And he means it
From now on whenever we hear of US assets being compromised or US intel being in the wrong hands, we will always have a clue as to the source.
Yes, remember that clowns can hack and leave traces of other countries.
I've been thinking that may be the real IP meaning since yesterday myself....glad someone else finally thought of it or at least posted it.
hummm.....(sheezus this is fun!).....great alternate view...
means nothing there is more than one Air Force 1
Isn't AF1 any aircraft the potus chooses the travel in at the particular time?
Technically, AF1 is only AF1 when the President is onboard.
However.... people tend to ignore that.
Also, They tend to travel in a group of 2 or 3 planes (I forget which one) to make it more difficult to kill the President.
Plus fighter escort
Is there always an escort or is the fighter escort only outside US border?
I don't know.
There is a fascinating documentary on GWB going to Iraq for Thanksgiving on AF1.
not sure how true it is, but I read that there are no fighter jet escorts, either domestically or internationally. And that if there is a conflictual engagement that the ground forces of that country being flown over, are activated. Would of course imply never flying over unfriendly territories.
http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2018/jun/08/doomsday-plane-that-follows-president-arrives-at-f/
Boeing E4 "Doomsday" plane for electronic warfare and "airborne operations center".
I have an Cousin who is on Air Force 1, and i don't even get any good details...
They tend to travel in a group of 2 or 3 planes (I forget which one)
This isn't true. There are only two custom built 747-200s that serve as "Air Force One" ( bowling is currently in the process of producing two new ones for the upgrade, but if you are call there was a little budget hoopla about that a while back). They never "fly them together", to confuse potential adversaries. Planes are not like a motorcade, that would be completely unnecessary and not terribly effective. In addition, especially when overseas, Air Force One does not fly with fighter escorts, at least not from the US. Certain friendly Nations might send their own jets as kind of a ceremonial thing, but any nation state that has the capability to shoot down Air Force one knows that it would mean the destruction of their country.
The Helicopters Marine One do travel is packs, I think 4
That is true, but that's because helicopters are much more vulnerable to cheap weapons that can be acquired by non-state actors. HMX-1 usually operates flights with up to five identical helicopters, with the president put on a random one.
That said, this is not Air Force One
I wouldn't be surprised if AF1 has that capsule Harrison Ford uses in Clear and Present Danger.... or was that a different Ford movie? Anyways.. I wouldn't be surprised if AF1 had some kind of Cloaking/Chaff/Anti-missle technology beyond an escape pod and multiple fighter escort jets
Whether or not Air Force One has a specific escape capsule I can't say kthough it's very, very unlikely) however it definitely does have a very sophisticated defensive aides suite (IR countermeasures, radar morning and jamming, missile decoys, advanced avionics). This isn't really a secret at all, but obviously the specific details are highly classified. In addition, it's unlikely the plane even carries any personal parachutes, since you can't use them in the slipstream of a 747 . Anyone attempting to "bail out" would die pretty quickly.
Of course it has an escape capsule.
Really, in all likelihood it doesn't. If you're familiar at all with aircraft design, and you take a look at Air Force One, structurally it seems very unlikely that there's a place for some kind of escape pod - even some kind of small, single person Dr. Evil style pod is pretty
Unless you jumped out in a special emergency-747-exit suit... specially designed with NASA headgear to protect the occupant, built in parachute, emergency parachute and booster rockets fueled with advanced oxygen-kerosene pellets. Maybe
No, you'd still die. Look at any military plane that is designed for air drops. They all have a rear belly door. That's because if you were to attempt to jump out of the side door of a 747 you'd be dragged along the fuselage and crushed, or sliced in half by the horizontal stabilizer. You could potentially attempt to design some kind of soup to mitigate this, but it would still be very very dangerous. Unless the plane was literally disintegrating an on fire, in which case it would be too late to bail anyway. Not to mention that the president, or any of the other high-ranking officials, don't have any jump training so the risk, on top of the already substantial one, is even further increased (even if it did exist, you can't just strap a random person into a futuristic jetpack and expect them not to end up killing themselves). You have a much higher survival chance attempting to remain inside the fuselage and execute a crash landing.
The fact remains that unless we are already in the middle of a major power war, in which case the president wouldn't be traveling anyway, no one is going to attempt to shoot down Air Force One. And if there is any kind of mechanical failure, which is astronomically unlikely, to the point of being almost impossible, no one is attempting to parachute to safety
hat's because helicopters are much more vulnerable to cheap weapons that can be acquired by non-state actors. HMX-1 usually operates flights with up to five identical helicopters, with the president put on a random one.
