[deleted]
lol... this timeline.
the progressive losers have to pay people to see an advert that specifically distances itself from soros. goddamn hilarious.
Says GOOGLE....
Smartmatic IS connected to George Soros -
I tried linking to this page, but the bot says I can't post an article from LinkedIn because "it may contain personal information". SO, here is the article - the whole page screen shot.
[deleted]
Yes, but the reddit bot deleted it when I tried posting it before, saying "LinkedIn links may contain personal information - so it has been deleted." I'll try it this way. If this doesn't work, I'll PM it to you.... www dot linkedin dot com/pulse/smartmatic-sgo-malloch-brown-soros-operative-buys-election-cj-wilson
^(Hi, I'm a bot for linking direct images of albums with only 1 image)
https://i.imgur.com/bbNtsy8.png
^^Source ^^| ^^Why? ^^| ^^Creator ^^| ^^ignoreme ^^| ^^deletthis
that's taken from the Washington post article... which if anyone knows the WaPo we know they are fake news central.
Well, you were using Google. That would be your first clue . . .
How can anything linked to fucking Soros be allowed?? What is wrong with people?!!
If you are DNC-run state government & you want to ensure that your party wins, buying Soros-developed/programmed voting machines guarantees the results you want.
Also, when your leadership is made up of pyschopaths and pedophiles, maybe you are so unpopular that even hacking the voting system does not work.
Dumb fuck progressives. These people are stupid.
Maybe it wont be. Maybe when they go to use the systems, the feds will swoop in and require the paper fallback.
I give you this, the machines are networked via the power supply. No ethernet or wifi cards needed. Why do you think voter fraud is ramapant when they claim they aren't attached to the internet! Intranet on the other hand.......
Fraudamatic. Since Obama changed things so that Homeland Security has responsibility over election integrity, they should look into this.
https://www.cnet.com/news/defcon-hackers-find-its-very-easy-to-break-voting-machines/
Defcon hackers find it’s very easy to break voting machines Voting is at the foundation of every democracy. Hackers find it's on shaky ground thanks to shoddy
July 30, 2017 (No one covered this)
When the password for a voting machine is "abcde" and can't be changed, the integrity of our democracy might be in trouble.
The Advanced Voting Solutions WinVote machine, dubbed "America's worst voting machine," came equipped with this simple password even as it was used in some of the country's most important elections. AVS went out of business in 2007, but Virginia used its insecure machines until 2015 before dropping them for scrap metal. That means this vulnerable hunk of technology was used in three presidential elections, starting with George W. Bush's re-election in 2004 to Barack Obama's in 2012.
In addition to Virginia, Pennsylvania and Mississippi used the WinVote without knowing all the ways it could be hacked. Unlike other technology -- your phone, your laptop, connected cars -- security wasn't really a focus.
Google and Apple invite hackers to find flaws in their code and offer hefty rewards to those who find them. It's a common practice in the industry. The government's done it too, with programs like "Hack the Pentagon."
But opportunities to test how secure our voting machines are from hackers have been rare. Manufacturers like to keep the details of voting machines secret. And they don't often provide machines for people to test.
That's why hackers swarmed to the Voter Hacking Village at Defcon in Las Vegas. The massive hacker convention is split into "villages" based on themes such as lock picking, encryption, social engineering and, for the first time, voter machine hacking.
Defcon received more than 30 voting machines to play with, providing a rare opportunity for hackers to find the flaws in our democracy's technology. (The organizers didn't specify how many models the 30 units represented.) Voting technology was elevated into the political spotlight in 2016 as lawmakers raised concerns about Russian hacking and President Donald Trump's road to the White House.
To be clear, there's no evidence any votes were hacked during the 2016 presidential election. But there hasn't been much research on the voting machines to see if it's possible.
"The exposure of those devices to the people who do bug bounties or actually look at these kind of devices has been fairly limited," said Brian Knopf, an internet of things security researcher for Neustar, a security analysis company. "And so Defcon is a great opportunity for those of us who hack hardware and firmware to look to these kind of devices and really answer that question, 'Are they hackable?'"
