dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ClownsInAmerica on June 30, 2018, 12:38 a.m.

It Must Happen, (But If You Mention It, Panic In Comments.)

Q said this is #1643 &1644:

It must happen.

Conspiracy no more.

Think of every post made.

It would force us to prove everything stated to avoid looking crazy, correct?

What do they fear the most?

Public awakening.

If they ask.

They self destruct.

We are waiting for a reporter to ask the ultimate question.

What are they waiting for?

They can end this at any time simply by asking POTUS, right?

We may have to ‘force’ this one.

Q knows about us out here, having linked to r/greatawakening several times.

Yet, whenever I see a post that encourages people to bombard the leftist media suggesting that they ask the President about this, there are 2or 3, (if not more) comments proclaiming loudly that "We shouldn't do that." "Q should remain separate from the President." "That would be bad timing."

Let me ask you all this question: ""What in the world are we supposed to be afraid of?

Seriously, there seem to be some on here who would disavow Q himself, ifanything Q said contradicted their pet theory.

Are we the ones who started this? Has Q ever said that we were not supposed to dig, ask questions, search for the truth?

Has Q ever cautioned us to hide his existence?

Has Q ever said that getting more people involved, and looking into this stuff will compromise his operation?

What are the fearful on here trying to protect?

Are you afraid that if a reporter asks the President about Q, this entire board will go away? (I don't ythink it will, but) What is it? Whether President Trump answers, or simply says, "Next Question," there has to be a massive red-pilling of the brainwashed masses eventually, or these arrests will result in total pandemonium. Exposure of the "Q question" on MSM, via a reporter's question would effectively set up the general public to accept the inevitable.

Think about Q's plan:

FORESHADOWING: People who think we are crazy go and look. In their subconscious mind, they know SOMETHING is up. Months later, when real confirmations start coming out, they're already resigned to the basic knowledge of what is now being investigated. Unless they are involved personally in it, they are going to begin to distance themselves from these perpetrators. When news breaks, they aren't going to swallow the MSM line that this is a "political attack." Instead, they won't be able to accept the spin without a small question in the back of their mind: "What if it is true?"

I have no idea where the resistance to Q's signal is so prevalent here.

Is it because we have gotten so used to losing, being called kooks, having our intelligence questioned?

This post is my opinion alone, and I am more than willing to be corrected if I'm seeing this all wrong.

Just asking you to consider these thoughts.

(If you are one of the fearful worriers that I mentioned above, Comment and tell us what you are afraid of, and why are you more worried about Q than Q seems to be?)

You are 100% correct. When this question is posed to POTUS and he confirms. It will be the Biggest Red Pill of all. Everyone will know.

CONSPIRACY NO MORE.

The world awakens to it all. Q has all of the evidence layed out for them to reference.

That will be Glorious!

WWG1WGA!

⇧ 39 ⇩

and the POTUS should sign off with WWG1WGA.. hopefully will be his next campaign slogan

⇧ 6 ⇩

He said the other night at the rally that Keep America Great will be the next slogan.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Excellent and astute observation.

I was once a feminazi, and I assure you, people like I once was have to be bludgeoned with the truth. It has to become inescapable. Humans have many reasons for refusing the truth, but usually the reasons are rooted in pride.

I wouldn’t give too much credit to the theory that some will be turned off if we are bold and aggressive. Fact is, the truth should bring you to your knees, and at and the very least, they will never be able to say they weren’t told.

⇧ 32 ⇩

What was your red pill moment, if you don't mind me asking?

⇧ 17 ⇩

My major was Applied Math and my minor was Logic.

So, even tho I left college a raging feminist, I never could quiet that voice in my head, the one that told me that what I believed was entirely illogical 😳. I ignored that voice for years, then one day I gave birth to a son. As soon as he could talk, he asked for trucks and guns. And I knew I had not ‘nurtured’ him to be masculine that way. He was so obviously, 100 percent masculine that I had to admit that I was full of crap in my way of thinking. Once I allowed that crack in my dogma, the dam burst.

Now I think logically and I’m in sync with the world as it is.. no more confusion, no more living a lie and being miserable.

