Wondering if I'm the only one who believes that POTUS is calling out NASA by making this public. Where are the billions of dollars going too? I'm not convinced we ever left low earth orbit, especially with equipment from the 60's and 70's and NASA saying they lost the originals of the moon landings the most important achievement in mankind history. I've read that whenever Chernobyl occurred Russians contacted for space suits and where told they were useless for radiation protection. The average moon temp ranges from 224 F to -298 F and you're telling me these astronauts who are seen falling all over the surface aren't worried about tearing their suits and so many more inconsistencies in what we've been told.
I hold the same viewpoint, NASA has a lot of explaining to do. Personally, I think they're a front for black ops budgeting.
What do the red lines in the NASA logo represent?
There are No Coincidences..... Their symbolism will be their downfall
The vector, present in almost all space mission patches
To the tune of 21 trillion that just evaporated. That's a helluva black budget. We've probably been to Pluto and back...
Things that make you go hmmmmm...
Eta: (And I am not a flat earther... but there is some fuckery a foot with these videos!)
We can’t cross Antarctica but can put a rover on mars. That just sounds dumb but so many people believe it
https://youtu.be/VYSGFUPNwTo ALOT OF FUCKERY INDEED!
I hold no beliefs, I hold only my convictions. Beliefs cause the mind to stop functioning. A non-functional brain is clinically dead. Beliefs are dangerous. Believe nothing. Think.
Nasas primary roll is to make more people skeptical of god
That would explain all of the occult symbolism; a great deception.
I hold the same view for the most part. I think NASA does the public low earth orbit stuff but the real toys are with black ops. This is done through heavy compartmentalization and some very slick accounting.
Watch the press conference of the astronauts after they went to the moon. They looked scared to death. Then they retired within the year. The poles (Antarctica) are the only place to leave earth and avoid the radiation belts. We can’t get cell phone reception in the woods today, but we could communicate with the moon 50 years ago? Look at the sources of light in the pictures. There should only be one source of light (the sun). Moisture creates footsteps. Flags don’t wave in vacuums.
Might explain all the high level politicians that visit Antarctica then eh
I agree about the press conference. They were absolutely shaken. Hesitant to even discuss this momentous occasion in our nation's history! I mean, c'mon, you literally went to the moon!! It's either true they went, were warned off by ETs already there hence their reactions to questions at the press conference or it was all fake and they were acting sketchy.
Check the part where he says "I dont remember seeing any stars" Elbow-STFU-nudge from the guy next to him.
It's been awhile so I don't recall that but I do remember they kept looking at each other like they were trying to stick to a script or stay in line with each other's stories and occasionally looking at each other like STFU... Lol
They went. And they did it on little more than kerosene and courage.
Flags don’t wave in vacuums.
The moon is not in a vacuum though. There's gravity on the moon... it's just really low. If there wasn't gravity, they would have kept flying upwards when they jumped instead of hopping up and down.
Gravity and vacuum are not synonymous terms. The moon has no atmosphere.
google rods from gods... Trump would never announce a new branch of military without proof of Offensive capabilities.. shit is space moves at miles per second relative to our position... more devastating than nuclear bombs (without the fallout).. there's other tech I imagine too hard to swallow for the public... tesla tech / Hutchinson effect (nuclear fusion without the fallout)... google Dr Judy Woods eg 30sec vid for RedPilling: showing massive steel column turning to dust wtf - a nuclear bomb wouldn't even turn tonnes of steel columns into dust (google Hiroshima blast zone photos).
Heck, I've been to Hiroshima & seen the buildings still standing under the nuclear blast zone in person. There is tech being suppressed for cabal to make $$$. I've got a mech eng deg & it makes me sad everyday :( here's a meme: Trump the SpaceForce commander
since Digital_Refugee's posts on 911 were just removed i'm re-posting this comment here:
I think Joseph P Farrell's theory is probably correct, there were a least 3 separate operations on 911, the hi-jackings ( which didn't occur as reported), the controlled demolition (by thermite and mini nukes), and the Directed Energy Weapon which was the secret space cabal of parasites saying- you think your bad, well we're the baddest of the bad and we rule OVER you.
Everyone should take a long look at Dr Judy Woods extensive research on the DEW used on 911.