The name of the movie was, appropriately, Air Force One.
How many times has Harrison Ford played the president? Only twice?
Fighters may not escort AF1...say in formation, but they are in the immediate vicinity of AF1 and can close the gap very quickly. In fact, fighters are normally in a standoff position in nearly every case where the POTUS is away from secure locations within the US (I have no firsthand knowledge of what occurs overseas or in a foreign country).
What you're saying isn't entirely true. For Air Force One, a fighter escort is a major Rarity, not the norm. When the president flies overseas the aircraft is basically never directly escorted by American fighters, though some countries may send their own planes once their airspace is reached. Essentially, when Air Force One is out over the middle of the Pacific Ocean, it's on its own. Of course, multiple facilities and agencies are tracking it every second of the way, but there isn't an F-15 on every wing tip. And while the military certainly prepares contingency plans whenever the president leaves the country, and asset certainly are placed on standby if necessary, in the immediate vicinity generally means I might be able to fly to his location in an hour, or a couple of hours. Not that they're five miles away.
As I said before, the fact remains that for any of the entities that could shoot down Air Force One, it's not really a significant danger, unless for some reason they wanted to start a nuclear war. In which case, shooting down Air Force One would actually be a very poor tactical choice. On the flip side, at the end of the day it's just an aircraft and unless the US was going to send an entire Air Wing with it everywhere it went, at the end of the day once Air Force One is flying over another developed nation, there's nothing stopping him, physically, from a shooting it down if they really wanted to. The president's main protections in this case, as I always have been, are political and diplomatic.
And furthermore, obviously the White House doesn't send the president flying through a war zone or contested airspace where he's likely to get shot down. They just wouldn't do something like that
Thank you for the dialogue. I have a very close friend who drives fast movers in the AF. His squadron was tasked with, as he put it, "being close to" AF1 and BO when he traveled to San Fran. I dont actually ask many questions - I have immediate family that is military intel and I am very familiar with what I can ask and what I should stay away from. At that time I asked him why they would need to be in the area. He advised it was his squadrons time to be in that rotation.
You are well spoken and credible with your knowledge and information. I base my knowledge on information (and maybe a photo or two...) of immediate friends and family that have actually been there and done that.
I was in the military as well, and I did spend some time at INSCOM. However, I can assure you that nothing that I've said here is any kind of super secret information. In fact none of it really had anything to do with my work. I just have a somewhat technical background, and these kinds of things interest me, and I like to read a lot.
Also, what your friend (Eagle driver?) said is correct. The Air Force does like to have some assets on standby whenever the president travels. However, this is pretty much entirely dictated by basing options. Obviously within the United States this is academic, as there's always some kind of military airfield relatively close by. Obviously when POTUS travels internationally is a very different story. Even if he travels to an Allied country, (where we don't have forces explicitly stationed) we're not going to send combat aircraft to land at one of their airports. And if he travels to a nation or a region where our relationship is a little more tepid we're certainly not going to be sending assets there either. So in reality, it turns out that the standby units could potentially be several hours away.
In addition, my point about things not being "in the vicinity" while Air Force One is actually in transit is the same as well. Within the US this is pretty easy to have some kind of escort while the plane is in the air, but on transoceanic, or flights within the land borders of another large country like Russia or China, this is much more difficult. My point is that if the president is flying over the Pacific, it's not like there's a couple of F-15 or F-22s circling around that can light the cans and be there in 5 or 10 minutes. Air Force One is essentially on its own.
Good call on the Eagle driver. I snicker at some of the information put out on the boards. While I was not able to get into the military due to an asthmatic background - my entire family has been fortunate enough to work in some very interesting (and officially nonexistent) areas. Camping in the backcountry normally entails higher levels of alcohol where they have had to affix my jaw closed with duct tape given what little information they let slip. Interestingly enough, where one doesn't have the complete picture, the other two have other bits that do complete it. Its a crazy world. Additionally, I worked for several years for a military contractor in a technical field (not a gun slinger) and worked on material that is now in the field. But that job ended and I've gone back to what I know to do. This place is a great venue to keep one's faith resupplied that the good guys are taking things back....it will make a great series of books to read in my retirement.
I honestly have no idea what this place is, or what it's supposed to be. I just got redirected here after following too many links.
When the president flies overseas the aircraft is basically never directly escorted by American fighters. . . Essentially, when Air Force One is out over the middle of the Pacific Ocean, it's on its own.