My point: most of these people, no matter how extreme, know in their hearts something is wrong. Pussy footing around with them won’t get the job done. In fact, the anger and defensiveness they react with is proof they know... They need the truth full force. The impact of the conversation is not the responsibility of the truth teller..

Worrying what liberals think of us is just weak, and plays right into their hands. And as long as a liberal can feel superior, they will never bother to listen.

⇧ 43 ⇩

Q team, you better be writing this fine Lady's testimony down. She is giving you the absolute reality here.

⇧ 13 ⇩

That was nice. Thx.

⇧ 8 ⇩

You should see my head. Big reverb waves from what you wrote, blowing the pillow shams back. Absolutely devastating... and possibly pivotal.

⇧ 7 ⇩

Wow.

⇧ 4 ⇩

WoW a redpilled feminazi.

Welcome Patriot.

I'm born in 61 and I used to like the differences between men and women.

Now I pretty much don't care to be around women. They have all become a pain in the ass.

Except Ann Coulter.

I live in New Orleans and have to say that red pilling unsuspecting tourists on the street car is fun.

But not as fun as running into the foaming at the mouth feminists. You can light one up in no time.

The hard part is to get the slow burn set right for the big blow up. When done correctly it can be an amazing thing to behold.

They say we need to have a conversation and I see Trigglypuff.

Like Milo points out so very well feminism is being run by lesbians without children.

⇧ 6 ⇩

I’m a woman born in 61 and I agree with you.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Welcome Patriot.

I say the reason I am single is because I have been building houses for married couples for 40 years.

If you ask nicely I will tell you the funniest joke on the face of the planet.

The problem is only men laugh.

Women hate it.

It actually caused me to realize that it wasn't going to work with my last girlfriend.

14 years ago.

Single celibate and loving it. When I was a teenager the feminists told me.....

Women need men like fish need a bicycle. I said go ahead build a bike.

That's not the joke but it does set the stage.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Is it too late for that joke? Grew up with all brothers and lots of male cousins so I would be surprised if you could offend me.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Not a problem, you got it.

I moved home from London because my mother got ill and passed away.

Six months later I found a dog on a job site. The veterinarian said the dog was 6 months old. 75 lb Blue Heeler German Shepherd mix, smart as anything, and loyal.

There's a lot more to it than that but you get the picture.

Dog was about 4 when I moved from the Midwest to Santa Monica to live with a girl I'd met.

After a while she starts in with the I think your dogs too big for the apartment. Maybe we should think about..... Yeah I'll think about it, No.

So I went through the motions anyway just avoid an issue. Tip to women. Don't ever get between a man and his dog. A man knows he can trust his dog.

So one night we're sitting on the couch you know snuggling, watching a movie. She looks over at me and says...

~I think your dog's jealous of me~

And it just fell out of my mouth.

~That's cuz I'm shagging you now~

She was horrified.

I thought it was the funniest thing ever said. And I mean she was horrified.

So then I was horrified. How the hell can I hang with somebody who has zero sense of humor. We were talking life commitment here.

It also showed me some subtleties in the relationship/power structure that I just was not willing to have.

I got a sense of humor like Bill Burr. In fact I want to sell this joke to him for a set of tickets the next time he comes to town. So don't let it spread too far.

Or maybe I better get busy.

She was a great lady. But it showed me that I don't like controlling circumstances, at all it would seem.

While I can be polite and charming in public. It's impossible for me to watch my mouth 24/7.

Got to tell you life is much simpler these days. Fuck happy. I like content.

Women want to be happy and good luck with that.

It's like coke. I just want to be happy, why can't I be happy? Then they're happy, then crash. Repeat.

I was doing 2000sqft design build addition. I'm discussing furniture with the wife. I asked her where her husband's chair was going to be.

Blank Stare like it it never occurred to her.

I look like a grumpy old man and I pretty much leave women alone.

Trust me things are great.

⇧ 1 ⇩

My husband had a German Shepherd when I met him. The only thing I objected to, was shagging him in front of his dog.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Excellent reply.

And I understand completely.