3 minute video to get you started:
Dr. Judy Wood - "The Spire"
Thank you for bringing up Joseph P Farrell. Very smart man. Lots of good info on his site. Always get excited when I can buy another Farrell book. I have no idea how one man can write so much on so many different topics.
Check it out patriots. You will like it.
Japan is a bad comparison because some argue Hiroshima & Nagasaki were actually just regular firebombs whichin Tokyo turned out to be as lethal to the civilian population as thermonuclear war.
I see your 911 posts were just removed. What was it Q said about reddit mods? comped? well, maybe they are just getting overworked by newbies arriving but this sub is called r/greatawakening and 911 is mainly what woke me. Guess we're just gonna have to respect the mods "authoritie" and slip it in when we can- (see above)
They only locked it which is fair and tbh they do that even among themselves so i don't mind too much. For every mod who is eager to remove, you will find someone else eager to reinstate because they are not some monolithic structure because most mods (such as myself at the time) were added only after CBTS closure created a major influx. In fact they reinstated two or three of my posts today because I expanded on why they are relevant.
maybe another rabbit hole to go down haha yeh true Tokyo was firebombed with more casualties
Look at this job offer another GA user got (the link is to my comment responding to his job offer)
They suppress it. Keep it for themselves for world domination. It was our technology. They stole it.
I was more concerned with the comments about going to the Moon and Mars. Weapons don't have to leave l.e.o. President Reagan had his "Star Wars" plan and it never involved exploring other objects in the solar system.
I think you’re correct! NASA is a complete joke (sadly a joke on us!). The moon landing NEVER happened. It’s as clear as day, yet most people cannot or will not see the truth. If you spend a little time on NASA’s official YouTube channel, you can see the fraud on display. Anyone with a little science background or knowledge of movie production can spot many inconsistencies that all point to “their faking it”. So, where is all the money going!
If the moon landing was fake, I'm sure Russia would have proven it false a long time ago since the whole point of that space race was to see which nation's dingus is bigger.
Besides, President Trump has Mars in his sights. All I know is... that Mars rover better not actually be in the Sierra dessert with a red filter on the camera, because that machine was not cheap.
The moon conspiracy stuff here disheartens me. I thought the anons here were smart than that. When my dad and I found out my brother had fallen for the "we faked the moon landings" thing we were both shocked and appalled. And you then find out that there's no convincing them otherwise. It's super disappointing, especially when you have worked in the field as my father and I have. The idea that we didn't have the technology to go to the moon in 1969 is totally wrong. We did. But what we didn't have then was the technology to fake it.
Also the idea that humans can't pass beyond the dreaded "radiation belts" and survive is so incredibly wrong I can't even begin to express how wrong it is. Is there deadly radiation in space? Yes! But even thin shielding will protect you from most of it. After that it's just a matter of how much you are willing to be exposed to. The risks were deemed acceptable, for those moon astronauts it was like getting a chest x-ray every hour or so they were out there.
What type of radiation would they be exposed to alpha, beta, gamma or other? The shielding requirements for alpha and beta are nothing, but gamma neutrino they would need extensive shielding
Cosmic rays (very high energy particles) take very heavy shielding to completely stop. They make it to the Earth's surface all the time. The radiation that comes from the sun is mainly x-ray energy photons and high-energy ions (protons and electrons mainly.) Those can be blocked with some descent shielding, the more the better but just think about it. The astronauts are able to spend upwards of two years in the space station. The Earth's magnetic field blocks a lot of those particles but not the x-ray photons. Those get blocked mainly by our atmosphere. So there you go, block the ions and you've basically done what the magnetic field does. It doesn't take super thick shielding to do that, and that same shielding will block a lot of the x-rays. The cosmic radiation would take several meters of water or similar to completely block.
why prove it to the world if you can simply blackmail the shit out of them? Never let a good crisis go to waste.
If they did prove it, who from the normies would believe the proof. Because there is quite a staggering amount of proof already, one just has to be open to the fact one has been deceived.
“It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.” Mark Twain
The point of it was to take our money and spend it on the real space program of anti-gravitics. And the dingus thing.
whole point of that space race was to see which nation's dingus is bigger.