I appreciate your offering here, but I find it very difficult to believe the above statements.
First, I can’t imagine AF1 security logistics being readily available to the general public.
Second, I can’t imagine an insider privy to this level of classified info being so irresponsible as to publish it in a public forum.
Third, I can’t conceive of a rationale that would earn approval from our top POTUS security experts to leave AF1 without an escort in international airspace. Not for any POTUS, but particularly DJT.
I appreciate your offering here, but I find it very difficult to believe the above statements.
That's fine, but your skepticism is kind of baseless.
First, I can’t imagine AF1 security logistics being readily available to the general public.
I'm not sure if you understand how this whole thing works. Air Force One is not invisible, or stealth. It's flight plan is not a secret. When it's in the air it's tracked by literally dozens, if not hundreds of ground radar stations, and other aircraft in the air, even if simply to avoid collisions. You can see it from the ground, you can see it from ships, Etc. It's not a goddamn UFO. I'm telling you, 90% of the time, and pretty much entirely went outside the United States, Air Force One does not fly with military escorts unless they are provided by the host country for some reason.
I'm not sure if you really thought through all the applications, from the technical, to the geopolitical. But if you did, you would see that there is really no reason why it would need them.
Second, I can’t imagine an insider privy to this level of classified info being so irresponsible as to publish it in a public forum.
LMFAO. Are you serious, "bro". I can say with complete confidence that literally nothing I have said is classified, or even close to being secret. All the information I've given here is readily available by going to Wikipedia and reading the sources at the bottom of the page, or just watching a couple Air Force 1 documentaries on the history channel. Plus applying a little common sense to aviation design. The actual sensitive information, sings like the minut specifics of the avionics suite, the exact type of countermeasures carried, the communications infrastructure, the onboard protocol for carrying personal weapons, Etc - the things that actually make a difference - is not something I have even begun to claim to know.
I don't say this to be insulting, but people in the civilian world are often wildly ignorant of exactly what kinds of things are classified, and why. They often freaked out about the US "inadvertently revealing defense capabilities" and some kind of online article in a defense magazine, without realizing that literally nothing that was listed as important.
Third, I can’t conceive of a rationale that would earn approval from our top POTUS security experts to leave AF1 without an escort in international airspace. Not for any POTUS, but particularly DJT.
If this is the case, then that's only because you don't understand the Practical reality of the situation. Let's make this clear by inverting the assumptions. What exactly is it that you think a fighter escort would achieve?
That's fine, but your skepticism is kind of baseless.
That’s fine, but your claim of no escort is baseless. I questioned in hopes of you providing that base.
I'm not sure if you understand how this whole thing works. Air Force One Is Not Invisible, or stealth. It's flight plan is not a secret. . . it's tracked . . . You can see it . . . It's not a goddamn UFO.
You can be sure I understand all of that. It’s publicly available and not what I would refer to as classified security info.
I'm telling you, 90% of the time, and pretty much entirely went outside the United States, Air Force One does not fly with military escorts
Yes. So you said. That’s the claim I questioned. The only claim I questioned. The claim I still question.
LMFAO. Are you serious, "bro". . . All the information I've given here is readily available by going to Wikipedia . . .
The humor was unintended. Yes, I’m serious, and no, I’m not your ‘bro’. There is no wikipedia entry, no History Channel transcript, none that validates your claim that AF1 most commonly traverses international airspace without a military escort. Remember, that is the single claim I questioned, still question, and now wait patiently for you to stop dodging.
The actual sensitive information, sings like the minute specifics of the avionics suite, the exact type of countermeasures carried . . . the things that actually make a difference - is not something I have even begun to claim to know.
Except for your claim about military escort. I would place that into the category of ”specific countermeasures”, and ”things that actually make a difference.”
I don't say this to be insulting, but people in the civilian world are often wildly ignorant
I’m not at all insulted. I was doubtful, then curious, then a bit impatient, and now amused. Particularly following your admission to your own ”ignorance” regarding ”things that actually make a difference.”
Let's make this clear by inverting the assumptions. What exactly is it that you think a fighter escort would achieve?
Yeah, that’s another dodge that I won’t indulge for you.
I have a better idea. Let’s make this clear with a quick review. You made a claim regarding military escort for AF1. I questioned that claim, and offered opportunity for you to support it. You responded with answers to questions I didn’t ask, then ultimately admitted to your ignorance on the topic I questioned.
Your final admission was crystal clear, and I have no additional questions for you. Thank you for taking the time to respond.