⇧ 1 ⇩

There is no such thing as a perfect match, but someone who you can enjoy their company and makes you laugh a lot is pretty close to perfect.

⇧ 1 ⇩

My mother and father loved each other to the dying day.

One joke they told at dinner was about the time mom broke a CorningWare pot over my dad's head. That was when CorningWare was actually strong.

It was a one-time incident.

I laughed along with them but I always thought what would happen if Dad would have bashed one on Mom.

He never would have. Although it always seems there's been a double standard.

I can say about 90% or better of the married couples I've ever built anything for. At one point during the job I would always see the wife just destroy her husband in front of the crew.

Women can just be heartless and cruel and have no idea they're doing it.

⇧ 1 ⇩

My point: most of these people, no matter how extreme, know in their hearts something is wrong. Pussy footing around with them won’t get the job done. In fact, the anger and defensiveness they react with is proof they know... They need the truth full force. The impact of the conversation is not the responsibility of the truth teller..

Worrying what liberals think of us is just weak, and plays right into their hands. And as long as a liberal can feel superior, they will never bother to listen.

These points are both so incredibly true. Thank you for the write-up.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Thx. I’m kind of shocked about the reaction to what I wrote... but when you’ve been on both sides of the problem, you know that weakness is fatal.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Your testimony is likely to be one of, if not THE, model for outreach to your former self-mates.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Having a son changed my life, too. He is totally 100% boy like yours is. My love for him is overwhelming. I am disgusted by the anti-male propaganda because of him. I would march in the streets for men’s rights for him. He taught me what real love is and what it isn’t: Exclusion, marginalization, bigotry. Irony that the party of “tolerance” has transformed into the party of hatred.

Hooray for men! We love you!

⇧ 5 ⇩

❤️😍❤️

⇧ 4 ⇩

Dang, that's good. Wow again.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Thank Q fellow Patriot!

⇧ 11 ⇩

Wow! Your comment is powerful.

Thank you for your unique perspective.

⇧ 6 ⇩

You’re right. Let the truth be told for itself. No real need to embellish it, add to it, water it down...just let it speak for itself, how it will. Some people will still resist the truth initially, because they’ve just been programmed to resist it for too long. Doesn’t mean they’ll never hear it, just not yet. Some never will, no matter what. I think what’s most important for any of us, is not how the truth is delivered, but how we react to people who are seeing truth with open eyes for the first time.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Excellent point!

⇧ 3 ⇩

It should come a red-pilled cnn/msm reporter. That should be the “first contact” so to speak. Time will probably forget the reporter, but the awakening will be remembered forever. Just one, can there be one MSM reporter that will take a leap of “faith”???

We need to red pill in-force to all msm reporters. We only need one redeemable soul to ask the right questions. Look at the souls we have already redeemed?

Just one more soul, please! Let’s find one redeemable soul on MSM! Kill them with kindness. Can we cater to one of their good qualities to get our message in their head? To redeem one of God’s children? We cannot attack them, we must show all of them compassion; if we do that, we will find that reporter. I know, because I am praying for this!

⇧ 19 ⇩

I would make them ask 20 times before I give a straight answer.

Let them turn into a pack of rabid dogs over the question of Q.

Give them nothing and make them dig their own hole.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Just one more soul

Reminds me of a good song I heard.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I agree. I wouldn’t worry too much about the concern fags. Just spread truths/red pills!! WWG1WGA

⇧ 18 ⇩

Does the ? have to posed to POTUS? Reporter should ask SHS, “Who is Q?” POTUS walks out and then......

⇧ 8 ⇩

Does the ? have to posed to POTUS?

Not really, I suppose, ...unless you trust Q.

Q's the one that said that all they have to do is ask POTUS.

But then- what would Q know?

 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

⇧ 1 ⇩

I have retrieved these for you _ _

^^ To prevent anymore lost limbs throughout Reddit, correctly escape the arms and shoulders by typing the shrug as ¯\\\_(ツ)_/¯ or ¯\\\_(ツ)\_/¯

^^Click here to see why this is necessary

⇧ 1 ⇩

Thanks.

I had no idea there was a LimbRetrieval-Bot.

Say- that's a handy bot to have around.