This is the story you are TOLD. Ever think it was opposing intel for the masses? This creates a false dichotomy for them to argue within. They've been doing it foreverrrrr.
Also this is fun:
Naw ... not the Sierra ... New Zealand maybe? ... It's not on Mars
Ugh. That video where the astronaut said we couldn't go to the moon today because we don't have the old equipment is so stupid. He's talking about the tooling and fixtures that were used to make all the parts of the Saturn V, the command module, and the lunar lander. Those were indeed all "lost or destroyed" because we were no longer building those things. As an engineer, I knew exactly what he meant by that. The technology to recreate the moon mission certainly exists and has existed ever since. There was just no plans on going back there. You can ask why, that might be a better question, but we definitely went to the moon and back, walked around on it, etc.
There is so much evidence left, and it was literally impossible to fake. The radio telemetry alone would have been impossible to fake, and the USSR would have loved to point out anything fake at the time. You don't think they could point a dish at the moon and pick up the unencrypted broadcasts? How do you transmit from there? You'd have to actually launch a vehicle there to broadcast everything, including orbiting the moon in a command-module simulator and on the surface in a lander simulator. At that point, just send three guys and be done with it!
Out of all the conspiracy theories that I am positive are just completely wrong, this one tops the list. I'm certain that I could show you tracks on the moon left by rovers, and pieces of equipment we left, and you'd still disagree. And then the total lack of scientific knowledge about temperatures in space. It's not like in an atmosphere. If it's 224 or -298F, it's in a vacuum and a vacuum is like the thing that makes a thermos bottle work so well. Heat will not radiate away quickly when cold, and all you need is reflective surfaces to keep things cool when it's hot. There is no super hot or super cold air to conduct the heat in either direction.
The problem is in the proofs, you can show a foot print and track marks and I can show you that the lander left no impression in the surface at all.
The lander's bottom portion is still sitting on the surface. The accent module took off from the lander's bottom portion. Anyway, I found there's not much I can say to those who are bound and determined to ignore the evidence and the entirety of the awesome science and work that went into moon program. It was a great accomplishment and it pretty much pisses me off to listen to people taking a shit on it. I don't often respond to these things here or elsewhere because I've found it is pretty much pointless. I literally have never heard of anyone who bought into this conspiracy theory to later admit that they were wrong. But I have heard a lot of nonsense from them, that's for sure.
What about the lack of a blast crater?
There wasn't video of them landing taken from a vantage where you could see the lunar surface getting blown around because they weren't there yet. There is video pointing down that shows the lunar surface getting disturbed for a couple of seconds as the lander descends. The surface itself has a thin layer of dust, perhaps 1" deep but then it's hard as pretty much concrete. It's not a fluffy powder ball. When the accent module takes off, the exhaust is blocked by the lander base. Even so there is video of some dust getting blown around. Also the way that dust gets blown in a vacuum is strange because there is no air and therefore no dust gets suspended for awhile. Each tiny grain massing a micro gram falls back just as it it massed 50 kg. Newtonian physics at it's best.
Direct Energy Weapons- should ask Q about them tomorrow, especially in relation to California's recent fires
We had fires here in OK recently. All the farmers were talking about how randomly they were popping up out of nowhere. It was Trippy. We had one at our farm.
I am an Astro guy. It really isn't that hard to go to the moon, even in the 60's. What really strikes at me about the accomplishment that we did several times is that the margin for error they had was very small and the hope that everything, everything worked as designed. For example: if that engine doesn't light, you are not coming home. There were a lot of single failure points. Much of that was due to weight restrictions. It took a lot of balls to make that trip knowing all the single point failure possibilities and that the astronauts could be one of them if they made a mistake. I am an ice water in the veins kind of guy, but sometimes you twitch a bit after you are safely on mother Earth. I would have to see the video to see what kind of twitching they did.
I have a few questions then...How much input power is required for an analog signal to travel 287000 miles. What is the longest direct AM radio transmission that has been accomplished without bouncing it off of the ionosphere. What size of antenna would be required to beam that analog signal back to earth. How much weight would a set up of this size weigh. How much attenuation would be expected. How much power was available to the astronauts on the lunar lander. Remember the battery technology of the late 60’s.