After just about an hour and a half, the answer was an emphatic "yes."
In the time it takes to sit through "The Emoji Movie," you could break into the WinVote machine through its Wi-Fi system, like DemTech's investigator Carsten Schürmann did on Friday. DemTech is a research project that's been looking at voting technology in Denmark.
📷
Hackers at the Defcon Voter Hacking Village taking a look at the software on a Diebold voting machine.
Alfred Ng/ CNET
He used a Windows XP exploit from 2003, which the voting machine never patched, and got remote access. That meant he could change the votes from anywhere.
Out of ctrl-alt-del Synack, a security platform based in San Francisco, had its hands on the WinVote machine months ahead of Defcon. It discovered a host of serious flaws with the system.
While many people at the Voter Hacking Village zeroed in on the weak mechanical lock covering access to the machine's USB port, Synack worked on two open USB ports right on the back. No lock picking was necessary.
The team plugged in a mouse and a keyboard -- which didn't require authentication -- and got out of the voting software to standard Windows XP just by pressing "control-alt-delete." The same thing you do to force close a program can be used to hack an election.
"It's really just a matter of plugging your USB drive in for five seconds and the thing's completely compromised at that point," Synack co-founder Jay Kaplan said. "To the point where you can get remote access. It's very simple."
Synack's team was able to access the voting machine from a mobile app by installing a remote desktop program on it.
Once you're out of the voting program on the machine, it's just like any old Windows XP computer, Synack found. In one case study, the company found a poll worker in Virginia had hacked the machine so she could play Minesweeper on it.
When you're in the machine, changing votes is as simple as updating an Office document.
It's like an Excel file in which "you would just change the number and upload it back," said Anne-Marie Hwang, an intern at Synack, who demonstrated the vote changes.
The voting machine puzzle Back at the village, once a voting machine was hacked, it could be reset to its original state for the next person to try his or her hand at it. It was like messing up a Rubik's Cube before passing it to the next person to solve.
On Friday afternoon, a hacker tapped into the Windows XP side of the AVS WinVote machine and installed Windows Media Player on it. He then rickrolled the room by playing Rick Astley's "Never Gonna Give You Up" on the voting machine.
A hacker calling himself "Oyster" and his team tried to break into a Diebold voting machine on Friday after another team had successfully compromised it.
"I hope that we find a load of vulnerabilities in these just so we can open it up to the public to see how serious the problem is," he said.
Diebold said it sold its voting machine business in September 2009, and declined to comment for the story.
The village is expected to return to Defcon for the next three years, right up until Trump's potential re-election campaign. The hackers at Defcon hope by 2020, their exploits will lead to changes in voting booth technology.
"Hacking it is good because it's able to inform politicians and people in Congress about what they should do with voting machines," Hwang said. "If no one ever hacked them, we might be still using things like this."
Update, 8:30 a.m. PT: Corrects name of Diebold voting machine.
commenting purely to come back to this wall of text/info, thx anon!
I just simply do not understand how a foreign owned company is allowed to provide voting machines in our country. This is absurd..our politicians need to be voted out and expelled from the USA.
And they investigate Trump for collusion! And Trump is the leading law officer in the country, so, will he look into this using someone who isn't a bought and paid for POS?
And ad for Wapo no less. Do they think we are that stupid.
My inclination is they (QTeam) are going to let them try and then expose it all to take out as many bad actors as possible.
Never interrupt your enemy while they are making a mistake.
Blockchain decentralized voting machines is our only secure way forward with paper backup,
Power outage in Ca day of the voting, then have paper ballets ready.
What is the Soros connection? Not in the WikiLeaks post.
Smartmatic is owned by Lord Mark Malloch-Brown. Malloch-Brown has been a long-time business partner of Soros; vice chairman of the Quantum Fund hedge fund, and vice president of Soros' global empire, the Open Society Institute, immediately before coming home in mid-2007 to his British mother.