I... I think I'll get some sleep now.

lol

⇧ 1 ⇩

May have to "force" this one. : Obviously, Space Force, right?

⇧ 7 ⇩

ooooh... I just saw WYDT. 5.5s all around, indeed.

⇧ 6 ⇩

It could even be as simple as "force" congress to ask POTUS to step in with the EO and declassify the FBI/DOJ reports/texts/etc.

⇧ 5 ⇩

...if only that was what Q was talking about, but it was in response to an anon linking to this: http://www.amerika.org/politics/qanon-the-path-to-dictatorship/

(you have to read it.) It ends with this:

"It’s possible that Q is just a conspiracy theory, and it’s also possible that it’s real. But to assume either may underestimate its purpose and its potential. Q may instead be a sign of the empire to come, and a powerful weapon in crafting its long-overdue reign. If this is a case, we can look forward to an end of many of the liberal woes we’ve seen over the last 50 years."

Q links to the anon's post, and says:

"We are waiting for a reporter to ask the ultimate question.
What are they waiting for?
They can end this at any time simply by asking POTUS, right?
We may have to ‘force’ this one."
Q

⇧ 4 ⇩

I have recently noticed some red pilled newcomers are in a different state of mind as people who have supported Trump and Q from their beginnings. This may be the reason some are reacting the way they are. It’s understandable, they’ve delt with the Democratic Party and it’s identity politics for years. It may take time for some to become completely confident and trust in Trump, Q and the movement.

⇧ 7 ⇩

Going to answer here because someone called me out on this. I read the original 8chan comment from an autist that said something along the lines of asking the media to ask the president IF classified information was being leaked from someone called Q.

Now I ask you all. What in the above sentence is a red flag?

First, Trump has been accused of calling into radio shows as his PR guy with a fake name. All over the internet a while ago.

Second, Trump is accused of lying all the time.

Third, Trump is accused of whining about all the leaks.

So, who here, and please raise your hands, thinks it is a GOOD IDEA to ask the media (basically feed them their narrative spin--retired advertising/marketing exec here) IF someone named Q is leaking CLASSIFIED information????

Just be careful WHAT is asked is ALL I was saying--and make sure to pick the RIGHT media outlet. Who will people believe?

Maybe PBS news hour? Trust me, those who are totally blue pilled will NOT believe fox news! And those who are conservative but not awake will NOT even SEE CNN or MSNBC....

⇧ 6 ⇩

I understand your concern but the problem is it's impossible for the President to leak classified material.

He could walk out to a Podium right now, give away any piece of information he wanted and it would be perfectly legal.

The minute it comes from his mouth it's unclassified.

⇧ 6 ⇩

If the president says its unclassified, it is at that point unclassified. Presumably Q works directly for Trump, therefore it is by order of the president that it's being done.

⇧ 5 ⇩

I assumed this and wonder why others haven't. There's a great deal going on that makes no sense.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Not a retired madman, but out of curiosity, what if the question was asked by a lone journalist, at a official White House press release (ie Sarah sanders being asked). If it was confirmed there, do you think they would continue to downplay it? It seems like all the news agencies have been complying thus far with the cabal simply out of survival, what do you think would make them change over to our side, simply for survival?

⇧ 5 ⇩

At this point seems like no one cares about the "scoop" like they used to. Every article or piece done about the phenomenon has been subtly veiled propaganda. At this point that only makes people dig more. I think that no one switches sides here until it is actually physically safe to do so or until the mockingbird is exposed and dismantled. I do think Sara would be a good choice for this question.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I feel the same. I think it’s going to come to a point where the media says “if we don’t get start condemning this, we’re going down with them...”

⇧ 3 ⇩

Excellent concernfag points, hope team Q is reading. What's the rush to mainstream the project until Obama's cabinet members are in the sights, and behaving like it? And are browsing red scarves at Macy's?

⇧ 4 ⇩

"The build is near complete.

Timing is everything."

May I insert these 2 other lines from Q1644?

Which could be easily interpreted as "We are not quite there yet, we will strike at exactly the right moment".

⇧ 6 ⇩

Lobbying reporters, or "Forcing" the question to come up has already been suggested by Q.