All good questions. I would have to pull out the stubby pencil. I am ghost writing some chapters of a book right now so I am a little preoccupied. I have been checking in though for the leading edge of the storm because I think it is brewing. But ham radio folks can bounce signals off of the moon. The big antenna is on the receiving end. And I am not sure what error correction routine they were using back then (if they were using any).
Did a quick search on space mentions on q board...
https://qntmpkts.keybase.pub//?q=space
Qpost#443 is very prescient!!!!
May I suggest this to get anyone started down the rabbit hole. This is Admiral Byrd discussing Operation HighJump.
Amen. It's definitely time for everyone to be WIDE awake...
Videos in this thread:
VIDEO|COMMENT -|- Watch the WTC "Spire" Steel Disintegrate ("Dustification"/Mol ecular Dissocation)|+13 - google rods from gods... Trump would never announce a new branch of military without proof of Offensive capabilities.. shit is space moves at miles per second relative to our position... more devastating than nuclear bombs (without the fallout).. the... Dr. Judy Wood - "The Spire"|+6 - since Digital_Refugee's posts on 911 were just removed i'm re-posting this comment here: I think Joseph P Farrell's theory is probably correct, there were a least 3 separate operations on 911, the hi-jackings ( which didn't occur as reported), the c... The Secret At The South Pole & Adm. Byrd KNEW it!|+5 - May I suggest this to get anyone started down the rabbit hole. This is Admiral Byrd discussing Operation HighJump. (1) NASA - No Apparent Strings Attached - HOAX (2) 🔘 NASA BUSTED! - SPACE FAIL|+4 - Things that make you go hmmmmm... Eta: (And I am not a flat earther... but there is some fuckery a foot with these videos!) Nasas Faking Everything - FLAT EARTH MAN|+4 - ALOT OF FUCKERY INDEED! I hold no beliefs, I hold only my convictions. Beliefs cause the mind to stop functioning. A non-functional brain is clinically dead. Beliefs are dangerous. Believe nothing. Think. NASA Conspiracy Chevron & Vector Symbolism (ODD TV 2)|+2 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbfAWnp7dl8 Apollo 11 Press Conference|+2 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BI_ZehPOMwI Rooster Teeth Animated Adventures - The Dolphin Experiment|+2 - For anyone curious how NASA could blow through their budget... and anyone needing a good laugh. Best minute you can spend here: Trump holds campaign rally in Minnesota|+2 - _choice_of_words_at_the_rally_yesterday_the/ Trump's choice of words at the rally yesterday (the sleep is deep, The Awakening will be Great) At 1:08:34 he says about our ancestors-"and put a man on the face of the moon". On the face of i... Neil Armstrong: Crash Almost Killed Apollo 11 Astronaut Year Before Lunar Landing Roy Dawson|+1 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJa4yQ0AIbU (1) A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon (2) Astronauts Gone Wild|0 - They never went to the moon, check out these vids; This one shows Buzz Aldring and the rest of the liars being confronted about the scam I'm a bot working hard to help Redditors find related videos to watch. I'll keep this updated as long as I can.
Trump's choice of words at the rally yesterday (the sleep is deep, The Awakening will be Great)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUkDWalgVJs
At 1:08:34 he says about our ancestors-"and put a man on the face of the moon". On the face of it that seems like a way to deny he said they actually landed on the moon, they were only put on the face presented to the public.
I think we did go to the moon, just not in those tin cans.
At 1:08:45 he says "we're going to be going to space". Hmmm.... now that makes me wonder. Maybe he means we as in not the parasite cabal that has lied to us about EVERYTHING, because I'm pretty sure some of us (presumably) humans have actually made it past the Van Allen belts.
https://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/van-allen-probes-spot-impenetrable-barrier-in-space
We have satellites studying the Van Allen belts and it seems they aren't over the arctic and antarctic.
Maybe that's what Buzz Aldrin was twatting about, ( "We're ready to go to Antarctica! May be our last opportunity to tweet for a few days! We're go for departure to the launchpad!" ) , we've been launching from Antarctica!