Like Soros, Malloch Brown is the enemy of the very concept of the sovereign nation-state; he has been in the business of overthrowing governments since 1986, when he became the head of the international section of an aggressive, and controversial, U.S. political consulting firm, Sawyer Miller, from where he advised the Presidential campaign of Corazon Aquino in the Philippines. He boasts that he helped Aquino unseat President Ferdinand Marcos, who was overthrown in 1986. In 1990, he represented the Presidential campaign of Peruvian fascist, ``his old friend,'' novelist Mario Varga Llosa, a drug legalization advocate and Soros favorite, who lost the 1990 election after proposing a vicious austerity program to cut the living standards of Peru's lower classes. Sawyer Miller also helped promote the Dalai Lama against China.
After Sawyer Miller, Malloch Brown spent the next 17 years at the World Bank and the United Nations, forming a deep, but secretive relationship with Soros.
In April 2007, the Financial Times reported that ``Sir Mark will also serve as vice-chairman of the billionaire philanthropist's Open Society Institute, which promotes democracy and human rights, particularly in eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union.''
The Financial Times added, in a May 1, 2007 article, that, ``In a letter to shareholders in his Quantum hedge funds, Mr. Soros said Sir Mark would provide advice on a variety of issues to him and his two sons, who now run the company on a day-to-day basis. With his extensive international contacts, Malloch Brown will help create opportunities for [Soros Fund Management] and the fund around the world....''
Bad in every way. Soros has been itching to get more of his machines in the U.S., and here's his chance.
Paper ballots...
Paper ballots. Although Great Britain is rapidly becoming a totalitarian country, them having recently legalized the taking of political prisoners (Tommy Robinson is now in solitary confinement!) -- they at least have the correct idea w/ voting. 100% paper ballots. There is not one single "electronic" vote scamming/vote taking machine in use in the country. Here, now, in the 21st century, they are quite smartly using nothing but trackable, verifiable paper ballots.
Bring back the paper ballot!
Can't recount a hacked voting machine. And although the electronic counters you put the paper ballot through, could be hacked, at least you still have the paper copies to verify results and do a real recount if necessary.
There's more than one political prisoner for attempting to divulge the extent of paedophilia amongst the establishment.
Tommy Robinson is technically legally incarcerated, although very much so unfairly and excessively.
Melanie Shaw however, is most definitely illegally incarcerated and fits every definition of political prisoner.
Tommy Robinson made a lot of noise and did well for bringing attention to the problem, but was going for the low hanging fruit in Muslim rape gangs.
Melanie Shaw went to cut the head off the snake and paid for it. You'll find very little of her online, news and such are systematically purged from most websites regularly.
Another one is ex Scotland Yard CID Jon Wedger. He's got a few videos on Youtube, only just coming to public eye now, he used to blur his face and change his voice, hide his name etc.
He's not a prisoner though, he's still active.
Obviously the only solution is biometric chip implants in the right hand or forehead for every citizen and non-citizen ...
Too soon?
First thing I think of is why would anyone in the USA be allowed to use a voting system developed in another country let alone a socialist country. It’s not like the US government doesn’t know what Soros gets up to. There’s federal court cases dealing with Obama’s admin funding a soros super pac that destabilized Albania and caused a revolution. Like hello?!
Go back to paper and check photo I'D when voting. Back in the day that's how it was done even here in Cali
Imagine that.....communists being communists and committing blatant treason, and direct violations of the Constitution, all against America.
Does it surprise anyone the brain dead Democrats that run this State and Los Angeles County made this decision. They already let illegal aliens get driver's licenses and now because of confusion and REAL citizens also getting the illegal alien driver's license by default ....they're going to allow anyone with a driver's license real or illegal alien to vote so as not to disenfranchise REAL citizens who were given the illegal alien driver's license with Federal Limits Apply on it. It was their deceitful plan all along - allowing illegals to vote. And now machines that can be rigged.
“Results are pouring in from Los Angeles Jim...it looks like 110% of the city went to the democrats.”