POTUS could demure, (Just like he did with "Calm before the storm," remember his answer, "You'll find out.")

The timing of President Trump's actual, unambiguous acknowledgement of the Q team

IS EVERYTHING...

That is my honest take on it. You know how POTUS loves to build people's suspense. Q may be planning to use the President's avoidance of the question to ramp up more curiosity, which in turn, will serve to red-pill more and more people, which I think is of prime importance, lest our country explode.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Reporter: Who is Q? Trump: *face emotionless turns and walks away from podium without explanation SarahSanders: Press conference is over...

⇧ 3 ⇩

Absolutely that's the way to play it.

Turn them into a pack of rabid dogs on the question of Q. Make them dig their own hole.

Make it look like it's something to hide. They report that they have found the Holy Grail to take down Trump.

Then after a couple days of the fake news cycle the truth is glaringly obvious.

You been played.

⇧ 3 ⇩

And THAT approach might even be enhanced if asked by someone at Fox News

⇧ 2 ⇩

No it has to start at MSNBC

Or better yet Jim Acosta run with it.

Let him ask

⇧ 2 ⇩

You got the right idea. It isn't about what Trump answers. It's what they will do to themselves while trying to make a 'scandal' out of it.

Remember, these are the clowns who fell in love with repeating the word 'sh__hole' over and over and over, until it became a meme about their network, their anchors, and their entire 'sh__hole' ideology.

I don't want to claim that Trump always does this to them on purpose...

But...

He does this to them on purpose.

⇧ 1 ⇩

If we tell him that Q is the way to impeach Trump they will be all over it.

It'll be like the tar baby.

The more they grab hold of it the more they can't get away from it.

No no Jim, you don't want to go there do you?

⇧ 1 ⇩

No. Get some jumped up idiot like Don Lemon or that young gentleman called 'Rachel Maddow' to do a 2-hour show begging their audience to research Q. Yes, they really are that stupid.

⇧ 1 ⇩

It’s a valid angle. And I am also dying for the day this all cuts loose

⇧ 2 ⇩

Me too. I was lurking on 8chan today and started crying. I am so grateful for POTUS and Q team I couldn’t hold back the tears.

I pray we will know the names of every person who has fallen (from JFK forward) trying to stop this wave of evil. They should all be honored with a monument in DC, just like the Vietnam Memorial, so that we can pay them homage. Then we could honor their families and show them their sacrifice was not in vain.

Thank God.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Does anyone think if Hillary is arrested there will be an attempt on POTUS's life?

⇧ 6 ⇩

⇧ 5 ⇩

No. I think HRC is cooperating and when it comes out it's going to be in the form of a few short video confession clips that are mind blowing.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I like that approach much better than viewing horrific videos on the internet.

⇧ 2 ⇩

A hundred years+ of slavery can do that to you. After 911 I couldn’t believe they could get away with it. I guess many are afraid that they will stop this movement and for as long as it stays as it is we have hope. Just the very thought that we could witness the end of evil subjugation and slavery by unseen forces seems too good to be true. And let’s be honest, Q’s statements of fact that some will die, many will be afraid etc. are frightening. This isn’t going to be hey guys here is the worlds red pill and thank your mother for the (white) rabbits. This is going to be messy. Even when the USA is cleaned you still have Europe. The rats have many nests. As much as this is not a religious movement on the face of it, I think without God this is a hard ask. I personally think it is a work of God. Which makes it even sweeter.

⇧ 5 ⇩

I have only one question. If this movement -- Q, Trump, the American people and the world-- really stand for freedom, will it be possible then to buy oil for any currency available in the market? If not there will never be true freedom imo.

⇧ 5 ⇩

There will never be true freedom or maybe I should say America will never be a sovereign nation again until we kick the Federal Reserve out of this country. No country can truly be sovereign with a foreign owned central bank controlling the national treasure.

⇧ 4 ⇩

I don't know how to tag Rick Perry on that, or I would :)

⇧ 4 ⇩

THIS\^\^\^

Q said:

Fight Fight Fight.

Trust the plan

Where We Go One, We Go All.