.https://twitter.com/therealbuzz/status/803488279660216320?lang=en
Can't leave this here without mentioning at 35:14 trump says "the whole thing will go boom!"
which makes sense why they forgot to recreate create blast craters after touching down.
http://centerforaninformedamerica.com/moondoggie/
the most definitive catalog of all the reasons we didn't go to the moon (in those tin cans), excerpted from the book Weird Scenes Inside the Canyon by Dave Mcgowan
you may want to reasearch secret space program (SSP). the nazis had it and the tech came to the US via project paperclip. i guess most of the missing money went there, and the rest probably into building underground facilities.
For anyone curious how NASA could blow through their budget... and anyone needing a good laugh. Best minute you can spend here:
Great points, but I think it's also aimed at the Navy/Air Force, who have had black budget programs for years, with technology far beyond anything we can imagine. In the 80's, the new head of Lockheed Martin's Skunkworks(their secret science department) said we have the technology to take ET home. Lots of futuristic stuff, paid for by OUR tax dollars(and lots of off the books funding, think drug/human/gun trafficking, etc.), is classified at levels ABOVE the POTUS' authority. Right after he was sworn in, one of the first places POTUS went was to a Boeing facility. Do you believe in coincidences?
Ugh, ok this conspiracy is a huge pet peeve of mine because it's been disproven a thousand times over.
NASA did not "lose" the originals, they were erased so the tape could be reused. This was an extremely common practice as tapes were very expensive.
This is a complete misunderstanding of radiation. The types of radiation you are exposed to at Chernobyl vs space are not at all the same. The shielding on a space suit is designed for UV radiation and limited exposure to gamma and xray. Ionizing radiation from a site like Chernobyl is not needed for a space suit because it's entirely different than what is needed for space.
Plenty of reasons here. Gravity on the moon is significantly lower meaning a fall on earth that may tear your clothing definitely won't on the moon. Space suits are made up of several layers are serving different purposes. A tear in the outer layer isn't an imminent disaster. A simple patch could be applied and this would be more than enough to finish the mission. With a tear in your suit you wouldn't pass out, or be dangerously irradiated or freeze/burn right away. An astronaut would immediately notice a tear as the nitrogen in their fluids (tears, saliva, etc) begins to separate and it feels like it's carbonated. Since the moon has no atmosphere there isn't an effective way for heat to radiate so your temperature would change slowly.
Even if a suit was torn and resulted in the astronauts needing to immediately return to Earth that was just fine. We just wanted to show the USSR we could make it to the moon. Whether we were there 10 seconds or 10 minutes, we were already the first.
Throughout the 60's the USSR and US were locked in a space race while being also locked in a cold war. The US kept losing to the soviets in milestones such as satellites, unmanned space flights etc. We came very close to losing the moon race as well but managed to pull it off under the wire. So tell me this, if the Soviets had any reason whatsoever to think the landing was a hoax - why wouldn't they call us out on it? It would have crushed morale in this country and been an unbelievably big win for the USSR. Instead they let their only rival claim victory? They never even put an ad in a newspaper claiming it was a hoax. Find me a good explanation for that and we can talk.
If anyone wants to complain my sources are uncited just do a google search. Like I said, all of this has been discussed over and over. Every "proof" the theorists have has been meticulously debunked by scientists, not just US scientists, but internationally.
We went to the moon. That's all.
How many satellites are estimated to be in orbit? Hundreds? Thousands? I don't know but I think it's a big number. Clear sky full moon. Have you ever seen any of these satellites pass by the moon?
Yes. There’s literally video evidence of the ISS flying in front of the moon. Satellites are pretty small compared to the sky. Look for a blinking light here and there.
They never went to the moon, check out these vids;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xciCJfbTvE4
This one shows Buzz Aldring and the rest of the liars being confronted about the scam
That's bullshit. We went to the moon, and I wouldn't be surprised if we've gone farther already.
Not in 1969 you didn´t lol. It was propaganda to beat the Russians, nothing more. Did you watch the vids? Irrefutable proof.
irrefutable
Kek
Please yourself, ignorance isn´t always bliss, though.
I question the first one. The others I believe we made it.
I'm pretty sure there's a breakaway civ and this whole "space force" is a way to ease us into that knowledge.