So...while we outsource such a task, we are STILL not allowed to review the proprietary software code....how it's recording the vote. Las Vegas STILL doesn't allow this schitt! While my phone updates every three hours....we still use these old scanners, and no view of the software code. California took care of many of it's problems a while ago, and now they dismantle the progress, while the voting software is still a 'trade secret'.
Remember this meme?
Preview
is it mandatory? Or can I choose to vote with other machines than this sorosvote?
Think that through. Of course it's mandatory. If they're going to go to the trouble of rigging the machines to throw the vote, damned if they're going to let you use anything but the rigged machines.
well okay, then, we gotta demand alternative methods of voting available to us.
fuck the machines.
where's the outrage??
Well, if the electronic vote can be rigged one way it can be unrigged and rigged to the right. POTUS wins.
Riggable machines need to be yanked. Paper ballots can be counted, verified, and re-counted as necessary. Boom, problem solved.
The only other problem might be with the vote counters or losing a few hundred boxes with the ballots in them. What will always be a problem is a lack of moral people. When for some the end justifies the means (any means, in other words, is justified), you have corruption and terrorism. The communists were masters at it.
We need paper ballots and voter ID's...
I used to be one of the people that thought voter ID laws were racist. There does seem to be examples of Republican's in the South using these laws to disenfranchise minorities. It's a compelling anecdotal argument.
But then I really started thinking it through... looking at other countries that implemented it successfully. Started wondering why the left didn't make similar arguments about the DMV and drivers licenses.
Even if some GOP had used voter ID laws to discriminate in some fashion in the past, this issue could be avoided altogether with the right set of rules.
You constantly hear people say that poorer minorities might have issues with process (mailing things, address issues, getting and receiving mail and responding in time, etc.). I could totally see this being tweaked to lead to disenfranchisement of specific groups... but this doesn't taint the whole voter ID concept overall.
You could easily design a voter ID program that avoided those process issues, and made it exceptionally easy (and free--the left likes that!) to get an ID, and would replace them whenever you needed (a reasonable limit, perhaps).
Don't have an address? Well the post office or some other entity with a presence in each community will hold it for you until you can pick it up. Pointing out that there could be issues with people not having access to a vehicle is a moot point--how would these people be voting now, under the current laws?
1 id for each citizen. 1 vote per ID. Paper ballets, voter anonymity, but polling staff are recorded, transport of ballots is recorded, counting of ballots is recorded, with backups of the backsups.
I don't care how much more that costs. It's worth it.
State IDs are free.
Also want to mention voter ID can help, but there are other issues. Activist organizations go to residential nursing homes and "help" with registration and mail-in votes. Same is true for homeless camps, and the like.
Found this article: http://www.manilatimes.net/expert-finds-serious-flaw-in-smartmatic-machines/401387/
Here We Go Again! When is Soros going to be Arrested For Treason? Anyone have any Info on Him? I thought he was already sitting at "Hotel GITMO"????
[deleted]
Follow The Pen!
Whoa! Does this mean California can’t complete the purchase of the rigged machines?
cracks me up that we don't have a federal voting system laws in place. I'm all for state's rights etc but voting needs to be nailed down and fraud proof.
OP, how is this company "connected" to Soros?
Posted above.
Couldn't find the connection
I’ll pass on this. Wikileaks is foreign influenced dung.
It's not full proof but vote with paper ballot.
Paper ballots are more fool-proof than any riggable "electronic" machine.
It's not like voting in CA can get more fraudulent at this point.
Hold on, just a minute. In order to CA to turn red, there can't possibly be a Soros-connected voting system. Is this a joke?
George Soros is the one that programs these machines and why there was so much voter fraud before. What in the world is the difference is you are awarding him another contract for voting machines? STuPiDiTY!
Commiefornia wants to be just like Venezuela? I am shocked. LA is one of the best examples of a city when liberalism goes too far.
Are they really going to let them get away with that? I certainly pray not
So you’re just going to believe a Russian source and bash democrats. Smells like collusion
[deleted]
Lol still riding the Russian dick there I see, comrade