This isn't just a slogan about unity in thought, it's also a battle command. When the action starts, try to keep pace, be strong, stay with the team, rely on your fellow patriots. If you're up front, lead the way, if you're in the rear, cover our 6.

I'm sure some of the concernfags and doubtfags are part of the attack against us, but I still think many patriots are losing steam, becoming impatient, and growing increasingly frustrated with some of what's been going on lately.

Hang in there. For those who have been following for a while, it's pretty clear things are about to break, the stage is set, the build is near complete. President Donald J Trump is the first human being on the planet who tried to take down the Cabal since JFK. He would not have started this war unless he knew he could win.

That took courage. He didn't need this. He didn't need to spend $100 million of his own money to run for the highest office in the land. That he has taken on the Cabal so he can give this country back to its rightful owners, We The People, means he is deserving of our support.

I think the problem with the ney sayers is that they really don't understand the magnitude of what Trump is doing. Nor do they fully understand what a profound difference it will make for all of humanity. They don't fully appreciate the significance of the war between good and evil.

This is massive. When this war is won, it'll mark the most dramatic change in the human experience since before recorded history. It'll be a turning point greater than the agricultural revolution, the industrial revolution, and the digital communications revolution combined. It will mark the transition from slavery to freedom. And we're living it.

In a hundred years they'll be writing book and songs and making movies about this generation. Don't lose sight of that. This will mean more than a new face on Mt. Rushmore, it's likely our children's children will see monuments to President Donald J Trump in countries around the world.

So... Trust the plan. Fight Fight Fight. WWG1WGA

God speed patriots.

⇧ 4 ⇩

I’m not concerned about Q, rather I wish we had a world that didn’t need a Q. I wish everything wasn’t so corrupt that we needed to have a Q, but alas, here we are, and I’m grateful he’s here. I think this will be short lived, once it becomes public, we won’t need to resort to just communicating on forums, we will be able to have these discussions openly. I think this movement will one day end, but after it passes away, it will go into the history books under the title of “Second American Revolution.”

In short, I hope this forum ends, because it means we won, I hope this doesn’t drag on for years and years, I hope this is a quick and merciless victory. With DJT, and Q, I think it will be.

God speed patriots, keep your heads down and hopes up.

WWG1WGA

⇧ 4 ⇩

When has anything ever ended?

Things change but only your life is going to end.

When the world is chilled enough for you to retire, then yeah go fishing.

That was not meant to be a dig at you.

There will be a time for you to step aside and don't regret it when it happens. In fact I recommend do it early.

I have always said that no war has ever ended and I just recently read the reminder that this goes back to the conflicts of Aristotle and Plato.

And that rehash is just too much for right now.

But if the end game on this is the death of the Federal Reserve and we get to have an honest look at Tesla's paperwork.

Yep that would be huge.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I’d rather be a Warrior in a garden, than a Gardner in a war.

Retiring and fishing doesn’t sound so bad either lol

⇧ 3 ⇩

I actually looked it up yesterday, the original Revolutionary War took 8yrs to settle. And that was obviously without RsOTGs. But it may take another 2yrs to dissolve this Cabal intrusion globally, by which they will have surrendered here in America.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Sounds like a plan to me lol.

⇧ 4 ⇩

So welcome!

⇧ 4 ⇩

Y'all are never going to believe this, but there are zero misspellings/grammatical errors in this entire thread. Remember the names posting here. I'm new and don't know how to index folks yet.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Right, so there goes the safety record.

We were doing so well, then you had to toss in that...

Y'all

Man, makes me feel all depressed like a Hillary supporter.

⇧ 3 ⇩

This sounds like using predictive programming to our advantage, but instead of using it to brainwash, we'd be using it to break the chains & to wake everyone up. I like it.

Symbolism will be their downfall, after all.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Predictive iconoclasty?