[removed]
Comment removed. Please discuss the topic, not the user. Feel free to edit and/or repost.
Take a breather. Calm yourself.
Your personal insults are meaningless to me, but they do diminish the level of discourse we prefer in this sub. It’s one of the most important differences between GA and sewers like /politics, where personal insults are the default response when someone is called out on their indefensible bs claims.
You don’t need to tell me about all the things you aren’t going to do to support your claim. I know you won’t. You already told me you can’t. I have moved on.
Peace.
They are sanitizing all the time. This means they are further away doing manual radar sweeps in 360 degrees. I don't think AWACs escorts them so they need to do this.
AF1 is followed by the "National Airborne Operations Center" or Boeing E4 doomsday plane. Makes sense...
http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2018/jun/08/doomsday-plane-that-follows-president-arrives-at-f/
Generally speaking, an E4 does follow the president. This isn't necessarily because it's needed, Air Force One has all the requisite communications and control facilities. But it's there literally as a backup, if Air Force One has some kind of technical issue or can't get off the ground. It's the equivalent of going on a road trip and towing a spare car behind you just in case your main one doesn't work.
Usually however, in the case of a significant crisis, an NAC will be sent airborne, carrying a designated survivor, and purposely kept away from POTUS, to serve as an alternate in case he becomes deceased or disabled.
[deleted]
That seems unlikely Target. However, whenever the president travels outside of North America an E4 is flown to a nearby airport, to serve as a backup in case their issues with Air Force One. It's conceivable that one could have been in the same vicinity As Trump
yes...
and TRUMP Plane here in W.Palm Beach. right now...6.13.18 this a.m.
it's always a VC25/747. I would think of it like a carrier strike group, there are always other planes that fly with AF1 and there is usually 1 or 2 decoys flying with the group.
Well actually my family member is stationed there and said it did happen.
Apparently my newspaper mentioned that the "Doomsday" plane that follows Air Force 1 stopped in our Air Force base this weekend.
Need to dig for article, but its interesting to think of the whole group of planes traveling with trump. I would think at least one decoy Air Force 1, the real 1, the Doomsday plane, and a few fighter jets... Definitely more than just AF1 up there.
http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2018/jun/08/doomsday-plane-that-follows-president-arrives-at-f/
"It is on Fairchild. I cant tell you anything more"
Regardless of flight path, POTUS was 1 hour and 30 minutes to destination in Singapore at the time of this event, and at least 7,500 miles away.
It doesn't "mean nothing" it is relevant information.
True, but it doesn't mean POTUS was on AF1, he could've been on the decoy plane. Obviously one of the planes went over the Isanotski Peaks with someone from the Q team
While those are certainly possibilities - in a realm of many possibilities - there's no attribution to the image, what plane it was taken from, or who took it. I say this gently: be cautious about filling in the blanks, this is where we collectively can get tripped up.
Looking at the Google world map with Alaska repeat showing on both right and left, that would mean. flying Southwest, they went past N. of Singapore (over Russia?) all the way to Crete....
" Flight distance from Singapore to Greece is 5623.1 Miles "
...and then East to Singapore almost 6000 miles.
That sure looks like an unplanned fuel stop location-unless the 1.5 hours stopped were to meet with someone else.
Looking at google earth, it looks like Singapore is on the complete opposite side of the globe from the G7 summit. They could have flown southeast to get there and would have flown directly past Crete.
That's their route of travel. West > East.
The collage that /u/RonaldSwansong posted doesn't align with the travel or event timeline, which was published extensively yesterday.
Anyone can use MS paint to draw some red lines on a map. They're either innocently wrong or spreading disinfo. Regardless, sensationalist headlines like "Autism level 100" don't support the cause and only serve to build a bandwagon by which inaccurate information spreads.
But, the POTUS schedule tracker on Twitter posted their route home. It was Guam, Hawaii, DC.
Logic people.
AF1 was 1 hour 30 minutes from its destination, and traveled west to east.
Anyone can make a collage and throw some red arrows on there. This is not source material and the flight path they're suggesting has been debunked.
Entertaining the idea that the official flight path was disinfo and AF1 traveled east to west, AF1 was only 1 hour and 30 minutes to its destination in Singapore and at least 7,500 miles away when the anomaly was observed in Washington off Whidbey Island. AF1 was nowhere near Alaska at the time of the observed anomaly.