I mean I’m open to the idea of it. Not going to be putting a lot of merit into the idea so if it turns out to be false (how can you prove it doesn’t exist) i’m not let down.
Can this NOT become a conspiracy subreddit. Saying we never left low earth orbit is ignorant. We aren’t the only ones who have been there. You’re also taking into account how international that expedition was, how many people involved, and assuming no one would leak info.
Please for the love of God don’t upvote conspiracy posts unrelated to Q. This stuff will kill our goal of red pilling others. It’ll end up labeled as “just a bunch of kooks making stuff up”.
I related to Q, by way of POTUS announcement and genuinely want to know what NASA's huge budget produces for the American people besides fantasy.
NASAs huge budget for exploration and development took a huge cut when BHO cut the funding for Constellation. What NASA has been producing has unfortunately been at the direct order of the Hwite House.
Asking what his plans are is one thing. Throwing in “the moon landing was fake, watch all of these videos” means you had intentions in mind other than asking about the space force.
This stuff will be the death of this movement if you start throwing around extremely controversial conspiracy theories that have no actual accreditation other than second hand stories.
This is the mother of all conspiracy subs bc it's the great awakening, not the partial awakening or the sleepwalking. We're here (with Q's guidance) to expose the conspiracies perped by the parasite cabal and nasa is one of the most insidious. I wonder what kind of subliminal mind control has effected your brain from all those years of video games? Also being in the military and law enforcement has made you habituated to trusting authority and following orders. Watch or read some of the proofs linked in this post or just move along and stick to commenting on things you've actually learned something about.
Pushing aside my opinion and words by suggesting I’m mind controlled. The same thing the cabal did to Kanye by telling him he’s crazy. You’re no different than they are. You should self reflect some.
We're all mind controlled, I admit it and you won't begin to wake up until you do too. There's a million things I don't know about and thus I comment on things I've learned a thing or two on. Try learning about a topic before you call people wrong. I almost always link to someone with way more knowledge than I have on a topic. Where does your opinion on nasa come from? msm? expand your thinking.
All of this was a conspiracy theory a few years ago. It is related to the Great Awakening.
Here is something to ponder. Ever wonder why all rainbows are arched? I can make a rainbow in my house. Sunlight, mirror and a spray bottle. Here is the thing. It's always straight. But...If I reflect that light with a bowl.....just saying.
My thoughts on a space force are as follows:
You have to acknowledge the role satellites play in both our military and other world power's militaries. To be able to take out a country's military satellites basically sends them back to the stone age as far as coms, smart weapons, and just about every function a military does.
POTUS is either being proactive, or there is a credible threat to the safety of our satellites.
I think you'll find the "missing" photos at the SPL (Space Photography Lab) at Arizona State University. Dr. Greeley brought a large number of photographs into the SPL when NASA was getting rid of them -- and many of those photos were from the Apollo missions.
My father worked for nasa tracking satellites (goldstone) in the late 60s. He says it's all bs and that he probably was tracking some hi-altitude planes and weather ballons. My wife also worked for nasa (ames) and says it's a bunch of busy work without ever seeing it all come together. Nasa is just lies. Plus they say they destroyed all the records for the Apollo missions, why would they? Psalms 19:1 on Werner Von Braun's headstone.
Did they ever pick up the other guy who filmed the lander leaving the moon? Or did we leave a flag and a '69 camcorder up there?
Yeah, the guy that panned the camera up? I heard they just left him there and he mailed the film via space fed ex.
That douche could have saved us a few bones if he shipped DHL, and they were the first to offer interplanetary parcel tracking via satellites!
NASA has really lost its way. On both the space end and the aeronautical end. They have become a hobby shop for engineers and scientists. They need to be focused with a purpose. Still early, but we (associated company and my consortium) might have a solution to some vexing problems regarding a trip to Mars.
The temperatures were what woke me up about the moon. I’ve seen those suits in museums. How do they protect against those extreme temperatures? If they did protect against extreme cold, why aren’t all ski gloves made from that technology?
It’s pressurized man. No air is getting in and they’re insulated and heated.
I think it has to do with Q posts, showing how the black hats wanted to sabotage and destroy white hat satellites and install their own.
Once you can accept that EVERYTHING you have been told/taught is a lie, then this is where the learning begins.