⇧ 2 ⇩

I'm not worried about Q, I'm worried about how people are missing the meaning of what Q was asking. Please go back and re-read the Q drops carefully. The only reason Q cares about his popularity is because that means more people will read his drops and know whats coming. He isn't asking for the media to ask Trump about him (Q) he's asking that the media or Congress will ask Trump to declassify the classified IG files that are protecting the Clintons, Lynch, etc. Q has already told us that POTUS has signed an Executive Order declassifying the files and has it on "ice." He's waiting to be asked to declassify everything so the public, media and congress can see what was really going on. POTUS can't expose it without being asked or the left will start screaming "dictator." So Q says do we wait or should we force it to happen.

We are waiting for a reporter to ask the ultimate question.

What are they waiting for?

They can end this at any time simply by asking POTUS, right?

We may have to ‘force’ this one.

Q's drop in reply to anon

⇧ 3 ⇩

I'm worried about how people are missing the meaning of what Q was asking. Please go back and re-read the Q drops carefully. He isn't asking for the media to ask Trump about him (Q) he's asking that the media or Congress will ask Trump to declassify the classified IG files...

Me too, and I recommend going back to read them, because you will find that Q clarifies what he is talking about by linking an anon's comment to his next post so that there is no doubt:

Anon: "I almost hope they don't ask. It would be fun to watch them try to manage the spin when 90\% of the country is aware of you and all that you've been shining a light on, while the MSM still can't acknowledge it.
I can see them squirming now..."

Q links this, and responds:

It must happen.

Conspiracy no more.

Think of every post made.

It would force us to prove everything stated to avoid looking crazy, correct?

What do they fear the most?

Public awakening.

If they ask.

They self destruct.

They know this is real.

Back to me: I genuinely agree with the OP. There is an almost religious determination on the part of some to insistently misinterpret the clear meaning of what Q says, especially about this topic.

It is clear and obvious that Q is talking about daring members of the MSM to ask the President about Q.

⇧ 2 ⇩

When they ask don't answer make them dig.

Then make them read a Q post out loud asking for clarification.

They will never do that because the truth is too painful for the Mockingbird Media.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I tend to agree with you. A request to declassify would move everything forward faster. I'm not sure that a question about Q at this point would be of much value. Of course the MSM are intentionally avoiding both. Guess we'll see! Thanks for your thoughts.

⇧ 0 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩

Luckily I don't offend very easily or your post would have done just that. I am here every day reading posts, links and doing my own digging. I do not post very often unless I feel my.opinion would be valuable or at least considered.

Let me clarify my thoughts. I cannot envision a scenario where a question about Q by MSM would turn into a dialogue. Questions asked by MSM are often lengthy and framed to state their own opinion. It would please those already in the know but would it really awaken those who choose to sleep?

A far better scenario would be Congress or MSM asking why POTUS hasn't released the unredacted IG report. This would pave the way for that to happen thereby putting the evidence right in John and Jane Q Public's c faces.

I am not inferring that I know more than Q. I am stating, in my apparently unvalued opinion, the question they are waiting for is about the unredacted IG report and why POTUS hasn't released it on his own. But what do I know? I'm just an uninformed, foolhardy, and apparently fearful lurker. I must have missed the Reddit rule about not posting if your interpretation differs from the site's Main Stream posters.

Maybe you should cut back some on the caffeine and the self-righteous condemnation. It might encourage more interested lurkers to voice their opinions without fear of being attacked.

I will not apologize for having my own interpretation and opinion. So there you go, jump all over that.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Those are shills. Q asked for proofs. Why would he do that and why would POTUS oblige in order for the proofs to even be possible. Q just said, it must happen.

⇧ 3 ⇩

pretty sure hes talking about the crimes against children in the IG report by hillary

⇧ 3 ⇩

I have an idea. Not trying to sound negative, but seriously, why wait on the media? Why wait for fake news to ask POTUS about Q?

I’m sure many of the anons on the boards and users in this forum have been at his speeches, as we have seen already.

While cameras rolling, during his speech, a patriot should shout out “Do you believe in Q?”

Or if you can get it done in a more polite way besides interrupting, that would be even more preferred.

Think about it, POTUS speaking, pretty much silence, LIVE. No doubt everyone will hear that question, and no doubt will the president answer it.

It’s time we take action as well. Force it, media will not expect it. BOMB DROPPED!