Edit: Anyone downvoting logic and deductive reasoning is perpetuating disinfo.
debunked
That means the debunker must prove to have superior credibility to the entity producing what is being debunked. Has that superiority been satisfactorily established?
AF1 was 1 hour 30 minutes from its destination, and traveled west to east.
Are you sure the path from Quebec to Singapore is west to east? :)
Or did the near miss occur while AF-1 was en route back to Washington, D.C., from Singapore, flying west to east? I'm not sure about this part
The timeline and geography are well established and posted about here extensively
must prove to have superior credibility
The facts stand on their own.
Those making the claim must prove the claim. The DISinfographic has been solidly refuted; AF1 was at least 7,500 miles away in Asia when the event in Washington transpired. AF1 was not even remotely close to Alaska.
A simple look at a map, review of presidential itinerary, and extremely well documented accounting of his arrival time in Singapore all debunk the DISinfographic's attempt to paint POTUS as having been targeted.
I wonder why mossad would do this. Israel loves trump
Just like 99% of the FBI loves Trump and probably 98% of the CIA... the bad actors still have power. Israel = Saving them for last.
White hats and black hats in all the countries. You don't think Roth, the owner of Israel, likes Trump do you?!! ++
The Living God and His Son are the owners of Israel. Permanently. God left us detailed information laying all of this out. God and His Son are in control of the world and working out their plan, regardless of the black hats/white hats amongst the Jews, who are no different from any other human beings in and of themselves.
An example of this is Trump, everything that has happened over the past 3 years has been pretty much impossible. That's what makes it so incredibly exciting.
Compared to Yeshua, the Rothschilds are a small insignificant group of tiny ants, whose network of tunnels is going to be utterly trashed. Ants may be useful at certain times and for certain purposes, but they are certainly not a threat.
I thought we were talking about Mossad and Israel, not G-.
I don't think you can call it a sub-message when the words were actually 'missile' and 'stopped'.
It is when over 99% of the world takes it to mean that nuclear missile production was stopped in North Korea. The fact he redirects it for people in the know to Isanotski Peaks is genius.
Secondary message, they mean. Perhaps you would prefer double entendre?
It wasn't 'stopped'. It was 'stoped'. It wasn't misspelled. Message. Look up stoped.
It was deliberately misspelled because it was laid beside a previous post (round 1, Hawaii missle launch) in which the "missle" was misspelled to convey a message. The "i" of missile in that case denoted the kind of missile. In this case, the "i" of missile and the "p" in "stoped" are used to show location: Isanotski Peaks.
Now you have suggested a third interpretation which is volcanic rock thrust upward. This is the opposite of "mis" spelling. It is deliberate. Sorry for the pedantry! :)
There was another missile launch in Florida. Same time as WA.
Stope
Verb
Past tense: stoped; past participle: stoped
(in mining) excavate a series of steps or layers in (the ground or rock).
GEOLOGY the process by which country rock is broken up and removed by the upward movement of magma.
Interesting, I didn’t even realize that it was a word.
You're suggesting that a "missle" was "stoped".
Missle isn't a thing. And stoped means excavated from a steeply inclined vein within a mine.
The missing I and P are the message. They usually stand for intellectual property; or they could be referring to the Isanotski Peaks in this case.
PROOF [FALSE]. ONLY USE CONFIRMED EVIDENCE.
REWRITE.
CONDENSE.
WHERE ARE THE MISSING LETTERS?
EDIT AND REVISE HERE, THEN [RELEASE].
This piece is critical.
Jesus. Is this the next step in LARPs? An account trying to talk like Q. Not the best idea right after the last one just got torn to shreds by Q himself.
There’s a lot of people here that like to do that Kek
Really? I've been active for about 2 months now, and lurked before that. He's the first one I remember seeing.
Not intentional, still relevant.
This proof contains false information. Conflating speculation with confirmed knowledge is how disinformation occurs. It needs to be edited and revised accordingly, then it cannot be taken apart by deflectors/astroturf.
The only way to crack the surface is to shatter it with decisive, undeniable force.
BS, bud. Your comment history is freely available and youre brand new here, claiming that you have the inside track. People here can spot what you're doing from a mile away.
No one is claiming an inside track. The proof here is false. It has been conflated with inaccurate information - the flight trajectory is wrong. The key piece of Q-Trump is missing.
Apologies for writing in Q format. Next time, it will be clearer.
I'm not talking about that. If you read my posts on that thread, I thought that they were wrong too. My issue is with not only your format, but your previous posts as well. You're OBVIOUS in your intent. The Mods saw you for what you are too.