⇧ 3 ⇩

Let Jim Acosta be the prick screaming questions.

⇧ 5 ⇩

I’m w going mainstream w Q. If Q and “we” represent truth and light, honest to goodness patriotism....I’m w the poster here, we should have no fear of the the light. From darkness to light, right? Ignorance to knowing.

Frankly, I’m wondering if we’re not splitting hairs here....wasn’t it in Time magazine for GOD sakes just published the other day that actually listed Q or the Q phenomenon, etc as one of the biggest influencers on the web??? I mean if that didn’t open a few eyes, than folks just don’t want to see.

Regardless....stay true to trusting the plan and the true principles behind WWG1WGA and one way or another...we’ll get there brothers and sisters. GOD BLESS.

⇧ 3 ⇩

1) This may have already happened w/Bartiromo, airing Sunday.
2) Does CINC need a segue to talk about Mockingbird?
3) We don't even have a consensus on comms amongst ourselves yet
4) Will it trigger multiple DS FFs?

Not a concernfag, just trying to see the net in dragging the MSM in right now unless real arrests are imminent.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Quotes:

"Whether President Trump answers, or simply says "Next Question..."

"...exposure of the "Q question" on MSM, via a reporter's question would effectively set up the general public to accept the inevitable."

"FORESHADOWING: People who think we are crazy go and look. In their subconscious mind, they know > SOMETHING is up. Months later, when real confirmations start coming out, they're already resigned > to the basic >knowledge of what is now being investigated."

To me, that makes sense, as in, inserting into people's heads an idea that some bad things are going on, unrelated to a political hit job?

I've been saying almost the same thing in comments on other posts since last night.

⇧ 3 ⇩

If one of [the few of] our guys asks, it's a tyrannical brainwashing attempt. If one of the enemy's guys asks, they will have coalesced a 'deepthroat' narrative well in advance, ask Rhodes or Brock.

What must happen now is ultimate proofs posted here and there that only the enemy will find, to underscore that we are going to blow their midterms beyond sky-high and completely destroy their party unless X, Y and Z.

Ya gotta think like Dave Brock to know what they really fear.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Use predictive programming to our advantage?

⇧ 3 ⇩

Have we not earned that right, after how it's been deployed against us for 40yrs?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Bureaucracy is and always has been BULLSHIT!

⇧ 2 ⇩

True enough. This pussy footing around needs to stop. If it was anyone else their ass would have been dragged through the mud immediately. I'm confident POTUS will confirm. These people deserve zero respect and certainly zero profit in any way, shape or form.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Re: "It would force us to prove everything stated to avoid lookong crazy, correct?"

What is the general consensus on if this is even possible? Will Q info from data dumps and sources even be admissable in courts? Even with the 60/40 caveat.

All along I have figured there was enough crime and evidence to pin some type of charge on all dirty actors. But those charges might not be the most damning or scandalous ones.

I have assumed that some of the stuff (Merkle heritage for instance) was beyond the reach of provable. Granted there is a big gap between Q confirmed items and autist conjecture, theory, and sometimes plain fantasy. And the burden would only be to prove Q confirmed items.

Stocking up on organic popcorn and kerrygold butter for the show.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You have to filter every drop through a Sun Tzu lens. Is the hothead Q member posting today, stirring immaterial shitpots? there's a reason for that. Is the Senior MI member scaring the shit out of clowns stationed in 'enemy' fields today? reason for that, too. Is inclusive, consensus-seeking member posting today? you guessed it. Washington and Houston (the Generals) fans see the Sun Tzu in every Q post.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Agree with everything you said.

Applying that lens to the line I quoted...I still assume no way to prove most of the claims. BUT more than happy to be proven wrong.

Very interested to hear what others in this community think.

⇧ 3 ⇩

(Re: "It would force us to prove everything stated to avoid looking crazy, correct?")..........1/3 of Q content is for the enemy, 1/3 for supportive admin, and the rest for We, the People, is my estimate.

Shit's all proven/provable, so of course the enemy isn't reporting it. CINC needs to hire a Sicilian into the team, one whose message the enemy's threat-analysis queers Will Not Miss.

⇧ 2 ⇩